AzTrials
AzTrials

Wassel IV Thumb DuplicationNCT06377670

Study of Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes After Wassel IV Thumb Duplication Surgery in Pediatric Population, With a Follow-up of at Least One Year

An observational study of Wassel IV Thumb Duplication, run by University Hospital, Grenoble.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional and aesthetic outcomes in children with Wassel IV thumb duplication Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 year to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Wassel IV Thumb Duplication
What is being tested?
Wassel IV Thumb Duplication Surgery
How many people
30 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
25 Apr 2024to 15 May 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 year to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Study population: Pediatric patients who have undergone surgical correction for Wassel IV thumb duplication and have been followed up for at least one year post-surgery. The study population includes patients from the CHU Grenoble Alpes and Clinique Val d'Ouest Lyon.

Who may be able to join

  • Confirmed diagnosis of Wassel IV thumb duplication
  • Pediatric patients aged between 1 and 18 years
  • Minimum of one year post-operative follow-up
  • Availability of radiographic, photographic, and medical data
  • Regular post-operative medical follow-up with the referring surgeon
  • Legal guardian and patient consent (non-opposition) to participate in the study

Who cannot join

  • Subjects under guardianship or deprived of liberty
  • Opposition from legal guardians or from the patient to participate in the study

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

About this study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional and aesthetic outcomes in children with Wassel IV thumb duplication

Read the detailed description

Wassel IV thumb duplication is a congenital hand anomaly characterized by the presence of two adjacent thumbs. This condition has significant functional and aesthetic implications.

Previous studies have highlighted the complexity of the surgical management of Wassel IV thumb duplication, underscoring the need for an individualized approach for each case. Early interventions are often recommended to optimize long-term functional and aesthetic outcomes.

The field of study for evaluating these outcomes focuses on the analysis of the medium and long-term consequences of surgical interventions in children with this malformation. Evaluation criteria may include hand functionality, thumb mobility, overall aesthetics, and other aspects relevant to the quality of life of the affected pediatric patients. This medium and long-term approach offers crucial insights for refining treatment protocols and improving the overall management of this condition.

Being tested
Wassel IV Thumb Duplication Surgery
Keywords
functional outcomes, aesthetic outcomes, pediatric surgery, thumb reconstruction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Wassel IV Thumb Duplication SurgeryProcedure or surgery

    This intervention involves the surgical correction of Wassel IV thumb duplication, which is a congenital hand anomaly. The study retrospectively evaluates the outcomes of various surgical techniques that have been employed to correct this condition, with a focus on functionality and aesthetics of the thumb post-surgery. Data collected post-intervention include preoperative metacarpophalangeal angle, type of skin flap, surgical reconstruction technique, immobilization method, and postoperative complications. Additionally, patient satisfaction and daily pain levels are assessed using standardized questionnaires. Each patient serves as their own control, with outcomes compared to their contralateral healthy thumb.

Study groups in NCT06377670
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Wassel IV Thumb Duplication CasesThis group consists of pediatric patients who have undergone surgical correction for Wassel IV thumb duplication. All participants have had a minimum of one year post-operative follow-up. This cohort will be assessed for functional and aesthetic outcomes using the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand (JSSH) scoring method. This includes evaluating thumb mobility, functionality, global aesthetics, and other quality of life aspects for each patient using their contralateral healthy thumb as a control. Data will be collected on preoperative metacarpophalangeal angle, type of skin flap used, surgical reconstruction technique, immobilization method, postoperative complications, and patient satisfaction with surgery and daily pain levels.
Receives: Procedure: Wassel IV Thumb Duplication Surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes

    Evaluation of functional and aesthetic outcomes using the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand (JSSH) scoring method. Functional outcomes include thumb mobility and function scored out of 10 points, and aesthetic outcomes include overall thumb appearance scored out of 14 points. The minimal and worst score is 0, the maximal and best score is 30.

    Measured: Up to one year post-surgery for the primary outcome measure time frame

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Comparison of Surgical Techniques

    Evaluate which surgical reconstruction techniques yield better functional and aesthetic outcomes.

    Soft tissue reconstruction only or need for osteotomy.

    Measured: One year post-operative, to align with the follow-up period of the primary outcome measure.

  2. Efficacy of Skin Flap Types

    Assess the outcomes associated with different types of skin flaps used in the surgical correction.

    Number of "racquet skin plasty" and number of "Dautel flap". The evaluation of skin flaps will be assessed by various measures: the circumference of the thumb in millimeters, the appearance of the scar by self-assessment (visual analogue scale), and the symmetry of the thumb by self-assessment (visual analogue scale). All these measures are integrated into the JSSH score.

    Measured: One year post-operative, to align with the follow-up period of the primary outcome measure.

  3. Immobilization Method Analysis

    Determine the effectiveness of various immobilization methods post-surgery. Plaster immobilization or splint, with or without wire.

    Measured: One year post-operative, to align with the follow-up period of the primary outcome measure.

  4. Preoperative Angle Decision Model

    Measurement of the preoperative metacarpophalangeal angle of the thumb to be reconstructed.

    Develop a decision-making model for surgery based on the preoperative radiographic metacarpophalangeal angle.

    Measured: One year post-operative, to align with the follow-up period of the primary outcome measure.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Apr 2024
  2. Study start25 Apr 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion6 May 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion15 May 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06377670
Sponsor's protocol ID
38RC24.0012
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
5 Mar 2024
Last updated
22 Apr 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Dautel G, Perrin P. Use of an Axial Flap to Increase the Girth of Wassel IV Thumb Reconstructions. J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Jul;40(7):1327-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.02.032. Epub 2015 Apr 16.

    PubMed 25892712
  • Luangjarmekorn P, Virojanawat N, Pongpacharaamphon P, Kitidumrongsook P. Preoperative angulation as a predictor for operations of Wassel type IV polydactyly. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2021 Nov 1;30(6):605-610. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000806.

    PubMed 32956284
  • Dijkman R, Selles R, van Rosmalen J, Hulsemann W, Mann M, Habenicht R, Hovius S, van Nieuwenhoven C. A clinically weighted approach to outcome assessment in radial polydactyly. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016 Mar;41(3):265-74. doi: 10.1177/1753193415601336. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

    PubMed 26319288
  • Kayalar M, Gurbuz Y, Kucuk L, Sugun TS, Ademoglu Y, Ozaksar K. Surgical reconstruction in Wassel type IV thumb duplication. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2014;48(2):181-6. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2014.13.0042.

    PubMed 24747627

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Wassel IV Thumb Duplication, run by University Hospital, Grenoble.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Emeline Bourgeois (0476767575, ebourgeois@chu-grenoble.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes (time frame: Up to one year post-surgery for the primary outcome measure time frame). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06377670, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Apr 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in