Effect of Propofol vs. Sevoflurane on Erections During Narcosis In Transurethral Surgery

Introduction

Intraoperative penile erection is an unwanted event during transurethral surgery, since it may impair the access to the urinary pathways thus prolonging operation time and sometimes requiring ancillary measures to reach penis flaccidity. Ultimately, penile erections may cause operation abortion. Fortunately, reversal of penile erections can be achieved intraoperatively by pharmacological interventions such as intravenous administration of ketamine or intracorporeal injection of vasoactive agents such as phenylephrine or epinephrine, although these medications are in turn associated with potentially severe secondary effects. The incidence of intraoperative penile erections is reported to lay between 2.2% and 3.5% in adults. The evidence on the topic is of limited quality, thus the risk factors and frequency of unwanted penile erections in transurethral interventions remain to be evaluated.

The use of propofol has been associated with a particularly high risk for sexual arousal and intraoperative erections, reaching an incidence of unwanted erections of up to 10% in pediatric case series undergoing urethral surgery. The causes and the pathophysiology have been partially explored, although the leading mechanisms remain debated.

In an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the primary use of propofol instead of gaseous agents for general anesthesia has been introduced at our tertiary academic hospital in October 2022. This institutional change in anesthesia protocol has led to a perceived increase in the rates of unwanted intraoperative erections and interventions to achieve penile flaccidity, possibly associated with the increased use of propofol. Because there are no high-quality studies investigating the impact of various anesthetic agents on penile tumescence in men during transurethral procedures in literature to date, anesthesiologist and urologist at our institution initiated together a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the incidence of intraoperative penile tumescence during propofol versus sevoflurane general anesthesia.

Sample size determination

The investigators anticipate the detection of a 9% points absolute risk elevation of intraoperative erections in the intervention group (propofol) compared to the control group (sevoflurane). To detect a 9% risk elevation, which is considered a clinically relevant increase in the intervention group (10% anticipated) in comparison with the control group (1% anticipated), and to assure a study power of 80% with dichotomous outcome variable and a 2-sided significance level of alpha = 0.05, 100 patients will be needed in each group (200 patients in total). The calculated sample size is appropriate to the hypothesis being tested, so that any results will be appropriately generalizable.

Statistical methods

Prior to data export, a statistical analysis plan will be written up and signed by the principle investigator and the trial statistician. The analysis will be performed blinded and using dynamic reporting tools in a fully scripted way to guarantee highest standards regarding reproducibility. The primary analysis of the primary outcome will be performed using a logistic regression model with logit link function with treatment group, as well as the stratification variable as an independent variable. The effect measure will be an odds ratio.

Enrolment and study schedule

Every male patient referred for surgical consultation prior to transurethral surgery will be screened by age and International Index of Erectile Function:5-item version (IIEF-5) score. If the patient is eligible for participation in the study, he will be informed accordingly. After giving his informed consent, patients will be randomized to the intervention or control group by computerized random sequence generation on the day of surgery. Within one day after the intervention, patients will be visited by the urology and anesthesiology team at the end of study.

Data collection

The following parameters will be recorded for each patient: age, blood pressure, heart rate, weight, height, IIEF-5 Score as well as the duration of, reason for and the type of transurethral intervention. All primary and secondary outcomes will be reported immediately prior to the operation's sign-out by the operating urologists. Until the end of the study visit, all patients will be screened for related adverse events (AEs). In the case of an AE, the type of AE, grade of AE, and time until resolution of AE will be recorded. All parameters are entered into a secure electronic database.

Auditing, Data monitoring and Harms

Regular monitoring visits will be performed prior to the start and during the period of the study at the investigator's site. During internal audits, all paper CRF and the electronical database will be inspected. Since both anesthesiological drugs are licensed for their use, a continues data monitoring board will be not be necessary and no interim analysis is planned, in accordance with local laws and ethical principles. Any complication of the investigational drugs will be collected as a secondary outcome, as detailed above.

Consent

All patients will be informed about the study by trained urologists and anesthesiologists. Patient inclusion into the study will only occur after written consent of the patient has been obtained. When the participant withdraws consent, data collected prior to the date of withdrawal remains within the electronical study database and can be included in data analysis. Participants who discontinue the study prior to data collection will be replaced. Individual medical information obtained within this study is considered confidential and disclosure to third parties is prohibited. Subject confidentiality will be further ensured by utilizing patient identification code to correspond to treatment data in the computer files. For source data verification purposes, authorized representatives of the investigator, a competent authority or monitoring may require direct access to parts of the medical records relevant to the study, including participants' medical history. The planned clinical trial entails only minimal risks for study participants considering that both investigated drugs are licensed for use by the Swiss medical authorities and have been regularly used in daily routine for many years.