Failure, ProsthesisNCT06388395
Clinical Performance of All-on-4 PEEK and Conventional Prostheses
A study testing Accuracy of full-arch surgical guides, Survival and complications of the prostheses and Survival and complications of the implants in people with Failure, Prosthesis and Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, run by University of Sharjah at 1 site in United Arab Emirates.
Trial summary
The all-on-4 treatment approach for completely edentulous mandible is a proven concept. However, there are still issues regarding the use of metal substructure to support the prostheses such as allergy, metallic taste, and aesthetic. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Failure, Prosthesis, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Survival, Prosthesis
- What is being tested?
- Accuracy of full-arch surgical guides, Survival and complications of the prostheses and Survival and complications of the implants
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Arab Emirates
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2024to 30 Aug 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- no contraindications for implant surgery (including uncontrolled systemic diseases)
- sufficient bone height in the inter-foraminal area for an implant length of at least 10 mm
- ridge width of 5.5 mm for implant insertion of at least 3.5 mm in diameter,
Who cannot join
- individuals who disagreed with being randomly allocated to the treatment study groups, those with signs of untreated temporomandibular disorders or uncontrolled systemic or oral conditions requiring additional treatment, participants unable to understand and answer the questionnaires used in the study, and unable to attend the scheduled post-treatment appointments for longitudinal data collection.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United Arab Emirates1 site
University of Sharjah
Sharjah city, 7724
About this study
Official title: Clinical Performance of Mandibular All-on-4 Modified Polyetheretherketone Treatment Approach Versus Conventional Metal Framework and Hybrid Prostheses: a Randomized Clinical Trial
The all-on-4 treatment approach for completely edentulous mandible is a proven concept. However, there are still issues regarding the use of metal substructure to support the prostheses such as allergy, metallic taste, and aesthetic. Therefore, other materials such as polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are being tested for its suitability and is showing good potential. However, available evidence is limited regarding its clinical performance. Thus, the aim of this study is to compare clinical performance of all-on-4 treatment concept utilizing PEEK versus conventional metal framework as substructure in fully edentulous mandible. Thirty suitable patients will receive either PEEK or conventional all-on-4 prostheses for fully edentulous mandible. The prostheses will be retained by four implants utilizing the all-on-4 principle. Clinical performance will be assessed during the follow up period of up 3 years concerning screw loosening, material chipping or fracture, wear or staining, prosthesis survival and success, implant survival and success.
Read the detailed description
The objectives of this randomized clinical trial are to 1) compare clinical performance of the two different treatment concepts during the follow up period of up to 3 years concerning prosthesis survival and success, 2) to assess the implants survival and success rates after 3 years, 3) to assess the accuracy of two surgical guides for full-arch implant surgery, 4) to assess the anticipated and actual pain following implant surgery, and 5) to assess patient satisfaction and quality of life will be assessed.
The study will be conducted according to the guidelines of the CONSORT statement for reporting randomized clinical. The study will be conducted at the College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Population and sample Study patients will be recruited from an existing pool of edentate adults referred for treatment to the College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. The patients will not be charged any treatment costs as part of this study. The target population will comprise patients requiring treatment for edentulous arches. Eligible patients for the implant phase of the study will be evaluated through a clinical assessment, panoramic radiograph, and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) exam. All study patients will be provided with a patient information sheet and provided written consent to take part in the study.
Conventional upper and lower denture constructions In the first phase of treatment, new maxillary and mandibular complete dentures with acceptable function and esthetics will be made and deliver to the patients. The conventional maxillary and mandibular complete denture constructions will follow the established methods which are primary impression with compound impression material, secondary impression with zinc oxide eugenol, jaw relation, try-in, issue and recall. The satisfactory mandibular complete denture will be converted into provisional all-on-4 mandibular prostheses immediately after implants placement.
Implant treatment planning The implant surgery planning will be performed using CBCT images of the anterior mandible obtained with a limited Field of View and standard protocols for minimizing radiation exposure. Implant placement planning and construction of surgical guides will be accomplished using available software and 3D printing machine. Implant placement will be fully guided surgery. The accuracy of two surgical guides will be assessed (milled and 3D-printed) by obtaining another CBCT after 3 months. The pre- and post-treatment scans will be superimposed and evaluated using Geomagic Control software.
Implant surgeries All implant surgeries will be performed by one surgeon. Surgeries will be carried out under local anesthesia. Four axial and tilted implants (All-on-4) will be placed in association with the treatment protocol. Four dental implants with a platform-switching design (Replace Conical Connection; Nobel Biocare, Zurich, Switzerland) will be placed with computer-guided technology (Nobel Guide; Nobel Biocare, Zurich, Switzerland) in the mandible at the lateral incisor and distal to first premolar sites. Primary stability of more than 35 Ncm will be achieved for all implants.
Pain Evaluation Anticipated pain will be recorded before surgery using visual analog scale (VAS) and actual pain levels will be recorded at day 1, 2 and 4 and at week 1, 2 and 3 after surgery using VAS.
Prostheses constructions Provisional prostheses Following implant placement, straight and 30-degree angled multiunit abutments will be torqued to the implants. Temporary abutments will be connected to the multiunit abutments, and the mandibular denture will be hollowed out to accommodate the temporary abutments. Rubber dam will be used to isolate the underlying soft tissue, and the temporary abutments will be connected to the denture with acrylic resin and picked up with the conversion prosthesis technique. The provisional prosthesis will be torqued to the multiunit abutments at 15 Ncm, and the screw access holes will be filled with Teflon tape and composite resin.
Definitive prostheses (conventional) Conventional hybrid prostheses combining metal frameworks as substructure, acrylic teeth and acrylic soft tissue will be constructed after three months of implants placement according to published protocols. Shimstock foil (GMH; Hanel Medizinal, Nu€rtingen, Germany) will be used for minor occlusal assessments during delivery of the prostheses. The prostheses will be torqued to the multi-unit abutments at 15Ncm, and the screw access holes will be filled with Teflon tape and composite resin (Z250, 3M ESPE, Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN). Oral hygiene instructions will be given to the patients. The follow up will be a week, three months, six months, a year, and 18 months or as needed by the patients. All prosthodontics procedures will be performed by the same prosthodontist.
Definitive prostheses (PEEK) Like conventional hybrid prostheses, the PEEK frameworks hybrid prostheses will also be constructed three months after implants' placement. The prostheses frameworks will be fabricated from modified PEEK (BioHPP; bredent GmbH \& Co KG). The definitive impression will be made with a custom tray (Fastray LC; Harry J. Bosworth Co), medium viscosity polyether impression material (Impregum Penta; 3M ESPE), and low shrinkage auto polymerizing acrylic resin (GC pattern resin; GC America Inc) to splint the impression copings for better accuracy. The definitive cast will be poured with Type IV dental stone (Prima-Rock; Whip Mix Corp), and an accuracy transfer index will be fabricated on this cast. This index will be transferred intraorally to verify implant position. The implant misfit will be accommodated by sectioning the index and reconnecting it using the same low-shrinkage resin. This corrected position will be transferred onto the definitive cast by removing the analog from the cast and re-attaching and repositioning it with the transfer index in place. Once the accuracy of the definitive casts has been verified, a facebow transfer and an interocclusal centric relation record will be made using a conventional occlusal wax rim. The casts will be mounted on the semi-adjustable articulator (Denar Mark II; Whip Mix Corp). The cast with the implant abutments in place will be scanned with a laboratory scanner (Dental Create; Smart Optics GmbH); the implant framework will be digitally designed using digital software (Exocad; Exocad America Inc); and a wax implant framework pattern will be fabricated using CAD-CAM technology (DMU 80P duoBLOCK; DMG MORI). The wax frameworks will be made to fit over the selected abutments, which will be incorporated into the framework by using a sculpting wax (Thowax; Yeti Dental) and then cast in 1 piece from modified PEEK, using the conventional lost wax technique, using a special investment (Brevest; bredent GmbH \& Co KG) and vacuum press device (2 press; bredent GmbH \& Co KG) designed for this material. The fit of the PEEK framework will be verified intraorally, as is the space for the acrylic teeth and pink PMMA. The prostheses will clinically be evaluated to ensure correct tooth position, midline, esthetics, and phonetics. The PEEK framework will then be used to fabricate hybrid prostheses like conventional one. The implant supported prostheses will be tightened to 30 Ncm according to the manufacturer's instructions. Specific oral hygiene instructions will be given to the patients. The follow up will be a week, three months, six months, a year, and 18 months or as needed by the patients. All prosthodontic procedures will be performed by the same prosthodontist.
- Conditions
- Failure, Prosthesis, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Survival, Prosthesis, Complete Edentulism, Complication;Prostheses
- Being tested
- Accuracy of full-arch surgical guides, Survival and complications of the prostheses, Survival and complications of the implants, Conventional (metal-resin) implant-supported prosthesis, PEEK implant-supported prosthesis
- Medical subject headings
- Prosthesis Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Accuracy of full-arch surgical guidesProcedure or surgery
The accuracy of the surgical guides will be assessed by superimposing the pre and post-treatment CBCT scans.
Survival and complications of the prosthesesProcedure or surgery
Two different prostheses will be assessed (conventional and PEEK). All complications will be recorded for a period of 3 years
Survival and complications of the implantsProcedure or surgery
The effect of the two different prostheses on implants will be assessed in terms of survival and success rates.
Conventional (metal-resin) implant-supported prosthesisProcedure or surgery
Full-mouth implant-supported conventional prosthesis will be constructed and evaluated for up to 3 years.
PEEK implant-supported prosthesisProcedure or surgery
Full-mouth implant-supported PEEK prosthesis will be constructed and evaluated for up to 3 years.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy of full-arch surgical guides | Experimental | Two surgical guides (milled and 3D printed) will be used randomly to assess the accuracy of the guides following guided implant surgery. Receives: Procedure: Accuracy of full-arch surgical guides |
| Survival and complications of the prostheses | Experimental | The clinical performance of the two different treatment concepts during the follow up period of 3 years concerning screw loosening, veneering material chipping, wear or staining, prosthesis survival and success will be assessed. Receives: Procedure: Survival and complications of the prostheses |
| Survival and complications of the implants | Experimental | The implants survival and success rates will be evaluated after 1, 2 and 3 years of prostheses insertion. Receives: Procedure: Survival and complications of the implants |
| Conventional implant-supported prosthesis | Experimental | Full-arch implant-supported conventional (metal-resin) prosthesis will be constructed and assessed for up to 3 years Receives: Procedure: Conventional (metal-resin) implant-supported prosthesis |
| PEEK implant-supported prosthesis | Experimental | Full-arch implant-supported PEEK prosthesis will be constructed and assessed for up to 3 years Receives: Procedure: PEEK implant-supported prosthesis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Accuracy of full-arch surgical guides
Two types of surgical guides will be assessed for the accuracy. CBCT scans before and after surgery will be imported into 3D inspection software (Geomagic, 3D Systems Inc., Rock Hill, SC) for merging and evaluation of 3D deviations. Following software best-fit alignment, the 3D comparison will be used to evaluate the 3D deviations between the scans limited to the implants. Root man square (RMS) deviations will be recorded.
Measured: 6 months
Survival rate of implants
Implant survival will be assessed clinically and radiographically every year. The criteria for implant success according to Buser et al, were no radiolucent zone around the implant, confirmed individual implant stability, and no suppuration, pain or ongoing pathologic processes (Buser et al., 1997). All implants that failed to fulfill these criteria will be regarded as failures.
Measured: 3 years
Success rates of the Prostheses
Successful prosthesis must be free from any of the following technical complications: screw loosening, screw fracture, veneer material fracture or chipping, bulk fracture. Kaplan-meier analysis will be used.
Measured: 3 years
Pain level
Anticipated and actual pain will be assessed before and after surgery using the 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 "no pain" to 10 "worst pain ever." The scale has no other markings along the line. Patients will be asked to record their pain level before surgery and after surgery, 24 hours after surgery, at day 2, day 4 and at week 1, week 2, and week 3.
Measured: 1 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Marginal bone loss
Bone loss around implants will be measured radiographically every year for up to 3 years. All measurements will be done by one examiner, and radiographs will be analyzed using specially designed computer software (DicomWorks, Biomedical Engineering, the Netherlands) to perform linear measurements. Ideally, should be no bone loss, the higher the number after measurement the higher bone lost (resorbed) around implants.
Measured: 3 years
Plaque index
The presence of plaque will be recorded using a plaque indicator liquid (Mira-2 Ton Liquid; Hager \& Werken). The number of plaque sites will be analyzed according to modified plaque Index. Mild represents only 30% with plaque, moderate when up to 60% and severe when more than 60%.
Measured: 3 years
Pocket depth
Pocket depth around implants will be meaured at baseline and every year using dental probe with light force (0.25 N). Pocket depths around healthy implants should generally be less than 5 mm in depth. Pockets more than 5 mm are indicative of an inflammation.
Measured: 3 years
Bleeding index
Bleeding around implants will be assessed at baseline and every year using dental probe with light force (0.25 N) at six-points according to modified bleeding Index. Score 1 (up to 2 sites), score 2 (2-4 sites), score 3 (all sites).
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Apr 2024
- Study start1 Aug 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Aug 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Failure, ProsthesisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Two groups will be provided with two types of implant-supported prostheses
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sharjah
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ahmed Aziz, University of Sharjah
- Investigators
- Ahmed Aziz, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Sharjah
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06388395
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REC-23-05-12-02-F
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 22 Apr 2024
- Last updated
- 25 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individuals data will not be shared, data required normally for publication will be shared upon reasonable request.
Publications
Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Rangert B. Short implants placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007 Mar;9(1):15-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00027.x.
PubMed 17362493Patzelt SB, Bahat O, Reynolds MA, Strub JR. The all-on-four treatment concept: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Dec;16(6):836-55. doi: 10.1111/cid.12068. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
PubMed 23560986Sailer I, Philipp A, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE, Hammerle CH, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 4:4-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01787.x.
PubMed 19663946Fabbri G, Sorrentino R, Brennan M, Cerutti A. A novel approach to implant screw-retained restorations: adhesive combination between zirconia frameworks and monolithic lithium disilicate. Int J Esthet Dent. 2014 Winter;9(4):490-505.
PubMed 25289384Rubo JH, Capello Souza EA. Finite-element analysis of stress on dental implant prosthesis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 Jun 1;12(2):105-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00142.x. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
PubMed 19220846Ciftci Y, Canay S. The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Jul-Aug;15(4):571-82.
PubMed 10960992Davis DM, Rimrott R, Zarb GA. Studies on frameworks for osseointegrated prostheses: Part 2. The effect of adding acrylic resin or porcelain to form the occlusal superstructure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988 Winter;3(4):275-80. No abstract available.
PubMed 3075967Gracis SE, Nicholls JI, Chalupnik JD, Yuodelis RA. Shock-absorbing behavior of five restorative materials used on implants. Int J Prosthodont. 1991 May-Jun;4(3):282-91.
PubMed 1810320Stijacic T, Chung KH, Flinn BD, Raigrodski AJ. Effect of Tooth-Colored Restorative Materials on Reliability of Heat-Pressed Lithium Disilicate. J Prosthodont. 2015 Aug;24(6):475-83. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12243. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
PubMed 25522165
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Performance of Mandibular All-on-4 Modified Polyetheretherketone Treatment Approach Versus Conventional Metal Framework and Hybrid Prostheses: a Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06388395
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REC-23-05-12-02-F
- Conditions
- Failure, Prosthesis, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Survival, Prosthesis, Complete Edentulism, Complication;Prostheses
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of SharjahUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Aug 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The all-on-4 treatment approach for completely edentulous mandible is a proven concept. However, there are still issues regarding the use of metal substructure to support the prostheses such as allergy, metallic taste, and aesthetic. Therefore, other materials such as polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are being tested for its suitability and is showing good potential. However, available evidence is limited regarding its clinical performance. Thus, the aim of this study is to compare clinical performance of all-on-4 treatment concept utilizing PEEK versus conventional metal framework as substructure in fully edentulous mandible. Thirty suitable patients will receive either PEEK or conventional all-on-4 prostheses for fully edentulous mandible. The prostheses will be retained by four implants utilizing the all-on-4 principle. Clinical performance will be assessed during the follow up period of up 3 years concerning screw loosening, material chipping or fracture, wear or staining, prosthesis survival and success, implant survival and success.
Detailed description
The objectives of this randomized clinical trial are to 1) compare clinical performance of the two different treatment concepts during the follow up period of up to 3 years concerning prosthesis survival and success, 2) to assess the implants survival and success rates after 3 years, 3) to assess the accuracy of two surgical guides for full-arch implant surgery, 4) to assess the anticipated and actual pain following implant surgery, and 5) to assess patient satisfaction and quality of life will be assessed.
The study will be conducted according to the guidelines of the CONSORT statement for reporting randomized clinical. The study will be conducted at the College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Population and sample Study patients will be recruited from an existing pool of edentate adults referred for treatment to the College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. The patients will not be charged any treatment costs as part of this study. The target population will comprise patients requiring treatment for edentulous arches. Eligible patients for the implant phase of the study will be evaluated through a clinical assessment, panoramic radiograph, and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) exam. All study patients will be provided with a patient information sheet and provided written consent to take part in the study.
Conventional upper and lower denture constructions In the first phase of treatment, new maxillary and mandibular complete dentures with acceptable function and esthetics will be made and deliver to the patients. The conventional maxillary and mandibular complete denture constructions will follow the established methods which are primary impression with compound impression material, secondary impression with zinc oxide eugenol, jaw relation, try-in, issue and recall. The satisfactory mandibular complete denture will be converted into provisional all-on-4 mandibular prostheses immediately after implants placement.
Implant treatment planning The implant surgery planning will be performed using CBCT images of the anterior mandible obtained with a limited Field of View and standard protocols for minimizing radiation exposure. Implant placement planning and construction of surgical guides will be accomplished using available software and 3D printing machine. Implant placement will be fully guided surgery. The accuracy of two surgical guides will be assessed (milled and 3D-printed) by obtaining another CBCT after 3 months. The pre- and post-treatment scans will be superimposed and evaluated using Geomagic Control software.
Implant surgeries All implant surgeries will be performed by one surgeon. Surgeries will be carried out under local anesthesia. Four axial and tilted implants (All-on-4) will be placed in association with the treatment protocol. Four dental implants with a platform-switching design (Replace Conical Connection; Nobel Biocare, Zurich, Switzerland) will be placed with computer-guided technology (Nobel Guide; Nobel Biocare, Zurich, Switzerland) in the mandible at the lateral incisor and distal to first premolar sites. Primary stability of more than 35 Ncm will be achieved for all implants.
Pain Evaluation Anticipated pain will be recorded before surgery using visual analog scale (VAS) and actual pain levels will be recorded at day 1, 2 and 4 and at week 1, 2 and 3 after surgery using VAS.
Prostheses constructions Provisional prostheses Following implant placement, straight and 30-degree angled multiunit abutments will be torqued to the implants. Temporary abutments will be connected to the multiunit abutments, and the mandibular denture will be hollowed out to accommodate the temporary abutments. Rubber dam will be used to isolate the underlying soft tissue, and the temporary abutments will be connected to the denture with acrylic resin and picked up with the conversion prosthesis technique. The provisional prosthesis will be torqued to the multiunit abutments at 15 Ncm, and the screw access holes will be filled with Teflon tape and composite resin.
Definitive prostheses (conventional) Conventional hybrid prostheses combining metal frameworks as substructure, acrylic teeth and acrylic soft tissue will be constructed after three months of implants placement according to published protocols. Shimstock foil (GMH; Hanel Medizinal, Nu€rtingen, Germany) will be used for minor occlusal assessments during delivery of the prostheses. The prostheses will be torqued to the multi-unit abutments at 15Ncm, and the screw access holes will be filled with Teflon tape and composite resin (Z250, 3M ESPE, Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN). Oral hygiene instructions will be given to the patients. The follow up will be a week, three months, six months, a year, and 18 months or as needed by the patients. All prosthodontics procedures will be performed by the same prosthodontist.
Definitive prostheses (PEEK) Like conventional hybrid prostheses, the PEEK frameworks hybrid prostheses will also be constructed three months after implants' placement. The prostheses frameworks will be fabricated from modified PEEK (BioHPP; bredent GmbH \& Co KG). The definitive impression will be made with a custom tray (Fastray LC; Harry J. Bosworth Co), medium viscosity polyether impression material (Impregum Penta; 3M ESPE), and low shrinkage auto polymerizing acrylic resin (GC pattern resin; GC America Inc) to splint the impression copings for better accuracy. The definitive cast will be poured with Type IV dental stone (Prima-Rock; Whip Mix Corp), and an accuracy transfer index will be fabricated on this cast. This index will be transferred intraorally to verify implant position. The implant misfit will be accommodated by sectioning the index and reconnecting it using the same low-shrinkage resin. This corrected position will be transferred onto the definitive cast by removing the analog from the cast and re-attaching and repositioning it with the transfer index in place. Once the accuracy of the definitive casts has been verified, a facebow transfer and an interocclusal centric relation record will be made using a conventional occlusal wax rim. The casts will be mounted on the semi-adjustable articulator (Denar Mark II; Whip Mix Corp). The cast with the implant abutments in place will be scanned with a laboratory scanner (Dental Create; Smart Optics GmbH); the implant framework will be digitally designed using digital software (Exocad; Exocad America Inc); and a wax implant framework pattern will be fabricated using CAD-CAM technology (DMU 80P duoBLOCK; DMG MORI). The wax frameworks will be made to fit over the selected abutments, which will be incorporated into the framework by using a sculpting wax (Thowax; Yeti Dental) and then cast in 1 piece from modified PEEK, using the conventional lost wax technique, using a special investment (Brevest; bredent GmbH \& Co KG) and vacuum press device (2 press; bredent GmbH \& Co KG) designed for this material. The fit of the PEEK framework will be verified intraorally, as is the space for the acrylic teeth and pink PMMA. The prostheses will clinically be evaluated to ensure correct tooth position, midline, esthetics, and phonetics. The PEEK framework will then be used to fabricate hybrid prostheses like conventional one. The implant supported prostheses will be tightened to 30 Ncm according to the manufacturer's instructions. Specific oral hygiene instructions will be given to the patients. The follow up will be a week, three months, six months, a year, and 18 months or as needed by the patients. All prosthodontic procedures will be performed by the same prosthodontist.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 5
- Model description
- Two groups will be provided with two types of implant-supported prostheses
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy of full-arch surgical guides | Experimental | Procedure: Accuracy of full-arch surgical guidesTwo surgical guides (milled and 3D printed) will be used randomly to assess the accuracy of the guides following guided implant surgery. |
| Survival and complications of the prostheses | Experimental | Procedure: Survival and complications of the prosthesesThe clinical performance of the two different treatment concepts during the follow up period of 3 years concerning screw loosening, veneering material chipping, wear or staining, prosthesis survival and success will be assessed. |
| Survival and complications of the implants | Experimental | Procedure: Survival and complications of the implantsThe implants survival and success rates will be evaluated after 1, 2 and 3 years of prostheses insertion. |
| Conventional implant-supported prosthesis | Experimental | Procedure: Conventional (metal-resin) implant-supported prosthesisFull-arch implant-supported conventional (metal-resin) prosthesis will be constructed and assessed for up to 3 years |
| PEEK implant-supported prosthesis | Experimental | Procedure: PEEK implant-supported prosthesisFull-arch implant-supported PEEK prosthesis will be constructed and assessed for up to 3 years |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- no contraindications for implant surgery (including uncontrolled systemic diseases)
- sufficient bone height in the inter-foraminal area for an implant length of at least 10 mm
- ridge width of 5.5 mm for implant insertion of at least 3.5 mm in diameter,
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- individuals who disagreed with being randomly allocated to the treatment study groups, those with signs of untreated temporomandibular disorders or uncontrolled systemic or oral conditions requiring additional treatment, participants unable to understand and answer the questionnaires used in the study, and unable to attend the scheduled post-treatment appointments for longitudinal data collection.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy of full-arch surgical guidesThe accuracy of the surgical guides will be assessed by superimposing the pre and post-treatment CBCT scans. | Procedure or surgery | Accuracy of full-arch surgical guides |
| Survival and complications of the prosthesesTwo different prostheses will be assessed (conventional and PEEK). All complications will be recorded for a period of 3 years | Procedure or surgery | Survival and complications of the prostheses |
| Survival and complications of the implantsThe effect of the two different prostheses on implants will be assessed in terms of survival and success rates. | Procedure or surgery | Survival and complications of the implants |
| Conventional (metal-resin) implant-supported prosthesisFull-mouth implant-supported conventional prosthesis will be constructed and evaluated for up to 3 years. | Procedure or surgery | Conventional implant-supported prosthesis |
| PEEK implant-supported prosthesisFull-mouth implant-supported PEEK prosthesis will be constructed and evaluated for up to 3 years. | Procedure or surgery | PEEK implant-supported prosthesis |
Primary outcome
Accuracy of full-arch surgical guides
Time frame: 6 months
Two types of surgical guides will be assessed for the accuracy. CBCT scans before and after surgery will be imported into 3D inspection software (Geomagic, 3D Systems Inc., Rock Hill, SC) for merging and evaluation of 3D deviations. Following software best-fit alignment, the 3D comparison will be used to evaluate the 3D deviations between the scans limited to the implants. Root man square (RMS) deviations will be recorded.
Survival rate of implants
Time frame: 3 years
Implant survival will be assessed clinically and radiographically every year. The criteria for implant success according to Buser et al, were no radiolucent zone around the implant, confirmed individual implant stability, and no suppuration, pain or ongoing pathologic processes (Buser et al., 1997). All implants that failed to fulfill these criteria will be regarded as failures.
Success rates of the Prostheses
Time frame: 3 years
Successful prosthesis must be free from any of the following technical complications: screw loosening, screw fracture, veneer material fracture or chipping, bulk fracture. Kaplan-meier analysis will be used.
Pain level
Time frame: 1 months
Anticipated and actual pain will be assessed before and after surgery using the 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 "no pain" to 10 "worst pain ever." The scale has no other markings along the line. Patients will be asked to record their pain level before surgery and after surgery, 24 hours after surgery, at day 2, day 4 and at week 1, week 2, and week 3.
4 secondary outcomes
Marginal bone loss
Time frame: 3 years
Plaque index
Time frame: 3 years
Pocket depth
Time frame: 3 years
Bleeding index
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jul 2024.
- Background: PubMed 17362493Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Rangert B. Short implants placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007 Mar;9(1):15-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00027.x.
- Background: PubMed 23560986Patzelt SB, Bahat O, Reynolds MA, Strub JR. The all-on-four treatment concept: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Dec;16(6):836-55. doi: 10.1111/cid.12068. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
- Background: PubMed 19663946Sailer I, Philipp A, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE, Hammerle CH, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 4:4-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01787.x.
- Background: PubMed 25289384Fabbri G, Sorrentino R, Brennan M, Cerutti A. A novel approach to implant screw-retained restorations: adhesive combination between zirconia frameworks and monolithic lithium disilicate. Int J Esthet Dent. 2014 Winter;9(4):490-505.
- Background: PubMed 19220846Rubo JH, Capello Souza EA. Finite-element analysis of stress on dental implant prosthesis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 Jun 1;12(2):105-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00142.x. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
- Background: PubMed 10960992Ciftci Y, Canay S. The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Jul-Aug;15(4):571-82.
- Background: PubMed 3075967Davis DM, Rimrott R, Zarb GA. Studies on frameworks for osseointegrated prostheses: Part 2. The effect of adding acrylic resin or porcelain to form the occlusal superstructure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988 Winter;3(4):275-80. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 1810320Gracis SE, Nicholls JI, Chalupnik JD, Yuodelis RA. Shock-absorbing behavior of five restorative materials used on implants. Int J Prosthodont. 1991 May-Jun;4(3):282-91.
- Background: PubMed 25522165Stijacic T, Chung KH, Flinn BD, Raigrodski AJ. Effect of Tooth-Colored Restorative Materials on Reliability of Heat-Pressed Lithium Disilicate. J Prosthodont. 2015 Aug;24(6):475-83. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12243. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individuals data will not be shared, data required normally for publication will be shared upon reasonable request.
Related trials for Failure, Prosthesis
Active, not recruiting
Comparison of the Balloon-Expandable Edwards Valve and Self-Expandable CoreValve Evolut R or Evolut PRO System for the Treatment of Small, Severely Dysfunctional Surgical Aortic Bioprotheses. The 'LYTEN' Trial
Aortic Valve Stenosis, Regurgitation, Aortic
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Performance of All-ceramic Posterior Crowns. A Randomized, Prospective Clinical.
Dental Prosthesis Failure
RecruitingObservational study
The ReTAVI Prospective Observational Registry
Structural Valve Deterioration, Structural Valve Degeneration
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Mpact DM France
Total Hip Arthroplasty, Survival, Prosthesis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Local Antibiotics for Breast Implants
Implant Complication, Implant Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Ahmed Aziz, PhD principal investigator
University of Sharjah
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Accuracy of full-arch surgical guides, Survival and complications of the prostheses and Survival and complications of the implants in people with Failure, Prosthesis and Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, run by University of Sharjah at 1 site in United Arab Emirates.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Arab Emirates. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Accuracy of full-arch surgical guides (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06388395, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jul 2024.