AzTrials
AzTrials

AphakiaNCT06389643

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Four-Point Scleral Intraocular Lens Fixation and Yamane Techniques

A study testing Four-point scleral fixation of Akreos AO60 IOL and Sutureless scleral fixation of AcrySof MA60AC IOL with Yamane technique in people with Aphakia, run by Military Institute od Medicine National Research Institute at 1 site in Poland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Comparison of safety and efficacy of two scleral fixation intraocular lens (IOL) methods of four-point scleral fixation ( Akreos AO60) and the Yamane technique (AcrySof MA60AC) Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Aphakia
What is being tested?
Four-point scleral fixation of Akreos AO60 IOL and Sutureless scleral fixation of AcrySof MA60AC IOL with Yamane technique
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 sitePoland
Study dates
19 Mar 2021to 19 Sep 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • only adult men and women with aphakia without capsular support

Who cannot join

  • Fuchs' dystrophy
  • corneal haze or scarring
  • history of corneal transplantation
  • astigmatism of more than 2,0D
  • clinically active uveitis
  • advanced glaucoma
  • macular diseases that affect visual acuity (age-related macular degeneration, diabetic maculopathy)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Poland1 site
  • Military Institute of Medicine - National Research Institute

    Warsaw, 04-141

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Comparison of safety and efficacy of two scleral fixation intraocular lens (IOL) methods of four-point scleral fixation ( Akreos AO60) and the Yamane technique (AcrySof MA60AC)

Read the detailed description

Purpose of the study is to compare two methods of scleral fixation of IOL: two-point fixation of AcrySof MA60AC IOL (Alcon) using Yamane technique and four-point fixation of the Akreos AO60 IOL (Bausch \& Lomb) using polypropylene suture. The investigators rated the BCVA, refractive outcomes, intraocular pressure, and also determined intra- and postoperative complications.

Conditions
Aphakia
Being tested
Four-point scleral fixation of Akreos AO60 IOL, Sutureless scleral fixation of AcrySof MA60AC IOL with Yamane technique
Keywords
scleral fixation IOL, sutureless fixation IOL, four-point scleral fixation, Yamane technique, aphakia
Medical subject headings
Aphakia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Four-point scleral fixation of Akreos AO60 IOLProcedure or surgery

    Intrascleral tunnels were marked at a distance of 2 mm from the corneal limbus, 6 mm apart (4 in number) after retrobulbar anesthesia. Next corneal incisions were performed. An artificial lens was then implanted into the anterior chamber. The 6-0 polypropylene suture was introduced into the anterior chamber through openings in the cornea. The next stage was to perform a sclerotomy using a 30G needle. Then the needle was passed through the hole in the haptic and 6-0 polypropylene suture was inserted into the needle hole and guided outside. The other end of the suture, passed through the opening in the haptic, was placed in the lumen of the needle and carried out through another sclerotomy and then externalised. This maneuver was repeated with another haptics as well. Correct position of the IOL in the eye was achieved by pulling on the ends of the monofilament. The ends of sutures were trimmed and cauterized. The melted tips of the sutures were then fixed subconjunctivally.

  • Sutureless scleral fixation of AcrySof MA60AC IOL with Yamane techniqueProcedure or surgery

    The surgery was performed under retrobulbar anesthesia. The first step of the procedure was to mark the locations of the intrascleral tunnels (2 mm from the corneal limbus) and locate them at a distance of 180° from each other to prevent the lens from tilting in the eyeball. Openings in the cornea were done. Three-piece IOL was implanted into the anterior chamber. The first sclerotomy was performed through the conjunctiva using a 30G needle 2 mm from the limbus. One of the haptics was inserted into the needle lumen and then brought out. Same procedure was performed with another haptic at a distance of 180°. The next step was to perform cautery of the tips of the haptics, obtaining a 0.3 mm collar that prevents the risk of the haptic coming out of the tunnel and displacing the lens inside the eyeball. The tips of the haptics were finally gently inserted into the scleral canals and covered with conjunctiva.

Study groups in NCT06389643
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Four-point scleral fixation groupActive comparatorFour-point scleral fixation group
Receives: Procedure: Four-point scleral fixation of Akreos AO60 IOL
Yamane technique groupActive comparatorYamane technique group
Receives: Procedure: Sutureless scleral fixation of AcrySof MA60AC IOL with Yamane technique

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. BCVA

    The change of best- corrected visual acuity

    Measured: before and 12 months after surgery

  2. RE

    Postoperative total refractive error

    Measured: 12 months after surgery

  3. ECC

    corneal endothelial cell density

    Measured: before and 12 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Number of complications

    Rate of complications

    Measured: from day 1 until 12 months after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Apr 2024
  2. Study start19 Mar 2021
  3. Primary completion14 Sep 2022
  4. Study completion19 Sep 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06389643
Sponsor's protocol ID
11/WIM/2021
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
17 Apr 2024
Last updated
29 Apr 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Blagun N, Krix-Jachym K, Rekas M. Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Four-Point Scleral Intraocular Lens Fixation and the Yamane Technique. Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 Jul;13(7):1955-1966. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-00962-7. Epub 2024 May 21.

    PubMed 38771460

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Four-point scleral fixation of Akreos AO60 IOL and Sutureless scleral fixation of AcrySof MA60AC IOL with Yamane technique in people with Aphakia, run by Military Institute od Medicine National Research Institute at 1 site in Poland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

BCVA (time frame: before and 12 months after surgery). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06389643, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in