Pleural EffusionNCT06390969
TBP Survey Among Respiratory Physicians
An observational study of Pleural Effusion and Tuberculosis, Pleural, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.
Trial summary
Tuberculosis is a major infectious disease with a high mortality burden in the Asia-Pacific region and worldwide. Among various types of extrapulmonary tuberculosis, tuberculous pleuritis (TBP) is amongst the most common manifestations. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pleural Effusion, Tuberculosis, Pleural
- What is being tested?
- Survey
- How many people
- 418 participants
- Where
- 1 siteHong Kong
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2024to 28 Feb 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The questionnaire will be sent via social media, including WhatsApp, Facebook, X (formerly known as Twitter), targeting respiratory physicians practising in various Asia-Pacific regions, especially regions with intermediate to high TB burden, through snowball sampling. These regions include China, Hong Kong, India, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan (based on the network of the applicants) and beyond.
Who may be able to join
- Respiratory doctors practising in Asia-Pacific region
Who cannot join
- Do not consent for the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Survey on the Practice and Interpretation of Various Diagnostic Tests for Tuberculous Pleuritis Among Respiratory Physicians
Tuberculosis is a major infectious disease with a high mortality burden in the Asia-Pacific region and worldwide. Among various types of extrapulmonary tuberculosis, tuberculous pleuritis (TBP) is amongst the most common manifestations. TBP is also a major underlying cause among patients hospitalised with new-onset unilateral pleural effusion. The workup of TBP frequently involves thoracentesis to retrieve pleural fluid and pleural biopsy for microbiological and histological interpretations. However, the diagnostic accuracy of these tests is of unsatisfactory sensitivity, making diagnosing TBP challenging. In addition, certain tests, including pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA), Mycobacterium tuberculosis polymerase chain reaction (MTB PCR), advanced biopsy procedures (e.g. real-time image-guided biopsy, pleuroscopy) are not readily available in developing regions due to scarcity of resources and lack of expertise. All these factors lead to heterogeneous practice in approaching new-onset pleural effusion, interpretation of pleural TB investigations, and timing of TBP treatment initiation among respiratory physicians in different Asia-Pacific regions. The proposed multinational survey aims to understand the real-world clinical practice in approaching patients with new-onset unilateral pleural effusion and diagnosing TBP in Asia-Pacific regions with intermediate to high TB burden. The results will reflect the current practice of diagnosing TBP, clinical and resource discrepancies in investigating TBP, management of TBP and help prioritise the need for further research in TBP
Read the detailed description
Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the major global health threats, with an estimated 10.6 million people infected with TB in 2021, with 1.6 million dying from the disease. Apart from pulmonary involvement as the major manifestation of TB, there is an increasing trend of extrapulmonary TB (EPTB) reported in different continents. Among EPTB, TB pleuritis (TBP) was the most prevalent form in several large Chinese retrospective studies.
Diagnosing TBP is challenging due to paucibacillary involvement (TB disease caused by a small number of bacteria) of the pleural space. A diagnosis of definite TBP can be secured if the acid-fast bacilli (AFB), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) culture of pleural fluid reveals positive results. However, these conventional diagnostic tests for TBP are insufficiently sensitive, and the long turnaround time of culture would also delay the initial clinical management. The diagnosis of definite TBP may also be based on compatible histological findings of the pleural tissue obtained by biopsy procedures (bedside biopsy by Abram's needle, real-time image-guided biopsy by radiologists or experienced respiratory physicians, or pleuroscopy). The availability and waiting time of these procedures vary in different regions. Due to these reasons, a diagnosis of probable TBP may be pursued instead. This diagnostic entity is based on compatible clinical presentations with exudative, lymphocytic pleural effusion and raised pleural fluid biomarkers, commonly adenosine deaminase (ADA), without diagnostic microbiological results and alternative clinical explanation [10]. Other than pleural fluid ADA, several pleural fluid biomarkers have been explored to assist in diagnosing probable TBP. Therefore, a significant proportion of patients suspected to have TBP may have empirical anti-TB treatment initiated in the absence of a confirmatory diagnosis. In addition, these diagnostic clinical challenges are magnified among Asia-Pacific developing countries where contemporary diagnostic tools may be unavailable and hinder local TB control.
There is a lack of regional Asia-Pacific real-world evidence of how TBP is diagnosed and how pleural fluid biomarkers are used. We hypothesise that heterogeneous practice towards new-onset unilateral pleural effusion and understanding different diagnostic tests for diagnosing TBP across different countries depends on the TB burden and availability of advanced pleural services. Therefore, a multinational survey study is designed to understand the real-world practice of managing new-onset unilateral pleural effusion, the availability and utilisation of different diagnostic tests for TBP, and the factors determining the timing of initiating empirical anti-TB treatment for TBP among respiratory physicians in the Asia-Pacific region.
- Conditions
- Pleural Effusion, Tuberculosis, Pleural
- Being tested
- Survey
- Medical subject headings
- Pleural Effusion, Tuberculosis, Pleural
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SurveyOther
Cross-sectional online survey
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Survey respondent | All respiratory doctors who respond to the survey Receives: Other: Survey |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Treatment decision
the proprtion of respondents that would consider TBP as one of the differential diagnoses when approaching new-onset unilateral pleural effusion
Measured: 1 month
Secondary outcomes (3)
Test availability
To evaluate the availability of different diagnostic tests for diagnosing TBP, in 5 point Likert scale
Measured: 1 month
Disease understanding
To evaluate the understanding and utilisation of pleural fluid biomarkers for TBP among respiratory physicians, in 5 point Likert scale
Measured: 1 month
Treatment decision for suspected tuberculosis
To evaluate the factors determining the initiation of empirical anti-TB treatment for probable TBP, in 5 point Likert scale
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Apr 2024
- Study start1 Jul 2024
- Primary completion30 Nov 2024
- Study completion28 Feb 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pleural EffusionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Chinese University of Hong KongThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case crossover
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 418 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ka Pang Chan, Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Investigators
- David SC Hui, MD, Study director, Chinese University of Hong Kong
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06390969
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TBP_survey
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 26 Apr 2024
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Survey on the Practice and Interpretation of Various Diagnostic Tests for Tuberculous Pleuritis Among Respiratory Physicians
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06390969
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TBP_survey
- Conditions
- Pleural Effusion, Tuberculosis, Pleural
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 418 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Chinese University of Hong KongUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Tuberculosis is a major infectious disease with a high mortality burden in the Asia-Pacific region and worldwide. Among various types of extrapulmonary tuberculosis, tuberculous pleuritis (TBP) is amongst the most common manifestations. TBP is also a major underlying cause among patients hospitalised with new-onset unilateral pleural effusion. The workup of TBP frequently involves thoracentesis to retrieve pleural fluid and pleural biopsy for microbiological and histological interpretations. However, the diagnostic accuracy of these tests is of unsatisfactory sensitivity, making diagnosing TBP challenging. In addition, certain tests, including pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA), Mycobacterium tuberculosis polymerase chain reaction (MTB PCR), advanced biopsy procedures (e.g. real-time image-guided biopsy, pleuroscopy) are not readily available in developing regions due to scarcity of resources and lack of expertise. All these factors lead to heterogeneous practice in approaching new-onset pleural effusion, interpretation of pleural TB investigations, and timing of TBP treatment initiation among respiratory physicians in different Asia-Pacific regions. The proposed multinational survey aims to understand the real-world clinical practice in approaching patients with new-onset unilateral pleural effusion and diagnosing TBP in Asia-Pacific regions with intermediate to high TB burden. The results will reflect the current practice of diagnosing TBP, clinical and resource discrepancies in investigating TBP, management of TBP and help prioritise the need for further research in TBP
Detailed description
Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the major global health threats, with an estimated 10.6 million people infected with TB in 2021, with 1.6 million dying from the disease. Apart from pulmonary involvement as the major manifestation of TB, there is an increasing trend of extrapulmonary TB (EPTB) reported in different continents. Among EPTB, TB pleuritis (TBP) was the most prevalent form in several large Chinese retrospective studies.
Diagnosing TBP is challenging due to paucibacillary involvement (TB disease caused by a small number of bacteria) of the pleural space. A diagnosis of definite TBP can be secured if the acid-fast bacilli (AFB), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) culture of pleural fluid reveals positive results. However, these conventional diagnostic tests for TBP are insufficiently sensitive, and the long turnaround time of culture would also delay the initial clinical management. The diagnosis of definite TBP may also be based on compatible histological findings of the pleural tissue obtained by biopsy procedures (bedside biopsy by Abram's needle, real-time image-guided biopsy by radiologists or experienced respiratory physicians, or pleuroscopy). The availability and waiting time of these procedures vary in different regions. Due to these reasons, a diagnosis of probable TBP may be pursued instead. This diagnostic entity is based on compatible clinical presentations with exudative, lymphocytic pleural effusion and raised pleural fluid biomarkers, commonly adenosine deaminase (ADA), without diagnostic microbiological results and alternative clinical explanation [10]. Other than pleural fluid ADA, several pleural fluid biomarkers have been explored to assist in diagnosing probable TBP. Therefore, a significant proportion of patients suspected to have TBP may have empirical anti-TB treatment initiated in the absence of a confirmatory diagnosis. In addition, these diagnostic clinical challenges are magnified among Asia-Pacific developing countries where contemporary diagnostic tools may be unavailable and hinder local TB control.
There is a lack of regional Asia-Pacific real-world evidence of how TBP is diagnosed and how pleural fluid biomarkers are used. We hypothesise that heterogeneous practice towards new-onset unilateral pleural effusion and understanding different diagnostic tests for diagnosing TBP across different countries depends on the TB burden and availability of advanced pleural services. Therefore, a multinational survey study is designed to understand the real-world practice of managing new-onset unilateral pleural effusion, the availability and utilisation of different diagnostic tests for TBP, and the factors determining the timing of initiating empirical anti-TB treatment for TBP among respiratory physicians in the Asia-Pacific region.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case crossover
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Survey respondent | – | Other: SurveyAll respiratory doctors who respond to the survey |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The questionnaire will be sent via social media, including WhatsApp, Facebook, X (formerly known as Twitter), targeting respiratory physicians practising in various Asia-Pacific regions, especially regions with intermediate to high TB burden, through snowball sampling. These regions include China, Hong Kong, India, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan (based on the network of the applicants) and beyond.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Respiratory doctors practising in Asia-Pacific region
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Do not consent for the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SurveyCross-sectional online survey | Other | Survey respondent |
Primary outcome
Treatment decision
Time frame: 1 month
the proprtion of respondents that would consider TBP as one of the differential diagnoses when approaching new-onset unilateral pleural effusion
3 secondary outcomes
Test availability
Time frame: 1 month
Disease understanding
Time frame: 1 month
Treatment decision for suspected tuberculosis
Time frame: 1 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Mar 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pleural Effusion
Not yet recruiting
Iodine Starch Test Use in Pleuroperitoneal Leak
Peritoneal Dialysis, Peritoneal Dialysis (PD)
RecruitingObservational study
UNC Pleural Fluid Registry
Lung Cancer, Lung Infection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Union-LC-MPE Cohort:A Multicenter Cohort Study on Diagnosis and Prognosis of Malignant Pleural Effusion in Lung Cance
Malignant Pleural Effusions (Mpe), Lung Cancer (Diagnosis)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Intrapleural Catheter Daily Versus Three Times a Week Drainage
Advanced Cancer, Pleural Effusion
RecruitingPhase 4
Once Daily Intrapleural Enzyme Therapy in Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion or Empyema
Pleural Infection Bacterial, Pleural Infections
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David SC Hui, MD study director
Chinese University of Hong Kong
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pleural Effusion and Tuberculosis, Pleural, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Treatment decision (time frame: 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2026.