Borrelia Burgdorferi NeuroborreliosisDOTA-LYMENCT06392815
64Cu-DOTATATE-PET for Lyme Neuroborreliosis
A study testing Cu DOTATATE PET in people with Borrelia Burgdorferi Neuroborreliosis, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
The aim of the study is to investigate the applicability and performance of 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MR for diagnosis in patients with Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB). In this prospective, observational cohort study with 64Cu-DOTATATE, the investigators wish to include a total of 50 patients clinically suspected of LNB. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Borrelia Burgdorferi Neuroborreliosis
- What is being tested?
- Cu DOTATATE PET
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 20 May 2024to 31 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years AND
- Clinical suspicion of LNB AND
- Must be able to read and understand the patient information and to give informed consent -
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy OR
- Breast-feeding OR
- Concluded antibiotic treatment OR
- Weight more than the maximum weight limit for the PET/CT/MRI bed of the scanner (140 kg) OR
- History of allergic reaction attributable to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to 64Cu-DOTATATE OR
- Contraindications to MR (check list) -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Anne-Mette Lebech
Copenhagen, Capital Region, 2100
Anne-Mette Lebech, +4535458622, Anne-Mette.lebech@regionh.dk
About this study
Official title: 64Cu-DOTATATE-PET Imaging for Lyme Neuroborreliosis
The aim of the study is to investigate the applicability and performance of 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MR for diagnosis in patients with Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB).
In this prospective, observational cohort study with 64Cu-DOTATATE, the investigators wish to include a total of 50 patients clinically suspected of LNB. The investigators will investigate the diagnostic value of 64Cu-DOTATATE-PET comparing clinically suspected and CSF verified LNB patients with clinically suspected patients without CSF verification.
The investigators hypothesize that the information obtained from 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MRI can improve the diagnostics of LNB as well as that 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MRI will be able to contribute to the follow-up of patients by adding prognostic information and the risk of persistent symptoms. The application of 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MRI in the diagnostic work-up of LNB would thus expectedly lead to a more precise diagnosis and risk assessment.
Read the detailed description
Background
Imaging of neuroinfections is well documented, however with several restrictions due to the heterogeneity of pathogens. Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB) is a tick-borne infection, caused by Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato complex (Bb) and among the most prevalent bacterial infections of the nervous system. Due to climatic and environmental changes, the incidence of tickborne diseases is increasing throughout Europe, in Denmark the annual incidence is estimated to 3-4/100,000. Adults mainly manifests as a self-limiting subacute painful meningoradiculitis, lymphocytic meningitis and/or cranial nerve palsy, symptoms of CNS involvement such as acute encephalitis and myelitis are rare. Over time, most cases of Bb infection is thought to be self-resolving, however antibiotics accelerate the process by eradicating the pathogen and reduces the risk of disseminated late infection and persistent symptoms. The response to antibiotics can be slow, but the majority of patients report marked improvement in symptoms after treatment, a proportion of patients, do however report to experience persistent residual symptoms including fatigue, pain or cognitive disturbances and studies have suggested that late diagnosis and the burden of symptoms at time of treatment initiation increases the risk of these symptoms.
If antibiotic treatment is initiated as early as possible, LNB has a very good prognosis, early diagnosis and treatment initiation are therefore of paramount interest.
As no markers in plasma can be used to diagnose or follow LNB, the diagnosis of LNB is based on clinical symptoms in combination with elevated white blood cell count in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the detection of specific Bb intrathecal antibody production. However, Bb serology has several disadvantages in the ability to confirm active disease and monitor disease activity and response to antibiotic treatment. Bb antibodies in CSF are first detectable weeks after onset of the neuroinfection and they may persist for years even after the disease has been well-treated. In addition, symptoms can be unspecific, evolving over time and even mimic other neurological diseases potentially resulting in misdiagnosis, diagnostic delay and reduced patient outcome. The investigators recently reported a median duration of neurological symptoms before first hospital contact of 21 days in a Danish nationwide prospective cohort study of 194 LNB patients included between 2015-2018. Currently, the only way to monitor disease activity - although not ideal - is to to perform a re-lumbar puncture, which is an invasive procedure, not always possible or successful and with risk of post lumbar puncture headache which develops in 10-20% of the patients.
Improving diagnosis, ideally non-invasively, is therefore of great interest and new methods to confirm active disease and monitor the effect of treatment an important field of research which might promote a shift from empirical treatment to personalized medicine with expected improvement in patient outcome.
Non-invasive imaging seems an obvious solution. The investigators have retrospectively studied the value of CT and MRI in diagnosis of LNB and found no value of computerized tomography (CT)-head and limited value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-Brain/Spine. Regarding use of positron emission tomography (PET) the most commonly used ligand for infection and inflammation imaging is the radiolabeled glucose analogue, fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG). However, 18F-FDG has major limitations including low specificity, as it is taken up by any cell with increased glucose metabolism including but not restricted to leukocytes, macrophages, monocytes, lymphocytes and giant cells. In addition, as the normal brain has high glucose consumption, it is difficult (impossible) to obtain sufficient contrast in LNB as inflammation is primarily in the meninges. Indeed, the investigators have confirmed from cases of LNB that had 18F-FDG-PET could not be used. Due to these limitations, there is an unmet need for other, more specific, targeted radioligands to improve imaging of infectious diseases e.g. LNB and the adjacent inflammatory response.
Macrophages is a potential and promising target for the diagnosing of more specific infections and in particular LNB. Macrophages have anti-inflammatory properties with high phagocytic activity, and they are not only involved in the early immune response but present as long as the infection is active. Macrophage activation can be monitored by the circulating biomarker soluble CD163, the intrathecal inflammation in LNB does not lead to any or only very subtle peripheral measurable changes of normal infectious parameters even with highly active but localized infection as in LNB. As activated macrophages overexpresses somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (sstr2), the activity of macrophages can be visualized by PET imaging targeting sstr2 using the ligand 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid]-d-Phe1,Tyr3-octreotate (DOTATATE). At Rigshospitalet the investigators recently developed 64Cu-DOTATATE with a physical half-life of 12.7 hours (vs. 1 hour) and a 4-fold better theoretical (positron range) spatial resolution compared to existing 68Ga-labeled tracers. These characteristics are a prerequisite. Accordingly, the investigators found in a pre-clinical trial that 64Cu-DOTATATE was able to non-invasively detect and monitor Lyme borreliosis in a murine model of Lyme arthritis and that delayed imaging, later than 3 h and ideally 24 h post injection, was necessary to obtain good target-to-background ratios in images of Bb infection.
In humans, the investigators previously demonstrated that 64Cu-DOTATATE-PET could visualize macrophages in vivo in atherosclerotic, carotid plaques prior to endarterectomy. Gene expression analysis on the excised plagues demonstrated at close correlation between CD163 gene expression and PET tracer uptake confirming that it was indeed macrophages that were visualized.
In this prospective, observational cohort study with 64Cu-DOTATATE, the investigators wish to include a total of 50 patients clinically suspected of LNB. The investigators will investigate the diagnostic value of 64Cu-DOTATATE-PET comparing clinically suspected and CSF verified LNB patients with clinically suspected patients without CSF verification. The investigators further wish to explore if the biomarkers sCD163, NfL, and Tau may contribute to the diagnostics of LNB, and if 64Cu-DOTATATE PE/CT/MRI have a prognostic value by including a follow-up visit 6 months after treatment, comparing patients with persistent symptoms to patients without persistent symptoms. The investigators hypothesize that the information obtained from 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MRI and the biomarkers sCD163 and NfL can improve the diagnostics of LNB. The investigators also hypothesize that 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MRI will be able to contribute to the follow-up of patients by adding prognostic information and the risk of persistent symptoms. The application of 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MRI in the diagnostic work-up of LNB would thus expectedly lead to a more precise diagnosis and risk assessment.
- Conditions
- Borrelia Burgdorferi Neuroborreliosis
- Being tested
- Cu DOTATATE PET
- Keywords
- borrelia burgdorferi, Neuroborreliosis, Dotatate PET
- Medical subject headings
- Lyme Neuroborreliosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cu DOTATATE PETDiagnostic test
The primary endpoint of the study is diagnostic performance for detecting LNB by 64Cu-DOTATATE-PET/CT/MRI measured as the difference in uptake between patients with definite LNB and patients without LNB. The primary read-out from 64Cu-DOTATATE-PET/CT/MRI is SUV in CNS and reference organs
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroborreliosis | Other | 25 patients with possible or confirmed neuroborreliosis Receives: Diagnostic Test: Cu DOTATATE PET |
| controls | Other | 25 patients investigated for neuroborreliosis but with normal CSF examination Receives: Diagnostic Test: Cu DOTATATE PET |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary
Sensitivity and specificity of 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MR for detection of LNB in patients clinically suspected of LNB using CSF as reference
Measured: 2,5 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Secondary
Correlation between responders vs. non-responders on 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MR and outcome at 6 months measured according to 36-item short form survey (SF-36) score and multidimensional fatigue inventoryscore (MFI-20 score). The SF-36 is a set of self reported quality of life measures.Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better health status. MFI-20 The MFI is a 20-item self-report instrument designed to measure fatigue.Subscale scores (range 4-20) are calculated as the sum of item ratings and a total fatigue score (range 20-100) is calculated as the sum of subscale scores. Higher scores indicate a higher level of fatigue.
Measured: 2,5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Apr 2024
- Study start20 May 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Borrelia Burgdorferi NeuroborreliosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Copenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Anne-Mette Lebech, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Investigators
- Anne-Mette Lebech, Principal investigator, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06392815
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RH8622
- Acronym
- DOTA-LYME
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 25 Apr 2024
- Last updated
- 21 May 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- 64Cu-DOTATATE-PET Imaging for Lyme Neuroborreliosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06392815
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DOTA-LYME / RH8622
- Conditions
- Borrelia Burgdorferi Neuroborreliosis
- Keywords
- borrelia burgdorferi, Neuroborreliosis, Dotatate PET
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 May 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study is to investigate the applicability and performance of 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MR for diagnosis in patients with Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB).
In this prospective, observational cohort study with 64Cu-DOTATATE, the investigators wish to include a total of 50 patients clinically suspected of LNB. The investigators will investigate the diagnostic value of 64Cu-DOTATATE-PET comparing clinically suspected and CSF verified LNB patients with clinically suspected patients without CSF verification.
The investigators hypothesize that the information obtained from 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MRI can improve the diagnostics of LNB as well as that 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MRI will be able to contribute to the follow-up of patients by adding prognostic information and the risk of persistent symptoms. The application of 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MRI in the diagnostic work-up of LNB would thus expectedly lead to a more precise diagnosis and risk assessment.
Detailed description
Background
Imaging of neuroinfections is well documented, however with several restrictions due to the heterogeneity of pathogens. Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB) is a tick-borne infection, caused by Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato complex (Bb) and among the most prevalent bacterial infections of the nervous system. Due to climatic and environmental changes, the incidence of tickborne diseases is increasing throughout Europe, in Denmark the annual incidence is estimated to 3-4/100,000. Adults mainly manifests as a self-limiting subacute painful meningoradiculitis, lymphocytic meningitis and/or cranial nerve palsy, symptoms of CNS involvement such as acute encephalitis and myelitis are rare. Over time, most cases of Bb infection is thought to be self-resolving, however antibiotics accelerate the process by eradicating the pathogen and reduces the risk of disseminated late infection and persistent symptoms. The response to antibiotics can be slow, but the majority of patients report marked improvement in symptoms after treatment, a proportion of patients, do however report to experience persistent residual symptoms including fatigue, pain or cognitive disturbances and studies have suggested that late diagnosis and the burden of symptoms at time of treatment initiation increases the risk of these symptoms.
If antibiotic treatment is initiated as early as possible, LNB has a very good prognosis, early diagnosis and treatment initiation are therefore of paramount interest.
As no markers in plasma can be used to diagnose or follow LNB, the diagnosis of LNB is based on clinical symptoms in combination with elevated white blood cell count in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the detection of specific Bb intrathecal antibody production. However, Bb serology has several disadvantages in the ability to confirm active disease and monitor disease activity and response to antibiotic treatment. Bb antibodies in CSF are first detectable weeks after onset of the neuroinfection and they may persist for years even after the disease has been well-treated. In addition, symptoms can be unspecific, evolving over time and even mimic other neurological diseases potentially resulting in misdiagnosis, diagnostic delay and reduced patient outcome. The investigators recently reported a median duration of neurological symptoms before first hospital contact of 21 days in a Danish nationwide prospective cohort study of 194 LNB patients included between 2015-2018. Currently, the only way to monitor disease activity - although not ideal - is to to perform a re-lumbar puncture, which is an invasive procedure, not always possible or successful and with risk of post lumbar puncture headache which develops in 10-20% of the patients.
Improving diagnosis, ideally non-invasively, is therefore of great interest and new methods to confirm active disease and monitor the effect of treatment an important field of research which might promote a shift from empirical treatment to personalized medicine with expected improvement in patient outcome.
Non-invasive imaging seems an obvious solution. The investigators have retrospectively studied the value of CT and MRI in diagnosis of LNB and found no value of computerized tomography (CT)-head and limited value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-Brain/Spine. Regarding use of positron emission tomography (PET) the most commonly used ligand for infection and inflammation imaging is the radiolabeled glucose analogue, fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG). However, 18F-FDG has major limitations including low specificity, as it is taken up by any cell with increased glucose metabolism including but not restricted to leukocytes, macrophages, monocytes, lymphocytes and giant cells. In addition, as the normal brain has high glucose consumption, it is difficult (impossible) to obtain sufficient contrast in LNB as inflammation is primarily in the meninges. Indeed, the investigators have confirmed from cases of LNB that had 18F-FDG-PET could not be used. Due to these limitations, there is an unmet need for other, more specific, targeted radioligands to improve imaging of infectious diseases e.g. LNB and the adjacent inflammatory response.
Macrophages is a potential and promising target for the diagnosing of more specific infections and in particular LNB. Macrophages have anti-inflammatory properties with high phagocytic activity, and they are not only involved in the early immune response but present as long as the infection is active. Macrophage activation can be monitored by the circulating biomarker soluble CD163, the intrathecal inflammation in LNB does not lead to any or only very subtle peripheral measurable changes of normal infectious parameters even with highly active but localized infection as in LNB. As activated macrophages overexpresses somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (sstr2), the activity of macrophages can be visualized by PET imaging targeting sstr2 using the ligand 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid]-d-Phe1,Tyr3-octreotate (DOTATATE). At Rigshospitalet the investigators recently developed 64Cu-DOTATATE with a physical half-life of 12.7 hours (vs. 1 hour) and a 4-fold better theoretical (positron range) spatial resolution compared to existing 68Ga-labeled tracers. These characteristics are a prerequisite. Accordingly, the investigators found in a pre-clinical trial that 64Cu-DOTATATE was able to non-invasively detect and monitor Lyme borreliosis in a murine model of Lyme arthritis and that delayed imaging, later than 3 h and ideally 24 h post injection, was necessary to obtain good target-to-background ratios in images of Bb infection.
In humans, the investigators previously demonstrated that 64Cu-DOTATATE-PET could visualize macrophages in vivo in atherosclerotic, carotid plaques prior to endarterectomy. Gene expression analysis on the excised plagues demonstrated at close correlation between CD163 gene expression and PET tracer uptake confirming that it was indeed macrophages that were visualized.
In this prospective, observational cohort study with 64Cu-DOTATATE, the investigators wish to include a total of 50 patients clinically suspected of LNB. The investigators will investigate the diagnostic value of 64Cu-DOTATATE-PET comparing clinically suspected and CSF verified LNB patients with clinically suspected patients without CSF verification. The investigators further wish to explore if the biomarkers sCD163, NfL, and Tau may contribute to the diagnostics of LNB, and if 64Cu-DOTATATE PE/CT/MRI have a prognostic value by including a follow-up visit 6 months after treatment, comparing patients with persistent symptoms to patients without persistent symptoms. The investigators hypothesize that the information obtained from 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MRI and the biomarkers sCD163 and NfL can improve the diagnostics of LNB. The investigators also hypothesize that 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MRI will be able to contribute to the follow-up of patients by adding prognostic information and the risk of persistent symptoms. The application of 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MRI in the diagnostic work-up of LNB would thus expectedly lead to a more precise diagnosis and risk assessment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroborreliosis | Other | Diagnostic Test: Cu DOTATATE PET25 patients with possible or confirmed neuroborreliosis |
| controls | Other | Diagnostic Test: Cu DOTATATE PET25 patients investigated for neuroborreliosis but with normal CSF examination |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years AND
- Clinical suspicion of LNB AND
- Must be able to read and understand the patient information and to give informed consent -
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Pregnancy OR
- Breast-feeding OR
- Concluded antibiotic treatment OR
- Weight more than the maximum weight limit for the PET/CT/MRI bed of the scanner (140 kg) OR
- History of allergic reaction attributable to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to 64Cu-DOTATATE OR
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cu DOTATATE PETThe primary endpoint of the study is diagnostic performance for detecting LNB by 64Cu-DOTATATE-PET/CT/MRI measured as the difference in uptake between patients with definite LNB and patients without LNB. The primary read-out from 64Cu-DOTATATE-PET/CT/MRI is SUV in CNS and reference organs | Diagnostic test | Neuroborreliosis, controls |
Primary outcome
Primary
Time frame: 2,5 years
Sensitivity and specificity of 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT/MR for detection of LNB in patients clinically suspected of LNB using CSF as reference
1 secondary outcome
Secondary
Time frame: 2,5 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 May 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Borrelia Burgdorferi Neuroborreliosis
Recruiting
Effectiveness of an Intervention Combining Adapted Physical Activity and Therapeutic Education in Patients With Chronic Symptoms Attributed to Lyme Borreliosis.
Lyme Borreliosis, Physical Activity
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Doxycycline Boosted Therapy in Lyme Borreliosis: DoBo Study.
Lyme Borreliosis, Nervous System
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About Different Dosing Schedules of a Lyme Disease Vaccine in Healthy Adults
Lyme Borreliosis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Anti-phospolipid Antibodies in Lyme Borreliosis
Patients With Different Manifestations of Lyme Borreliosis, Persons With Nonspecific Symptoms and Positive Borrelia Antibodies in Serum
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Anne-Mette Lebech principal investigator
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cu DOTATATE PET in people with Borrelia Burgdorferi Neuroborreliosis, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Anne-Mette Lebech (+4535458622, Anne-Mette.lebech@regionh.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary (time frame: 2,5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 May 2024.