Alcohol Use DisorderInTEGRANCT06395467
Integrated Treatment for Enhancing Growth in Recovery During Adolescence
A study testing InTEGRA and MET/CBT in people with Alcohol Use Disorder and Cannabis Use Disorder, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This is a Phase II parallel group randomized controlled trial with 294 adolescents (age: 14-21 years) with alcohol and other drug [AOD] use disorder (hereafter substance use disorder), that compares two different active psychosocial interventions designed to address adolescent substance use disorder. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 to 21 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Alcohol Use Disorder, Cannabis Use Disorder
- What is being tested?
- InTEGRA and MET/CBT
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 294 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 26 Nov 2024to 31 May 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 to 21 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- 14-21 years old
- SUD based on criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5)
- able to read and comprehend English at a 5th-grade level
- residence in Eastern time zone states (Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia
- any AOD use in the past 90 days (or in the 90 days prior to being in a controlled environment)
- meet patient placement criteria for level I (outpatient) treatment
- participant and a family member/guardian responsible for providing collateral information (for those <18 years) agree to sign Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved consent
- participant and family member responsible for providing collateral information who could be contacted in case the subject became lost to follow-up.
Who cannot join
- suicidal ideation with a plan, suicidal behavior, a plan to hurt oneself or others, or a history of self-injurious behavior occurring in past 30 days
- lifetime diagnosis of schizophrenia
- current health condition (i.e., medical, psychiatric) that compromises participant's ability to attend outpatient treatment
- demonstrate inability or unwillingness to identify a "locator" who could be contacted in case participant becomes lost to follow-up; or
- youth attending another SUD treatment program or receiving psychotherapy that could conflict with study treatments.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
MGH Department of Psychiatry
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Alexandra W Abry, BA, 617-724-5259, aabry@mgh.harvard.edu
Jenny B O'Connor, BA, 617-724-7932, jboconnor@mgh.harvard.edu
- Recruiting
UConn Health
Farmington, Connecticut, 06032
Marla Genova, MA, 860.679.8165, Genova@uchc.edu
Yifrah Kaminer, MD
About this study
Official title: Integrated Treatment for Enhancing Growth in Recovery During Adolescence (InTEGRA)
This is a Phase II parallel group randomized controlled trial with 294 adolescents (age: 14-21 years) with alcohol and other drug [AOD] use disorder (hereafter substance use disorder), that compares two different active psychosocial interventions designed to address adolescent substance use disorder. Participants are recruited from our clinical settings and the community at two sites: one in the metro Boston, Massachusetts (MA) area and the other in the metro Farmington, Connecticut (CT), area.
Study aims and hypotheses are as follows:
- To extend the evidence for the initial efficacy of Integrated Treatment for Enhancing Growth in Recovery During Adolescence (InTEGRA), which integrates 12-Step Facilitation (TSF) with Motivational Enhancement Therapy/Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (MET/CBT) relative to gold standard MET/CBT alone (N = 294). It is hypothesized that youth assigned to InTEGRA will have greater 12-step participation during and following treatment, higher abstinence rates, and fewer substance-related negative consequences.
- Investigate the personal recovery capital (PRC) and social recovery capital (SRC) mechanisms of behavior change through which InTEGRA may confer benefits dynamically over time (e.g., PRC: motivation, self-efficacy, coping; SRC: 12-step involvement; social network changes).
- Investigate moderators of InTEGRA's effects on outcomes across one-year follow-up (e.g., effect of age, network support for AOD use; psychiatric severity; age composition of 12-step meetings on substance use and substance-related consequences). It is hypothesized that higher network support for AOD use, abstinence motivation, and greater AOD severity, will have a better response to InTEGRA.
- Explore barriers and facilitators to InTEGRA adoption and implementation across providers and system administrators within the context of a type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation research design.
Read the detailed description
Interested individuals will be screened by phone, followed by a more rigorous screening completed at intake. With the anticipated sample size of 294, expected enrollment is between 6-7 participants per month across the two sites during the enrollment period (about 3-4 per site).
Participants are randomized to treatment conditions in a 1:1 ratio using a computerized urn randomization program (stratified by age and gender) The study data analyst will share this information with the treatment providers once a given group is ready to begin. The research assistants conducting assessments will be blinded to condition assignment.
Beginning at treatment conclusion (approximately 3 months after enrollment), participants are followed up every 3 months for one year following their baseline enrollment date.
The treatment conditions are InTEGRA, which integrates key elements of TSF with MET/CBT, and MET/CBT alone.
- Conditions
- Alcohol Use Disorder, Cannabis Use Disorder
- Being tested
- InTEGRA, MET/CBT
- Medical subject headings
- Alcoholism
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
InTEGRABehavioural
Session topics are as follows: Parent Info Session - Informational and Q\&A format; Motivation Building- Addressing AA/NA Expectancies and Experiences; AA/NA Expectancies and Treatment Goal Setting Session; Alcohol and Drug Refusal Skills; Coping with Urges and Other Thoughts about Drinking; Problem Solving; Anger Management (AA/NA and Hungry, Angry, Lonely, Tired "HALT"; Effective Communication (Sharing at AA/NA meetings; getting a sponsor); Depression Management; Using AA/NA for enhancing Social Support and Increasing Pleasant Activities; Planning for Emergencies and Coping with Relapse
MET/CBTBehavioural
Session topics are as follows: Motivation Building Session; Goal Setting Session; Alcohol and Drug Refusal Skills; Coping with Urges and Other Thoughts about Drinking; Problem Solving; Anger Management; Effective Communication; Depression Management; Enhancing the Social Support Network and Increasing Pleasant Activities; Planning for Emergencies and Coping with Relapse
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| InTEGRA | Experimental | 10 weekly, in-person or virtual treatment sessions (2 individually-delivered and 8 group sessions). InTEGRA contains many primary treatment elements of MET/CBT, but comparatively less time is spent on these elements to allow for the integration of the TSF content (about 50%). As part of this TSF, for example speakers from 12-step fellowships such as Marijuana Anonymous (MA), Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and Narcotics Anonymous (NA) are invited to share their experiences and discuss myths and facts related to attendance at 12-step meetings as well as answer any questions participants have about these fellowships. During an orientation session, parents of youth in the InTEGRA condition only (not MET/CBT alone) are given information about the potential benefits of 12-step meeting participation and a list of Young Person's 12-step meetings and encouraged to facilitate their child's participation during and after treatment. Receives: Behavioral: InTEGRA |
| MET/CBT | Active comparator | 10 weekly, in-person or virtual treatment sessions (2 individually-delivered and 8 group sessions) modified from MET/CBT approaches (Webb, Scudder, Kaminer, \& Kadden, 2002; Sampl \& Kadden 2001) tested in the Cannabis Youth Treatment Study (Dennis et al. 2004). Receives: Behavioral: MET/CBT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent Days Abstinent (PDA)
Percent Days Abstinent (PDA) from alcohol and other drugs (cannabis, opioids, etc.). Derived from Timeline Followback (TLFB) and Form-90 measures of substance use.
Abstinence reports confirmed with Breathalyzer and Toxicology Screen data.
Measured: During treatment and up to 12 months following enrollment
Substance use related consequences
Substance use related consequences as measured by the Short Inventory of Problems - Revised (SIP-2R), a 15-item measure with response options from 0 to 3 (minimum = 0 and maximum = 45); higher scores correspond with more consequences.
Measured: During treatment and up to 12 months following enrollment
Secondary outcomes (1)
Psychiatric symptom severity
Measure of psychiatric symptoms as assessed by the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18), an 18-item measure with response options from 0 to 4 (minimum = 0 and maximum = 72 which are converted to gender normed T scores of M = 50 and SD = 10); higher scores correspond with more symptomatology.
Measured: During treatment and up to 12 months following enrollment.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 May 2024
- Study start26 Nov 2024
- Primary completion1 May 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion31 May 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Alcohol Use DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Massachusetts General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 294 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, John F. Kelly, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Investigators
- John F Kelly, PhD, Principal investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06395467
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2023P000727
- Other IDs
- R01AA030926
- Acronym
- InTEGRA
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 29 Apr 2024
- Last updated
- 6 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Even though the final dataset will be stripped of identifiers prior to release for sharing, there remains the possibility of deductive disclosure of this vulnerable population. Thus, given the prevailing stigma associated with substance use, investigators will make the data and associated documentation available to users only under a data-sharing agreement, which will provide for: (1) a commitment to using the data only for research purposes and not to identify any individual participant; (2) a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology; and (3) a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed.
Publications
Kelly JF, Kaminer Y, Kahler CW, Hoeppner B, Yeterian J, Cristello JV, Timko C. A pilot randomized clinical trial testing integrated 12-Step facilitation (iTSF) treatment for adolescent substance use disorder. Addiction. 2017 Dec;112(12):2155-2166. doi: 10.1111/add.13920. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
PubMed 28742932Kelly JF, Yeterian JD, Cristello JV, Kaminer Y, Kahler CW, Timko C. Developing and Testing Twelve-Step Facilitation for Adolescents with Substance Use Disorder: Manual Development and Preliminary Outcomes. Subst Abuse. 2016 Jun 13;10:55-64. doi: 10.4137/SART.S39635. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27429548Kelly JF, Urbanoski K. Youth recovery contexts: the incremental effects of 12-step attendance and involvement on adolescent outpatient outcomes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2012 Jul;36(7):1219-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01727.x. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
PubMed 22509904Kelly JF, Urbanoski KA, Hoeppner BB, Slaymaker V. Facilitating comprehensive assessment of 12-step experiences: A Multidimensional Measure of Mutual-Help Activity. Alcohol Treat Q. 2011 Jan 1;29(3):181-203. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2011.586280.
PubMed 22081741Kelly JF, Dow SJ, Yeterian JD, Myers M. How safe are adolescents at Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous meetings? A prospective investigation with outpatient youth. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2011 Jun;40(4):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
PubMed 21353446Kelly JF, Dow SJ, Yeterian JD, Kahler CW. Can 12-step group participation strengthen and extend the benefits of adolescent addiction treatment? A prospective analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Jul 1;110(1-2):117-25. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.02.019. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
PubMed 20338698Kelly JF, Myers MG, Rodolico J. What do adolescents exposed to Alcoholics Anonymous think about 12-step groups? Subst Abus. 2008;29(2):53-62. doi: 10.1080/08897070802093122.
PubMed 19042324Kelly JF, Brown SA, Abrantes A, Kahler CW, Myers M. Social recovery model: an 8-year investigation of adolescent 12-step group involvement following inpatient treatment. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008 Aug;32(8):1468-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00712.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
PubMed 18557829Dennis M, Godley SH, Diamond G, Tims FM, Babor T, Donaldson J, Liddle H, Titus JC, Kaminer Y, Webb C, Hamilton N, Funk R. The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Study: main findings from two randomized trials. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2004 Oct;27(3):197-213. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2003.09.005.
PubMed 15501373Webb, C., Scudder, M., Kaminer, Y., & Kadden, R. M. (2002). The Motivational Enhancement Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Supplement: 7 Sessions of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adolescent Cannabis Users, Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Series, Volume 2. DHHS Pub. No. (SMA) 07-3954. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2002, reprinted 2003, 2004, and 2007.
Sampl, S., & Kadden, R. M. (2001). Motivational Enhancement Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adolescent Cannabis Users: 5 Sessions, Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Series, Volume. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. BKD384.
Kelly JF, Myers MG, Brown SA. A multivariate process model of adolescent 12-step attendance and substance use outcome following inpatient treatment. Psychol Addict Behav. 2000 Dec;14(4):376-89.
PubMed 11130156
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Integrated Treatment for Enhancing Growth in Recovery During Adolescence (InTEGRA)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06395467
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- InTEGRA / 2023P000727
- Conditions
- Alcohol Use Disorder, Cannabis Use Disorder
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 294 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
- Study start
- 26 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 May 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a Phase II parallel group randomized controlled trial with 294 adolescents (age: 14-21 years) with alcohol and other drug [AOD] use disorder (hereafter substance use disorder), that compares two different active psychosocial interventions designed to address adolescent substance use disorder. Participants are recruited from our clinical settings and the community at two sites: one in the metro Boston, Massachusetts (MA) area and the other in the metro Farmington, Connecticut (CT), area.
Study aims and hypotheses are as follows:
- To extend the evidence for the initial efficacy of Integrated Treatment for Enhancing Growth in Recovery During Adolescence (InTEGRA), which integrates 12-Step Facilitation (TSF) with Motivational Enhancement Therapy/Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (MET/CBT) relative to gold standard MET/CBT alone (N = 294). It is hypothesized that youth assigned to InTEGRA will have greater 12-step participation during and following treatment, higher abstinence rates, and fewer substance-related negative consequences.
- Investigate the personal recovery capital (PRC) and social recovery capital (SRC) mechanisms of behavior change through which InTEGRA may confer benefits dynamically over time (e.g., PRC: motivation, self-efficacy, coping; SRC: 12-step involvement; social network changes).
- Investigate moderators of InTEGRA's effects on outcomes across one-year follow-up (e.g., effect of age, network support for AOD use; psychiatric severity; age composition of 12-step meetings on substance use and substance-related consequences). It is hypothesized that higher network support for AOD use, abstinence motivation, and greater AOD severity, will have a better response to InTEGRA.
- Explore barriers and facilitators to InTEGRA adoption and implementation across providers and system administrators within the context of a type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation research design.
Detailed description
Interested individuals will be screened by phone, followed by a more rigorous screening completed at intake. With the anticipated sample size of 294, expected enrollment is between 6-7 participants per month across the two sites during the enrollment period (about 3-4 per site).
Participants are randomized to treatment conditions in a 1:1 ratio using a computerized urn randomization program (stratified by age and gender) The study data analyst will share this information with the treatment providers once a given group is ready to begin. The research assistants conducting assessments will be blinded to condition assignment.
Beginning at treatment conclusion (approximately 3 months after enrollment), participants are followed up every 3 months for one year following their baseline enrollment date.
The treatment conditions are InTEGRA, which integrates key elements of TSF with MET/CBT, and MET/CBT alone.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| InTEGRA | Experimental | Behavioral: InTEGRA10 weekly, in-person or virtual treatment sessions (2 individually-delivered and 8 group sessions). InTEGRA contains many primary treatment elements of MET/CBT, but comparatively less time is spent on these elements to allow for the integration of the TSF content (about 50%). As part of this TSF, for example speakers from 12-step fellowships such as Marijuana Anonymous (MA), Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and Narcotics Anonymous (NA) are invited to share their experiences and discuss myths and facts related to attendance at 12-step meetings as well as answer any questions participants have about these fellowships. During an orientation session, parents of youth in the InTEGRA condition only (not MET/CBT alone) are given information about the potential benefits of 12-step meeting participation and a list of Young Person's 12-step meetings and encouraged to facilitate their child's participation during and after treatment. |
| MET/CBT | Active comparator | Behavioral: MET/CBT10 weekly, in-person or virtual treatment sessions (2 individually-delivered and 8 group sessions) modified from MET/CBT approaches (Webb, Scudder, Kaminer, \& Kadden, 2002; Sampl \& Kadden 2001) tested in the Cannabis Youth Treatment Study (Dennis et al. 2004). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 to 21 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- 14-21 years old
- SUD based on criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5)
- able to read and comprehend English at a 5th-grade level
- residence in Eastern time zone states (Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia
- any AOD use in the past 90 days (or in the 90 days prior to being in a controlled environment)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- suicidal ideation with a plan, suicidal behavior, a plan to hurt oneself or others, or a history of self-injurious behavior occurring in past 30 days
- lifetime diagnosis of schizophrenia
- current health condition (i.e., medical, psychiatric) that compromises participant's ability to attend outpatient treatment
- demonstrate inability or unwillingness to identify a "locator" who could be contacted in case participant becomes lost to follow-up; or
- youth attending another SUD treatment program or receiving psychotherapy that could conflict with study treatments.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| InTEGRASession topics are as follows: Parent Info Session - Informational and Q\&A format; Motivation Building- Addressing AA/NA Expectancies and Experiences; AA/NA Expectancies and Treatment Goal Setting Session; Alcohol and Drug Refusal Skills; Coping with Urges and Other Thoughts about Drinking; Problem Solving; Anger Management (AA/NA and Hungry, Angry, Lonely, Tired "HALT"; Effective Communication (Sharing at AA/NA meetings; getting a sponsor); Depression Management; Using AA/NA for enhancing Social Support and Increasing Pleasant Activities; Planning for Emergencies and Coping with Relapse | Behavioural | InTEGRA |
| MET/CBTSession topics are as follows: Motivation Building Session; Goal Setting Session; Alcohol and Drug Refusal Skills; Coping with Urges and Other Thoughts about Drinking; Problem Solving; Anger Management; Effective Communication; Depression Management; Enhancing the Social Support Network and Increasing Pleasant Activities; Planning for Emergencies and Coping with Relapse | Behavioural | MET/CBT |
Primary outcome
Percent Days Abstinent (PDA)
Time frame: During treatment and up to 12 months following enrollment
Percent Days Abstinent (PDA) from alcohol and other drugs (cannabis, opioids, etc.). Derived from Timeline Followback (TLFB) and Form-90 measures of substance use. Abstinence reports confirmed with Breathalyzer and Toxicology Screen data.
Substance use related consequences
Time frame: During treatment and up to 12 months following enrollment
Substance use related consequences as measured by the Short Inventory of Problems - Revised (SIP-2R), a 15-item measure with response options from 0 to 3 (minimum = 0 and maximum = 45); higher scores correspond with more consequences.
1 secondary outcome
Psychiatric symptom severity
Time frame: During treatment and up to 12 months following enrollment.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Mar 2026.
- Background: PubMed 28742932Kelly JF, Kaminer Y, Kahler CW, Hoeppner B, Yeterian J, Cristello JV, Timko C. A pilot randomized clinical trial testing integrated 12-Step facilitation (iTSF) treatment for adolescent substance use disorder. Addiction. 2017 Dec;112(12):2155-2166. doi: 10.1111/add.13920. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
- Background: PubMed 27429548Kelly JF, Yeterian JD, Cristello JV, Kaminer Y, Kahler CW, Timko C. Developing and Testing Twelve-Step Facilitation for Adolescents with Substance Use Disorder: Manual Development and Preliminary Outcomes. Subst Abuse. 2016 Jun 13;10:55-64. doi: 10.4137/SART.S39635. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 22509904Kelly JF, Urbanoski K. Youth recovery contexts: the incremental effects of 12-step attendance and involvement on adolescent outpatient outcomes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2012 Jul;36(7):1219-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01727.x. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
- Background: PubMed 22081741Kelly JF, Urbanoski KA, Hoeppner BB, Slaymaker V. Facilitating comprehensive assessment of 12-step experiences: A Multidimensional Measure of Mutual-Help Activity. Alcohol Treat Q. 2011 Jan 1;29(3):181-203. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2011.586280.
- Background: PubMed 21353446Kelly JF, Dow SJ, Yeterian JD, Myers M. How safe are adolescents at Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous meetings? A prospective investigation with outpatient youth. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2011 Jun;40(4):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
- Background: PubMed 20338698Kelly JF, Dow SJ, Yeterian JD, Kahler CW. Can 12-step group participation strengthen and extend the benefits of adolescent addiction treatment? A prospective analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Jul 1;110(1-2):117-25. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.02.019. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
- Background: PubMed 19042324Kelly JF, Myers MG, Rodolico J. What do adolescents exposed to Alcoholics Anonymous think about 12-step groups? Subst Abus. 2008;29(2):53-62. doi: 10.1080/08897070802093122.
- Background: PubMed 18557829Kelly JF, Brown SA, Abrantes A, Kahler CW, Myers M. Social recovery model: an 8-year investigation of adolescent 12-step group involvement following inpatient treatment. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008 Aug;32(8):1468-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00712.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
- Background: PubMed 15501373Dennis M, Godley SH, Diamond G, Tims FM, Babor T, Donaldson J, Liddle H, Titus JC, Kaminer Y, Webb C, Hamilton N, Funk R. The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Study: main findings from two randomized trials. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2004 Oct;27(3):197-213. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2003.09.005.
- BackgroundWebb, C., Scudder, M., Kaminer, Y., & Kadden, R. M. (2002). The Motivational Enhancement Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Supplement: 7 Sessions of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adolescent Cannabis Users, Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Series, Volume 2. DHHS Pub. No. (SMA) 07-3954. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2002, reprinted 2003, 2004, and 2007.
- BackgroundSampl, S., & Kadden, R. M. (2001). Motivational Enhancement Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adolescent Cannabis Users: 5 Sessions, Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Series, Volume. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. BKD384.
- Background: PubMed 11130156Kelly JF, Myers MG, Brown SA. A multivariate process model of adolescent 12-step attendance and substance use outcome following inpatient treatment. Psychol Addict Behav. 2000 Dec;14(4):376-89.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Even though the final dataset will be stripped of identifiers prior to release for sharing, there remains the possibility of deductive disclosure of this vulnerable population. Thus, given the prevailing stigma associated with substance use, investigators will make the data and associated documentation available to users only under a data-sharing agreement, which will provide for: (1) a commitment to using the data only for research purposes and not to identify any individual participant; (2) a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology; and (3) a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed.
Related trials for Alcohol Use Disorder
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Not yet recruiting
Substance Use and Media Preferences
Substance Use Behavior, Cannabis Intoxication
RecruitingPhase 1
Environment and Alcohol: A Pilot Study
Alcohol Use Disorder
RecruitingObservational study
SMART-r: Substance Monitoring and Active Relapse Tracking Repository
Alcoholism, Substance-Related Disorders
Not yet recruiting
A MRT to Optimize a JITAI for Alcohol Craving and Suicide Ideation
Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), Suicide Ideation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
John F Kelly, PhD principal investigator
Massachusetts General Hospital
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing InTEGRA and MET/CBT in people with Alcohol Use Disorder and Cannabis Use Disorder, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Alexandra W Abry, BA (617-724-5259, aabry@mgh.harvard.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent Days Abstinent (PDA) (time frame: During treatment and up to 12 months following enrollment). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06395467, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2026.