AzTrials
AzTrials

ProcedureIVR-PNCT06396572

Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) Procedure

A study testing IVR-Procedure and Nursing Clinical Laboratory practice in people with Procedure, run by National University of Singapore at 1 site in Singapore.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A pilot randomised controlled trial to assess the nursing students' learning outcomes of the urinary catheterisation procedure by comparing the immersive virtual reality (IVR) to traditional lab sessions. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Procedure
What is being tested?
IVR-Procedure and Nursing Clinical Laboratory practice
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
93 participants
Where
1 siteSingapore
Study dates
17 Jan 2023to 27 Mar 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Year 2 Nursing students enrolled in the PPNP2 module

Who cannot join

  • Students who declined to participate

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Singapore1 site
  • Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies

    Singapore, 117597

Other trials in Singapore

About this study

Official title: Enhancing Clinical Procedures Through Deliberate Practice Using Immersive Virtual Reality

A pilot randomised controlled trial to assess the nursing students' learning outcomes of the urinary catheterisation procedure by comparing the immersive virtual reality (IVR) to traditional lab sessions.

Read the detailed description

Design: A pilot randomised controlled trial was employed to assess the learning outcomes of the urinary catheterisation procedure by comparing the immersive virtual reality (IVR) intervention to traditional lab sessions.

Eligibility: Second-year undergraduate nursing students (n = 200) enrolled into the module NUR2125 (Pathophysiology, Pharmacology and Nursing Practice II) were invited to participate in the study.

Setting: The study was conducted at a university in Singapore from January to April 2023.

Procedure: Ten lab groups of second-year undergraduate nursing students were invited to participate in the study. They received the standard blended learning activities, which included clinical lab sessions and videos on the urinary catheterisation procedure. Out of the ten groups, four groups were randomly allocated to the IVR intervention group, and another four groups were randomly assigned to the waitlist control group (traditional lab sessions).

  1. For the intervention group (IVR), the students used the IVR device for practice in class under the supervision of their tutor. They then loaned the IVR device for two weeks for home practice.
  2. For the waitlist control group (traditional lab sessions), they learned and practiced the urinary catheterisation procedure in class. Students received the additional intervention (using the IVR device for home practice) after the collection of post-test data.

Data collection: Prior to lab practice, each participant completed a demographic survey and a set of pre-test questionnaires on personality inventory, cognitive load, and representation of VR in education. Only students who voluntarily joined the programme were recruited into the study.

The participants completed the post-test questionnaires in March 2023 prior to their formative clinical assessment.

Conditions
Procedure
Being tested
IVR-Procedure, Nursing Clinical Laboratory practice
Keywords
urinary catheterisation, Immersive Virtual Reality, Clinical competency, Clinical procedures, Nursing

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • IVR-ProcedureProcedure or surgery

    Using immersive virtual reality to learn urinary catheterisation procedure

  • Nursing Clinical Laboratory practiceProcedure or surgery

    Also called Active Comparator

    Using nursing clinical laboratory sessions to learn urinary catheterisation procedure

Study groups in NCT06396572
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Immersive Virtual RealityExperimentalThe Participants used Immersive Virtual Reality for learning and practice urinary catheterisation procedure
Receives: Procedure: IVR-Procedure
Nursing clinical laboratoryActive comparatorThe Participants used a traditional nursing clinical laboratory for face to face learning and practice urinary catheterisation procedure
Receives: Procedure: Nursing Clinical Laboratory practice

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cognitive Load

    The Cognitive Load Scale (CLS) was adapted from Leppink et al. (2013) and analyses the level of working memory resources needed to process information. It consists of 10 items that are rated on an 11-point scale (0 = Not at all the case to 10 = Completely the case). Items 1 to 3 relate to intrinsic load, items 4 to 6 fall under extraneous load, and items 7 to 10 are associated with germane load. Responses are added to give a total score for each subscale, which ranges from 0 (lowest) to 30 or 40 (highest) in the case of the germane load subscale. Higher total scores indicate more working memory resources required to process the information load under different conditions.

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Clinical skill competency

    To evaluate the skills competency, the nursing students were assessed by their tutors using a competency assessment tool based on the skills checklist. Within the checklist, it determined the performance of the participants on completing the procedural steps on a 10-point scale (0-3 = Need improvement, 4-6 = Meet expectation, 7-9 = Exceed expectation), which was computed into a percentage score. Higher scores indicate a higher competency level in conducting the urinary catheterization procedure.

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 May 2024
  2. Study start17 Jan 2023
  3. Primary completion27 Mar 2023
  4. Study completion27 Mar 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Cluster randomization trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
93 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06396572
Sponsor's protocol ID
IVR-Procedure
Acronym
IVR-P
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
15 Apr 2024
Last updated
2 May 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing IVR-Procedure and Nursing Clinical Laboratory practice in people with Procedure, run by National University of Singapore at 1 site in Singapore.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cognitive Load (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 May 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in