Back Pain Lower Back ChronicPhase 4NCT06401499
The Effect of Pregabalin and Etoricoxib on Pain Alone Versus in Combination
A Phase 4 study testing etoricoxib 60mg in people with Back Pain Lower Back Chronic, run by Muhammad Ilyas.
Trial summary
To determine the effects of pregabalin in reducing pain intensity and improving functional disability in patients with chronic low back pain of neuropathic origin when used in combination with Etoricoxib. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Back Pain Lower Back Chronic
- What is being tested?
- etoricoxib 60mg
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 140 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2024to 31 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants within age 20-65 years
- Both male and non-pregnant non-lactating female patients will be included in the study
- Patients experiencing CLBP symptoms from last 6 months
Who cannot join
- • Patients with the history of antidepressant, opioid, and benzodiazepine medications
- Patients with the history of CYP1A2 inhibitors usage
- Patients already taking pregabalin
- Patients with the history of suicidal ideation, severe depression, anxiety disorder psychosis, and cognitive impairment
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Low Dose Pregabalin and Etoricoxib Combination on Pain in Comparison to Etoricoxib Alone in Patients Suffering From Chronic Low Back Pain
To determine the effects of pregabalin in reducing pain intensity and improving functional disability in patients with chronic low back pain of neuropathic origin when used in combination with Etoricoxib.
Hypothesis Pregabalin-etoricoxib combination is more effective than etoricoxib monotherapy in reducing pain and improving functional status in patients with chronic low back pain.
Read more
Null Hypothesis:
There is no significant difference between pregabalin-etoricoxib combination and etoricoxib monotherapy in reducing pain and improving functional status in patients with chronic low back pain.
Study Design: Comparative clinical study Setting: Watim General Hospital Duration of study: 18 months after ethical approval Sample Size: a previous study (8), was used to calculate the sample size, Using the WHO sample size calculator, a sample size of 140 patients (70 in each group) was determined with a 5% level of significance and 95% power of test.
Sampling Technique: non-probability convenience sampling. Sample selection
Inclusion criteria:
- Participants within age 20-65 years
- Both male and non-pregnant non-lactating female patients will be included in the study
- Patients experiencing CLBP symptoms from last 6 months
- No experience of previous low back surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with the history of antidepressant, opioid, and benzodiazepine medications
- Patients with the history of CYP1A2 inhibitors usage
- Patients already taking pregabalin
- Patients with the history of suicidal ideation, severe depression, anxiety disorder psychosis, and cognitive impairment Data collection Participants will be divided into two study groups. Group A (n=70) participant will receive 60mg Etoricoxib once daily along with a placebo and Group B (n=70) participants will also receive etoricoxib 60mg once daily(15) along with a placebo for 4 weeks. At the start of week 5 the group B will start taking Pregabalin 75mg along with Etoricoxib 60mg once daily for next 4 weeks, while, group A will continue same treatment as before. At Weeks 0 and 4 and 8 of the study, participants will be evaluated. Liver enzyme levels will be measured both at the beginning and end of the trial. The pain will be measured using numeric rating scale (NRS). CLBP-related impairment will be evaluated using the self-reported 24-item Roland-Morris impairment Questionnaire (RMDQ)
Read the detailed description
Introduction When back pain persists for more than three months due to a variety of non-mechanical and mechanical diseases, it is considered chronic low back pain (CLBP) Fifty percent to eighty percent of the population will have chronic low back pain (CLBP) at some time in their lives. According to a study conducted in China in 2017 "global burden of disease", CLBP affects around 4.2% of those aged 20-29, and 19.6% of people aged 30-59. The global years lived with disability for LBP were 42.5 million in 1990, and increased 52.7% to 64.9 million in 2017. In addition to being the leading cause of requesting health care services, it is also associated with substantial impairment, treatment expenditures, and sick leave. This makes it all the more important to find effective methods of treating CLBP. Treatment of CLBP remains a clinical challenge for clinicians despite the availability of several pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic techniques. The failure to address the underlying cause of the pain is a major barrier to effective treatment of CLBP. Both the nociceptive and neuropathic pain (NeP) processes may be at play in chronic low back pain, making it a disorder with a wide range of possible causes. Analysis of a US claims database found that 90% of patients with CLBP have a neuropathic component. Neuropathic pain is generally associated with more severe pain symptoms. It is the result of multiple pathways at the peripheral, spinal, and supraspinal levels that trigger pain conduction pathway changes. When compared to individuals with no neuropathic pain component, those with CLBP incur an annual treatment cost that is almost 160% greater. Therefore, it is therapeutically crucial to differentiate between the nociceptive and neuropathic processes of CLBP and to treat this illness based on its underlying mechanisms in order to improve patient outcomes and reduce disease burden.
The majority of recommendations for treating Chronic LBP are non-pharmaceutical, including multidisciplinary rehabilitation, physical therapy, acupuncture, motor control exercise, mindfulness-based stress reduction, operant therapy, low-level laser therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, or spinal surgery. However, in cases when the patient is unresponsive , treatment is started. Etoricoxib, is a highly selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor with anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic properties, recommended in the relief of acute and chronic pain , Indicated for pain and inflammation in osteoarthritis, in rheumatoid arthritis, in acute gouty arthritis, in chronic low back pain. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and simple analgesics, only work for nociceptive pain, have poor efficacy against NeP, and have the risk of side effects with long-term use , making the treatment of CLBP even more difficult when NeP is present.
Pregabalin and gabapentin are both derived from GABA, but they have no effect on the GABAergic system. Their mechanism of action includes binding to the alpha-2/delta-1 subunit of the voltage-gated calcium channels in several areas of the central nervous system (CNS) and spinal cord, and this is sufficient to explain their analgesic, anxiolytic, and anticonvulsant pharmacological properties. Voltage-gated calcium channels are localized on presynaptic terminals, where they control neurotransmitter release. Gabapentinoids, by binding to the alpha-2/ delta-1 subunit, destabilize the macromolecular complex that keeps the calcium channel on the surface of the presynaptic terminal, promoting its internalization.
46.5 percent of Pakistanis over the age of fifty have CLBP, according to recent estimates. There was a correlation between obesity, sedentary occupations, mental health issues, inactivity, ignorance about health risks, and heavy lifting in the Pakistani population, as shown by local statistics. The incidence of this condition is greater in cities than in rural regions. In Pakistan data shows that there are studies done on other uses of pregabalin, but its role in chronic low back pain is not known to be investigated.
Rationale:
The rationale of following study is to determine the role of pregabalin in chronic low back pain in order to address neuropathic component of pain.
Data collection Participants will be divided into two study groups. Group A (n=70) participant will receive 60mg Etoricoxib once daily along with a placebo and Group B (n=70) participants will also receive etoricoxib 60mg once daily(15) along with a placebo for 4 weeks. At the start of week 5 the group B will start taking Pregabalin 75mg along with Etoricoxib 60mg once daily for next 4 weeks, while, group A will continue same treatment as before. At Weeks 0 and 4 and 8 of the study, participants will be evaluated. Liver enzyme levels will be measured both at the beginning and end of the trial. The pain will be measured using numeric rating scale (NRS). It is an 11-point scale (a lower rating suggests improvement in back pain) 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4- 6 = moderate pain, 7-10 = worst/severe pain. CLBP-related impairment will be evaluated using the self-reported 24-item Roland-Morris impairment Questionnaire (RMDQ), which may be scored from 0 to 24. The bigger the score, the more severe the CLBP-related disability. Patient global impression of improvement is a global index used to rate the patients' impression of their condition's response to a specific treatment. The assessment is based on the following ratings: 1 = very much better, 2 = much better, 3 = a little better, 4 = no change, 5 = a little worse, 6 = much worse, 7 = very much worse. Assessments will be performed at week 8.
Data analysis Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows version 21. Descriptive analysis will be carried out and results will be presented in frequencies alongside means and standard deviation. The data will be tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic. Independent t-tests or their non-parametric analogues (Mann-Whitney U tests) will be used to compare group means. The change in values of the variables over time will be examined using ANOVA. The confounders will be accounted for using regression models. Quantitative information will be compared using the chi-squared test (or one tailed t-test). A significance level of ≤.05 will be used.
- Conditions
- Back Pain Lower Back Chronic
- Being tested
- etoricoxib 60mg
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
etoricoxib 60mgDrug
Also called pregabalin 75mg
investigator will compare effects of etoricoxib alone and in combination with pregabalin on pain relief in chronic low back pain participants
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| etoricoxib 60mg | Experimental | tablet etoricoxib 60mg once daily for four weeks Receives: Drug: etoricoxib 60mg |
| pregabalin 75mg | Experimental | tablet pregabalin 75mg once daily for 4 weeks tablet etoricoxib 60mg once daily for four weeks Receives: Drug: etoricoxib 60mg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluation of pregabalin's effectiveness in chronic lower back will be the primary outcomes of this study
The pain will be measured using numeric rating scale (NRS). It is an 11-point scale (a lower rating suggests improvement in back pain) 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4- 6 = moderate pain, 7-10 = worst/severe pain. CLBP-related impairment will be evaluated using the self-reported 24-item Roland-Morris impairment Questionnaire (RMDQ), which may be scored from 0 to 24
Measured: 8 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 May 2024
- Study start1 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Oct 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Back Pain Lower Back ChronicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Muhammad Ilyas
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Muhammad Ilyas, Watim Medical & Dental College
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06401499
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- WM&DCR/R&D(ERB)/2024/92
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 29 Apr 2024
- Last updated
- 13 May 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Allegri M, Montella S, Salici F, Valente A, Marchesini M, Compagnone C, Baciarello M, Manferdini ME, Fanelli G. Mechanisms of low back pain: a guide for diagnosis and therapy. F1000Res. 2016 Jun 28;5:F1000 Faculty Rev-1530. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8105.2. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27408698Fatoye F, Gebrye T, Odeyemi I. Real-world incidence and prevalence of low back pain using routinely collected data. Rheumatol Int. 2019 Apr;39(4):619-626. doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04273-0. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
PubMed 30848349Wu A, March L, Zheng X, Huang J, Wang X, Zhao J, Blyth FM, Smith E, Buchbinder R, Hoy D. Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(6):299. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.175.
PubMed 32355743Meucci RD, Fassa AG, Faria NM. Prevalence of chronic low back pain: systematic review. Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49:1. doi: 10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005874. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
PubMed 26487293Sakai Y, Ito K, Hida T, Ito S, Harada A. Neuropathic pain in elderly patients with chronic low back painand effects of pregabalin: a preliminary study. Asian Spine J. 2015 Apr;9(2):254-62. doi: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.2.254. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
PubMed 25901238Yeole AB, Sree Ranga Lakshmi G, Selvakumar CJ, Goni VG, Nawal CL, Valya BJ, Patel BJ, Patel RD, Pawar ED, Panigrahi R, Kumar AY, Shintre SS, Devkare PH, Dharmadhikari SK, Choudhari SY, Doshi MS, Mehta SC, Joglekar SJ. Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin Prolonged Release-Etoricoxib Combination Compared to Etoricoxib for Chronic Low Back Pain: Phase 3, Randomized Study. Pain Ther. 2022 Dec;11(4):1451-1469. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00437-2. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
PubMed 36224489Caglar Okur S, Vural M, Pekin Dogan Y, Mert M, Sayiner Caglar N. The effect of pregabalin treatment on balance and gait in patients with chronic low back pain: a retrospective observational study. J Drug Assess. 2019 Feb 4;8(1):32-35. doi: 10.1080/21556660.2019.1579098. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 30834164Otto JC, Forstenpointner J, Sachau J, Hullemann P, Hukauf M, Keller T, Gierthmuhlen J, Baron R. A Novel Algorithm to Identify Predictors of Treatment Response: Tapentadol Monotherapy or Tapentadol/Pregabalin Combination Therapy in Chronic Low Back Pain? Front Neurol. 2019 Sep 13;10:979. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00979. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31572292Igarashi A, Akazawa M, Murata T, Taguchi T, Sadosky A, Ebata N, Willke R, Fujii K, Doherty J, Kobayashi M. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pregabalin for treatment of chronic low back pain in patients with accompanying lower limb pain (neuropathic component) in Japan. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 Oct 7;7:505-20. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S89833. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 26504403Fornasari D. Pharmacotherapy for Neuropathic Pain: A Review. Pain Ther. 2017 Dec;6(Suppl 1):25-33. doi: 10.1007/s40122-017-0091-4. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
PubMed 29178034Mathieson S, Lin CC, Underwood M, Eldabe S. Pregabalin and gabapentin for pain. BMJ. 2020 Apr 28;369:m1315. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1315. No abstract available.
PubMed 32345589Taguchi T, Nakano S, Nozawa K. Effectiveness of Pregabalin Treatment for Neuropathic Pain in Patients with Spine Diseases: A Pooled Analysis of Two Multicenter Observational Studies in Japan. J Pain Res. 2021 Mar 16;14:757-771. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S293556. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 33758538Siddiqui AS, Javed S, Abbasi S, Baig T, Afshan G. Association Between Low Back Pain and Body Mass Index in Pakistani Population: Analysis of the Software Bank Data. Cureus. 2022 Mar 30;14(3):e23645. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23645. eCollection 2022 Mar.
PubMed 35510015
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Low Dose Pregabalin and Etoricoxib Combination on Pain in Comparison to Etoricoxib Alone in Patients Suffering From Chronic Low Back Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06401499
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- WM&DCR/R&D(ERB)/2024/92
- Conditions
- Back Pain Lower Back Chronic
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Muhammad IlyasUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Oct 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 May 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To determine the effects of pregabalin in reducing pain intensity and improving functional disability in patients with chronic low back pain of neuropathic origin when used in combination with Etoricoxib.
Hypothesis Pregabalin-etoricoxib combination is more effective than etoricoxib monotherapy in reducing pain and improving functional status in patients with chronic low back pain.
Null Hypothesis:
There is no significant difference between pregabalin-etoricoxib combination and etoricoxib monotherapy in reducing pain and improving functional status in patients with chronic low back pain.
Study Design: Comparative clinical study Setting: Watim General Hospital Duration of study: 18 months after ethical approval Sample Size: a previous study (8), was used to calculate the sample size, Using the WHO sample size calculator, a sample size of 140 patients (70 in each group) was determined with a 5% level of significance and 95% power of test.
Sampling Technique: non-probability convenience sampling. Sample selection
Inclusion criteria:
- Participants within age 20-65 years
- Both male and non-pregnant non-lactating female patients will be included in the study
- Patients experiencing CLBP symptoms from last 6 months
- No experience of previous low back surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with the history of antidepressant, opioid, and benzodiazepine medications
- Patients with the history of CYP1A2 inhibitors usage
- Patients already taking pregabalin
- Patients with the history of suicidal ideation, severe depression, anxiety disorder psychosis, and cognitive impairment Data collection Participants will be divided into two study groups. Group A (n=70) participant will receive 60mg Etoricoxib once daily along with a placebo and Group B (n=70) participants will also receive etoricoxib 60mg once daily(15) along with a placebo for 4 weeks. At the start of week 5 the group B will start taking Pregabalin 75mg along with Etoricoxib 60mg once daily for next 4 weeks, while, group A will continue same treatment as before. At Weeks 0 and 4 and 8 of the study, participants will be evaluated. Liver enzyme levels will be measured both at the beginning and end of the trial. The pain will be measured using numeric rating scale (NRS). CLBP-related impairment will be evaluated using the self-reported 24-item Roland-Morris impairment Questionnaire (RMDQ)
Detailed description
Introduction When back pain persists for more than three months due to a variety of non-mechanical and mechanical diseases, it is considered chronic low back pain (CLBP) Fifty percent to eighty percent of the population will have chronic low back pain (CLBP) at some time in their lives. According to a study conducted in China in 2017 "global burden of disease", CLBP affects around 4.2% of those aged 20-29, and 19.6% of people aged 30-59. The global years lived with disability for LBP were 42.5 million in 1990, and increased 52.7% to 64.9 million in 2017. In addition to being the leading cause of requesting health care services, it is also associated with substantial impairment, treatment expenditures, and sick leave. This makes it all the more important to find effective methods of treating CLBP. Treatment of CLBP remains a clinical challenge for clinicians despite the availability of several pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic techniques. The failure to address the underlying cause of the pain is a major barrier to effective treatment of CLBP. Both the nociceptive and neuropathic pain (NeP) processes may be at play in chronic low back pain, making it a disorder with a wide range of possible causes. Analysis of a US claims database found that 90% of patients with CLBP have a neuropathic component. Neuropathic pain is generally associated with more severe pain symptoms. It is the result of multiple pathways at the peripheral, spinal, and supraspinal levels that trigger pain conduction pathway changes. When compared to individuals with no neuropathic pain component, those with CLBP incur an annual treatment cost that is almost 160% greater. Therefore, it is therapeutically crucial to differentiate between the nociceptive and neuropathic processes of CLBP and to treat this illness based on its underlying mechanisms in order to improve patient outcomes and reduce disease burden.
The majority of recommendations for treating Chronic LBP are non-pharmaceutical, including multidisciplinary rehabilitation, physical therapy, acupuncture, motor control exercise, mindfulness-based stress reduction, operant therapy, low-level laser therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, or spinal surgery. However, in cases when the patient is unresponsive , treatment is started. Etoricoxib, is a highly selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor with anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic properties, recommended in the relief of acute and chronic pain , Indicated for pain and inflammation in osteoarthritis, in rheumatoid arthritis, in acute gouty arthritis, in chronic low back pain. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and simple analgesics, only work for nociceptive pain, have poor efficacy against NeP, and have the risk of side effects with long-term use , making the treatment of CLBP even more difficult when NeP is present.
Pregabalin and gabapentin are both derived from GABA, but they have no effect on the GABAergic system. Their mechanism of action includes binding to the alpha-2/delta-1 subunit of the voltage-gated calcium channels in several areas of the central nervous system (CNS) and spinal cord, and this is sufficient to explain their analgesic, anxiolytic, and anticonvulsant pharmacological properties. Voltage-gated calcium channels are localized on presynaptic terminals, where they control neurotransmitter release. Gabapentinoids, by binding to the alpha-2/ delta-1 subunit, destabilize the macromolecular complex that keeps the calcium channel on the surface of the presynaptic terminal, promoting its internalization.
46.5 percent of Pakistanis over the age of fifty have CLBP, according to recent estimates. There was a correlation between obesity, sedentary occupations, mental health issues, inactivity, ignorance about health risks, and heavy lifting in the Pakistani population, as shown by local statistics. The incidence of this condition is greater in cities than in rural regions. In Pakistan data shows that there are studies done on other uses of pregabalin, but its role in chronic low back pain is not known to be investigated.
Rationale:
The rationale of following study is to determine the role of pregabalin in chronic low back pain in order to address neuropathic component of pain.
Data collection Participants will be divided into two study groups. Group A (n=70) participant will receive 60mg Etoricoxib once daily along with a placebo and Group B (n=70) participants will also receive etoricoxib 60mg once daily(15) along with a placebo for 4 weeks. At the start of week 5 the group B will start taking Pregabalin 75mg along with Etoricoxib 60mg once daily for next 4 weeks, while, group A will continue same treatment as before. At Weeks 0 and 4 and 8 of the study, participants will be evaluated. Liver enzyme levels will be measured both at the beginning and end of the trial. The pain will be measured using numeric rating scale (NRS). It is an 11-point scale (a lower rating suggests improvement in back pain) 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4- 6 = moderate pain, 7-10 = worst/severe pain. CLBP-related impairment will be evaluated using the self-reported 24-item Roland-Morris impairment Questionnaire (RMDQ), which may be scored from 0 to 24. The bigger the score, the more severe the CLBP-related disability. Patient global impression of improvement is a global index used to rate the patients' impression of their condition's response to a specific treatment. The assessment is based on the following ratings: 1 = very much better, 2 = much better, 3 = a little better, 4 = no change, 5 = a little worse, 6 = much worse, 7 = very much worse. Assessments will be performed at week 8.
Data analysis Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows version 21. Descriptive analysis will be carried out and results will be presented in frequencies alongside means and standard deviation. The data will be tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic. Independent t-tests or their non-parametric analogues (Mann-Whitney U tests) will be used to compare group means. The change in values of the variables over time will be examined using ANOVA. The confounders will be accounted for using regression models. Quantitative information will be compared using the chi-squared test (or one tailed t-test). A significance level of ≤.05 will be used.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| etoricoxib 60mg | Experimental | Drug: etoricoxib 60mgtablet etoricoxib 60mg once daily for four weeks |
| pregabalin 75mg | Experimental | Drug: etoricoxib 60mgtablet pregabalin 75mg once daily for 4 weeks tablet etoricoxib 60mg once daily for four weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Participants within age 20-65 years
- Both male and non-pregnant non-lactating female patients will be included in the study
- Patients experiencing CLBP symptoms from last 6 months
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- • Patients with the history of antidepressant, opioid, and benzodiazepine medications
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| etoricoxib 60mgAlso: pregabalin 75mginvestigator will compare effects of etoricoxib alone and in combination with pregabalin on pain relief in chronic low back pain participants | Drug | etoricoxib 60mg, pregabalin 75mg |
Primary outcome
Evaluation of pregabalin's effectiveness in chronic lower back will be the primary outcomes of this study
Time frame: 8 weeks
The pain will be measured using numeric rating scale (NRS). It is an 11-point scale (a lower rating suggests improvement in back pain) 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4- 6 = moderate pain, 7-10 = worst/severe pain. CLBP-related impairment will be evaluated using the self-reported 24-item Roland-Morris impairment Questionnaire (RMDQ), which may be scored from 0 to 24
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 May 2024.
- Background: PubMed 27408698Allegri M, Montella S, Salici F, Valente A, Marchesini M, Compagnone C, Baciarello M, Manferdini ME, Fanelli G. Mechanisms of low back pain: a guide for diagnosis and therapy. F1000Res. 2016 Jun 28;5:F1000 Faculty Rev-1530. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8105.2. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 30848349Fatoye F, Gebrye T, Odeyemi I. Real-world incidence and prevalence of low back pain using routinely collected data. Rheumatol Int. 2019 Apr;39(4):619-626. doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04273-0. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
- Background: PubMed 32355743Wu A, March L, Zheng X, Huang J, Wang X, Zhao J, Blyth FM, Smith E, Buchbinder R, Hoy D. Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(6):299. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.175.
- Background: PubMed 26487293Meucci RD, Fassa AG, Faria NM. Prevalence of chronic low back pain: systematic review. Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49:1. doi: 10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005874. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
- Background: PubMed 25901238Sakai Y, Ito K, Hida T, Ito S, Harada A. Neuropathic pain in elderly patients with chronic low back painand effects of pregabalin: a preliminary study. Asian Spine J. 2015 Apr;9(2):254-62. doi: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.2.254. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
- Background: PubMed 36224489Yeole AB, Sree Ranga Lakshmi G, Selvakumar CJ, Goni VG, Nawal CL, Valya BJ, Patel BJ, Patel RD, Pawar ED, Panigrahi R, Kumar AY, Shintre SS, Devkare PH, Dharmadhikari SK, Choudhari SY, Doshi MS, Mehta SC, Joglekar SJ. Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin Prolonged Release-Etoricoxib Combination Compared to Etoricoxib for Chronic Low Back Pain: Phase 3, Randomized Study. Pain Ther. 2022 Dec;11(4):1451-1469. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00437-2. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
- Background: PubMed 30834164Caglar Okur S, Vural M, Pekin Dogan Y, Mert M, Sayiner Caglar N. The effect of pregabalin treatment on balance and gait in patients with chronic low back pain: a retrospective observational study. J Drug Assess. 2019 Feb 4;8(1):32-35. doi: 10.1080/21556660.2019.1579098. eCollection 2019.
- Background: PubMed 31572292Otto JC, Forstenpointner J, Sachau J, Hullemann P, Hukauf M, Keller T, Gierthmuhlen J, Baron R. A Novel Algorithm to Identify Predictors of Treatment Response: Tapentadol Monotherapy or Tapentadol/Pregabalin Combination Therapy in Chronic Low Back Pain? Front Neurol. 2019 Sep 13;10:979. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00979. eCollection 2019.
- Background: PubMed 26504403Igarashi A, Akazawa M, Murata T, Taguchi T, Sadosky A, Ebata N, Willke R, Fujii K, Doherty J, Kobayashi M. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pregabalin for treatment of chronic low back pain in patients with accompanying lower limb pain (neuropathic component) in Japan. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 Oct 7;7:505-20. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S89833. eCollection 2015.
- Background: PubMed 29178034Fornasari D. Pharmacotherapy for Neuropathic Pain: A Review. Pain Ther. 2017 Dec;6(Suppl 1):25-33. doi: 10.1007/s40122-017-0091-4. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
- Background: PubMed 32345589Mathieson S, Lin CC, Underwood M, Eldabe S. Pregabalin and gabapentin for pain. BMJ. 2020 Apr 28;369:m1315. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1315. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 33758538Taguchi T, Nakano S, Nozawa K. Effectiveness of Pregabalin Treatment for Neuropathic Pain in Patients with Spine Diseases: A Pooled Analysis of Two Multicenter Observational Studies in Japan. J Pain Res. 2021 Mar 16;14:757-771. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S293556. eCollection 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Back Pain Lower Back Chronic
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Enrolling by invitation
Effects of 3-dimensional Versus Dynamic Myofascial Release Techniques With Lumbar Mobilization and Exercise Therapy Program in Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain, Myofascial Release
RecruitingPhase 2
A Master Protocol Study (LY900028) of Multiple Intervention-Specific-Appendices (ISAs) in Participants With Chronic Pain
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Diabetic Neuropathic Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing etoricoxib 60mg in people with Back Pain Lower Back Chronic, run by Muhammad Ilyas.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Eisha Akram, MBBS,MPhil (00923353048668, eisha80akram@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluation of pregabalin's effectiveness in chronic lower back will be the primary outcomes of this study (time frame: 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06401499, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2024.