AzTrials
AzTrials

Work-Related ConditionNCT06406478

Work Time Schedule Changes for Nurse Managers

A study testing Schedule Change and No Schedule Change in people with Work-Related Condition, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 2 sites in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to explore how working a 4-day schedule impacts nurse manager wellbeing and job performance. The main questions it aims to answer are: Do those working 4-days have improved wellbeing with reduced levels of burnout and work/family conflict when compared to those in the control group?… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Work-Related Condition
What is being tested?
Schedule Change and No Schedule Change
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2025to Sep 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years old or older
  • Registered nurse
  • Currently employed as a full-time nurse manager
  • Having a span of control greater than 40 Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Direct Reports
  • Currently working at either Ronald Regan UCLA Medical Center or UCLA Medical Center Santa Monica
  • In the acute care setting

Who cannot join

  • Those working in ambulatory care settings
  • Nurse leaders with less than 30 FTE's
  • Working part time
  • Working a schedule less than 5 days a week

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Elizabeth G Keller, PhD contact

8593915038

kellere4@g.ucla.edu

Jian Li, MD, PhD contact

310-206-3788

JiaLi@mednet.ucla.edu

United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

    Ida Anderson, DNP, 678-794-7914, IAnderson@mednet.ucla.edu

    Ida Anderson

    Recruiting
  • UCLA Health, Santa Monica

    Santa Monica, California, 90404

    Ida Anderson, DNP, 6787947914, IAnderson@mednet.ucla.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Measuring the Effects of Potential Work Time Schedule Changes on Nurse Manager Health and Patient Outcomes

The goal of this clinical trial is to explore how working a 4-day schedule impacts nurse manager wellbeing and job performance. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Do those working 4-days have improved wellbeing with reduced levels of burnout and work/family conflict when compared to those in the control group?
  • Do levels of sleep, heart rate variability, and physical activity significantly differ between those working the 4-day schedule change and those in the control group?
  • Are nurse manager satisfaction, patient satisfaction, and patient quality outcomes different among those working the 4-day schedule change and those in the control group?
Read more

Researchers will compare those working the 4-day schedule change to those working the standard 5-day schedule to determine causality between the intervention and the outcomes.

Participants will:

  • Complete an initial visit to learn about the study.
  • Begin wearing an OURA ring, which will collect data on physical activity, sleep, and heart rate variability. They will need to download the Oura Ring app on their phone and log in weekly to sync data so that the researchers may access it.
  • Complete the first survey on the online REDCap platform (baseline).
  • Begin the work schedule that was assigned to them.
  • Clock in and out of work each shift.
  • Take the follow-up survey online (month 3).
  • Take the final survey online (month 6).
Read the detailed description

Researchers are looking to measure the effects of potential worktime schedule changes on a) nurse manager wellbeing (i.e., work/family conflict, burnout) and b) job performance (i.e., nurse manager satisfaction, patient satisfaction, and patient quality outcomes). Informed by the Conservation of Resources (COR) theory, it is hypothesized that working 4 days per week instead of 5 will improve nurse manager wellbeing with reduced burnout and work/family conflict.

Using a randomized control trial design, nurse managers working at UCLA Health will be purposively recruited for the study. All participants will begin by taking a baseline online survey at the initial visit. This survey will collect primary data on wellbeing by measuring work/family conflict and burnout using the scales: Work-Family and Family-Work Conflict Scale + Work-Life Balance scale and the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory. The survey will include demographic questions and qualitative questions to elicit responses from nurse managers on how they believe the schedule changes impacts their wellbeing and job performance, providing additional understanding of results from the quantitative part of the survey. All participants will wear a biotracker, called an Oura Ring, for the study duration, uploading their data weekly via an app. The Oura Ring will provide primary data on sleep, heart rate variability, physical activity of nurse managers, which is hypothesized to mediate the relationship between the schedule change and nurse manager wellbeing. Secondary data will be gathered from UCLA MedNet system, including nurse manager TimeClock information, and de-identified aggregate data on job performance (including nurse manager satisfaction, patient satisfaction, and patient quality outcomes) over the duration of the study.

Participants will be randomized either into the intervention group or the control group at the initial visit. Those in the intervention group will begin working only four days a week as a schedule change, and those in the control will continue working five days per week. All participants will be taught how to input their time clock information on the UCLA Health System for all working days. Follow-up surveys will be completed remotely, occurring at three months and six months. The participants will receive a reminder email to complete the survey. After six months when the final survey is completed, study participation will conclude. Fifty participants are anticipated.

Being tested
Schedule Change, No Schedule Change

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Schedule ChangeBehavioural

    This 4-day workweek is defined by any 4 ten hour shifts between Sunday and Saturday. It will be up to the discretion of participants in the intervention group to coordinate which 4 days they work. The 4 days will most likely be weekdays, but some participants may work weekends. If participants do any work from home, they will clock in remotely to account for the time.

  • No Schedule ChangeBehavioural

    The control group will continue to work five days per week, receiving standard practice for the schedule policies at the participating study sites.

Study groups in NCT06406478
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention GroupExperimentalThe intervention group will begin working only four days a week as a schedule change.
Receives: Behavioral: Schedule Change
Control GroupActive comparatorThe control group will continue to work five days per week, receiving standard practice for the schedule policies at the participating study sites.
Receives: Behavioral: No Schedule Change

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. work family conflict

    Work family conflict will be measured with the Work-Family and Family-Work Conflict Scale + Work-Life Balance scale with 11 items. Work-Family Conflict is determined with a mean of score of responses for items 1 through 5; higher scores reflect more work-family conflict. Family-Work Conflict is determined with the mean of score of responses for items 6 through 10; higher scores reflect more family-work conflict. Work-Life Balance: Item score.

    Measured: 0, 3, and 6 months

  2. Burnout

    Burnout will be measured with the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory with 16 items. Disengagement in burnout is the sum of items: 1, 3(Reverse), 6(Reverse), 7, 9(Reverse), 11(Reverse), 13, and 15. Exhaustion is the sum of items: 2(Reverse), 4(Reverse), 5, 8(Reverse), 10, 12(Reverse), 14, and 16. Full Burnout is the sum of the two scales: Disengagement and exhaustion.

    Measured: 0, 3, and 6 months

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Hospital rate of Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI)

    This variable is secondary, de-identified aggregate data from the UCLA Tableau server, narrowed down to location, date, and unit, and is a measure of Patient Quality Outcomes.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Hospital rate of center-association urinary tract infections (CAUTI)

    This variable is secondary, de-identified aggregate data from the UCLA Tableau server, narrowed down to location, date, and unit, and is a measure of Patient Quality Outcomes.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Hospital rate of falls

    This variable is secondary, de-identified aggregate data from the UCLA Tableau server, narrowed down to location, date, and unit, and is a measure of Patient Quality Outcomes.

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Hospital rate of hospital acquired pressure injuries

    This variable is secondary, de-identified aggregate data from the UCLA Tableau server, narrowed down to location, date, and unit, and is a measure of Patient Quality Outcomes.

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Nurse manager satisfaction as assessed by the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI)

    This variable is secondary, de-identified aggregate data from the Center for Nursing Excellence stored on UCLA Health Box. This is measured by the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI). NDNQI is the leading nursing-sensitive quality indicators database that contains unit-level information about 600+ measures relevant to nursing performance, patient and workforce experience, and health outcomes. The data is derived from a combination of administrative documentation and medical records. All information reported to NDNQI is available for NDNQI users to review and benchmark performance against other participating NDNQI facilities, to better understand how these findings stack up against competitors-providing valuable insights.

    Measured: 6 months

  6. Patient satisfaction as assessed by the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAPHS)

    This variable is secondary, de-identified aggregate data from the UCLA Tableau server. This is measured by the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAPHS). Individual patient responses are utilized for each of the ten HCAHPS measures for all valid and complete surveys within a discharge quarter. These measures include six composite items, two global items, and two individual items. The composite measures are each comprised of two to three questions from the HCAHPS survey.

    Composite Measures

    1. Communication with Nurses (Q1, Q2, Q3)
    2. Communication with Doctors (Q5, Q6, Q7)
    3. Responsiveness of Hospital Staff (Q4, Q11)
    4. Pain Management (Q13, Q14)
    5. Communication about Medicine (Q16, Q17)
    6. Discharge Information (Q19, Q20) Individual Items
    7. Cleanliness of Hospital Environment (Q8) 2. Quietness of Hospital Environment (Q9) Global Items
    8. Overall Hospital Rating (Q21)
    9. Recommend the Hospital (Q22)

    Measured: 6 months

  7. Average weekly working hours

    Time clock information will provide data for average weekly working hours

    Measured: 3 and 6 months

  8. Oura Ring sleep score

    Data will be collected from the Oura Ring. When participants open the Oura Ring app on their phones, their data will be shared with the researchers, providing a 30 day and 60 day summary score of sleep quality and duration. The Sleep Score ranges from 0-100.

    85 or higher: sleep is optimal. 70-84: sleep is good. Under 70: sleep is off and there may be lifestyle changes needed to improve it

    Measured: 3 and 6 months

  9. Oura Ring heart rate variability

    Data will be collected from the Oura Ring. When participants open the Oura Ring app on their phones, their data will be shared with the researchers, providing a 30 day and 60 day summary score of heart rate variability.

    Measured: 3 and 6 months

  10. Oura Ring physical activity score

    Data will be collected from the Oura Ring. When participants open the Oura Ring app on their phones, their data will be shared with the researchers, providing a 30 day and 60 day summary score of physical activity.

    The Activity Score ranges from 0-100 and tells participants at a glance, how to adjust their activity-rest balance:

    85 or higher: balance is optimal. 70-84: balance is good. Under 70: balance seems off and there may be lifestyle changes needed to improve it.

    Measured: 3 and 6 months

  11. Write in questions: nurse manager perceptions of their work schedules

    Nurse manager will have the opportunity to write in how they perceive their work schedules impact their own health and family life, and the outcomes of their patients. These questions are researcher-developed, allowing participants to share additional qualitative data.

    Measured: 3 and 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 May 2024
  2. Study startJan 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionMar 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants will be stratified by study site and race, and then randomized into either the control or intervention group. The allocation sequences will be generated by a research team member using a random number table assigning groups 1:1, with equal numbers of participants in each intervention and control group.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06406478
Sponsor's protocol ID
#23-001694
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
10 Apr 2024
Last updated
14 Nov 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Schedule Change and No Schedule Change in people with Work-Related Condition, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Elizabeth G Keller, PhD (8593915038, kellere4@g.ucla.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

work family conflict (time frame: 0, 3, and 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in