AzTrials
AzTrials

Parkinson DiseaseNCT06409338

Research on the Brain Mechanism of taVNS in Regulating PD Motor Symptoms

A study testing Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (active) in people with Parkinson Disease, run by The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a double blind comparative study exploring the neural underpinnings of taVNS modulating PD motor deficits. We hypothesize that taVNS might improve PD motor deficits by regulating the balance between excitation and inhibition in the primary motor cortex. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Parkinson Disease
What is being tested?
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (active)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
32 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
11 May 2024to Sep 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • (1) had a diagnosis of idiopathic PD according to the Movement Disorder Society Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for PD and ON-medication Hoehn and Yahr (H\&Y) stage ≤2,
  • (2) had stable pharmacotherapy for PD at least one month prior to the study,
  • (3) were aged between 40 and 80,
  • (4) signed written informed consent,
  • (5) can cooperate with the testing and taVNS treatment.

Who cannot join

  • (1) with cognitive impairment, according to Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) < 24;
  • (2) with severe tremor or levodopa-induced dyskinesia;
  • (3) with current intake of anticholinergics or any drugs that could induce cerebral functional change;
  • (4) with taVNS contraindications;
  • (5) received VNS treatment during the past six month;
  • (6) with concomitant severe neurologic, renal, cardiovascular, or hepatic disease.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

    Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029

    Kezhong Zhang, 13770840575, kezhong_zhang1969@126.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Research on the Brain Mechanism of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Regulating PD Motor Symptoms

This study is a double blind comparative study exploring the neural underpinnings of taVNS modulating PD motor deficits. We hypothesize that taVNS might improve PD motor deficits by regulating the balance between excitation and inhibition in the primary motor cortex.

Read the detailed description

Patients in the Experimental group underwent fourteen consecutive daily sessions of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS, twice daily, 30 minutes each time) , whereas patients in the sham stimulation group underwent fourteen consecutive daily sessions of sham taVNS with the electrodes were fixed at the left earlobe . Assessments of motor symptoms and cortical activity (using Functional near-infrared spectroscopy and Transcranial magnetic stimulation) were performed two times: at baseline, one day post intervention.

Being tested
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (active), Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (sham)
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, motor symptoms, taVNS, neural mechanism
Medical subject headings
Parkinson Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (active)Device

    Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation was conducted by transcutaneous electrical stimulation therapy instrument to the cymba conchae of left ear in the vicinity of the auricular branch vagus nerve. Stimulation parameters: frequency = 20 Hz; pulse width = 500 μs, twice a day, 30 minutes each time.

  • Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (sham)Device

    In the sham stimulation group, the electrodes were fixed at the left earlobe with the same stimulus parameters. Stimulation parameters: frequency = 20 Hz; pulse width = 500 μs, twice a day, 30 minutes each time.

Study groups in NCT06409338
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Active Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulationActive comparatorFor Experimental Arm, active transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation, Patients underwent 14 consecutive daily sessions of taVNS.
Receives: Device: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (active)
Sham Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulationSham comparatorFor sham transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation arm, Sham Comparator, patients underwent 14 consecutive daily sessions of sham-taVNS (the electrodes were fixed at the the left earlobe).
Receives: Device: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (sham)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. alterations in functional topological properties within the cortex of bilateral cerebral hemispheres-Sigma

    Resting state fNIRS data was preprocessed to obtain the cortical oxyhemoglobin values which indicate the cortical excitability. Based on the established cortical functional network, we calculate three typical global parameters named small-worldness (Sigma) which can valuatable cortical network small world attributes.

    Measured: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention

  2. alterations in functional topological properties within the cortex of bilateral cerebral hemispheres-global efficiency (Eg)

    Resting state fNIRS data was preprocessed to obtain the cortical oxyhemoglobin values which indicate the cortical excitability. Based on the established cortical functional network, we calculate three typical global parameters named global efficiency (Eg) which can To evaluate the global efficiency of parallel information transmission in cortical networks.

    Measured: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention

  3. alterations in functional topological properties within the cortex of bilateral cerebral hemispheres-local efficiency (Eloc)

    Resting state fNIRS data was preprocessed to obtain the cortical oxyhemoglobin values which indicate the cortical excitability. Based on the established cortical functional network, we calculate typical global parameter named local efficiency (Eloc) which can evaluate functional separation in cortical networks.

    Measured: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention

  4. alterations in functional topological properties within the cortex of bilateral cerebral hemispheres-nodal efficiency (Ne)

    Resting state fNIRS data was preprocessed to obtain the cortical oxyhemoglobin values which indicate the cortical excitability. Based on the established cortical functional network, we calculate one nodal parameter named nodal efficiency (Ne) which can evaluate the nodal efficiency of information transmission in cortical networks.

    Measured: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention

  5. changes in MEPs values

    Surface electromyography (sEMG) recordings from the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle were obtained to record motor evoked potentials (MEPs), which underwent amplification and filtering (bandwidth 20 Hz to 2000 Hz).

    Measured: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention

  6. changes in RMT values

    The individual resting motor threshold (RMT) was established as the minimum stimulus intensity required to evoke a MEP peak-to-peak amplitude of at least 0.05 mV in five of ten consecutive trials in a resting muscle.

    Measured: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention

  7. changes in CSP values

    The cortical silent period (CSP) was measured by sEMG of the APB following a single TMS pulse at 130% of the RMT to the opposite PMC-UL, while participants were requested to maintain active contraction of the APB at 20% of the maximum force.

    Measured: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention

  8. changes in SICI values

    Test stimulus intensity was set according to an unconditioned MEP with an amplitude of ~1 mV. For the conditioning stimulus of SICI and ICF, 80% of RMT was used. We tested interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 2 and 4 ms for SICI. Each ISI was repeated 10 times to calculate the average value.

    Measured: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention

  9. changes in ICF values

    Test stimulus intensity was set according to an unconditioned MEP with an amplitude of ~1 mV. For the conditioning stimulus of SICI and ICF, 80% of RMT was used. We tested interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 10 and 15 ms for ICF. Each ISI was repeated 10 times to calculate the average value.

    Measured: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change from Baseline Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-III at one day post intervention

    The measure mainly reflects the overall severity of Parkinson's disease motor symptoms. UPDRS III is a motor examination score that includes 14 items such as facial expression, tremor, rigidity, motor delay, posture disorders, and gait examination, with a total score of 0-56 points. The higher the score, the more severe the physical movement symptoms are.

    Measured: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 May 2024
  2. Study start11 May 2024
  3. Primary completionAug 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
32 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06409338
Sponsor's protocol ID
2024-SR-235
Status last verified
Jun 2024
First submitted
5 May 2024
Last updated
3 Jul 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (active) in people with Parkinson Disease, run by The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Zhang Kezhong (13770840575, kezhong_zhang1969@126.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

alterations in functional topological properties within the cortex of bilateral cerebral hemispheres-Sigma (time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jul 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in