StrokeNCT06409351
Multi-modal Training Program to Promote Physical Activity After Stroke
A study testing Intervention group in people with Stroke and Physical Inactivity, run by Singapore General Hospital at 1 site in Singapore.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to learn if a behavioral change intervention can improve physical activity in stroke survivors living in the community. The main question it aims to answer is, if a behaviour change intervention and personalised physical activity prescription, are effective in improving the time spent in… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke, Physical Inactivity
- What is being tested?
- Intervention group
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSingapore
- Study dates
- 11 Jun 2024to 31 Mar 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged 21 years and over
- Haemorrhagic or ischaemic stroke
- At least 6 months post-stroke
- Living at home
- Able to walk independently +/- gait aid short distances (self-reported)
- Have sufficient cognition and/or carer support to engage in the interventions (clinical judgement)
- Agreement to undertake a supported self-management physical activity intervention programme
Who cannot join
- Living in residential care
- Unstable cardiac conditions, severe arthritis, or other conditions limiting the ability to exercise
- Advised by GP/consultant not to undertake moderate-intensity exercise for health reason
- Currently already participating in physical activity that meets recommended levels (150mins of moderate-vigorous physical activity)
- Enrolled in another physical activity intervention trial
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Singapore1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore, Singapore, 169608
Juliana Wang, MSc, +6597124823, juliana.wang.y.y@sgh.com.sg
Shamala Thilarajah, PhD
About this study
Official title: Multi-mOdal Training Program to Promote Physical actIVity After sTrokE: MOTIVATE
The goal of this study is to learn if a behavioral change intervention can improve physical activity in stroke survivors living in the community.
The main question it aims to answer is, if a behaviour change intervention and personalised physical activity prescription, are effective in improving the time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity amongst chronic stroke survivors.
Read more
Researchers will compare the intervention group to a control group, to see if physical activity counselling and a personalized physical activity prescription is more effective in improving moderate to vigorous physical activity, than usual care alone. The study period for each participant is 6 months. Assessments are conducted at month 1 (baseline), 3 and 6.
The control group will receive only usual care, which consists of an information sheet on physical activity with the following content: (1) Why be active and (2) How to be active (with URL links to resources and videos). The usual care is delivered at 3-time points during month 1, 3 and 6.
The intervention group will receive usual care and a behavioral change intervention. The behavioral change intervention consists of up to 6 individual physical activity counselling sessions and a personalized physical activity prescription. The 6 sessions will take place only during months 1 to 3 and there will be no intervention during months 4 to 6. Of the 6 sessions, 3 are conducted face-to-face and another 3 sessions will take place using telehealth methods such as phone, text messaging and videoconference. Participants can meet the study physiotherapist at their preferred exercise space during the 3 face-to-face sessions. The physical activity counselling sessions consist of goal setting and action planning, and problem-solving barriers around participation in physical activity. The overall aim is to increase time spent in moderate-vigorous physical activity.
Read the detailed description
The MOTIVATE study will take place in Singapore with participants recruited through hospital-based stroke clinics, rehabilitation facilities, and stroke support organizations via posters, email, word of mouth, and social media. Potential participants can sign up by self-registering on the study URL link or through referrals from healthcare professionals and study members. Participants will be screened for eligibility via telephone using the inclusion and exclusion criteria and the Get Active Questionnaire. Participants. Those who have not engaged in regular exercise are required to obtain medical clearance. Informed consent will be taken by a study team member.
This trial will use a 1:1 concealed randomisation, to allocate participants with chronic stroke to an intervention group (n= 60) or control group (n = 60). Between-group comparisons will be made at 3 time points: months 1, 3 and 6.
The control group will receive usual care, which consists of 3 face-to-face sessions on general physical activity recommendations, lasting 30 to 60 minutes each during months 1, 3, and 6. Participants will be given an information sheet on the importance and benefits of physical activity after a stroke and general guidelines on how to start to be active. The general guidelines on how to be active include engaging in 150 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity per week. The information sheet will also include links to publicly accessible online resources.
The intervention group will receive a behavioural change intervention, in addition to usual care. Information sheet about general guidelines on physical activity will be handed to the intervention group, as per control group. Each participant will receive up to 6 sessions of tailored behavioural change intervention during months 1 to 3 and there will be no intervention during months 4 to 6. Of the 6 sessions, 3 are face-to-face and another 3 will take place using telehealth methods such as phone, text messaging and videoconference. The tailoring of the intervention allows participants to decide the location during face-to-face sessions, how many sessions and how the sessions are spaced out during the 3-month intervention period and which sessions are face-to-face or telehealth. The preferred meeting location may include exercise spaces within home, common spaces just outside their homes and under their housing blocks, outdoor fitness zones or parks near home and residential or inclusive public gyms. The behavioural change intervention consists of physical activity counselling and prescription of a personalized physical activity plan. The first session will be conducted in-person, to allow the study physiotherapist to identify the participant's physical function, safety concerns and the impact of medical, social, environmental and resources on mobility. During the initial visit, the venue, frequency and mode of support (face-to-face or virtual) for subsequent sessions will be established. The study physiotherapist will provide physical activity counselling, set goals and discuss action plans to enhance moderate intensity physical activity, problem solve barriers on physical activity and prescribe a personalized physical activity plan. Subsequent sessions can include (1) training on physical activity modification to accommodate the weak arm and / leg at the participant's preferred exercise location, (2) taking videos of the personalized adapted exercises using the participant's phone when meeting face-to-face and (3) in-person or virtual support sessions to review physical activity progress and action plans.
A process and cost-utility evaluation will be embedded into the study design and conducted concurrently.
- Conditions
- Stroke, Physical Inactivity
- Being tested
- Intervention group
- Keywords
- Physical activity, Behavioural change, Implementation Science, Stroke
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Sedentary Behavior, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intervention groupBehavioural
Also called MOTIVATE
Please refer to arm descriptions
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Study period: 6 months (1st 3 months intervention, last 3 months no intervention) No. of sessions: up to 6 per participant Mode: 3 sessions are conducted face-to-face and 3 sessions via telehealth methods e.g. phone, text message or video conferencing using virtual platforms like zoom.
Where: Face-to-face at the participant's preferred exercise space like home, outdoor fitness zone, parks, gyms etc.
Duration of sessions: each face-to-face session will take 60-90 mins Details of intervention: Physical activity counselling on adaptation of exercises, goal setting, action planning, problem solving around barriers to physical activity and provision of study resources Receives: Behavioral: Intervention group |
| Control group | Active comparator | Study period: 6 months No. of sessions: 2 sessions (at month 1 and 3) Mode: Face-to-face Where: At the participant's home Duration of session: 20- 30 minutes Details of control: physical activity information without any other support. Receives: Behavioral: Intervention group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Duration of moderate to vigorous physical activity
Average minutes/day, measured by Fitbit Inspire 3 tracker
Measured: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Secondary outcomes (16)
Number of steps per day
Number of steps per day, measured by Fitbit Inspire 3 tracker
Measured: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF)
Duration (in minutes) and frequency (days) of walking, moderate-intensity, and vigorous-intensity activity, which are used to compute the total score.
Measured: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Modified Rankin Scale
- No symptoms
- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities
- Slight disability: unable to carry out all previous activities but able to look after own affairs without assistance
- Moderate disability: requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance
- Moderately severe disability: unable to walk without assistance, and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance
- Severe disability: bedridden, incontinent, and requiring constant nursing care and attention
Outcome data: One score from a 6-point scale of 0-5.
Measured: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Functional Ambulation Category
- Patient cannot walk, or needs help from 2 or more persons
- Patients needs firm continuous support from 1 person who helps carrying weight and with balance
- Patient needs continuous or intermittent support of one person to help with balance and coordination
- Patient requires verbal supervision or stand-by help from one person without physical contact
- Patient can walk independently on level ground, but requires help on stairs, slopes or uneven surfaces
- Patient can walk independently anywhere
Outcome data: One score from a 6-point scale of 0-5
Measured: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Comfortable gait speed
Comfortable walking speed equals to predetermined distance divided by the average time taken from 2 trials to walk that distance comfortably or naturally (e.g., 5m/__sec).
Measured: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Fast gait speed
Fast walking speed equals to predetermined distance divided by the average time taken from 2 trials to walk that distance as fast as possibly safe (e.g., 5m/__sec).
Measured: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Life-space Assessment Measure
For the five "Life-Space Levels," each "Yes" is given a point value, starting with 1 (life-space level 1) and increasing by 1 point for each life-space level (2 for "Yes" in life-space level 2, 3 for "Yes" in life-space level 3, etc.).
For frequency of each life-space level [less than 1 time per week (score = 1), 1-3 times per week (score = 2), 4-6 times per week (score = 3), or daily (score = 4)].
For independence level, requiring assistance or use of any equipment [personal assistance (score = 1), equipment only (score = 1.5), or neither equipment nor personal assistance (score = 2)].
Outcome data: The total score ranges from 0 ("totally bed-bound") to 120 ("traveling out of town every day without assistance").
Measured: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Fall Efficacy Scale International (FES-I)
The Short FES-I consists of seven items
Each item is scored on a 4-point scale:
- Not concerned at all
- Somewhat concerned
- Fairly concerned
- Very concerned
Outcome data: Total score ranging from 7 (no concern about falling) to 28 (severe concern about falling).
Measured: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale (SEES)
Consists of 9 questions on the individual's confidence in their ability to engage in exercise. Each item is rated on a 11-point scale. Score of 0 indicates "not confident", and score of 10 indicates "very confident".
Outcome data: Total score ranges from 0 ("not confident" in own ability to engage in exercise) to 90 ("very confident" in own ability to engage in exercise)
Measured: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Fatigue Severity Scale - 7 item (FSS-7)
The FSS-7 consists of seven items, and the responses are scored on a seven-point scale, where 1 indicates "strongly disagree" and 7 indicates "strongly agree."
Outcome data: Total score ranges from 7 to 49, with higher scores indicating more severe fatigue and greater impact on activities.
Measured: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Fatigue screening tool (SF-CAT)
Yes/no screening questions to 16 questions that cover fatigue, mood, sleep quality, new / uncontrolled conditions, physical / nutrition status, role of medication consumption of alcohol, new / undiagnosed cognitive impairment, speech and language disorder.
Measured: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Depression and Anxiety (PHQ-4)
The responses are scored on a four-point scale, where 0 indicates "not at all" and 3 indicates "nearly every day."
Outcome data: Total score ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression and anxiety symptoms.
Measured: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Global Sleep Assessment Questionnaire (GSAQ)
Consists of 11 questions, rated on a 4-point scale ("never", "sometimes", "usually", "always").
Outcome data: More "always" responses indicate better sleep quality.
Measured: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
EQ-5D
Outcome data: index values are used in the estimation of quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gains in economic analysis.
Measured: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Global Rating of Change on Physical Activity and Fatigue
Score rated on a 15-point scale, ranging from -7 (a very great deal worse) to +7 (a very great deal better). A score of 0 indicates unchanged.
Outcome data: One score from the 15-point scale.
Measured: Month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Adapted Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI)
Cost estimate of resource utilization to generate an average cost per participant
Measured: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 May 2024
- Study start11 Jun 2024
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants are assigned to either treatment or control group only during the duration of the study
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Singapore General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Singapore Institute of Technology, National Neuroscience Institute
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Shamala Thilarajah, PhD, Principal investigator, Singapore General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06409351
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024/2015
- Other IDs
- 06/FY2023/P1/21-A36
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 7 May 2024
- Last updated
- 27 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The study protocol with the statistical analysis plan will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Publications
Hardie K, Hankey GJ, Jamrozik K, Broadhurst RJ, Anderson C. Ten-year risk of first recurrent stroke and disability after first-ever stroke in the Perth Community Stroke Study. Stroke. 2004 Mar;35(3):731-5. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000116183.50167.D9. Epub 2004 Feb 5.
PubMed 14764929Turan TN, Nizam A, Lynn MJ, Egan BM, Le NA, Lopes-Virella MF, Hermayer KL, Harrell J, Derdeyn CP, Fiorella D, Janis LS, Lane B, Montgomery J, Chimowitz MI. Relationship between risk factor control and vascular events in the SAMMPRIS trial. Neurology. 2017 Jan 24;88(4):379-385. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003534. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
PubMed 28003500Fini NA, Bernhardt J, Said CM, Billinger SA. How to Address Physical Activity Participation After Stroke in Research and Clinical Practice. Stroke. 2021 Jun;52(6):e274-e277. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034557. Epub 2021 May 6. No abstract available.
PubMed 33951930WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK566045/
PubMed 33369898Billinger SA, Arena R, Bernhardt J, Eng JJ, Franklin BA, Johnson CM, MacKay-Lyons M, Macko RF, Mead GE, Roth EJ, Shaughnessy M, Tang A; American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Clinical Cardiology. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014 Aug;45(8):2532-53. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000022. Epub 2014 May 20.
PubMed 24846875Thilarajah S, Bower KJ, Pua YH, Tan D, Williams G, Larik A, Bok CW, Koh G, Clark RA. Modifiable Factors Associated With Poststroke Physical Activity at Discharge From Rehabilitation: Prospective Cohort Study. Phys Ther. 2020 May 18;100(5):818-828. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa022.
PubMed 31995190Fini NA, Holland AE, Keating J, Simek J, Bernhardt J. How Physically Active Are People Following Stroke? Systematic Review and Quantitative Synthesis. Phys Ther. 2017 Jul 1;97(7):707-717. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx038.
PubMed 28444348Thilarajah S, Mentiplay BF, Bower KJ, Tan D, Pua YH, Williams G, Koh G, Clark RA. Factors Associated With Post-Stroke Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Sep;99(9):1876-1889. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.09.117. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
PubMed 29056502Moncion K, Biasin L, Jagroop D, Bayley M, Danells C, Mansfield A, Salbach NM, Inness E, Tang A. Barriers and Facilitators to Aerobic Exercise Implementation in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020 Jul;44(3):179-187. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000318.
PubMed 32516297Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products. Points to consider on switching between superiority and non-inferiority. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Sep;52(3):223-8. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01397-3.x. No abstract available.
PubMed 11560553Yarnell CJ, Abrams D, Baldwin MR, Brodie D, Fan E, Ferguson ND, Hua M, Madahar P, McAuley DF, Munshi L, Perkins GD, Rubenfeld G, Slutsky AS, Wunsch H, Fowler RA, Tomlinson G, Beitler JR, Goligher EC. Clinical trials in critical care: can a Bayesian approach enhance clinical and scientific decision making? Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Feb;9(2):207-216. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30471-9. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
PubMed 33227237Chang BH, Pocock S. Analyzing data with clumping at zero. An example demonstration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Oct;53(10):1036-43. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00223-7.
PubMed 11027937Thorn JC, Coast J, Cohen D, Hollingworth W, Knapp M, Noble SM, Ridyard C, Wordsworth S, Hughes D. Resource-use measurement based on patient recall: issues and challenges for economic evaluation. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Jun;11(3):155-61. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0022-4.
PubMed 23529715Hodgson TA. Costs of illness in cost-effectiveness analysis. A review of the methodology. Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Dec;6(6):536-52. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199406060-00007.
PubMed 10155283Stinnett AA, Mullahy J. Net health benefits: a new framework for the analysis of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Med Decis Making. 1998 Apr-Jun;18(2 Suppl):S68-80. doi: 10.1177/0272989X98018002S09.
PubMed 9566468
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multi-mOdal Training Program to Promote Physical actIVity After sTrokE: MOTIVATE
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06409351
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2024/2015
- Conditions
- Stroke, Physical Inactivity
- Keywords
- Physical activity, Behavioural change, Implementation Science, Stroke
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Singapore General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Singapore Institute of Technology, National Neuroscience Institute
- Study start
- 11 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 May 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to learn if a behavioral change intervention can improve physical activity in stroke survivors living in the community.
The main question it aims to answer is, if a behaviour change intervention and personalised physical activity prescription, are effective in improving the time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity amongst chronic stroke survivors.
Researchers will compare the intervention group to a control group, to see if physical activity counselling and a personalized physical activity prescription is more effective in improving moderate to vigorous physical activity, than usual care alone. The study period for each participant is 6 months. Assessments are conducted at month 1 (baseline), 3 and 6.
The control group will receive only usual care, which consists of an information sheet on physical activity with the following content: (1) Why be active and (2) How to be active (with URL links to resources and videos). The usual care is delivered at 3-time points during month 1, 3 and 6.
The intervention group will receive usual care and a behavioral change intervention. The behavioral change intervention consists of up to 6 individual physical activity counselling sessions and a personalized physical activity prescription. The 6 sessions will take place only during months 1 to 3 and there will be no intervention during months 4 to 6. Of the 6 sessions, 3 are conducted face-to-face and another 3 sessions will take place using telehealth methods such as phone, text messaging and videoconference. Participants can meet the study physiotherapist at their preferred exercise space during the 3 face-to-face sessions. The physical activity counselling sessions consist of goal setting and action planning, and problem-solving barriers around participation in physical activity. The overall aim is to increase time spent in moderate-vigorous physical activity.
Detailed description
The MOTIVATE study will take place in Singapore with participants recruited through hospital-based stroke clinics, rehabilitation facilities, and stroke support organizations via posters, email, word of mouth, and social media. Potential participants can sign up by self-registering on the study URL link or through referrals from healthcare professionals and study members. Participants will be screened for eligibility via telephone using the inclusion and exclusion criteria and the Get Active Questionnaire. Participants. Those who have not engaged in regular exercise are required to obtain medical clearance. Informed consent will be taken by a study team member.
This trial will use a 1:1 concealed randomisation, to allocate participants with chronic stroke to an intervention group (n= 60) or control group (n = 60). Between-group comparisons will be made at 3 time points: months 1, 3 and 6.
The control group will receive usual care, which consists of 3 face-to-face sessions on general physical activity recommendations, lasting 30 to 60 minutes each during months 1, 3, and 6. Participants will be given an information sheet on the importance and benefits of physical activity after a stroke and general guidelines on how to start to be active. The general guidelines on how to be active include engaging in 150 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity per week. The information sheet will also include links to publicly accessible online resources.
The intervention group will receive a behavioural change intervention, in addition to usual care. Information sheet about general guidelines on physical activity will be handed to the intervention group, as per control group. Each participant will receive up to 6 sessions of tailored behavioural change intervention during months 1 to 3 and there will be no intervention during months 4 to 6. Of the 6 sessions, 3 are face-to-face and another 3 will take place using telehealth methods such as phone, text messaging and videoconference. The tailoring of the intervention allows participants to decide the location during face-to-face sessions, how many sessions and how the sessions are spaced out during the 3-month intervention period and which sessions are face-to-face or telehealth. The preferred meeting location may include exercise spaces within home, common spaces just outside their homes and under their housing blocks, outdoor fitness zones or parks near home and residential or inclusive public gyms. The behavioural change intervention consists of physical activity counselling and prescription of a personalized physical activity plan. The first session will be conducted in-person, to allow the study physiotherapist to identify the participant's physical function, safety concerns and the impact of medical, social, environmental and resources on mobility. During the initial visit, the venue, frequency and mode of support (face-to-face or virtual) for subsequent sessions will be established. The study physiotherapist will provide physical activity counselling, set goals and discuss action plans to enhance moderate intensity physical activity, problem solve barriers on physical activity and prescribe a personalized physical activity plan. Subsequent sessions can include (1) training on physical activity modification to accommodate the weak arm and / leg at the participant's preferred exercise location, (2) taking videos of the personalized adapted exercises using the participant's phone when meeting face-to-face and (3) in-person or virtual support sessions to review physical activity progress and action plans.
A process and cost-utility evaluation will be embedded into the study design and conducted concurrently.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants are assigned to either treatment or control group only during the duration of the study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Behavioral: Intervention groupStudy period: 6 months (1st 3 months intervention, last 3 months no intervention) No. of sessions: up to 6 per participant Mode: 3 sessions are conducted face-to-face and 3 sessions via telehealth methods e.g. phone, text message or video conferencing using virtual platforms like zoom. Where: Face-to-face at the participant's preferred exercise space like home, outdoor fitness zone, parks, gyms etc. Duration of sessions: each face-to-face session will take 60-90 mins Details of intervention: Physical activity counselling on adaptation of exercises, goal setting, action planning, problem solving around barriers to physical activity and provision of study resources |
| Control group | Active comparator | Behavioral: Intervention groupStudy period: 6 months No. of sessions: 2 sessions (at month 1 and 3) Mode: Face-to-face Where: At the participant's home Duration of session: 20- 30 minutes Details of control: physical activity information without any other support. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Aged 21 years and over
- Haemorrhagic or ischaemic stroke
- At least 6 months post-stroke
- Living at home
- Able to walk independently +/- gait aid short distances (self-reported)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Living in residential care
- Unstable cardiac conditions, severe arthritis, or other conditions limiting the ability to exercise
- Advised by GP/consultant not to undertake moderate-intensity exercise for health reason
- Currently already participating in physical activity that meets recommended levels (150mins of moderate-vigorous physical activity)
- Enrolled in another physical activity intervention trial
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention groupAlso: MOTIVATEPlease refer to arm descriptions | Behavioural | Control group, Intervention group |
Primary outcome
Duration of moderate to vigorous physical activity
Time frame: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Average minutes/day, measured by Fitbit Inspire 3 tracker
16 secondary outcomes
Number of steps per day
Time frame: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF)
Time frame: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Modified Rankin Scale
Time frame: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Functional Ambulation Category
Time frame: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Comfortable gait speed
Time frame: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Fast gait speed
Time frame: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Life-space Assessment Measure
Time frame: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Fall Efficacy Scale International (FES-I)
Time frame: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale (SEES)
Time frame: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Fatigue Severity Scale - 7 item (FSS-7)
Time frame: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Fatigue screening tool (SF-CAT)
Time frame: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Depression and Anxiety (PHQ-4)
Time frame: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Global Sleep Assessment Questionnaire (GSAQ)
Time frame: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
EQ-5D
Time frame: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Global Rating of Change on Physical Activity and Fatigue
Time frame: Month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Adapted Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI)
Time frame: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Apr 2026.
- Background: PubMed 14764929Hardie K, Hankey GJ, Jamrozik K, Broadhurst RJ, Anderson C. Ten-year risk of first recurrent stroke and disability after first-ever stroke in the Perth Community Stroke Study. Stroke. 2004 Mar;35(3):731-5. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000116183.50167.D9. Epub 2004 Feb 5.
- Background: PubMed 28003500Turan TN, Nizam A, Lynn MJ, Egan BM, Le NA, Lopes-Virella MF, Hermayer KL, Harrell J, Derdeyn CP, Fiorella D, Janis LS, Lane B, Montgomery J, Chimowitz MI. Relationship between risk factor control and vascular events in the SAMMPRIS trial. Neurology. 2017 Jan 24;88(4):379-385. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003534. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
- Background: PubMed 33951930Fini NA, Bernhardt J, Said CM, Billinger SA. How to Address Physical Activity Participation After Stroke in Research and Clinical Practice. Stroke. 2021 Jun;52(6):e274-e277. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034557. Epub 2021 May 6. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 33369898WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK566045/
- Background: PubMed 24846875Billinger SA, Arena R, Bernhardt J, Eng JJ, Franklin BA, Johnson CM, MacKay-Lyons M, Macko RF, Mead GE, Roth EJ, Shaughnessy M, Tang A; American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Clinical Cardiology. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014 Aug;45(8):2532-53. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000022. Epub 2014 May 20.
- Background: PubMed 31995190Thilarajah S, Bower KJ, Pua YH, Tan D, Williams G, Larik A, Bok CW, Koh G, Clark RA. Modifiable Factors Associated With Poststroke Physical Activity at Discharge From Rehabilitation: Prospective Cohort Study. Phys Ther. 2020 May 18;100(5):818-828. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa022.
- Background: PubMed 28444348Fini NA, Holland AE, Keating J, Simek J, Bernhardt J. How Physically Active Are People Following Stroke? Systematic Review and Quantitative Synthesis. Phys Ther. 2017 Jul 1;97(7):707-717. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx038.
- Background: PubMed 29056502Thilarajah S, Mentiplay BF, Bower KJ, Tan D, Pua YH, Williams G, Koh G, Clark RA. Factors Associated With Post-Stroke Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Sep;99(9):1876-1889. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.09.117. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
- Background: PubMed 32516297Moncion K, Biasin L, Jagroop D, Bayley M, Danells C, Mansfield A, Salbach NM, Inness E, Tang A. Barriers and Facilitators to Aerobic Exercise Implementation in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020 Jul;44(3):179-187. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000318.
- Background: PubMed 11560553Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products. Points to consider on switching between superiority and non-inferiority. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Sep;52(3):223-8. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01397-3.x. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 33227237Yarnell CJ, Abrams D, Baldwin MR, Brodie D, Fan E, Ferguson ND, Hua M, Madahar P, McAuley DF, Munshi L, Perkins GD, Rubenfeld G, Slutsky AS, Wunsch H, Fowler RA, Tomlinson G, Beitler JR, Goligher EC. Clinical trials in critical care: can a Bayesian approach enhance clinical and scientific decision making? Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Feb;9(2):207-216. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30471-9. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
- Background: PubMed 11027937Chang BH, Pocock S. Analyzing data with clumping at zero. An example demonstration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Oct;53(10):1036-43. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00223-7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The study protocol with the statistical analysis plan will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Related trials for Stroke
Recruiting
Connectomic Alterations Following Acute Ischemic Stroke in the MCA Territory
Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Clevidipine for the Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Stroke
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
A Study Testing How Well the Drug Extract of Ginkgo Biloba Leaves Tablets Works for People With Memory or Thinking Problems After a Stroke When Added to Standard Treatment
Ischemic Stroke Hospitalized, Impairment, Cognitive
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Anti-inflammatory and Anti-thrombotic Therapy With colcHicine and Low Dose Rivaroxaban for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Reduction in Ischemic Stroke
Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
CoMind Early Feasibility Study
Intracranial Pressure, Intracranial Pressure Changes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Shamala Thilarajah, PhD principal investigator
Singapore General Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intervention group in people with Stroke and Physical Inactivity, run by Singapore General Hospital at 1 site in Singapore.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Juliana Wang, MSc (+6597124823, juliana.wang.y.y@sgh.com.sg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Duration of moderate to vigorous physical activity (time frame: Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06409351, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2026.