AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal CancerNCT06409403

Study on Effect of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgical Technology on Genitourinary Function After Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer

A study testing clinical application of robotic technique in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by general surgery 3 at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Intraoperative pelvic autonomic nerve (PAN) injury is the dominant reason for genitourinary malfunction after total mesorectal excision (TME), particularly in low rectal tumours. TME necessitates meticulous, sharp dissection with an awareness of the PAN pathway. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Colorectal Cancer
What is being tested?
clinical application of robotic technique
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
164 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jan 2017to 31 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Inclusion Criteria: (i) lesions that were determined by histopathological examination and were staged preoperatively using pelvic MRI and CT scans; (ii) patients aged ≥18 and ≤ 75 years; and (iii) American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class ≤3

Exclusion Criteria: Benign prostate hyperplasia, previous bladder or prostate surgery, severe sexual dysfunction (International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score <10 or Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) score ≤26.55), urgent operation, simultaneous or heterochronous multiple primary rectal tumours, distant metastasis, or other severe cardiopulmonary complications.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

    Changsha, Hunan, 410013

    Bo Yi, MD, 13786179533, 1459082987@qq.com

    Bo Yi, MD, 13786179533, yibo2018pro@126.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Study on Clinical Application of Robotic Technique

Intraoperative pelvic autonomic nerve (PAN) injury is the dominant reason for genitourinary malfunction after total mesorectal excision (TME), particularly in low rectal tumours. TME necessitates meticulous, sharp dissection with an awareness of the PAN pathway. In particular, laparoscopic TME (L-TME) is technically difficult and requires advanced laparoscopic surgical skills. Comparing with the conventional laparoscopic approach, 3D vision, surgeon-manipulated camera systems, and multi-degree-of-freedom robotic instruments facilitate identification and preservation of the PAN during robotic-assisted TME (R-TME), theoretically facilitating favourable recovery of postoperative genitourinary function. Previous studies have mostly focused on the impact of advanced robotic technologies on postoperative functions. However, in addition to robotic surgical technology, postoperative function is impacted by multiple other intricate factors, such as oncology, comorbidities, postoperative complications, and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Consequently, the superiority of robotic surgery in terms of recovery of postoperative genitourinary function has been controversial in previous studies. Hence, to comprehensively evaluate the effect of robotic technology on postoperative genitourinary function, we conducted a prospective controlled study comparing the conventional approach and robotic surgery.

Being tested
clinical application of robotic technique
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • clinical application of robotic techniqueDevice

    effect of various surgical technique on clinical efficacy of TME

Study groups in NCT06409403
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
da Vinci robotic TMEExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: clinical application of robotic technique
Microhands robotic TMEExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: clinical application of robotic technique
laparoscopic surgery TMEActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Device: clinical application of robotic technique

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

    evaluation of genitourinary function

    Measured: preoperation,1、3、6、12 months after operation

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)

    evaluation of genitourinary function

    Measured: preoperation,1、3、6、12 months after operation

  2. Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)

    evaluation of genitourinary function

    Measured: preoperation,1、3、6、12 months after operation

  3. operative time

    operative outcomes

    Measured: perioperative

  4. blood loose

    operative outcomes

    Measured: perioperative

  5. conversion

    operative outcomes

    Measured: perioperative

  6. retrieved lymph nodes

    operative outcomes

    Measured: perioperative

  7. complete TME specimens

    operative outcomes

    Measured: perioperative

  8. circumferential resection margins (CRMs)

    operative outcomes

    Measured: perioperative

  9. complication

    operative outcomes

    Measured: perioperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 May 2024
  2. Study start1 Jan 2017
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
164 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06409403
Sponsor's protocol ID
YB2017
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
7 May 2024
Last updated
10 May 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing clinical application of robotic technique in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by general surgery 3 at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Bo Yi, MD (13786179533, yibo2018pro@126.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (time frame: preoperation,1、3、6、12 months after operation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 May 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in