Colorectal NeoplasmsPACENCT06411756
Physical Activity Centers Empowerment
A study testing Narrative videos, A Fitbit activity tracker and Daily text message in people with Colorectal Neoplasms, run by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This research study tests the feasibility of the Physical Activity Centers Empowerment (PACE) physical activity intervention for African American individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Feasibility will be measured as intervention reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Narrative videos, A Fitbit activity tracker and Daily text message
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 21 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 14 Aug 2024to 18 May 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- self-identifying as AA of Black,
- diagnosis of CRC,
- scheduled to receive chemotherapy,
- age 18 years or older,
- no contraindications to unsupervised PA as determined by the PA readiness questionnaire,
- oncologist approval to participate, and
- a smartphone for Fitbit syncing.
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514
About this study
Official title: Physical Activity Intervention Co-created and Tested With African American Colorectal Cancer Survivors
This research study tests the feasibility of the Physical Activity Centers Empowerment (PACE) physical activity intervention for African American individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer.
Feasibility will be measured as intervention reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. Seventy-two subjects will be recruited to conduct a pilot two-group, randomized repeated measures study.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this research is to improve the quality of life for underserved cancer survivors by increasing physical activity. A physical activity intervention will be tested for feasibility with African American cancer survivors. The project will serve as a foundation for intervening with other underserved cancer survivors.
Feasibility will be measured as intervention Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance, following the RE-AIM framework. Survey and biomarker data will be collected at baseline, 3 and 9 months later. These time points will facilitate exploration of changes pre- and post-intervention, and to determine if effects are maintained 6 months after completing the intervention. Our primary hypothesis is that the intervention will be feasible to deliver.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- Being tested
- Narrative videos, A Fitbit activity tracker, Daily text message, Monthly Zoom meeting, Website access
- Keywords
- Physical activity, Colorectal Neoplasms, Health Equity, Black or African American
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Narrative videosBehavioural
Culturally targeted narrative videos will be sent via email.
A Fitbit activity trackerBehavioural
A Fitbit activity tracker is a wireless wearable device that monitors physical fitness activity.
Daily text messageOther
A daily adaptive step goal that will be sent via text message with a short positive message.
Monthly Zoom meetingOther
Monthly Zoom meetings, led by the research team, to discuss physical activity with other study subjects.
Website accessOther
Access to Physical Activity Centers Empowerment (PACE) website.
Printed materialsOther
Printed materials from the American College of Sport's Medicine's "Moving through Cancer" campaign.
Printed materialsBehavioural
Printed materials from the American College of Sports Medicine's "Moving through Cancer" campaign.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Other | Subjects will receive access to the video library, a Fitbit, a daily adaptive step goal that will be sent via text message with a short positive message; and monthly Zoom meetings, led by the research team, to discuss physical activity with other study subjects. Receives: Behavioral: Narrative videos; Behavioral: A Fitbit activity tracker; Other: Daily text message; Other: Monthly Zoom meeting; Other: Website access |
| Control Arm | Other | Subjects will receive access to the video library after the study period (after the 9-month assessment). Receives: Behavioral: A Fitbit activity tracker; Other: Printed materials; Behavioral: Printed materials |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility Reach- Recruitment
Feasibility Reach- Recruitment is measured by the number of participants screened, ineligible, eligible, enrolled and declined participation.
Measured: 18 months
Feasibility Retention
Retention is measured by the frequency of enrolled participants continued study interventions
Measured: 18 months
Average weekly steps
Average weekly steps and the frequency of participants achieving daily step goals. Daily steps are collected via Fitbit Inspire activity tracker. Differences in daily steps and the frequency of meeting daily step goals between the intervention and control arms.
Measured: 3 months
Weekly participation in mild, moderate, and vigorous exercise
Weekly participation in mild, moderate, and vigorous exercise is time spent on physical activity each week is measured subjectively using the Godin Leisure-time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ) and objectively by the Fitbit Inspire activity tracker. The GLTEQ asks participants to self-report how many times they do strenuous, moderate, and mild or light exercise each week and the average duration of exercise. The intervention effectiveness is operationalized by the differences in minutes of doing mild, moderate, and vigorous physical activity between the intervention and control arms.
Measured: 3 months
Daily engagement in sedentary behaviors
Daily engagement in sedentary behaviors will be measured as time spent on sedentary behaviors per day is measured subjectively by a 10-option Likert scale called the Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire. Participants are asked to select one of the following options: none,<=15 minutes, 30 minutes,1 hour,2 hours,3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, and 6 hours or more" to estimate the time they spend doing each sedentary behavior on a typical week and a typical weekend day. The behaviors include watching television, playing computer or video games, sitting and listening to music on the radio, tapes, or CDs, sitting and talking on the phone, doing paperwork or computer work, sitting and reading a book or magazine, playing a musical instrument, doing artwork or crafts, and sitting and driving a car, bus or train. The total daily sedentary score ranges from 0 to 81. Daily sedentary time is also recorded objectively by the Fitbit Inspire activity tracker.
Measured: 3 months
Adaption of the study
Adaption of the study will be measured by the percentage of contacted individuals who meet study criteria to participate in the study.
Measured: Up to 18 months
Implementation of the video library
Implementation of the video library: The percentage of participants who watched study-related video content.
Measured: Up to 3 months
Implementation of using FITBIT
Implementation of using FITBIT: The percentage of days that participants wear the study-issued Fitbits.
Measured: Up to 3 months
The differences between intervention and control arms
The Maintenance will be measured as the differences in intervention effects between intervention and control arms groups 6 months post-intervention (9 months post-baseline).
Measured: 3 months to 9 months
Secondary outcomes (15)
Outcome expectations
Outcome expectations will be measured using the modified Multidimensional Outcome Expectations for Exercise Scale, which has an internal consistency of 0.82, 0.84, and 0.81 for physical, self-evaluative, and social outcomes. Differences in outcome expectation scores between the intervention and control arms will be analyzed.
This 5-point Likert scale contains 19 items with the outcome expectation score ranging from 19 to 95. A higher score indicates a higher expectation of doing physical activity for diverse health, cancer, social, and psychological outcomes.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Feasibility activity knowledge
Physical activity knowledge will be measured using a 5-point behavioral capacity Likert scale that assesses participants' knowledge about types, intensity, frequency, and skills of doing physical activity. The knowledge score ranges from 5 to 25. A higher score indicates a higher level of knowledge about doing appropriate physical activity. Differences in knowledge scores between the intervention and control arms will be analyzed.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Self-efficacy
Self-efficacy will be measured using a nine-item barrier self-efficacy scale and a four-item task self-efficacy scale to assess participants' confidence in overcoming barriers to physical activity and ability to do physical activity. The two self-efficacy scales have Cronbach's alpha of 0.96 and 0.89 among cancer patients, respectively. The total self-efficacy score ranges from The total self-efficacy score ranges from 13 to 65. A higher score indicates a higher level of confidence in overcoming barriers and doing physical activity. Differences in total self-efficacy scores between the intervention and control arms will be analyzed.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Physical activity engagement
Physical activity engagement is measured by a 6-point Likert scale that measures the habit strength for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. The total habit score ranges from 17 to 102. A higher score indicates a greater engagement in physical activity. Differences in habit scores between the intervention and control arms will be analyzed.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Physical activity enjoyment
Enjoyment is measured by a short version of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (4-item). The enjoyment score ranges from 4 to 20. A higher score indicates a higher level of enjoyment participants perceive from doing physical activity. Differences in enjoyment scores between the intervention and control arms will be analyzed.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Pain score
Pain will be measured using a 4-item 5-point Likert pain interference scale from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures. The pain score ranges from 4 to 20. A higher score indicates a higher level of pain interfering with participants' activities. Differences in the pain score between intervention and control groups will be analyzed.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Fatigue score
Fatigue will be measured using a 4-item 5-point Likert fatigue scale from the PROMIS measures. The fatigue score ranges from 4 to 20. A higher score indicates a higher level of fatigue. Differences in the fatigue score between intervention and control groups will be analyzed.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Depression score
Depression will be measured using a 4-item 5-point Likert emotional distress scale from PROMIS measures. The depression score ranges from 4 to 20. A higher score indicates a higher level of depression. Differences in the depression score between intervention and control groups will be analyzed.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Bowel dysfunction score
Bowel dysfunction will be measured using a 5-point Likert scale from the PROMIS that measures gastrointestinal diarrhea and constipation. The bowel dysfunction score ranges from 15 to 75. A higher score indicates a higher gastrointestinal discomfort participants have. Differences in the score between intervention and control groups will be analyzed.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Sleep quality
Sleep quality will be measured using a 4-item 5-point Likert scale from the PROMIS measures. The sleep score ranges from 4 to 20. A higher score indicates a better sleep quality. Differences in the sleep score between intervention and control groups will be analyzed.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Neurotoxicity
Neurotoxicity will be measured using a 4-item 5-point Likert scale from the PROMIS measures. The neurotoxicity score ranges from 4 to 20. A higher score indicates greater neurotoxicity symptoms participants report. Differences in the neurotoxicity score between intervention and control groups will be analyzed.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Quality of life score
Quality of life score will be measured using the 36-item Short Form Health Survey. The quality of life score ranges from 0 to 100. The score for each item in the form ranges from 0 to 100 and the average scores of items representing general physical, mental, and social health are calculated, respectively. A higher score indicates better general physical, mental, or social health. Differences in the score between intervention and control groups will be analyzed.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Inflammation biomarkers level
Inflammation biomarkers, including IL-4, IL-10, IL-6, and TNF-α, will be measured by collecting participants' blood samples using the Dried Blood Spot card. The differences in inflammation biomarker levels between the intervention and control groups will be analyzed.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Dietary behaviors
Dietary behaviors are measured by the Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants (Shortened Version, 16 items). The diet score ranges from 1 to 46. A higher score indicates that the participant follows healthier dietary behaviors. Differences in diet scores between the intervention and control arms will be analyzed.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Comorbidities
Comorbidities will be measured using the Self-administered Comorbidity Questionnaire. Participants are asked to self-report whether they have or received treatment for 14 common health problems. The comorbidity score ranges from 0 to 28. Differences in comorbidity scores between the intervention and control arms will be analyzed.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 May 2024
- Study start14 Aug 2024
- Primary completion18 May 2026
- Study completion18 May 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Rachel Hirschey, Ph.D, RN, Principal investigator, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06411756
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LCCC2143AIM2
- Other IDs
- 1K23MD015719-01
- Acronym
- PACE
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 6 May 2024
- Last updated
- 8 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Hirschey R, Xu J, Woodard N, Duggins P, Lea DF, Milner JL, Coleman K Jr, Bryant AL, Sanoff HK, Triglianos T, Zou B, Burse NR, Hoover RL, Leeman J, Wheeler SB, Battaglini CL, Valle CG. Community-Engaged Approach to Increase Physical Activity Among Black Individuals With Colorectal Cancer: Protocol for a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial of the Physical Activity Centers Empowerment Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Oct 17;14:e65804. doi: 10.2196/65804.
PubMed 41105939
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Physical Activity Intervention Co-created and Tested With African American Colorectal Cancer Survivors
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06411756
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PACE / LCCC2143AIM2
- Conditions
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Physical activity, Colorectal Neoplasms, Health Equity, Black or African American
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
- Study start
- 14 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 May 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 May 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 May 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This research study tests the feasibility of the Physical Activity Centers Empowerment (PACE) physical activity intervention for African American individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer.
Feasibility will be measured as intervention reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. Seventy-two subjects will be recruited to conduct a pilot two-group, randomized repeated measures study.
Detailed description
The purpose of this research is to improve the quality of life for underserved cancer survivors by increasing physical activity. A physical activity intervention will be tested for feasibility with African American cancer survivors. The project will serve as a foundation for intervening with other underserved cancer survivors.
Feasibility will be measured as intervention Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance, following the RE-AIM framework. Survey and biomarker data will be collected at baseline, 3 and 9 months later. These time points will facilitate exploration of changes pre- and post-intervention, and to determine if effects are maintained 6 months after completing the intervention. Our primary hypothesis is that the intervention will be feasible to deliver.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Other | Behavioral: Narrative videos, Behavioral: A Fitbit activity tracker, Other: Daily text message, Other: Monthly Zoom meeting, Other: Website accessSubjects will receive access to the video library, a Fitbit, a daily adaptive step goal that will be sent via text message with a short positive message; and monthly Zoom meetings, led by the research team, to discuss physical activity with other study subjects. |
| Control Arm | Other | Behavioral: A Fitbit activity tracker, Other: Printed materials, Behavioral: Printed materialsSubjects will receive access to the video library after the study period (after the 9-month assessment). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- self-identifying as AA of Black,
- diagnosis of CRC,
- scheduled to receive chemotherapy,
- age 18 years or older,
- no contraindications to unsupervised PA as determined by the PA readiness questionnaire,
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Narrative videosCulturally targeted narrative videos will be sent via email. | Behavioural | Intervention Arm |
| A Fitbit activity trackerA Fitbit activity tracker is a wireless wearable device that monitors physical fitness activity. | Behavioural | Control Arm, Intervention Arm |
| Daily text messageA daily adaptive step goal that will be sent via text message with a short positive message. | Other | Intervention Arm |
| Monthly Zoom meetingMonthly Zoom meetings, led by the research team, to discuss physical activity with other study subjects. | Other | Intervention Arm |
| Website accessAccess to Physical Activity Centers Empowerment (PACE) website. | Other | Intervention Arm |
| Printed materialsPrinted materials from the American College of Sport's Medicine's "Moving through Cancer" campaign. | Other | Control Arm |
| Printed materialsPrinted materials from the American College of Sports Medicine's "Moving through Cancer" campaign. | Behavioural | Control Arm |
Primary outcome
Feasibility Reach- Recruitment
Time frame: 18 months
Feasibility Reach- Recruitment is measured by the number of participants screened, ineligible, eligible, enrolled and declined participation.
Feasibility Retention
Time frame: 18 months
Retention is measured by the frequency of enrolled participants continued study interventions
Average weekly steps
Time frame: 3 months
Average weekly steps and the frequency of participants achieving daily step goals. Daily steps are collected via Fitbit Inspire activity tracker. Differences in daily steps and the frequency of meeting daily step goals between the intervention and control arms.
Weekly participation in mild, moderate, and vigorous exercise
Time frame: 3 months
Weekly participation in mild, moderate, and vigorous exercise is time spent on physical activity each week is measured subjectively using the Godin Leisure-time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ) and objectively by the Fitbit Inspire activity tracker. The GLTEQ asks participants to self-report how many times they do strenuous, moderate, and mild or light exercise each week and the average duration of exercise. The intervention effectiveness is operationalized by the differences in minutes of doing mild, moderate, and vigorous physical activity between the intervention and control arms.
Daily engagement in sedentary behaviors
Time frame: 3 months
Daily engagement in sedentary behaviors will be measured as time spent on sedentary behaviors per day is measured subjectively by a 10-option Likert scale called the Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire. Participants are asked to select one of the following options: none,<=15 minutes, 30 minutes,1 hour,2 hours,3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, and 6 hours or more" to estimate the time they spend doing each sedentary behavior on a typical week and a typical weekend day. The behaviors include watching television, playing computer or video games, sitting and listening to music on the radio, tapes, or CDs, sitting and talking on the phone, doing paperwork or computer work, sitting and reading a book or magazine, playing a musical instrument, doing artwork or crafts, and sitting and driving a car, bus or train. The total daily sedentary score ranges from 0 to 81. Daily sedentary time is also recorded objectively by the Fitbit Inspire activity tracker.
Adaption of the study
Time frame: Up to 18 months
Adaption of the study will be measured by the percentage of contacted individuals who meet study criteria to participate in the study.
Implementation of the video library
Time frame: Up to 3 months
Implementation of the video library: The percentage of participants who watched study-related video content.
Implementation of using FITBIT
Time frame: Up to 3 months
Implementation of using FITBIT: The percentage of days that participants wear the study-issued Fitbits.
The differences between intervention and control arms
Time frame: 3 months to 9 months
The Maintenance will be measured as the differences in intervention effects between intervention and control arms groups 6 months post-intervention (9 months post-baseline).
15 secondary outcomes
Outcome expectations
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Feasibility activity knowledge
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Self-efficacy
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Physical activity engagement
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Physical activity enjoyment
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Pain score
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Fatigue score
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Depression score
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Bowel dysfunction score
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Sleep quality
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Neurotoxicity
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Quality of life score
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Inflammation biomarkers level
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Dietary behaviors
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Comorbidities
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jul 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41105939Hirschey R, Xu J, Woodard N, Duggins P, Lea DF, Milner JL, Coleman K Jr, Bryant AL, Sanoff HK, Triglianos T, Zou B, Burse NR, Hoover RL, Leeman J, Wheeler SB, Battaglini CL, Valle CG. Community-Engaged Approach to Increase Physical Activity Among Black Individuals With Colorectal Cancer: Protocol for a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial of the Physical Activity Centers Empowerment Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Oct 17;14:e65804. doi: 10.2196/65804.
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Clinical TrialsLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Colorectal Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of MGC030 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
Urothelial Cancer, GastroEsophageal Cancer
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The IMPACT Study - Identification of Men With a Genetic Predisposition to ProstAte Cancer
Prostate Cancer, BRCA Mutation
RecruitingObservational study
ABCSG R07 Rectal Cancer Registry
Rectal Cancer, Adenocarcinoma of Rectum
Recruiting
Mainstreaming Genetics: Evaluation of a Digital Application to Scale and Spread Oncologist-initiated Genetic Testing
Cancer, Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rachel Hirschey, Ph.D, RN principal investigator
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Narrative videos, A Fitbit activity tracker and Daily text message in people with Colorectal Neoplasms, run by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility Reach- Recruitment (time frame: 18 months). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06411756, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2026.