Atrial FibrillationHPSDNCT06415149
High-Power, Short-Duration Ablation in Treatment of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
A study testing High power short duration ablation with 50 W and High power short duration ablation with 45 W in people with Atrial Fibrillation and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, run by People's Friendship University of Russia at 1 site in Russia.
Trial summary
Atrial fibrillation (AF) stands as the most common type of cardiac arrhythmia. The frequency of AF in the overall population is 1-2%, with the incidence rate increasing with age from 0.5% in the 40-50 years old to 5-15% in those aged 80. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrial Fibrillation, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
- What is being tested?
- High power short duration ablation with 50 W and High power short duration ablation with 45 W
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 185 participants
- Where
- 1 siteRussia
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2022to 1 Mar 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) or resistance to at least one antiarrhythmic drug from the first or third group of antiarrhythmic drugs.
Who cannot join
- Left atrial thrombosis
- significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization
- valvular heart disease requiring surgical correction
- acute infectious diseases
- severe heart failure (NYHA class IV) or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35%,
- history of stroke within the past 3 months.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Atrial fibrillation (AF) stands as the most common type of cardiac arrhythmia. The frequency of AF in the overall population is 1-2%, with the incidence rate increasing with age from 0.5% in the 40-50 years old to 5-15% in those aged 80. [According to current recommendations for catheter ablation (CA) in patients with AF, the isolation of the pulmonary veins (PV) is a pivotal aspect of treating this arrhythmia. Despite recent advancements, 20-45% of patients experience recurrences after PV isolation. According to the study by Wasmer K. et al., it was demonstrated that most patients with recurrent AF after PVI showed at least one reconnected vein during redo procedures. The primary cause of recurrences is the restoration of conduction, attributed to endurable isolation (non-transmural, intermittent RF). Numerous approaches have been presented to enhance the outcomes of surgical treatment for AF, such as the CLOSE protocol and Ablation Index (AI) . CLOSE protocol represents an approach aimed at isolating the PV ostia through precise continuous (distance between points ≤ 6 mm) radiofrequency intervention, achieving target ablation index values of ≥ 400au for the posterior wall and ≥ 500au for the anterior wall. The Ablation Index is a marker of quality lesion formation, providing a visual representation of the lesion based on the integration of power, contact force, and time parameters, which is displayed on the CARTO® 3 system (Biosense Webster).
Throughout radiofrequency ablation, electromagnetic energy undergoes conversion into thermal energy, leading to tissue damage and temperature elevation. The temperature elevation process encompasses two stages: resistive heating, impacting surface tissues (1-2mm), and conductive heating, which facilitates the transfer of heat from surface tissues to underlying tissues.
Read more
In the presence of good catheter-endocardium contact (25%), only 9% of the power is effectively delivered to the endocardium. For instance, at a power level of 30 watts and optimal contact (25%) with the endocardium, merely 2.7 watts are transferred to the endocardial tissue. When applying 30 watts of power for 30 seconds, a total energy delivery of 900 joules occurs, with only 90 joules being imparted to the endocardium. Similarly, at 50 watts for 10 seconds, only 45 joules of energy are transmitted to the endocardium. When operating at 10 watts, the catheter temperature elevates by 13°C. Consequently, at 30 watts, the temperature reaches 39°C, and at 50 watts, it rises to 65°C. The formation of an irreversible lesion necessitates a temperature exceeding 50°C. During standard radiofrequency ablation (RFA) procedures with power settings ranging from 20 to 45 watts and a duration of 20 to 60 seconds, the formation of ablation points predominantly occurs during the conductive heating phase.
High power short duration ablation (HPSD) is an approach that reduces the conductive heating phase while increasing the resistive heating phase. This results in an expanded area of lesion, facilitating the formation of transmural lesions in the atrial myocardium with irreversible tissue damage and reduced risk to surrounding structures, such as thermal injury to the esophagus.
The strategy of HPSD ablation was developed to overcome limitations of the traditional approach. However, much remains unknown regarding the safety and effectiveness of this approach. Additionally, the question for the optimal interventional treatment method for atrial fibrillation (AF) and the selection of the optimal RF energy for pulmonary vein isolation still require confirmation. This forms the basis for our research objective.
Read the detailed description
The research was a multi-center retrospective blind randomized controlled trial between 2021 and 2023. A comprehensive sample of 185 participants was enrolled in the study and categorized into 2 cohorts, each of which was further subdivided into two subgroups. Patients were enrolled in the study after providing informed consent. In the first group (n=95), PVI was performed with power of 50 watts in Ia subgroup (n=55) AI was 400-450 arbitrary units (au) for the posterior wall and 500-550 au for the anterior wall, in Ib (n=40) AI was 400-450 au for the posterior wall and 450-500 au for the anterior wall. In the second group (n=90), PVI was performed at a power of 45 watts, in IIa (n=50) with target AI of 400-450 au for the posterior wall and 500-550 au for the anterior wall in IIb (n=40) AI of 400-450 au for the posterior wall and 450-500 au for the anterior wall.
Assessment of conduction block was performed 20 minutes after RFA using a twenty-pole diagnostic electrode (Lasso, Biosense Webster, USA).
- Being tested
- High power short duration ablation with 50 W, High power short duration ablation with 45 W
- Keywords
- high-power, short-duration, catheter ablation
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High power short duration ablation with 50 WProcedure or surgery
Group 1 (n=95): pulmonary vein isolation for treatment of atrial fibrillation was performed with power of 50 watts in Ia subgroup (n=55) AI (ablation index) was 400-450 arbitrary units (au) for the posterior wall and 500-550 au for the anterior wall, in Ib (n=40) AI was 400-450 au for the posterior wall and 450-500 au for the anterior wall.
High power short duration ablation with 45 WProcedure or surgery
Group 2 (n=90): Pulmonary vein islolation was performed at a power of 45 watts, in IIa subgroup (n=50) with target AI of 400-450 au for the posterior wall and 500-550 au for the anterior wall in IIb (n=40) AI of 400-450 au for the posterior wall and 450-500 au for the anterior wall.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High power short duration ablation with 50 W | Experimental | Group 1 (n=95): pulmonary vein isolation for treatment of atrial fibrillation was performed with power of 50 watts in Ia subgroup (n=55) AI (ablation index) was 400-450 arbitrary units (au) for the posterior wall and 500-550 au for the anterior wall, in Ib (n=40) AI was 400-450 au for the posterior wall and 450-500 au for the anterior wall. Receives: Procedure: High power short duration ablation with 50 W |
| High power short duration ablation with 45 W | Experimental | Group 2 (n=90): Pulmonary vein islolation was performed at a power of 45 watts, in IIa subgroup (n=50) with target AI of 400-450 au for the posterior wall and 500-550 au for the anterior wall in IIb (n=40) AI of 400-450 au for the posterior wall and 450-500 au for the anterior wall. Receives: Procedure: High power short duration ablation with 45 W |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Interoperative outcomes
1-Radiofrequency (RF) ablation duration from start of first pulmonary vein isolation to end of 2-the last lesion.
3-Total Procedure duration. 4-First pass PVI. 5-Interoperative complications. 6-Total RF energy delivery. 7-Number of RF lesions required for PVI. 8-Freedom from Atrial Fibrillation.
Measured: During ablation
Blinded period
- The proportion of patients maintaining Freedom from Atrial Fibrillation.
- Overall Complication rate.
Measured: 1- 3 months after ablation
Secondary outcomes (1)
Long-term outcomes
- The proportion of patients maintaining Freedom from Atrial Fibrillation.
- The proportion of patients with PV reconnection seen at repeat EP study.
Measured: 6 -12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 May 2024
- Study start1 Feb 2022
- Primary completion1 Feb 2023
- Study completion1 Mar 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 185 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- People's Friendship University of Russia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- City Clinical Hospital No.1 named after N.I. Pirogov
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, afsoon fayez, People's Friendship University of Russia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06415149
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 27711
- Acronym
- HPSD
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 10 May 2024
- Last updated
- 30 May 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Fayez A. , Safonov N. V., Steklov A. S., Faybushevich A. G., Baranovich V. Y. HIGH POWER SHORT DURATION ABLATION USING ABLATION INDEX (AI) IN PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILATION // Современная наука: актуальные проблемы теории и практики. Серия: Естественные и Технические Науки. -2023. -№02. -С. 244-250 DOI 10.37882/2223-2966.2023.02.37
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- High-Power, Short-Duration Ablation in Treatment of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06415149
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HPSD / 27711
- Keywords
- high-power, short-duration, catheter ablation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 185 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- People's Friendship University of RussiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- City Clinical Hospital No.1 named after N.I. Pirogov
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Mar 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 May 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) stands as the most common type of cardiac arrhythmia. The frequency of AF in the overall population is 1-2%, with the incidence rate increasing with age from 0.5% in the 40-50 years old to 5-15% in those aged 80. [According to current recommendations for catheter ablation (CA) in patients with AF, the isolation of the pulmonary veins (PV) is a pivotal aspect of treating this arrhythmia. Despite recent advancements, 20-45% of patients experience recurrences after PV isolation. According to the study by Wasmer K. et al., it was demonstrated that most patients with recurrent AF after PVI showed at least one reconnected vein during redo procedures. The primary cause of recurrences is the restoration of conduction, attributed to endurable isolation (non-transmural, intermittent RF). Numerous approaches have been presented to enhance the outcomes of surgical treatment for AF, such as the CLOSE protocol and Ablation Index (AI) . CLOSE protocol represents an approach aimed at isolating the PV ostia through precise continuous (distance between points ≤ 6 mm) radiofrequency intervention, achieving target ablation index values of ≥ 400au for the posterior wall and ≥ 500au for the anterior wall. The Ablation Index is a marker of quality lesion formation, providing a visual representation of the lesion based on the integration of power, contact force, and time parameters, which is displayed on the CARTO® 3 system (Biosense Webster).
Throughout radiofrequency ablation, electromagnetic energy undergoes conversion into thermal energy, leading to tissue damage and temperature elevation. The temperature elevation process encompasses two stages: resistive heating, impacting surface tissues (1-2mm), and conductive heating, which facilitates the transfer of heat from surface tissues to underlying tissues.
In the presence of good catheter-endocardium contact (25%), only 9% of the power is effectively delivered to the endocardium. For instance, at a power level of 30 watts and optimal contact (25%) with the endocardium, merely 2.7 watts are transferred to the endocardial tissue. When applying 30 watts of power for 30 seconds, a total energy delivery of 900 joules occurs, with only 90 joules being imparted to the endocardium. Similarly, at 50 watts for 10 seconds, only 45 joules of energy are transmitted to the endocardium. When operating at 10 watts, the catheter temperature elevates by 13°C. Consequently, at 30 watts, the temperature reaches 39°C, and at 50 watts, it rises to 65°C. The formation of an irreversible lesion necessitates a temperature exceeding 50°C. During standard radiofrequency ablation (RFA) procedures with power settings ranging from 20 to 45 watts and a duration of 20 to 60 seconds, the formation of ablation points predominantly occurs during the conductive heating phase.
High power short duration ablation (HPSD) is an approach that reduces the conductive heating phase while increasing the resistive heating phase. This results in an expanded area of lesion, facilitating the formation of transmural lesions in the atrial myocardium with irreversible tissue damage and reduced risk to surrounding structures, such as thermal injury to the esophagus.
The strategy of HPSD ablation was developed to overcome limitations of the traditional approach. However, much remains unknown regarding the safety and effectiveness of this approach. Additionally, the question for the optimal interventional treatment method for atrial fibrillation (AF) and the selection of the optimal RF energy for pulmonary vein isolation still require confirmation. This forms the basis for our research objective.
Detailed description
The research was a multi-center retrospective blind randomized controlled trial between 2021 and 2023. A comprehensive sample of 185 participants was enrolled in the study and categorized into 2 cohorts, each of which was further subdivided into two subgroups. Patients were enrolled in the study after providing informed consent. In the first group (n=95), PVI was performed with power of 50 watts in Ia subgroup (n=55) AI was 400-450 arbitrary units (au) for the posterior wall and 500-550 au for the anterior wall, in Ib (n=40) AI was 400-450 au for the posterior wall and 450-500 au for the anterior wall. In the second group (n=90), PVI was performed at a power of 45 watts, in IIa (n=50) with target AI of 400-450 au for the posterior wall and 500-550 au for the anterior wall in IIb (n=40) AI of 400-450 au for the posterior wall and 450-500 au for the anterior wall.
Assessment of conduction block was performed 20 minutes after RFA using a twenty-pole diagnostic electrode (Lasso, Biosense Webster, USA).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High power short duration ablation with 50 W | Experimental | Procedure: High power short duration ablation with 50 WGroup 1 (n=95): pulmonary vein isolation for treatment of atrial fibrillation was performed with power of 50 watts in Ia subgroup (n=55) AI (ablation index) was 400-450 arbitrary units (au) for the posterior wall and 500-550 au for the anterior wall, in Ib (n=40) AI was 400-450 au for the posterior wall and 450-500 au for the anterior wall. |
| High power short duration ablation with 45 W | Experimental | Procedure: High power short duration ablation with 45 WGroup 2 (n=90): Pulmonary vein islolation was performed at a power of 45 watts, in IIa subgroup (n=50) with target AI of 400-450 au for the posterior wall and 500-550 au for the anterior wall in IIb (n=40) AI of 400-450 au for the posterior wall and 450-500 au for the anterior wall. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) or resistance to at least one antiarrhythmic drug from the first or third group of antiarrhythmic drugs.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Left atrial thrombosis
- significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization
- valvular heart disease requiring surgical correction
- acute infectious diseases
- severe heart failure (NYHA class IV) or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35%,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High power short duration ablation with 50 WGroup 1 (n=95): pulmonary vein isolation for treatment of atrial fibrillation was performed with power of 50 watts in Ia subgroup (n=55) AI (ablation index) was 400-450 arbitrary units (au) for the posterior wall and 500-550 au for the anterior wall, in Ib (n=40) AI was 400-450 au for the posterior wall and 450-500 au for the anterior wall. | Procedure or surgery | High power short duration ablation with 50 W |
| High power short duration ablation with 45 WGroup 2 (n=90): Pulmonary vein islolation was performed at a power of 45 watts, in IIa subgroup (n=50) with target AI of 400-450 au for the posterior wall and 500-550 au for the anterior wall in IIb (n=40) AI of 400-450 au for the posterior wall and 450-500 au for the anterior wall. | Procedure or surgery | High power short duration ablation with 45 W |
Primary outcome
Interoperative outcomes
Time frame: During ablation
1-Radiofrequency (RF) ablation duration from start of first pulmonary vein isolation to end of 2-the last lesion. 3-Total Procedure duration. 4-First pass PVI. 5-Interoperative complications. 6-Total RF energy delivery. 7-Number of RF lesions required for PVI. 8-Freedom from Atrial Fibrillation.
Blinded period
Time frame: 1- 3 months after ablation
1. The proportion of patients maintaining Freedom from Atrial Fibrillation. 2. Overall Complication rate.
1 secondary outcome
Long-term outcomes
Time frame: 6 -12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 May 2024.
- BackgroundFayez A. , Safonov N. V., Steklov A. S., Faybushevich A. G., Baranovich V. Y. HIGH POWER SHORT DURATION ABLATION USING ABLATION INDEX (AI) IN PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILATION // Современная наука: актуальные проблемы теории и практики. Серия: Естественные и Технические Науки. -2023. -№02. -С. 244-250 DOI 10.37882/2223-2966.2023.02.37
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
Horizon 360 Protocol for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation With the Sphere-360™ Catheter and Affera™ Mapping and Ablation System (Horizon 360)
Paroxysmal AF
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Concomitant Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Pulsed Field Ablation-Asia
Concomitant Procedures, Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
CONVERGE Post-Approval Study (PAS)
Chronic Atrial Fibrillation
Recruiting
Early Closure of Left Atrial Appendage for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Stroke Despite Anticoagulation Therapy
Ischemic Stroke, Atrial Fibrillation
RecruitingPhase 2
Safety in Adult Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Who Are Treated With Anticoagulation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing High power short duration ablation with 50 W and High power short duration ablation with 45 W in people with Atrial Fibrillation and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, run by People's Friendship University of Russia at 1 site in Russia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Interoperative outcomes (time frame: During ablation). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06415149, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 May 2024.