Breast CancerVENUSNCT06415266
Assessment the sExual Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving oncoSexology Supportive Care on Proactive Versus On-request
A study testing Quality of life questionnaire (QLQ), Satisfaction survey and Assessment of patient needs in the field of oncosexology in people with Breast Cancer, run by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle at 9 sites in France.
Trial summary
The study compares the quality of sexual life of breast cancer patients under two types of oncoSexology supportive care : personalized supportive care versus on-request. The aim is to improve the quality of sexual life of these patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Quality of life questionnaire (QLQ), Satisfaction survey and Assessment of patient needs in the field of oncosexology
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 264 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 9 Aug 2024to Aug 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Woman or man at least 18 years old
- Diagnosis of infiltrating breast cancer regardless of the biological characteristics of the tumor
- Standard treatment by surgery, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, completed a maximum of 3 months ago with the exception of post-neoadjuvant treatments (chemotherapy, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, immunotherapy, targeted treatment, ...) which must have been started less than 3 months previously
- Patient with sufficient command of the French language to be able to answer the questionnaires
- Patient having given informed, written and express consent.
- Affiliation to the French Social Security System
- Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan and other study procedures
Who cannot join
- Patient already taken cared of in oncosexology. The following are not criteria for non-inclusion (a previous single consultation without treatment, use of local vaginal treatments)
- Metastatic disease
- Patient under guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
9 sites in 1 country
France9 sites, 9 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon, 69008
Philippe TOUSSAINT, Dr, 04 78 78 28 40 ext. +33, philippe.toussaint@lyon.unicancer.fr
- Recruiting
ICM Val d'Aurelle
Montpellier, 34298
Véronique D'HONDT, Dr, 04 67 61 25 07 ext. +33, Veronique.Dhondt@icm.unicancer.fr
Angélique BOBRIE, Dr, 04 67 61 85 76 ext. +33, Angelique.Bobrie@icm.unicancer.fr
- Not yet recruiting
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
Nice, 06189
Anne CREISSON, Dr, 04 92 03 16 43 ext. +33, anne.creisson@nice.unicancer.fr
- Recruiting
CHU de Nîmes
Nîmes, 30029
Frédéric FITENI, Dr, 04 66 68 33 01 ext. +33, frederic.fiteni@chu-nimes.fr
- Recruiting
Institut Curie
Paris, 75005
Silène DELORME, silene.delorme@curie.fr
- Recruiting
Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest
Saint-Herblain, Saint Herblain, 44805
Aliette DEZELLUS, Dr, 02 40 67 99 00 ext. +33, aliette.dezellus@ico.unicancer.fr
- Recruiting
IUCT - Oncopole
Toulouse, 31100
Eva JOUVE, Dr, 05 31 15 60 16 ext. +33, jouve.eva@iuct-oncopole.fr
- Recruiting
Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Vandoeuvre LES Nancy, 54519
Claire CHARRA-BRUNAUD, Dr, 03 83 59 86 10 ext. +33, c.brunaud@nancy.unicancer.fr
- Recruiting
Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, 94800
Marion AUPOMEROL, Dr, Marion.AUPOMEROL@gustaveroussy.fr
About this study
Official title: Multicentric Randomized Study eValuating the sExual Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving oncoSexology Supportive Care on Proactive Versus On-request
The study compares the quality of sexual life of breast cancer patients under two types of oncoSexology supportive care : personalized supportive care versus on-request. The aim is to improve the quality of sexual life of these patients.
Read the detailed description
Breast cancer and its treatment are responsible for symptoms that can persist over time and affect quality of life. Given the improved prognosis for breast cancer, more and more patients are faced with the specific problems of the post-cancer period, and caring for them has become a major health issue. Sexual health is a crucial component of well-being and overall quality of life.
The study compares the quality of sexual life of breast cancer patients under two types of oncoSexology supportive care : personalized supportive care versus on-request.
For that, quality of life questionnaires will be completed by patients at inclusion and every 6 months for 2 years.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Quality of life questionnaire (QLQ), Satisfaction survey, Assessment of patient needs in the field of oncosexology
- Keywords
- quality of sexual life
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Quality of life questionnaire (QLQ)Other
Quality of life questionnaire : EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-Breast cancer module (BR) 23, EORTC SHQ-C22 et HADS at inclusion, visit 1 (6 months +/-1 month before the inclusion), visit 2 (12 months +/-1 month before the inclusion), visit 3 (18 months +/-1 month before the inclusion) and visit 4 (24 months +/-1 month before the inclusion).
Satisfaction surveyOther
The satisfaction score will be collected using a visual analog scale from 0 to 10 and the satisfaction questionnaire will also be completed at visit 4 (24 months +/- 1 month before the inclusion).
Assessment of patient needs in the field of oncosexologyOther
Assessment of patient needs in the field of oncosexology during a face-to-face or virtual interview at inclusion and every 6 months for 2 years. If a need is identified, an oncosexology consultation will be organised. Following this, a personalised care plan may be proposed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients receiving oncoSexology supportive care on proactive | Experimental | Repeated assessment of the patient's needs in the field of oncosexology. Proposal of a personalized care plan to meet the various needs identified. Receives: Other: Quality of life questionnaire (QLQ); Other: Satisfaction survey; Other: Assessment of patient needs in the field of oncosexology |
| Patients receiving oncoSexology supportive care on request | Other | One-off distribution of a flyer to the patient containing both general information on sexual health and contact telephone numbers and e-mail addresses for oncosexology help Receives: Other: Quality of life questionnaire (QLQ); Other: Satisfaction survey |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Comparison of the quality of sexual life of patients in the intervention arm and patients in the control arm
EORTC Sexual Health Questionnaire (SHQ)-C22 specific questionnaire sexual satisfaction scale score.
Questionnaire comprising 2 multi-item scales assessing sexual satisfaction and dyspareunia; as well as 11 single items (including: importance of sexual activity, libido, incontinence, fatigue, impact of treatment on sexual life, communication with professionals, partner); as well as 4 items related to gender: 2 specific items for women (body image, vaginal dryness); 2 specific items for men (body image, confidence in maintaining an erection). The score ranges from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
Measured: at 12 months after the inclusion
Secondary outcomes (8)
Description of evolution in sexual quality of life
Scores obtained on the EORTC SHQ-C22 questionnaire scales. Questionnaire comprising 2 multi-item scales assessing sexual satisfaction and dyspareunia; as well as 11 single items (including: importance of sexual activity, libido, incontinence, fatigue, impact of treatment on sexual life, communication with professionals, partner); as well as 4 items related to gender: 2 specific items for women (body image, vaginal dryness); 2 specific items for men (body image, confidence in maintaining an erection). The score ranges from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
Measured: at inclusion, 6,12,18, and 24 months before inclusion
Description of evolution in quality of life - QLQ-C30
Scores obtained on the scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Developed by the EORTC, this self-reported questionnaire assesses the health-related quality of life of cancer patients in clinical trials.
The questionnaire includes five functional scales (physical, everyday activity, cognitive, emotional, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting), a health/quality of life overall scale, and a number of additional elements assessing common symptoms (including dyspnea, loss of appetite, insomnia, constipation, and diarrhea), as well as, the perceived financial impact of the disease.
All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
Measured: at inclusion, 6,12,18, and 24 months before inclusion
Description of evolution in quality of life - QLQ-Breast (BR)cancer module 23 questionnaires.
Scores obtained on the scales of the QLQ-BR23 This EORTC breast cancer specific questionnaire is intended to supplement the QLQ-C30.
The QLQ-BR23 contains 23 items incorporating five multi-item scales to assess systemic therapy side effects, arm symptoms, breast symptoms, body image and sexual functioning. In addition, single items assess sexual enjoyment, hair loss and future perspective. All items are rated on a four-point Likert-type scale (1 = "not at all", 2 = "a little", 3 = "quite a bit", and 4 = "very much"), and are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For all items but sexual functioning and sexual enjoyment, higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.
Measured: at inclusion, 6,12,18, and 24 months before inclusion
Search for associations between comorbidities and risk factors
Coefficients obtained with a model adapted for longitudinal quality of life data scores as a function of covariates potentially associated with sexual and global quality of life.
Measured: at inclusion, 6,12,18, and 24 months before inclusion
Search for associations between comorbidities and risk factors -questionnaire
Anxiety and depression (psychological distress variables) will be assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire.
The HADS is a 14 items questionnaire: 7 items related to anxiety and 7 items related to depression scored on a scale. Scores for items in each subscale of the HADS are summed to produce an anxiety score (HADS-A) or a depression score (HADS-D), or can be added to produce a total score corresponding to emotional distress (HADS-T). Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = "not at all", 2 = "a little", 3 = "quite a bit", and 4 = "very much"), for a total score ranging from 0-21 for each subscale. The entire scale (emotional distress) range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating more distress.
Measured: at inclusion, 6,12,18, and 24 months before inclusion
Assessment of adherence to the programme in the interventional arm
Percentage of adherence in the interventional arm
Measured: at inclusion
Oncosexology programme satisfaction
Satisfaction score measured on a visual analogue scale ranging from 1 to 10 (10 indicating high satisfaction)
Measured: at 24 months before inclusion
Oncosexology programme satisfaction
Scores obtained of the Satisfaction questionnaire by arm. All the scale ranging from 1 to 5 (5 indicating high satisfaction).
Measured: at 24 months before inclusion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 May 2024
- Study start9 Aug 2024
- Primary completionAug 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 264 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Véronique D'HONDT, Dr, Principal investigator, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06415266
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PROICM 2023-07 VEN
- Other IDs
- 2023-A02474-41
- Acronym
- VENUS
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 17 Apr 2024
- Last updated
- 4 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual Participant Data will not be shared at an individual level. Those data will be part of the study database including all enrolled patients.
Publications
Carter J, Lacchetti C, Andersen BL, Barton DL, Bolte S, Damast S, Diefenbach MA, DuHamel K, Florendo J, Ganz PA, Goldfarb S, Hallmeyer S, Kushner DM, Rowland JH. Interventions to Address Sexual Problems in People With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Adaptation of Cancer Care Ontario Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 10;36(5):492-511. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.8995. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
PubMed 29227723Bobrie A, Jarlier M, Moussion A, Jacot W, D'Hondt V. Sexual quality of life assessment in young women with breast cancer during adjuvant endocrine therapy and patient-reported supportive measures. Support Care Cancer. 2022 Apr;30(4):3633-3641. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06810-3. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
PubMed 35028721Del Pup L, Villa P, Amar ID, Bottoni C, Scambia G. Approach to sexual dysfunction in women with cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Mar;29(3):630-634. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000096. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
PubMed 30765487Dizon DS. Quality of life after breast cancer: survivorship and sexuality. Breast J. 2009 Sep-Oct;15(5):500-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00766.x. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
PubMed 19614908Seguin L, Touzani R, Bouhnik AD, Charif AB, Marino P, Bendiane MK, Goncalves A, Gravis G, Mancini J. Deterioration of Sexual Health in Cancer Survivors Five Years after Diagnosis: Data from the French National Prospective VICAN Survey. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Nov 20;12(11):3453. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113453.
PubMed 33233583
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multicentric Randomized Study eValuating the sExual Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving oncoSexology Supportive Care on Proactive Versus On-request
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06415266
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VENUS / PROICM 2023-07 VEN
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- quality of sexual life
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 264 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 9 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 May 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study compares the quality of sexual life of breast cancer patients under two types of oncoSexology supportive care : personalized supportive care versus on-request. The aim is to improve the quality of sexual life of these patients.
Detailed description
Breast cancer and its treatment are responsible for symptoms that can persist over time and affect quality of life. Given the improved prognosis for breast cancer, more and more patients are faced with the specific problems of the post-cancer period, and caring for them has become a major health issue. Sexual health is a crucial component of well-being and overall quality of life.
The study compares the quality of sexual life of breast cancer patients under two types of oncoSexology supportive care : personalized supportive care versus on-request.
For that, quality of life questionnaires will be completed by patients at inclusion and every 6 months for 2 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients receiving oncoSexology supportive care on proactive | Experimental | Other: Quality of life questionnaire (QLQ), Other: Satisfaction survey, Other: Assessment of patient needs in the field of oncosexologyRepeated assessment of the patient's needs in the field of oncosexology. Proposal of a personalized care plan to meet the various needs identified. |
| Patients receiving oncoSexology supportive care on request | Other | Other: Quality of life questionnaire (QLQ), Other: Satisfaction surveyOne-off distribution of a flyer to the patient containing both general information on sexual health and contact telephone numbers and e-mail addresses for oncosexology help |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Woman or man at least 18 years old
- Diagnosis of infiltrating breast cancer regardless of the biological characteristics of the tumor
- Standard treatment by surgery, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, completed a maximum of 3 months ago with the exception of post-neoadjuvant treatments (chemotherapy, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, immunotherapy, targeted treatment, ...) which must have been started less than 3 months previously
- Patient with sufficient command of the French language to be able to answer the questionnaires
- Patient having given informed, written and express consent.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient already taken cared of in oncosexology. The following are not criteria for non-inclusion (a previous single consultation without treatment, use of local vaginal treatments)
- Metastatic disease
- Patient under guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of life questionnaire (QLQ)Quality of life questionnaire : EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-Breast cancer module (BR) 23, EORTC SHQ-C22 et HADS at inclusion, visit 1 (6 months +/-1 month before the inclusion), visit 2 (12 months +/-1 month before the inclusion), visit 3 (18 months +/-1 month before the inclusion) and visit 4 (24 months +/-1 month before the inclusion). | Other | Patients receiving oncoSexology supportive care on proactive, Patients receiving oncoSexology supportive care on request |
| Satisfaction surveyThe satisfaction score will be collected using a visual analog scale from 0 to 10 and the satisfaction questionnaire will also be completed at visit 4 (24 months +/- 1 month before the inclusion). | Other | Patients receiving oncoSexology supportive care on proactive, Patients receiving oncoSexology supportive care on request |
| Assessment of patient needs in the field of oncosexologyAssessment of patient needs in the field of oncosexology during a face-to-face or virtual interview at inclusion and every 6 months for 2 years. If a need is identified, an oncosexology consultation will be organised. Following this, a personalised care plan may be proposed. | Other | Patients receiving oncoSexology supportive care on proactive |
Primary outcome
Comparison of the quality of sexual life of patients in the intervention arm and patients in the control arm
Time frame: at 12 months after the inclusion
EORTC Sexual Health Questionnaire (SHQ)-C22 specific questionnaire sexual satisfaction scale score. Questionnaire comprising 2 multi-item scales assessing sexual satisfaction and dyspareunia; as well as 11 single items (including: importance of sexual activity, libido, incontinence, fatigue, impact of treatment on sexual life, communication with professionals, partner); as well as 4 items related to gender: 2 specific items for women (body image, vaginal dryness); 2 specific items for men (body image, confidence in maintaining an erection). The score ranges from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
8 secondary outcomes
Description of evolution in sexual quality of life
Time frame: at inclusion, 6,12,18, and 24 months before inclusion
Description of evolution in quality of life - QLQ-C30
Time frame: at inclusion, 6,12,18, and 24 months before inclusion
Description of evolution in quality of life - QLQ-Breast (BR)cancer module 23 questionnaires.
Time frame: at inclusion, 6,12,18, and 24 months before inclusion
Search for associations between comorbidities and risk factors
Time frame: at inclusion, 6,12,18, and 24 months before inclusion
Search for associations between comorbidities and risk factors -questionnaire
Time frame: at inclusion, 6,12,18, and 24 months before inclusion
Assessment of adherence to the programme in the interventional arm
Time frame: at inclusion
Oncosexology programme satisfaction
Time frame: at 24 months before inclusion
Oncosexology programme satisfaction
Time frame: at 24 months before inclusion
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Sep 2025.
- Background: PubMed 29227723Carter J, Lacchetti C, Andersen BL, Barton DL, Bolte S, Damast S, Diefenbach MA, DuHamel K, Florendo J, Ganz PA, Goldfarb S, Hallmeyer S, Kushner DM, Rowland JH. Interventions to Address Sexual Problems in People With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Adaptation of Cancer Care Ontario Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 10;36(5):492-511. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.8995. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
- Background: PubMed 35028721Bobrie A, Jarlier M, Moussion A, Jacot W, D'Hondt V. Sexual quality of life assessment in young women with breast cancer during adjuvant endocrine therapy and patient-reported supportive measures. Support Care Cancer. 2022 Apr;30(4):3633-3641. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06810-3. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
- Background: PubMed 30765487Del Pup L, Villa P, Amar ID, Bottoni C, Scambia G. Approach to sexual dysfunction in women with cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Mar;29(3):630-634. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000096. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
- Background: PubMed 19614908Dizon DS. Quality of life after breast cancer: survivorship and sexuality. Breast J. 2009 Sep-Oct;15(5):500-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00766.x. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
- Background: PubMed 33233583Seguin L, Touzani R, Bouhnik AD, Charif AB, Marino P, Bendiane MK, Goncalves A, Gravis G, Mancini J. Deterioration of Sexual Health in Cancer Survivors Five Years after Diagnosis: Data from the French National Prospective VICAN Survey. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Nov 20;12(11):3453. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113453.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual Participant Data will not be shared at an individual level. Those data will be part of the study database including all enrolled patients.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Véronique D'HONDT, Dr principal investigator
Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM)
9 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Quality of life questionnaire (QLQ), Satisfaction survey and Assessment of patient needs in the field of oncosexology in people with Breast Cancer, run by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle at 9 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Aurore MOUSSION (04 67 61 31 02 ext. +33, DRCI-icm105@icm.unicancer.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Comparison of the quality of sexual life of patients in the intervention arm and patients in the control arm (time frame: at 12 months after the inclusion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06415266, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Sep 2025.