Postural BalanceNCT06417164
Effects of FMS Functional Movement Training on Body Posture Control in College Female Aerobics Athletes
A study testing Functional Movement Training Group in people with Postural Balance, run by Lan Li at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
For this experiment, it was planned to randomly assign 40 female college aerobics athletes to two groups: a traditional physical training group (control group, T, N=20) and a functional training group (experimental group, F, N=20). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 23 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Postural Balance
- What is being tested?
- Functional Movement Training Group
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 25 May 2024to 1 Sep 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 23 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- ① Must be able to understand and comply with the study regulations and sign an informed consent form.
- ② Have a stable summer training schedule with no plans to return home during the summer.
- ③ No serious diseases or complications.
Who cannot join
- Athletes with recent sports injuries who may not participate in the training program.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
ZhengZhouU
Zhengzhou, Henan, 450001
Lan Li, 15038217255, 1096242208@qq.com
Qinghe Wang, 01079286663, 20222102103@kyonggi.ac.kr
About this study
For this experiment, it was planned to randomly assign 40 female college aerobics athletes to two groups: a traditional physical training group (control group, T, N=20) and a functional training group (experimental group, F, N=20). The control group will use traditional physical training methods, while the experimental group will use a training program based on the FMS functional movement design. The experimental group was scheduled to undergo a 12-week FMS functional movement training intervention, with each session lasting 40 minutes. Before and after the experiment, the subjects' FMS scores, body posture control, and competition performance will be measured.
Read the detailed description
Randomized into: Control, Traditional physical training Group, T, N = 20 , Intervention, Functional training Group, F, N = 20). The control group used traditional physical training methods, and the experimental group used FMS-based functional movement training methods. A 12-week functional movement training program was used and the experimental group was given intervention training 4 times a week for 40 min each time, and FMS scores, body posture control, and athletic performance were tested before and after the intervention. It was expected that the main assessment criteria would include the seven movements of the FMS Functional Movement Test (deep squat, hurdle step, lunge squat, shoulder flexibility, active straight leg raise, trunk stability push-up, and trunk rotational stability) as well as dynamic and static body postural control in aerobics movements. Tests of T-run and basic pace Y-jump time and athletic performance were used as secondary outcomes. The main tools included: a set of FMS tester, a roll of yellow tape, a measuring tape, a stopwatch, and a test chart for each index.
The test was divided into two phases. Phase 1: corrective training (1-4 weeks), Phase 2 is: the overall movement (functional patterning) 5-12 weeks, while the design concept of the program is shown in the increase of difficulty, specialization, but also includes the process of static stability to dynamic stability, and then finally, the overall movement pattern training. Tools used: balance disk, Swiss ball, solid ball, foam shaft, massage stick.
- Conditions
- Postural Balance
- Being tested
- Functional Movement Training Group
- Keywords
- Posture control, Functional movement training, Randomized controlled trial,
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Functional Movement Training GroupBehavioural
The program control group will use traditional physical training methods, while the experimental group will use a training program based on FMS functional movement design. The experimental group will receive a 12-week FMS functional movement training intervention, with each session lasting 40 minutes. The experimental group will be divided into two phases, a corrective intervention phase and a capacity enhancement phase, and the main assessment criteria will include the seven movements of the FMS Functional Movement Test (squat, hurdle step, deep squat, shoulder mobility, active straight leg raise, trunk stabilizing push-ups, and trunk rotational stabilization), as well as the ability to control the body's dynamic and static postures during aerobic exercise.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control, Traditional Physical Training Group | No intervention | The control group will use traditional physical training methods. |
| Intervention, Functional Training Group, | Experimental | Intervention, Functional Training Group will use functional movement training methods based on FMS. Receives: Behavioral: Functional Movement Training Group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
FMS Score
FMS test scores( in points)
Measured: 90days
Eight-stage abdominal bridge
Control of body posture stability under static conditions, ( in points)
Measured: 90days
five-step lateral bridge
Control of frontal body posture stability under static conditions (in points)
Measured: 90days
six supine bridge
Control of back and hip stability under static conditions (in points)
Measured: 90days
Secondary outcomes (3)
T-type running
examine the control ability of the unilateral lower limb of the aerobic athlete's body posture in the rapid and dynamic state.（second ）
Measured: 90days
Y-type jumping
The body posture control test under the conditions of dynamic movement surface change（second ）
Measured: 90days
Aerobics competitive performance
Four groups of difficulty combinations ABCD and single competition routines were used for comprehensive scoring（points）
Measured: 90days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 May 2024
- Study start25 May 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Aug 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Sep 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Postural BalanceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A randomized controlled clinical trial
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Lan Li
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Lan Li, Zhengzhou University
- Investigators
- Zijian Zhao, Study chair, Zhengzhou University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06417164
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LLi
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 7 May 2024
- Last updated
- 16 May 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All IPDs collected, all IPDs used as a basis for results in publications.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of FMS Functional Movement Training on Body Posture Control in College Female Aerobics Athletes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06417164
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LLi
- Conditions
- Postural Balance
- Keywords
- Posture control, Functional movement training, Randomized controlled trial,
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Lan LiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 May 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 May 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
For this experiment, it was planned to randomly assign 40 female college aerobics athletes to two groups: a traditional physical training group (control group, T, N=20) and a functional training group (experimental group, F, N=20). The control group will use traditional physical training methods, while the experimental group will use a training program based on the FMS functional movement design. The experimental group was scheduled to undergo a 12-week FMS functional movement training intervention, with each session lasting 40 minutes. Before and after the experiment, the subjects' FMS scores, body posture control, and competition performance will be measured.
Detailed description
Randomized into: Control, Traditional physical training Group, T, N = 20 , Intervention, Functional training Group, F, N = 20). The control group used traditional physical training methods, and the experimental group used FMS-based functional movement training methods. A 12-week functional movement training program was used and the experimental group was given intervention training 4 times a week for 40 min each time, and FMS scores, body posture control, and athletic performance were tested before and after the intervention. It was expected that the main assessment criteria would include the seven movements of the FMS Functional Movement Test (deep squat, hurdle step, lunge squat, shoulder flexibility, active straight leg raise, trunk stability push-up, and trunk rotational stability) as well as dynamic and static body postural control in aerobics movements. Tests of T-run and basic pace Y-jump time and athletic performance were used as secondary outcomes. The main tools included: a set of FMS tester, a roll of yellow tape, a measuring tape, a stopwatch, and a test chart for each index.
The test was divided into two phases. Phase 1: corrective training (1-4 weeks), Phase 2 is: the overall movement (functional patterning) 5-12 weeks, while the design concept of the program is shown in the increase of difficulty, specialization, but also includes the process of static stability to dynamic stability, and then finally, the overall movement pattern training. Tools used: balance disk, Swiss ball, solid ball, foam shaft, massage stick.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A randomized controlled clinical trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control, Traditional Physical Training Group | No intervention | –The control group will use traditional physical training methods. |
| Intervention, Functional Training Group, | Experimental | Behavioral: Functional Movement Training GroupIntervention, Functional Training Group will use functional movement training methods based on FMS. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 23 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- ① Must be able to understand and comply with the study regulations and sign an informed consent form.
- ② Have a stable summer training schedule with no plans to return home during the summer.
- ③ No serious diseases or complications.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Athletes with recent sports injuries who may not participate in the training program.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Functional Movement Training GroupThe program control group will use traditional physical training methods, while the experimental group will use a training program based on FMS functional movement design. The experimental group will receive a 12-week FMS functional movement training intervention, with each session lasting 40 minutes. The experimental group will be divided into two phases, a corrective intervention phase and a capacity enhancement phase, and the main assessment criteria will include the seven movements of the FMS Functional Movement Test (squat, hurdle step, deep squat, shoulder mobility, active straight leg raise, trunk stabilizing push-ups, and trunk rotational stabilization), as well as the ability to control the body's dynamic and static postures during aerobic exercise. | Behavioural | Intervention, Functional Training Group, |
Primary outcome
FMS Score
Time frame: 90days
FMS test scores( in points)
Eight-stage abdominal bridge
Time frame: 90days
Control of body posture stability under static conditions, ( in points)
five-step lateral bridge
Time frame: 90days
Control of frontal body posture stability under static conditions (in points)
six supine bridge
Time frame: 90days
Control of back and hip stability under static conditions (in points)
3 secondary outcomes
T-type running
Time frame: 90days
Y-type jumping
Time frame: 90days
Aerobics competitive performance
Time frame: 90days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 May 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All IPDs collected, all IPDs used as a basis for results in publications.
Related trials for Postural Balance
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Postural Control and Balance Performance in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Postural Assessment
Not yet recruiting
A Comparison of the Effects of Exercise Methods for Adolescent Hyperkyphosis on the Sensorimotor System
Kyphosis Postural Thoracic, Kyphosis
Recruiting
Effects of Alexander Technique Versus Feldenkrais Somatic Training in Patients With Text Neck Syndrome
Text Neck Syndrome
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Effects of Exercises on Reactive Balance and Fall Risk in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
COMMUNITY-DWELLING OLDER ADULTS
Recruiting
Effects of Custom 3D Printed Insoles and Short Foot Exercises in Pes Planus
Pes Planus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Zijian Zhao study chair
Zhengzhou University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Functional Movement Training Group in people with Postural Balance, run by Lan Li at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Lan Li, 2024 (+8615038217255, 1096242208@qq.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
FMS Score (time frame: 90days). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2024.