Spinal Muscular AtrophyACE SMANCT06419322
Acceptability, Feasibility, Safety and Efficacy of a Optimized Rehabilitation Program for Treated Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA).
A study testing Optimized rehabilitation program in people with Spinal Muscular Atrophy, run by University of Oxford at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to investigate the acceptability, feasibility, safety and efficacy of an optimized rehabilitation program for treated patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) compared to the current rehabilitation program in the United Kingdom. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 10 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Muscular Atrophy
- What is being tested?
- Optimized rehabilitation program
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 14 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2024to 31 Aug 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 10 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Genetically confirmed SMA considered as a non-sitter, sitter or walker
- Post-symptomatically treated and on stable dose for 12 months with any disease-modifying market-approved drug
- Patients from 1-10 years of age at baseline
- Parent(s)/legal guardian(s) of patients less than 16 years of age must provide written informed consent prior to the patient's participation in the study
- Willing and able to comply with all protocol requirements and procedures.
- Willing and able to comply with all protocol requirements and procedures
- Carer's child has been included in study.
Who cannot join
- The participant may not enter the trial if ANY of the following apply:
- Any acute or chronic condition which, as assessed by the investigator, significantly interferes with the rehabilitation of the patient
- Need of diurnal and/or invasive ventilation, naps excluded
- Currently enrolled in a treatment study; or treatment with an experimental therapy
- Any surgical and/or medical intervention, according to the investigator, 3 months before baseline and/or during the study participation.
- Carer (considered as participant) Eligibility Criteria:
- No exclusion criteria.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Oxford Brookes University
Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 0BP
About this study
Official title: A Monocentric, Prospective and Longitudinal Study Investigating the Acceptability, Feasibility, Safety and Efficacy of an Optimized Rehabilitation Program for Treated Patients With SMA Compared to the Current Rehabilitation Program in United Kingdom: ACE SMA.
The goal of this study is to investigate the acceptability, feasibility, safety and efficacy of an optimized rehabilitation program for treated patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) compared to the current rehabilitation program in the United Kingdom. The aim is to provide patients with more hands on physiotherapy and access to rehabilitation devices at home to support parents currently providing rehabilitation on their own.
Read the detailed description
The main study objective is to investigate whether an optimized rehabilitation program would be accepted and is feasible within the SMA patient community.
The optimized program will comprise of goal orientated rehabilitation with more frequent hands on physiotherapy (every 2 weeks) as well as a SMA approved rehabilitation device used at home on a weekly basis, to provide the most appropriate therapy for each individual patient. All study participants will receive the optimized rehabilitation program over 12 months. An external control group will be used to determine the potential efficacy.
Research study visits will take place at baseline, month 6 and month 12. At these visits a general physical exam will be undertaken alongside collecting the participant and carer perception, satisfaction and compliancy of the rehabilitation program. Motor function assessments according to age and ambulatory status will be assessed to help evaluate potential therapeutic benefits.
- Conditions
- Spinal Muscular Atrophy
- Being tested
- Optimized rehabilitation program
- Keywords
- physiotherapy, rehabilitation, SMA, acceptability, feasibility, United Kingdom, physical therapy, prospective, Spinal Muscular Atrophy
- Medical subject headings
- Muscular Atrophy, Spinal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Optimized rehabilitation programOther
Consisting of: goal-oriented rehabilitation, hands on physiotherapy sessions and home use of SMA approved rehabilitation device.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treated cohort | Other | Not described Receives: Other: Optimized rehabilitation program |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Acceptability of an optimized rehabilitation program. Measured as number of eligible patients who accepted to participate in the study compared to the number of eligible patients who have refused to participate. Endpoint: 70% of acceptability.
Number of eligible patients who accepted to participate in the study compared to the number of eligible patients who have refused to participate.
Measured: Baseline visit
Feasibility of an optimized rehabilitation program. Measured as the number of patients who complete the study compared to the number of included patients. Endpoint: 60% of feasibility.
Number of patients who complete the study compared to the number of included patients.
Measured: Month 12 (end of study)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Safety of an optimized rehabilitation program. Measured as the number of serious adverse events (SAE) compared to the year before the baseline.
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs).
Measured: From baseline to month 12 (end of study)
Carer perception and satification measured through the Clinical Global Impression scale - Improvement (CGI I). Comparison of CGI-S score with CGI-I score of the treated group.
Potential effects of the optimized rehabilitation program on patients experience.
Measured: Month 6 and Month 12 (end of study).
Carer perception and satification measured through the Clinical Global Impression scale - Severity (CGI-S). Comparison of CGI-S score with CGI-I score of the treated group.
Potential effects of the optimized rehabilitation program on patients experience.
Measured: Baseline visit: CGI-S.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 May 2024
- Study start1 Jun 2024
- Primary completion30 Jun 2026
- Study completion31 Aug 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Spinal Muscular AtrophyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of OxfordThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- All participants will receive the optimized rehabilitation program (intervention). An external control group will be used to determine the potential efficacy.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Oxford
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Oxford Brookes University, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, ACE SMA Charity, Hoffmann-La Roche, Scholar Rock, Inc., Biohaven Therapeutics Ltd., Rally Round Rupert Charity
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Charlotte Lilien, Principal investigator, University of Oxford, Department of Paediatrics
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06419322
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ACE SMA
- Other IDs
- PID17165
- Acronym
- ACE SMA
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 2 May 2024
- Last updated
- 15 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Monocentric, Prospective and Longitudinal Study Investigating the Acceptability, Feasibility, Safety and Efficacy of an Optimized Rehabilitation Program for Treated Patients With SMA Compared to the Current Rehabilitation Program in United Kingdom: ACE SMA.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06419322
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACE SMA / ACE SMA
- Conditions
- Spinal Muscular Atrophy
- Keywords
- physiotherapy, rehabilitation, SMA, acceptability, feasibility, United Kingdom, physical therapy, prospective
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of OxfordUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Oxford Brookes University, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, ACE SMA Charity, Hoffmann-La Roche, Scholar Rock, Inc., Biohaven Therapeutics Ltd., Rally Round Rupert Charity
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 May 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to investigate the acceptability, feasibility, safety and efficacy of an optimized rehabilitation program for treated patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) compared to the current rehabilitation program in the United Kingdom. The aim is to provide patients with more hands on physiotherapy and access to rehabilitation devices at home to support parents currently providing rehabilitation on their own.
Detailed description
The main study objective is to investigate whether an optimized rehabilitation program would be accepted and is feasible within the SMA patient community.
The optimized program will comprise of goal orientated rehabilitation with more frequent hands on physiotherapy (every 2 weeks) as well as a SMA approved rehabilitation device used at home on a weekly basis, to provide the most appropriate therapy for each individual patient. All study participants will receive the optimized rehabilitation program over 12 months. An external control group will be used to determine the potential efficacy.
Research study visits will take place at baseline, month 6 and month 12. At these visits a general physical exam will be undertaken alongside collecting the participant and carer perception, satisfaction and compliancy of the rehabilitation program. Motor function assessments according to age and ambulatory status will be assessed to help evaluate potential therapeutic benefits.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- All participants will receive the optimized rehabilitation program (intervention). An external control group will be used to determine the potential efficacy.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treated cohort | Other | Other: Optimized rehabilitation program |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 year to 10 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Genetically confirmed SMA considered as a non-sitter, sitter or walker
- Post-symptomatically treated and on stable dose for 12 months with any disease-modifying market-approved drug
- Patients from 1-10 years of age at baseline
- Parent(s)/legal guardian(s) of patients less than 16 years of age must provide written informed consent prior to the patient's participation in the study
- Willing and able to comply with all protocol requirements and procedures.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Any acute or chronic condition which, as assessed by the investigator, significantly interferes with the rehabilitation of the patient
- Need of diurnal and/or invasive ventilation, naps excluded
- Currently enrolled in a treatment study; or treatment with an experimental therapy
- Any surgical and/or medical intervention, according to the investigator, 3 months before baseline and/or during the study participation.
- No exclusion criteria.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Optimized rehabilitation programConsisting of: goal-oriented rehabilitation, hands on physiotherapy sessions and home use of SMA approved rehabilitation device. | Other | Treated cohort |
Primary outcome
Acceptability of an optimized rehabilitation program. Measured as number of eligible patients who accepted to participate in the study compared to the number of eligible patients who have refused to participate. Endpoint: 70% of acceptability.
Time frame: Baseline visit
Number of eligible patients who accepted to participate in the study compared to the number of eligible patients who have refused to participate.
Feasibility of an optimized rehabilitation program. Measured as the number of patients who complete the study compared to the number of included patients. Endpoint: 60% of feasibility.
Time frame: Month 12 (end of study)
Number of patients who complete the study compared to the number of included patients.
3 secondary outcomes
Safety of an optimized rehabilitation program. Measured as the number of serious adverse events (SAE) compared to the year before the baseline.
Time frame: From baseline to month 12 (end of study)
Carer perception and satification measured through the Clinical Global Impression scale - Improvement (CGI I). Comparison of CGI-S score with CGI-I score of the treated group.
Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12 (end of study).
Carer perception and satification measured through the Clinical Global Impression scale - Severity (CGI-S). Comparison of CGI-S score with CGI-I score of the treated group.
Time frame: Baseline visit: CGI-S.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Spinal Muscular Atrophy
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Study of the Safety of Nusinersen (Spinraza®) and Its Effects on Motor Function in Koreans Living With SMA Treated During Their Usual Medical Care
Muscular Atrophy, Spinal
Recruiting
Evaluating Long-term Use of a Pediatric Robotic Exoskeleton (P.REX/Agilik) to Improve Gait in Children With Movement Disorders
Cerebral Palsy, Muscular Dystrophy
Recruiting
SMAdult - Monitoring of Movement on Spinal Muscular Atrophy
Spinal Amyotrophy
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Safety of BIIB115 Injections and How BIIB115 is Processed in the Bodies of Healthy Adult Male Volunteers and of Pediatric Participants With Spinal Muscular Atrophy Who Previously Took Onasemnogene Abeparvovec
Healthy Volunteer, Muscular Atrophy, Spinal
Recruiting
Effects of Different Stiffness Settings During Robotic Isokinetic Training in Children With SMA
Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Charlotte Lilien principal investigator
University of Oxford, Department of Paediatrics
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Optimized rehabilitation program in people with Spinal Muscular Atrophy, run by University of Oxford at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Acceptability of an optimized rehabilitation program. Measured as number of eligible patients who accepted to participate in the study compared to the number of eligible patients who have refused to participate. Endpoint: 70% of acceptability. (time frame: Baseline visit). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Sep 2026.