AzTrials
AzTrials

Heavy DrinkingNCT06420050

Testing a Novel Instagram Intervention for Heavy Alcohol Use

A study testing Instagram Intervention in people with Heavy Drinking, run by Emily Grekin at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This project aims to test the efficacy of an Instagram-based intervention for reducing heavy alcohol use. More specifically, the investigators will use a randomized controlled design to analyze differences in alcohol use and alcohol-related outcomes (e.g., alcohol-related consequences, etc.) as well as differences in… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 30 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Heavy Drinking
What is being tested?
Instagram Intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
22 Jun 2024to 30 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 30 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Ages 18-30
  • Report regular Instagram usage (i.e., at least a few times a week)
  • Report having met the NIAAA's criteria for a binge-drinking episode (4+ drinks in a sitting for cisgender women, 5+ drinks in a sitting for all other genders) at least twice a month for the past three month

Who cannot join

  • No exclusion criteria

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Wayne State University

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Testing a Novel Instagram Intervention for Heavy Alcohol Use: A Randomized Controlled

This project aims to test the efficacy of an Instagram-based intervention for reducing heavy alcohol use. More specifically, the investigators will use a randomized controlled design to analyze differences in alcohol use and alcohol-related outcomes (e.g., alcohol-related consequences, etc.) as well as differences in the use of protective behavioral strategies and mindfulness practices. Participants (80 Prolific users who report binge drinking) will be randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: intervention or control. Those who are randomized to the intervention condition will be invited to follow study Instagram pages, and those who are randomized to the control condition will be invited to complete the assessments only. The investigators hypothesize that there will be greater reductions in alcohol use, frequency, and consequences and greater frequency of use of mindfulness exercises and protective behavioral strategies among those in the intervention condition as compared to those in the control condition.

Conditions
Heavy Drinking
Being tested
Instagram Intervention

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Instagram InterventionBehavioural

    The intervention consists of a study Instagram page, which will post intervention content every day for 42 days.

Study groups in NCT06420050
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Instagram InterventionExperimentalNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Instagram Intervention
ControlNo interventionNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Frequency of Past-month Alcohol Use Using the Computer-Administered Timeline Follow-Back

    The investigators will analyze differences in the amount of days spent drinking.

    Measured: Given pre-intervention and at 10-week follow-up

  2. Change in Quantity of Past-month Alcohol Use Using the Computer-Administered Timeline Follow-Back

    The investigators will analyze differences in amount of past-month alcohol use and the amount of past-month binge-drinking episodes.

    Measured: Given pre-intervention and at 10-week follow-up

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Change in Frequency of Protective Behavioral Strategy Use Using the Protective Drinking Practices Scale

    The investigators will analyze the difference in frequency of recent protective behavioral strategy use using the Protective Drinking Practices Scale (minimum score = 20, maximum score = 120, and higher scores indicate a better outcome).

    Measured: Given pre-intervention and at 10-week follow-up

  2. Change in the Amount of Recent Alcohol Consequences Using the Brief Young Adult Consequences Scale

    The investigators will analyze the difference in amount of consequences related to alcohol use using the Brief Young Adult Consequences Scale (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 24, and higher scores indicate a worse outcome).

    Measured: Given pre-intervention and at 10-week follow-up

  3. Change in Frequency of Mindfulness Practice Use Using the Mindfulness Awareness Scale

    The investigators will analyze the difference in frequency of use of mindfulness practices using the Mindfulness Awareness Scale (minimum score = 15, maximum score = 90, and higher scores indicate a better outcome).

    Measured: Given pre-intervention and at 10-week follow-up

  4. Change in Readiness to Change Drinking Behavior Using the Readiness to Change Questionnaire

    The investigators will analyze the difference in reported readiness to change drinking behavior using the Readiness to Change Questionnaire (minimum score = 12, maximum score = 84, and higher scores indicate a better outcome).

    Measured: Given pre-intervention and at 10-week follow-up

  5. Participant Subjective Reactions Using Likert Scales

    The investigators will ask participants to rate the intervention content on acceptability dimensions created specifically for this study (i.e., relevance, empathy, interest, helpfulness, respectfulness, personalization). On a given domain, minimum score = 1, maximum score = 5, and higher scores indicate better outcomes.

    Measured: Given at 10-week follow-up

  6. Participant Subjective Reactions Using Simple Yes/No Questions

    The investigators will ask participants to rate how the intervention has qualitatively impacted them using simple yes/no questions (i.e., if they remember seeing certain posts, if the posts made them think about their drinking, affected their sense of community, etc.).

    Measured: Given at 10-week follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 May 2024
  2. Study start22 Jun 2024
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06420050
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB-23-11-6344
Status last verified
Jul 2024
First submitted
10 Apr 2024
Last updated
24 Jul 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Instagram Intervention in people with Heavy Drinking, run by Emily Grekin at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Frequency of Past-month Alcohol Use Using the Computer-Administered Timeline Follow-Back (time frame: Given pre-intervention and at 10-week follow-up). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in