Acute DiseaseNCT06421246
Implementation and Evaluation of Real Time Monitoring of Physical Activity in Geriatric Patients - a Hybrid Implementation and Effectiveness Study in Two Patient Cohorts
An observational study of Acute Disease and Old Age, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
The study aim to assess 24-hour activity during hospitalization in older adults admitted to a geriatric ward and to validate the Danish version of the Acute Care Mobility Assessment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Disease, Old Age
- What is being tested?
- Staff-facing screen
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 15 May 2024to 30 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Study population: Older adults admitted to a geriatric ward at Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre
Who may be able to join
- 65 years
- no delirium
- ability to ambulate
Who cannot join
- in isolation
- teminally ill
- Expected to be discharged within 24-hours from inclusion
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Physical Activity in Geriatric Patients Before and After the Introduction of a Staff-facing Real-time Activity Screen and Validation of the Danish Version of the Acute Care Mobility Assessment - a Hybrid Implementation and Effectiveness Study in Two Patient Cohorts
The study aim to assess 24-hour activity during hospitalization in older adults admitted to a geriatric ward and to validate the Danish version of the Acute Care Mobility Assessment.
In a follow-up study, we will implement and evaluate a staff-facing activity screen showing real-time physical activity in the geriatric ward with a focus on changes in staff culture (awareness and actions) and basis for data-driven discussions about physical activity during hospitalization inspired by Making Every Contact Count. Also, we will reassess in-hospital physical activity in older adults admitted to the geriatric ward.
Read the detailed description
The study uses a Hybrid Type I design in which both the implementation of a staff-facing screen and the effectiveness on physical activity will be evaluated. The study is conducted in two phases.
Phase one is an observational cohort study. During 6 weeks, 24-hour activity will be assessed in all patients (65+) admitted to a geriatric ward in Denmark, who are able to walk and to provide informed consent (or vicarious consent). Activity will be measured for a maximum of 7 days. Demographic characteristics will be collected (sex, age, place of residence, comorbidities, admission diagnosis, civil status, frailty), and the patients will be asked about their: daily activities, walking ability, life space activity, present activity, use of walking aids, and falls. On inclusion, the patients will be assessed for their basic mobility, cognition, gait speed, and their level of mobility. The Acute Care Mobility Assessment will be validated on the initial 5-10 patients via cognitive debriefing interviews (May-July 2024). In the same period, an ethnographic field study will be conducted with focus on physical activity followed by semi-structured interviews (N=17) with managers and health care professionals.
In the follow-up study, we will assess in-hospital physical activity over a 6-week period after introducing a staff-facing activity screen, showing real-time activity and to investigate whether the activity screen increases physical activity among hospitalized geriatric patients. 24-hours physical activity will be re-quantified using SENS motion ®, sensor technology. The study design will otherwise follow the same approach as the initial study, including the use of the same outcome measures. In the same period, we will repeat the ethnographic field study and interviews regarding focus on physical activity and implementation of the activity screen with managers and health care professionals inspired by Making Every Contact Count. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will be used as Framework, and focus will be on adoption and adaptation.
The study meets the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and is approved by the Research Ethics Committee (F-24023831).
- Conditions
- Acute Disease, Old Age
- Being tested
- Staff-facing screen
- Medical subject headings
- Acute Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Staff-facing screenBehavioural
Activity will be monitored before and after the introduction of a staff-facing screen
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Activity monitoring and validity of the Danish Version of the Acute Care Mobility Assessement | 24- hour activity will be assessed by SENS motion acitivity monitors before (Cohort 1) and after the introduction (Cohort 2) of a screen-solution with staff-facing real time activity data and investigation of the implementation process and outcomes. Furthermore, the Acute Care mobility assessment will be validated by cognitive debriefing interviews in 5-10 patients in Cohort 1. Receives: Behavioral: Staff-facing screen |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Daily steps
Number of daily steps taken and the distribution over the entire hospitalization, assessed by a SENS motion accelerometer from inclusion and throughout hospitalization.
Measured: 7 days
Secondary outcomes (15)
Self-reported mobility
Self-reported mobility by the Acute Care Mobility Assessment. A score of 0-12 can be obtained, with 0 reflecting poor mobility and 12 reflecting a high level of mobility.
Measured: Days 2, 4 and 6 after inclusion
Life Space mobility
By the Life Space Assessment-DK, which measure mobility and level of dependence in mobility. A score of 0-120 can be obtained, with 0 reflecting poor mobility and 120 reflecting high mobility.
Measured: At inclusion, 4 weeks post discharge
Self-reported pre-admission (2 weeks prior to admission) and post discharge mobility
By the New Mobility Score, which assesses the ability to walk indoors and outdoors and the ability to go shopping. A score from 0-9 can be obtained, with 0 reflecting low mobility and 9 reflecting high mobility.
Measured: At inclusion and 1 week after discharge
Frailty
By the Clinical Frailty Scale, which is a clinical evaluation of the degree of frailty of a person. It is scored by health care professionals on a scale from 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill)
Measured: At inclusion
Cognitive status
By the Orientation Memory Concentration Test, which is a screening of cognitive function. A score from 0 to 28 i obtained with lower scores reflecting poorer cognition (0-7: highly impaired; 8-17 points: moderately imparied; 18-24 points: mildly impaired; 25-28 points: no or insignificatn impairment).
Measured: At inclusion
Activities of daily living
By the Katz index, which assesses independence in 6 Activities of Daily Living on a scale from 0 to 6 with 0 reflecting dependence in all activities and 6 reflecting independence in all activities.
Measured: At inclusion and 1 week after discharge
Basic mobility
By the The Cummulated Ambulation Score, which assessed the ability of a person to get in an out of bed, sit to stand from a chair and walk. It is scored from 0 to 6 with 0 reflecting inability to perform the 3 activities and a score of 6 refelcting independence in the three activities.
Measured: Days 2, 4 and 6 after inclusion
Highest level of mobility
By the Johns Hopkins Higest Level of Mobility Scale which evaluates a patient's level of mobiltiy on a 1 (lying) to 8 (waling more than 250 feet) point scale
Measured: At inclusion
Gait speed
By the 4 meter habitual gait speed test. It assesses the patient's habitual gait speed on a 4-meter course. The test is scored in m/s.
Measured: At inclusion
Uptime
Daily time spent in uptime and the distribution over the entire hospitalization, assessed by a SENS motion accelerometer from inclusion and throughout hospitalization.
Measured: 7 days
Daily walking
Daily time spent walking and the distribution over the entire hospitalization, assessed by a SENS motion accelerometer from inclusion and throughout hospitalization.
Measured: 7 days
Daily standing
Daily time spent walking assessed by a SENS motion accelerometer from inclusion and throughout hospitalization.
Measured: 7 days
Daily lying/sitting
Daily time spent sitting/lying and the distribution over the entire hospitalization, assessed by a SENS motion accelerometer from inclusion and throughout hospitalization.
Measured: 7 days
Readmission
Number of readmission with three months after discharge
Measured: 3 months after discharge
Falls
Number of falls within the first month after discharge.
Measured: 1 month after discharge
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 May 2024
- Study start15 May 2024
- Primary completion14 Mar 2025
- Study completion30 Dec 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mette Merete Pedersen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06421246
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- F-24023831
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 10 May 2024
- Last updated
- 19 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Johansen LK, Larsen TS, Kirk JW, Pedersen BS, Nielsen BR, Kallemose T, Bandholm T, Pedersen MM. Exploring in-hospital mobility practices for geriatric patients: insights from a mixed-method study. BMC Geriatr. 2025 May 13;25(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05976-9.
PubMed 40361036
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Physical Activity in Geriatric Patients Before and After the Introduction of a Staff-facing Real-time Activity Screen and Validation of the Danish Version of the Acute Care Mobility Assessment - a Hybrid Implementation and Effectiveness Study in Two Patient Cohorts
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06421246
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- F-24023831
- Conditions
- Acute Disease, Old Age
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, HvidovreUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 May 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 May 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study aim to assess 24-hour activity during hospitalization in older adults admitted to a geriatric ward and to validate the Danish version of the Acute Care Mobility Assessment.
In a follow-up study, we will implement and evaluate a staff-facing activity screen showing real-time physical activity in the geriatric ward with a focus on changes in staff culture (awareness and actions) and basis for data-driven discussions about physical activity during hospitalization inspired by Making Every Contact Count. Also, we will reassess in-hospital physical activity in older adults admitted to the geriatric ward.
Detailed description
The study uses a Hybrid Type I design in which both the implementation of a staff-facing screen and the effectiveness on physical activity will be evaluated. The study is conducted in two phases.
Phase one is an observational cohort study. During 6 weeks, 24-hour activity will be assessed in all patients (65+) admitted to a geriatric ward in Denmark, who are able to walk and to provide informed consent (or vicarious consent). Activity will be measured for a maximum of 7 days. Demographic characteristics will be collected (sex, age, place of residence, comorbidities, admission diagnosis, civil status, frailty), and the patients will be asked about their: daily activities, walking ability, life space activity, present activity, use of walking aids, and falls. On inclusion, the patients will be assessed for their basic mobility, cognition, gait speed, and their level of mobility. The Acute Care Mobility Assessment will be validated on the initial 5-10 patients via cognitive debriefing interviews (May-July 2024). In the same period, an ethnographic field study will be conducted with focus on physical activity followed by semi-structured interviews (N=17) with managers and health care professionals.
In the follow-up study, we will assess in-hospital physical activity over a 6-week period after introducing a staff-facing activity screen, showing real-time activity and to investigate whether the activity screen increases physical activity among hospitalized geriatric patients. 24-hours physical activity will be re-quantified using SENS motion ®, sensor technology. The study design will otherwise follow the same approach as the initial study, including the use of the same outcome measures. In the same period, we will repeat the ethnographic field study and interviews regarding focus on physical activity and implementation of the activity screen with managers and health care professionals inspired by Making Every Contact Count. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will be used as Framework, and focus will be on adoption and adaptation.
The study meets the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and is approved by the Research Ethics Committee (F-24023831).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Activity monitoring and validity of the Danish Version of the Acute Care Mobility Assessement | – | Behavioral: Staff-facing screen24- hour activity will be assessed by SENS motion acitivity monitors before (Cohort 1) and after the introduction (Cohort 2) of a screen-solution with staff-facing real time activity data and investigation of the implementation process and outcomes. Furthermore, the Acute Care mobility assessment will be validated by cognitive debriefing interviews in 5-10 patients in Cohort 1. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
- Study population
- Older adults admitted to a geriatric ward at Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- 65 years
- no delirium
- ability to ambulate
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- in isolation
- teminally ill
- Expected to be discharged within 24-hours from inclusion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Staff-facing screenActivity will be monitored before and after the introduction of a staff-facing screen | Behavioural | Activity monitoring and validity of the Danish Version of the Acute Care Mobility Assessement |
Primary outcome
Daily steps
Time frame: 7 days
Number of daily steps taken and the distribution over the entire hospitalization, assessed by a SENS motion accelerometer from inclusion and throughout hospitalization.
15 secondary outcomes
Self-reported mobility
Time frame: Days 2, 4 and 6 after inclusion
Life Space mobility
Time frame: At inclusion, 4 weeks post discharge
Self-reported pre-admission (2 weeks prior to admission) and post discharge mobility
Time frame: At inclusion and 1 week after discharge
Frailty
Time frame: At inclusion
Cognitive status
Time frame: At inclusion
Activities of daily living
Time frame: At inclusion and 1 week after discharge
Basic mobility
Time frame: Days 2, 4 and 6 after inclusion
Highest level of mobility
Time frame: At inclusion
Gait speed
Time frame: At inclusion
Uptime
Time frame: 7 days
Daily walking
Time frame: 7 days
Daily standing
Time frame: 7 days
Daily lying/sitting
Time frame: 7 days
Readmission
Time frame: 3 months after discharge
Falls
Time frame: 1 month after discharge
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Mar 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40361036Johansen LK, Larsen TS, Kirk JW, Pedersen BS, Nielsen BR, Kallemose T, Bandholm T, Pedersen MM. Exploring in-hospital mobility practices for geriatric patients: insights from a mixed-method study. BMC Geriatr. 2025 May 13;25(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05976-9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acute Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Population Pharmacokinetics of Temocillin in Acute Enterobacterial Pyelonephritis in Children
Pyelonephritis
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Acute Disease and Old Age, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Daily steps (time frame: 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06421246, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2026.