Bleed UlcerNCT06421389
Precise Endoscopic Application of Tranexamic Acid and Sucralfate in Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Randomized Controlled Trial
A study testing Tranexamic Acid Powder in people with Bleed Ulcer, run by National Cheng-Kung University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
Background and Aim: Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common problem in the hospital. GIB can be divided into upper GIB, small bowel bleeding, and lower GIB. Endoscopic hemostasis includes epinephrine injection, hemoclipping, heat probe coagulation, and Argon plasma coagulation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bleed Ulcer
- What is being tested?
- Tranexamic Acid Powder
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 15 Aug 2024to 30 Jun 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Eligible participants include patients aged ≥ 18 years who accept endoscopy for GIB, including hematemesis, Tarry stool, or bloody stool
Who cannot join
- no need of endoscopic hemostasis
- allergy to sucralfate, tranexamic acid, or barium
- pregnancy
- patients with hollow organ perforation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Background and Aim: Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common problem in the hospital. GIB can be divided into upper GIB, small bowel bleeding, and lower GIB. Endoscopic hemostasis includes epinephrine injection, hemoclipping, heat probe coagulation, and Argon plasma coagulation. Although the successful hemostasis rate is high, recurrent bleeding can occur, ranging from 10% to 50% according to the bleeding etiology. Therefore, how to reduce the rebleeding of GIB is an important clinical issue.
Methods: This is a randomized clinical trial. Patients with gastrointestinal bleeding for endoscopy screening and treatment at National Cheng Kung University Hospital were enrolled. The study will recruit 60 patients. After randomization, 30 patients will be classified into the intervention group and 30 into the control group. The participants will receive standard endoscopic hemostasis by either local injection of diluted epinephrine, heater probe coagulation, hemoclipping, or band ligation. After then, we will spray 2g of sucralfate powder and 1g of tranexamic acid through duodenoscopy precisely on the bleeding site in the intervention group. All enrolled patients will be monitored for rebleeding for 28 days after the first endoscopy.
Read the detailed description
Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common problem in the hospital. The annual rate of hospitalization for any type of GI hemorrhage is estimated to be 350 hospital admissions/100,000 population. GIB can be divided into upper GIB, small bowel bleeding, and lower GIB. Approximately 50% of admissions for GIB are for UGI bleeding (from the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum), 40% are for LGI bleeding (from the colon and anorectum), and 10% are for small intestine bleeding. Ulceration bleeding, variceal bleeding, angiodysplasia, Dieulafoy lesion, and tumor bleeding are common cause for UGIB, while diverticulosis, colitis, angioectasia, cancer bleeding, and polypectomy ulcer attribute to the LGIB. GI endoscopy can identify the bleeding site and permit therapeutic hemostasis in most patients with GI bleeding.
Endoscopic hemostasis includes epinephrine injection, hemoclipping, heat probe coagulation, and Argon plasma coagulation. Although the successful hemostasis rate is high, recurrent bleeding can occur, ranging from 10% to 50% according to the bleeding etiology. Therefore, how to reduce the rebleeding of GIB is an important clinical issue.
Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a well-known antifibrinolytic agent that inhibits fibrin degradation by binding to tissue plasminogen, thereby preventing blood clot lysis and reducing bleeding. A recent study evaluating the effect of topical tranexamic acid (TXA) powder on bleeding peptic ulcers demonstrated that the precise endoscopic administration of TXA powder can enhance the stop-bleeding effect.
Sucralfate, a complex of aluminum hydroxide and sucrose octa sulfate, can bind to the wound base. This protective barrier can prevent the wound from further environmental injury. Sucralfate has been widely used for wounds and ulcer treatment, e.g., skin wounds, oral ulcers, and peptic ulcers. With the protective effect of the papilla mucosa, sucralfate can cover the wound and has the potential to avoid further environmental damage. In combination with TXA powder in stabilizing the clotting, we expect the rebleeding event will reduce. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether the combination therapy of topical administration of TXA and sucralfate after standard endoscopic hemostasis can reduce the rebleeding event.
Furthermore, the adhesion time of the hemostasis powder at the bleeding site is also an unknown issue. High-dose barium enema use provides better clinical outcomes for initial hemostasis and long-term prevention of rebleeding than conservative therapy in LGIB. In combination of barium, the position of hemostasis powder can be identified by Xray.
Subjects and protocols Participants will be recruited from the volunteers with gastrointestinal bleeding at National Cheng Kung University Hospital. Eligible participants include patients aged ≥ 18 years who accept endoscopy for GIB, including hematemesis, Tarry stool, or bloody stool. Patient consent forms will be given and explained to all patients before the endoscopy. Exclusion criteria include patients with no need of endoscopic hemostasis, allergy to sucralfate, tranexamic acid, or barium, pregnancy, and patients with hollow organ perforation. After patient enrollment, we will randomize the patient into either the intervention group or control group by sealed envelope randomization method.
After the standard endoscopic hemostasis by either epinephrine injection, hemoclipping, heat coagulation, or band ligation, we will randomly assign the patients to either a control or an intervention group. After then, we will spray 2g of sucralfate powder, 1g of tranexamic acid powder, and 1g of barium through the endoscopy precisely on the bleeding site in the intervention group.
Blood tests As ward routine for bleeding patient, a blood sample is obtained to measure creatinine, albumin, total bilirubin, hemoglobin, platelet, prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). All lab data are checked by the central laboratory of the National Cheng Kung University Hospital.
- Conditions
- Bleed Ulcer
- Being tested
- Tranexamic Acid Powder
- Keywords
- Bleeding ulcer, Sulcralfate, Tranexamic acid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tranexamic Acid PowderDrug
Also called sucralfate powder, barrium sulfate powder
2g of sucralfate powder, 1g of tranexamic acid powder, and 1g of barium will be sprayed through the endoscopy precisely on the bleeding site
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | All patients will receive the standard endoscopic hemostasis by either epinephrine injection, hemoclipping, heat coagulation, or band ligation. After then, patients in intervention group will receive 2g of sucralfate powder, 1g of tranexamic acid powder, and 1g of barium spray through the endoscopy precisely on the bleeding site. Receives: Drug: Tranexamic Acid Powder |
| Control group | No intervention | All patients will receive the standard endoscopic hemostasis by either epinephrine injection, hemoclipping, heat coagulation, or band ligation. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the recurrent rate of GI bleeding during the study period
Recurrent bleeding was defined as remarkable hematochezia or Tarry stool with endoscopic evidence of the same site bleeding.
Measured: 28 days
Secondary outcomes (4)
the rate of rebleeding requiring transarterial embolization or emergency surgery
rebleeding requiring transarterial embolization or emergency surgery
Measured: 28 days
length of hospitalization
length of hospitalization
Measured: 28 days
all-cause mortality rate
all-cause mortality
Measured: 28 days
adverse events rate from powder spray
adverse events from powder spray, such as perforation or thrombotic events
Measured: 28 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 May 2024
- Study start15 Aug 2024
- Primary completion30 Jun 2025
- Study completion30 Jun 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bleed UlcerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Cheng-Kung University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hsueh-Chien Chiang, National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06421389
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B-BR-113-014
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 14 May 2024
- Last updated
- 18 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: The IPD will be shared once the trial completed and study published
Publications
Saydam SS, Molnar M, Vora P. The global epidemiology of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding in general population: A systematic review. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Apr 27;15(4):723-739. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i4.723.
PubMed 37206079Chiang HC, Chen PJ, Yang EH, Hsieh MT, Shih IC, Cheng HC, Chang WL, Chen WY, Chiu HC, Kuo HY, Tsai WC, Lo YN, Yang KC, Chiang CM, Chen WC, Huang KK, Tseng HH, Chen CY, Lin XZ, Chuang CH. Precise application of topical tranexamic acid to enhance endoscopic hemostasis for peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized controlled study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Nov;98(5):755-764. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.06.013. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
PubMed 37356632Masuelli L, Tumino G, Turriziani M, Modesti A, Bei R. Topical use of sucralfate in epithelial wound healing: clinical evidences and molecular mechanisms of action. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov. 2010 Jan;4(1):25-36. doi: 10.2174/187221310789895649.
PubMed 19832693Nagata N, Niikura R, Shimbo T, Ishizuka N, Yamano K, Mizuguchi K, Akiyama J, Yanase M, Mizokami M, Uemura N. High-dose barium impaction therapy for the recurrence of colonic diverticular bleeding: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):269-75. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000658.
PubMed 25569028Lu MH, Chiang HC, Yang EH, Kuo TL, Lin MY, Chiang CM, Wu MH, Chen WY, Chang WL, Chen CY, Chuang CH, Lin XZ, Chen PJ. Endoscopic Application of Tranexamic Acid and Sucralfate in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2026 Jul 1;17(7):e01023. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000001023. Epub 2026 Mar 20.
PubMed 41860133
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Precise Endoscopic Application of Tranexamic Acid and Sucralfate in Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06421389
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- B-BR-113-014
- Conditions
- Bleed Ulcer
- Keywords
- Bleeding ulcer, Sulcralfate, Tranexamic acid
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Cheng-Kung University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 May 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background and Aim: Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common problem in the hospital. GIB can be divided into upper GIB, small bowel bleeding, and lower GIB. Endoscopic hemostasis includes epinephrine injection, hemoclipping, heat probe coagulation, and Argon plasma coagulation. Although the successful hemostasis rate is high, recurrent bleeding can occur, ranging from 10% to 50% according to the bleeding etiology. Therefore, how to reduce the rebleeding of GIB is an important clinical issue.
Methods: This is a randomized clinical trial. Patients with gastrointestinal bleeding for endoscopy screening and treatment at National Cheng Kung University Hospital were enrolled. The study will recruit 60 patients. After randomization, 30 patients will be classified into the intervention group and 30 into the control group. The participants will receive standard endoscopic hemostasis by either local injection of diluted epinephrine, heater probe coagulation, hemoclipping, or band ligation. After then, we will spray 2g of sucralfate powder and 1g of tranexamic acid through duodenoscopy precisely on the bleeding site in the intervention group. All enrolled patients will be monitored for rebleeding for 28 days after the first endoscopy.
Detailed description
Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common problem in the hospital. The annual rate of hospitalization for any type of GI hemorrhage is estimated to be 350 hospital admissions/100,000 population. GIB can be divided into upper GIB, small bowel bleeding, and lower GIB. Approximately 50% of admissions for GIB are for UGI bleeding (from the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum), 40% are for LGI bleeding (from the colon and anorectum), and 10% are for small intestine bleeding. Ulceration bleeding, variceal bleeding, angiodysplasia, Dieulafoy lesion, and tumor bleeding are common cause for UGIB, while diverticulosis, colitis, angioectasia, cancer bleeding, and polypectomy ulcer attribute to the LGIB. GI endoscopy can identify the bleeding site and permit therapeutic hemostasis in most patients with GI bleeding.
Endoscopic hemostasis includes epinephrine injection, hemoclipping, heat probe coagulation, and Argon plasma coagulation. Although the successful hemostasis rate is high, recurrent bleeding can occur, ranging from 10% to 50% according to the bleeding etiology. Therefore, how to reduce the rebleeding of GIB is an important clinical issue.
Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a well-known antifibrinolytic agent that inhibits fibrin degradation by binding to tissue plasminogen, thereby preventing blood clot lysis and reducing bleeding. A recent study evaluating the effect of topical tranexamic acid (TXA) powder on bleeding peptic ulcers demonstrated that the precise endoscopic administration of TXA powder can enhance the stop-bleeding effect.
Sucralfate, a complex of aluminum hydroxide and sucrose octa sulfate, can bind to the wound base. This protective barrier can prevent the wound from further environmental injury. Sucralfate has been widely used for wounds and ulcer treatment, e.g., skin wounds, oral ulcers, and peptic ulcers. With the protective effect of the papilla mucosa, sucralfate can cover the wound and has the potential to avoid further environmental damage. In combination with TXA powder in stabilizing the clotting, we expect the rebleeding event will reduce. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether the combination therapy of topical administration of TXA and sucralfate after standard endoscopic hemostasis can reduce the rebleeding event.
Furthermore, the adhesion time of the hemostasis powder at the bleeding site is also an unknown issue. High-dose barium enema use provides better clinical outcomes for initial hemostasis and long-term prevention of rebleeding than conservative therapy in LGIB. In combination of barium, the position of hemostasis powder can be identified by Xray.
Subjects and protocols Participants will be recruited from the volunteers with gastrointestinal bleeding at National Cheng Kung University Hospital. Eligible participants include patients aged ≥ 18 years who accept endoscopy for GIB, including hematemesis, Tarry stool, or bloody stool. Patient consent forms will be given and explained to all patients before the endoscopy. Exclusion criteria include patients with no need of endoscopic hemostasis, allergy to sucralfate, tranexamic acid, or barium, pregnancy, and patients with hollow organ perforation. After patient enrollment, we will randomize the patient into either the intervention group or control group by sealed envelope randomization method.
After the standard endoscopic hemostasis by either epinephrine injection, hemoclipping, heat coagulation, or band ligation, we will randomly assign the patients to either a control or an intervention group. After then, we will spray 2g of sucralfate powder, 1g of tranexamic acid powder, and 1g of barium through the endoscopy precisely on the bleeding site in the intervention group.
Blood tests As ward routine for bleeding patient, a blood sample is obtained to measure creatinine, albumin, total bilirubin, hemoglobin, platelet, prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). All lab data are checked by the central laboratory of the National Cheng Kung University Hospital.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Drug: Tranexamic Acid PowderAll patients will receive the standard endoscopic hemostasis by either epinephrine injection, hemoclipping, heat coagulation, or band ligation. After then, patients in intervention group will receive 2g of sucralfate powder, 1g of tranexamic acid powder, and 1g of barium spray through the endoscopy precisely on the bleeding site. |
| Control group | No intervention | –All patients will receive the standard endoscopic hemostasis by either epinephrine injection, hemoclipping, heat coagulation, or band ligation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Eligible participants include patients aged ≥ 18 years who accept endoscopy for GIB, including hematemesis, Tarry stool, or bloody stool
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- no need of endoscopic hemostasis
- allergy to sucralfate, tranexamic acid, or barium
- pregnancy
- patients with hollow organ perforation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tranexamic Acid PowderAlso: sucralfate powder, barrium sulfate powder2g of sucralfate powder, 1g of tranexamic acid powder, and 1g of barium will be sprayed through the endoscopy precisely on the bleeding site | Drug | Intervention group |
Primary outcome
the recurrent rate of GI bleeding during the study period
Time frame: 28 days
Recurrent bleeding was defined as remarkable hematochezia or Tarry stool with endoscopic evidence of the same site bleeding.
4 secondary outcomes
the rate of rebleeding requiring transarterial embolization or emergency surgery
Time frame: 28 days
length of hospitalization
Time frame: 28 days
all-cause mortality rate
Time frame: 28 days
adverse events rate from powder spray
Time frame: 28 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jul 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 37206079Saydam SS, Molnar M, Vora P. The global epidemiology of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding in general population: A systematic review. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Apr 27;15(4):723-739. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i4.723.
- Results publication: PubMed 37356632Chiang HC, Chen PJ, Yang EH, Hsieh MT, Shih IC, Cheng HC, Chang WL, Chen WY, Chiu HC, Kuo HY, Tsai WC, Lo YN, Yang KC, Chiang CM, Chen WC, Huang KK, Tseng HH, Chen CY, Lin XZ, Chuang CH. Precise application of topical tranexamic acid to enhance endoscopic hemostasis for peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized controlled study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Nov;98(5):755-764. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.06.013. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 19832693Masuelli L, Tumino G, Turriziani M, Modesti A, Bei R. Topical use of sucralfate in epithelial wound healing: clinical evidences and molecular mechanisms of action. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov. 2010 Jan;4(1):25-36. doi: 10.2174/187221310789895649.
- Results publication: PubMed 25569028Nagata N, Niikura R, Shimbo T, Ishizuka N, Yamano K, Mizuguchi K, Akiyama J, Yanase M, Mizokami M, Uemura N. High-dose barium impaction therapy for the recurrence of colonic diverticular bleeding: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):269-75. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000658.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41860133Lu MH, Chiang HC, Yang EH, Kuo TL, Lin MY, Chiang CM, Wu MH, Chen WY, Chang WL, Chen CY, Chuang CH, Lin XZ, Chen PJ. Endoscopic Application of Tranexamic Acid and Sucralfate in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2026 Jul 1;17(7):e01023. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000001023. Epub 2026 Mar 20.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. The IPD will be shared once the trial completed and study published
Related trials for Bleed Ulcer
RecruitingObservational study
Association of Prophylactic Use of Stress Ulcer Drugs and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Anterior Circulation Thrombectomy
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Recruiting
Discontinuation of Antithrombotic Treatment Following Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Young Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke
Patent Foramen Ovale, Ischemic Stroke
Recruiting
Onyx™ Liquid Embolic IDE Clinical Study
Peripheral Arterial Hemorrhage, Trauma
RecruitingPhase 4
Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker Versus pROton-Pump Inhibitor for GastroproTECTion Strategies In Patients at High Gastro-Intestinal Bleeding Risk Receiving Antithrombotic Therapy
Coronary Artery Disease, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
RecruitingPhase 2
Tegoprazan Versus Lansoprazole for Endoscopic Ulcer Healing in Bleeding Peptic Ulcers
Peptic Ulcer Bleeding
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Tranexamic Acid Powder in people with Bleed Ulcer, run by National Cheng-Kung University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the recurrent rate of GI bleeding during the study period (time frame: 28 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06421389, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jul 2025.