Functional Neurological DisorderHRV_BFB_FNDNCT06422819
Clinical Evaluation of HRV Biofeedback in Functional Neurological Disorders Compared to Placebo
A study testing Heart rate variability Biofeedback [HRV-BFB] and Pseudo HRV-BFB in people with Functional Neurological Disorder, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Evaluation of the clinical effects of the Heart Rate Variability biofeedback training with patients suffering from Functional neurological Disorders compared with placebo. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Functional Neurological Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Heart rate variability Biofeedback [HRV-BFB] and Pseudo HRV-BFB
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 31 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 9 Sep 2024to May 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Functional Neurological Disorders (FND) diagnosis must be medically established
- Participants must have a smartphone (android ou Iphone)
- Participants must be of the age of majority
- Participants must have signed an informed consent
- Sufficiently fluent in French to understand study documents and instructions
- Consistency in performing repeated questionnaires
- Normal or corrected-to-normal visual acuity
Who cannot join
- Specially protected participants: juveniles, pregnant womens, nursing mothers, law's protection peoples
- Participants suffering from a severe psychiatric disease needing specialised attention
- History of severe neurosurgical pathology
- Alcohol dependence or drug use
- Participants suffering from or have suffered from a severe disease causing autonomic dysfunctions (heart failure, asthma, blood disease, renal failure, peripheral neuropathy, vagotomy, thyroid disorder, alcoholism, liver disease, amyloidosis)
- Participants taking medication which could be impact autonomic nervous system activity (anticholinergic, antiarrhythmics, clonidine, beta-blockers, tricyclic anti-depressants, metronidazole)
- Participants placing under judicial or administrative supervisions
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Université de Montréal's affiliated Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUM)
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 0C1
About this study
Official title: Probing the Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback as an Innovative and Non-invasive Treatment for Functional Neurological Disorders Guided by a Multimodal Approach of Autonomic Nervous System.
Evaluation of the clinical effects of the Heart Rate Variability biofeedback training with patients suffering from Functional neurological Disorders compared with placebo.
Read the detailed description
Although Functional Neurological Disorders (FND) represent one of the most common reasons for consultation in Neurology, the pathological mechanisms remain unexplained. Recent studies suggest disrupted emotional processes in patients with FND and disturbed autonomic nervous system profiles, highligting the hypothesis of autonomic endophenotypes among the FND population.
The Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRV-BFB) is an innovative and non-invasive approach, based on the self-regulation of autonomic physiological processes. It has shown promising results in clinical and non-clinical populations but has never been assessed in an adult FND population.
Therefore, this approach appears particularly promising for understanding the mechanisms underlying FND and developing personalized therapy.
The main objective is to investigate the clinical effects of HRV-BFB on FND patients compared to placebo in a single-blind crossover design.
The investigators predict that depending on their autonomic profile, patients will respond to HRV-BFB to varying degrees.
Firstly, patients with FND will prospectively undergo an comprehensive clinical evaluation considering symptoms, functional capacity, quality of life, and an assessment of the physical and psychological comorbidities. Then patients will complete an emotional task and undergo multimodal autonomic measures. Cluster analyses will be conducted to identify both dysfunctional and functional autonomic profiles associated with the clinical exploration, enabling confirmation of the endophenotypes hypothesis and allowing for specific characterization of the profils. The clinical evaluation of the beneficial effects of HRV BFB will rely on repeated mesures of symptoms, functional capacity, and quality of life at scheduled points in time before and after the both interventions (HRV-BFB and pseudo-BFB). The emotional task and autonomic measures will be repeated simultaneously.
- Conditions
- Functional Neurological Disorder
- Being tested
- Heart rate variability Biofeedback [HRV-BFB], Pseudo HRV-BFB
- Keywords
- Functional Neurological Disorder, Emotional dysregulation, Autonomic nervous system, Endophenotypes, Biofeedback of Heart Rate Variability, Transdiagnostic approach
- Medical subject headings
- Conversion Disorder
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Heart rate variability Biofeedback [HRV-BFB]Other
Biofeedback (BFB), sometimes referred to as "biological feedback technique," is a non-invasive and non-pharmacological approach based on physiological recordings that provide real-time feedback enabling people to learn how to control their physiological processes, which are typically unconscious and beyond their control. HRV-BFB specifically targets heart rate variability (HRV), which can help regulate the autonomic nervous system (including vagal tone and sympathetic-parasympathetic balance) as well as emotional states. HRV-BFB has been clinically and experimentally validated as a physiological intervention and has demonstrated its effectiveness. However, it has never been studied in an adult FND population.
Pseudo HRV-BFBOther
The pseudo HRV-BFB intervention aims to implement the same HRV BFB methods with no specific effect on HRV.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group (HRV-BFB training) | Experimental | Participants assigned to the experimental group will undergo HRV Biofeedback training using the Inner Balance Coherence Plus® software. This software incorporates a Bluetooth plethysmograph ear sensor, which will transmit cardiac pulse data to the Inner Balance Coherence Plus smartphone app, where the EmWave Pro® Plus software will extract HRV in real-time. This software will display the participant's HRV-BFB curve on their smartphone. The installation of the program and necessary instructions for its use will be provided at the first visit (V1). Fractional training sessions of 8 minutes will be recommended, twice daily for 30 days (during the period V1-V2 or the period V2-V3). Respiratory instructions will differ between the two interventions. During the HRV-BFB intervention, participants will be instructed to maximize their HRV. Receives: Other: Heart rate variability Biofeedback [HRV-BFB] |
| Placebo Control group (Pseudo HRV-BFB training) | Placebo comparator | Participants assigned to the placebo group will undergo a pseudo HRV Biofeedback training using the same Inner Balance Coherence Plus® software and ear sensor. The software will similarly display the participant's HRV-BFB curve on their smartphone. The installation of the program and necessary instructions for its use will be provided at the first visit (V1). To manage placebo effects, the same fractional training sessions of 8 minutes will be recommended, twice daily for 30 days (during the period V1-V2 or the period V2-V3). Respiratory instructions will differ between the two interventions. During the placebo pseudo BFB training, participants will be instructed to no have specific effect on HRV. Receives: Other: Pseudo HRV-BFB |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient Clinical Global Impression Score
The impression improvement and severity of the core symptoms will be measured by the participant using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement and/or Severity scale (CGI-I \& CGI-S; French version Busner \& Targum, 2007). This scale includes 2 items.
Measured: Day 1 (V1)
Patient Clinical Global Impression Score
The impression improvement and severity of the core symptoms will be measured by the participant using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement and/or Severity scale ( (CGI-I \& CGI-S; French version Busner \& Targum, 2007). This scale includes 2 items.
Measured: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Patient Clinical Global Impression Score
The impression improvement and severity of the core symptoms will be measured by the participant using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement and/or Severity scale ( (CGI-I \& CGI-S; French version Busner \& Targum, 2007). This scale includes 2 items.
Measured: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Patient Clinical Global Impression Score
The impression improvement and severity of the core symptoms will be measured by the participant using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement and/or Severity scale ( (CGI-I \& CGI-S; French version Busner \& Targum, 2007). This scale includes 2 items.
Measured: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
Patient Clinical Global Impression Score
The impression improvement and severity of the core symptoms will be measured by the participant using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement and/or Severity scale ( (CGI-I \& CGI-S; French version Busner \& Targum, 2007). This scale includes 2 items.
Measured: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
Clinician Clinical Global Impression Score
The impression improvement and severity of the core symptoms will be measured by the clinician using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement and/or Severity scale (CGI; French version Busner \& Targum, 2007). This scale includes 2 items.
Measured: Day 1 (V1)
Clinician Clinical Global Impression Score
The impression improvement and severity of the core symptoms will be measured by the clinician using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement and/or Severity scale (CGI; French version Busner \& Targum, 2007). This scale includes 2 items.
Measured: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Clinician Clinical Global Impression Score
The impression improvement and severity of the core symptoms will be measured by the clinician using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement and/or Severity scale (CGI; French version Busner \& Targum, 2007). This scale includes 2 items.
Measured: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Clinician Clinical Global Impression Score
The impression improvement and severity of the core symptoms will be measured by the clinician using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement and/or Severity scale (CGI; French version Busner \& Targum, 2007). This scale includes 2 items.
Measured: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
Clinician Clinical Global Impression Score
The impression improvement and severity of the core symptoms will be measured by the clinician using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement and/or Severity scale (CGI; French version Busner \& Targum, 2007). This scale includes 2 items.
Measured: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
Quality of life Score
The Quality of life Score will be measured using the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36; Jenkinson et al., 1993; French version Leplège et al., 1998). This scale includes 36 items.
Measured: Day 1 (V1)
Quality of life Score
The Quality of life Score will be measured using the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36; Jenkinson et al., 1993; French version Leplège et al., 1998). This scale includes 36 items.
Measured: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Quality of life Score
The Quality of life Score will be measured using the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36; Jenkinson et al., 1993; French version Leplège et al., 1998). This scale includes 36 items.
Measured: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Quality of life Score
The Quality of life Score will be measured using the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36; Jenkinson et al., 1993; French version Leplège et al., 1998). This scale includes 36 items.
Measured: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
Quality of life Score
The Quality of life Score will be measured using the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36; Jenkinson et al., 1993; French version Leplège et al., 1998). This scale includes 36 items.
Measured: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
Self-perception of Occupation Score
The Self-perception of Occupation will be measured using the Occupational Self- Assessment scale (OSA; French version Baron et al.,2006). This scale includes 21 items.
Measured: Day 1 (V1)
Self-perception of Occupation Score
The Self-perception of Occupation will be measured using the Occupational Self- Assessment scale (OSA; French version Baron et al.,2006). This scale includes 21 items.
Measured: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Self-perception of Occupation Score
The Self-perception of Occupation will be measured using the Occupational Self- Assessment scale (OSA; French version Baron et al.,2006). This scale includes 21 items.
Measured: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Self-perception of Occupation Score
The Self-perception of Occupation will be measured using the Occupational Self- Assessment scale (OSA; French version Baron et al.,2006). This scale includes 21 items.
Measured: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
Self-perception of Occupation Score
The Self-perception of Occupation will be measured using the Occupational Self- Assessment scale (OSA; French version Baron et al.,2006). This scale includes 21 items.
Measured: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
Secondary outcomes (76)
Other physical symptoms score
The other physical symptoms will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15; French version Kroenke et al., 2002). This scale includes 15 items.
Measured: Day 1 (V1)
Other physical symptoms score
The other physical symptoms will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15; French version Kroenke et al., 2002). This scale includes 15 items.
Measured: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Other physical symptoms score
The other physical symptoms will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15; French version Kroenke et al., 2002). This scale includes 15 items.
Measured: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Other physical symptoms score
The other physical symptoms will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15; French version Kroenke et al., 2002). This scale includes 15 items.
Measured: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
Other physical symptoms score
The other physical symptoms will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15; French version Kroenke et al., 2002). This scale includes 15 items.
Measured: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
Depressive symptoms score
The Depressive symptoms score will be measured using the for Epidemiologic Studies-- Depression (CES-D; Radloff, 1977; French version Führer \& Rouillon, 1989). This scale includes 20 items.
Measured: Day 1 (V1)
Depressive symptoms score
The Depressive symptoms score will be measured using the for Epidemiologic Studies-- Depression (CES-D; Radloff, 1977; French version Führer \& Rouillon, 1989). This scale includes 20 items.
Measured: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Depressive symptoms score
The Depressive symptoms score will be measured using the for Epidemiologic Studies-- Depression (CES-D; Radloff, 1977; French version Führer \& Rouillon, 1989). This scale includes 20 items.
Measured: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Depressive symptoms score
The Depressive symptoms score will be measured using the for Epidemiologic Studies-- Depression (CES-D; Radloff, 1977; French version Führer \& Rouillon, 1989). This scale includes 20 items.
Measured: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
Depressive symptoms score
The Depressive symptoms score will be measured using the for Epidemiologic Studies-- Depression (CES-D; Radloff, 1977; French version Führer \& Rouillon, 1989). This scale includes 20 items.
Measured: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
Trait anxiety score
The Trait anxiety score will be measured using the Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI- B; Spielberger, 1989; French version Bruchon-Schweitzer \& Paulhan, 1993; Huyghe Lydie, 2021). This scale includes 20 items.
Measured: Day 1 (V1)
Trait anxiety score
The Trait anxiety score will be measured using the Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI- B; Spielberger, 1989; French version Bruchon-Schweitzer \& Paulhan, 1993; Huyghe Lydie, 2021). This scale includes 20 items.
Measured: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Trait anxiety score
The Trait anxiety score will be measured using the Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI- B; Spielberger, 1989; French version Bruchon-Schweitzer \& Paulhan, 1993; Huyghe Lydie, 2021). This scale includes 20 items.
Measured: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Trait anxiety score
The Trait anxiety score will be measured using the Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI- B; Spielberger, 1989; French version Bruchon-Schweitzer \& Paulhan, 1993; Huyghe Lydie, 2021). This scale includes 20 items.
Measured: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
Trait anxiety score
The Trait anxiety score will be measured using the Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI- B; Spielberger, 1989; French version Bruchon-Schweitzer \& Paulhan, 1993; Huyghe Lydie, 2021). This scale includes 20 items.
Measured: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
Quality of sleep measure
The quality of sleep will be measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI; Buysse et al., 2002, French versionAit-Aoudia et al., 2013). This scale includes 7 items.
Measured: Day 1 (V1)
Quality of sleep measure
The quality of sleep will be measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI; Buysse et al., 2002, French versionAit-Aoudia et al., 2013). This scale includes 7 items.
Measured: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Quality of sleep measure
The quality of sleep measure will be measure using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI; Buysse et al., 2002, French versionAit-Aoudia et al., 2013). This scale includes 7 items.
Measured: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Quality of sleep measure
The quality of sleep will be measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI; Buysse et al., 2002, French versionAit-Aoudia et al., 2013). This scale includes 7 items.
Measured: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
Quality of sleep measure
The quality of sleep will be measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI; Buysse et al., 2002, French versionAit-Aoudia et al., 2013). This scale includes 7 items.
Measured: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
Dissociative Experiences
The Dissociative Experiences will be measured using the Dissociative Experiences Scale EDS; Steinberg et al., 1991; french version Eve Bernstein Carlson et Frank W. Putnam, 1986). This scale includes 28 items.
Measured: Day 1 (V1)
Dissociative Experiences
The Dissociative Experiences will be measured using the Dissociative Experiences Scale EDS; Steinberg et al., 1991; french version Eve Bernstein Carlson et Frank W. Putnam, 1986). This scale includes 28 items.
Measured: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Dissociative Experiences
The Dissociative Experiences will be measured using the Dissociative Experiences Scale EDS; Steinberg et al., 1991; french version Eve Bernstein Carlson et Frank W. Putnam, 1986). This scale includes 28 items.
Measured: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Dissociative Experiences
The Dissociative Experiences will be measured using the Dissociative Experiences Scale EDS; Steinberg et al., 1991; french version Eve Bernstein Carlson et Frank W. Putnam, 1986). This scale includes 28 items.
Measured: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
Dissociative Experiences
The Dissociative Experiences will be measured using the Dissociative Experiences Scale EDS; Steinberg et al., 1991; french version Eve Bernstein Carlson et Frank W. Putnam, 1986). This scale includes 28 items.
Measured: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
Alexithymia score
Alexithymia score will be measured using the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20; French version Loas, 1996). This scale includes 20 items.
Measured: Day 1 (V1)
Brief Illness Perception score
Brief Illness Perception score will be measured using the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ) (Moss-Morris et al., 2002 ; French version Demoulin et al., 2015). This scale includes 9 items.
Measured: Day 1 (V1)
Brief Illness Perception score
Brief Illness Perception score will be measured using the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ) (Moss-Morris et al., 2002 ; French version Demoulin et al., 2015). This scale includes 9 items.
Measured: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Brief Illness Perception score
Brief Illness Perception score will be measured using the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ) (Moss-Morris et al., 2002 ; French version Demoulin et al., 2015). This scale includes 9 items.
Measured: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Brief Illness Perception score
Brief Illness Perception score will be measured using the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ) (Moss-Morris et al., 2002 ; French version Demoulin et al., 2015). This scale includes 9 items.
Measured: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
Brief Illness Perception score
Brief Illness Perception score will be measured using the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ) (Moss-Morris et al., 2002 ; French version Demoulin et al., 2015). This scale includes 9 items.
Measured: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
Emotion Regulation Profile
The Emotion Regulation Profile score will be measured using the Emotion Regulation Profile-Revised (ERP-R) (French version Nelis et al., 2011). This scale includes 15 items.
Measured: Day 1 (V1)
Emotion Regulation Profile
The Emotion Regulation Profile score will be measured using the Emotion Regulation Profile-Revised (ERP-R) (French version Nelis et al., 2011). This scale includes 15 items.
Measured: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Emotion Regulation Profile
The Emotion Regulation Profile score will be measured using the Emotion Regulation Profile-Revised (ERP-R) (French version Nelis et al., 2011). This scale includes 15 items.
Measured: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Emotion Regulation Profile
The Emotion Regulation Profile score will be measured using the Emotion Regulation Profile-Revised (ERP-R) (French version Nelis et al., 2011). This scale includes 15 items.
Measured: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
Emotion Regulation Profile
The Emotion Regulation Profile score will be measured using the Emotion Regulation Profile-Revised (ERP-R) (French version Nelis et al., 2011). This scale includes 15 items.
Measured: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
Childhood Trauma profile
The Childhood Trauma profile will be measured using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ; Frenc version Paquette et al., 2004). This scale includes 28 items.
Measured: Day 1 (V1)
Positive Affect and Negative Affects
The Positive Affect and Negative Affects will be measured using the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson et al., 1988. French version Caci \& Bayle, 2007). To measure a global affective state, a score of positivity will be calculated by subtracting negative affect score from positive affect score. This scale includes 20 items.
Measured: Day 1 (V1) before the emotional induction task
Positive Affect and Negative Affects
The Positive Affect and Negative Affects will be measured using the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson et al., 1988. French version Caci \& Bayle, 2007). To measure a global affective state, a score of positivity will be calculated by subtracting negative affect score from positive affect score. This scale includes 20 items.
Measured: Day 1 (V1) after the emotional induction task
Positive Affect and Negative Affects
The Positive Affect and Negative Affects will be measured using the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson et al., 1988. French version Caci \& Bayle, 2007). To measure a global affective state, a score of positivity will be calculated by subtracting negative affect score from positive affect score. This scale includes 20 items.
Measured: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2) before the emotional re-exposure task
Positive Affect and Negative Affects
The Positive Affect and Negative Affects will be measured using the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson et al., 1988. French version Caci \& Bayle, 2007). To measure a global affective state, a score of positivity will be calculated by subtracting negative affect score from positive affect score. This scale includes 20 items.
Measured: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2) after the emotional re-exposure task
High Frequency [HF] (>0.15 Hz)
High Frequency (>0.15 Hz), frequency-domain parameter. HF will be measured using the electrocardiogram [ECG]: ECG data will be recorded using 3 single use and adhesive electrodes placed on the inner side of the right wrist, on the right shoulder and on the left side in accordance with the DII standard position (Einthoven). Physiological data recorded are related to the heart rate variability [HRV].
Measured: Day 1 (V1)
High Frequency [HF] (>0.15 Hz)
High Frequency (>0.15 Hz), frequency-domain parameter. HF will be measured using the electrocardiogram [ECG]: ECG data will be recorded using 3 single use and adhesive electrodes placed on the inner side of the right wrist, on the right shoulder and on the left side in accordance with the DII standard position (Einthoven). Physiological data recorded are related to the heart rate variability [HRV].
Measured: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
High Frequency [HF] (>0.15 Hz)
High Frequency (>0.15 Hz), frequency-domain parameter. HF will be measured using the electrocardiogram [ECG]: ECG data will be recorded using 3 single use and adhesive electrodes placed on the inner side of the right wrist, on the right shoulder and on the left side in accordance with the DII standard position (Einthoven). Physiological data recorded are related to the heart rate variability [HRV].
Measured: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
High Frequency [HF] (>0.15 Hz)
High Frequency (>0.15 Hz), frequency-domain parameter. HF will be measured using the electrocardiogram [ECG]: ECG data will be recorded using 3 single use and adhesive electrodes placed on the inner side of the right wrist, on the right shoulder and on the left side in accordance with the DII standard position (Einthoven). Physiological data recorded are related to the heart rate variability [HRV].
Measured: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
High Frequency [HF] (>0.15 Hz)
High Frequency (>0.15 Hz), frequency-domain parameter. HF will be measured using the electrocardiogram [ECG]: ECG data will be recorded using 3 single use and adhesive electrodes placed on the inner side of the right wrist, on the right shoulder and on the left side in accordance with the DII standard position (Einthoven). Physiological data recorded are related to the heart rate variability [HRV].
Measured: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
Root Mean Square of Successive Differences [RMSSD]
Root Mean Square of Successive Differences, Frequency-domain parameter. RMSSD will be measured using the electrocardiogram [ECG]: ECG data will be recorded using 3 single use and adhesive electrodes placed on the inner side of the right wrist, on the right shoulder and on the left side in accordance with the DII standard position (Einthoven). Physiological data recorded are related to the heart rate variability [HRV].
Measured: Day 1 (V1)
Root Mean Square of Successive Differences [RMSSD]
Root Mean Square of Successive Differences, Frequency-domain parameter. RMSSD will be measured using the electrocardiogram [ECG]: ECG data will be recorded using 3 single use and adhesive electrodes placed on the inner side of the right wrist, on the right shoulder and on the left side in accordance with the DII standard position (Einthoven). Physiological data recorded are related to the heart rate variability [HRV].
Measured: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Root Mean Square of Successive Differences [RMSSD]
Root Mean Square of Successive Differences, Frequency-domain parameter. RMSSD will be measured using the electrocardiogram [ECG]: ECG data will be recorded using 3 single use and adhesive electrodes placed on the inner side of the right wrist, on the right shoulder and on the left side in accordance with the DII standard position (Einthoven). Physiological data recorded are related to the heart rate variability [HRV].
Measured: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Root Mean Square of Successive Differences [RMSSD]
Root Mean Square of Successive Differences, Frequency-domain parameter. RMSSD will be measured using the electrocardiogram [ECG]: ECG data will be recorded using 3 single use and adhesive electrodes placed on the inner side of the right wrist, on the right shoulder and on the left side in accordance with the DII standard position (Einthoven). Physiological data recorded are related to the heart rate variability [HRV].
Measured: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
Root Mean Square of Successive Differences [RMSSD]
Root Mean Square of Successive Differences, Frequency-domain parameter. RMSSD will be measured using the electrocardiogram [ECG]: ECG data will be recorded using 3 single use and adhesive electrodes placed on the inner side of the right wrist, on the right shoulder and on the left side in accordance with the DII standard position (Einthoven). Physiological data recorded are related to the heart rate variability [HRV].
Measured: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
Skin conductance responses [SCR] frequency
Skin conductance responses [SCR] frequency : number of the spontaneous galvanic skin responses by periods. SCR will be measured using the Galvanic skin responses [GSR]: GSR data will be recorded using 2 skin sensors placed on the third phalanx of the forefinger and of the middle finger of the left hand. Physiological data recorded are related to the cholinergic sympathetic activity (tonic GSR / phasic GSR).
Measured: Day 1 (V1)
Skin conductance responses [SCR] frequency
Skin conductance responses [SCR] frequency : number of the spontaneous galvanic skin responses by periods. SCR will be measured using the Galvanic skin responses [GSR]: GSR data will be recorded using 2 skin sensors placed on the third phalanx of the forefinger and of the middle finger of the left hand. Physiological data recorded are related to the cholinergic sympathetic activity (tonic GSR / phasic GSR).
Measured: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Skin conductance responses [SCR] frequency
Skin conductance responses [SCR] frequency : number of the spontaneous galvanic skin responses by periods. SCR will be measured using the Galvanic skin responses [GSR]: GSR data will be recorded using 2 skin sensors placed on the third phalanx of the forefinger and of the middle finger of the left hand. Physiological data recorded are related to the cholinergic sympathetic activity (tonic GSR / phasic GSR).
Measured: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Skin conductance responses [SCR] frequency
Skin conductance responses [SCR] frequency : number of the spontaneous galvanic skin responses by periods. SCR will be measured using the Galvanic skin responses [GSR]: GSR data will be recorded using 2 skin sensors placed on the third phalanx of the forefinger and of the middle finger of the left hand. Physiological data recorded are related to the cholinergic sympathetic activity (tonic GSR / phasic GSR).
Measured: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
Skin conductance responses [SCR] frequency
Skin conductance responses [SCR] frequency : number of the spontaneous galvanic skin responses by periods. SCR will be measured using the Galvanic skin responses [GSR]: GSR data will be recorded using 2 skin sensors placed on the third phalanx of the forefinger and of the middle finger of the left hand. Physiological data recorded are related to the cholinergic sympathetic activity (tonic GSR / phasic GSR).
Measured: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
Skin conductance responses [SCR] amplitude
Skin conductance responses amplitude: amplitude of the spontaneous galvanic skin responses by periods. SCR will be measured using the Galvanic skin responses [GSR]: GSR data will be recorded using 2 skin sensors placed on the third phalanx of the forefinger and of the middle finger of the left hand. Physiological data recorded are related to the cholinergic sympathetic activity (tonic GSR / phasic GSR).
Measured: Day 1 (V1)
Skin conductance responses [SCR] amplitude
Skin conductance responses amplitude: amplitude of the spontaneous galvanic skin responses by periods. SCR will be measured using the Galvanic skin responses [GSR]: GSR data will be recorded using 2 skin sensors placed on the third phalanx of the forefinger and of the middle finger of the left hand. Physiological data recorded are related to the cholinergic sympathetic activity (tonic GSR / phasic GSR).
Measured: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Skin conductance responses [SCR] amplitude
Skin conductance responses amplitude: amplitude of the spontaneous galvanic skin responses by periods. SCR will be measured using the Galvanic skin responses [GSR]: GSR data will be recorded using 2 skin sensors placed on the third phalanx of the forefinger and of the middle finger of the left hand. Physiological data recorded are related to the cholinergic sympathetic activity (tonic GSR / phasic GSR).
Measured: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Skin conductance responses [SCR] amplitude
Skin conductance responses amplitude: amplitude of the spontaneous galvanic skin responses by periods. SCR will be measured using the Galvanic skin responses [GSR]: GSR data will be recorded using 2 skin sensors placed on the third phalanx of the forefinger and of the middle finger of the left hand. Physiological data recorded are related to the cholinergic sympathetic activity (tonic GSR / phasic GSR).
Measured: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
Skin conductance responses [SCR] amplitude
Skin conductance responses amplitude: amplitude of the spontaneous galvanic skin responses by periods. SCR will be measured using the Galvanic skin responses [GSR]: GSR data will be recorded using 2 skin sensors placed on the third phalanx of the forefinger and of the middle finger of the left hand. Physiological data recorded are related to the cholinergic sympathetic activity (tonic GSR / phasic GSR).
Measured: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
Delta frequency (0-4Hz)
Delta frequency 0-4 Hertz band
Delta frequency will be measured using the electroencephalogram [EEG]: EEG data will be recorded using a EEG headsets including 128 electrodes. The EEG is related to the brain activity generated by the neural functioning.
Measured: Day 1 (V1)
Delta frequency (0-4Hz)
Delta frequency 0-4 Hertz band
Delta frequency will be measured using the electroencephalogram [EEG]: EEG data will be recorded using a EEG headsets including 128 electrodes. The EEG is related to the brain activity generated by the neural functioning.
Measured: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Delta frequency (0-4Hz)
Delta frequency 0-4 Hertz band
Delta frequency will be measured using the electroencephalogram [EEG]: EEG data will be recorded using a EEG headsets including 128 electrodes. The EEG is related to the brain activity generated by the neural functioning.
Measured: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Theta frequency (4-7Hz)
Theta frequency 4-7 Hertz band
Theta frequency will be measured using the electroencephalogram [EEG]: EEG data will be recorded using a EEG headsets including 128 electrodes. The EEG is related to the brain activity generated by the neural functioning.
Measured: Day 1 (V1)
Theta frequency (4-7Hz)
Theta frequency 4-7 Hertz band
Theta frequency will be measured using the electroencephalogram [EEG]: EEG data will be recorded using a EEG headsets including 128 electrodes. The EEG is related to the brain activity generated by the neural functioning.
Measured: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Theta frequency (4-7Hz)
Theta frequency 4-7 Hertz band
Theta frequency will be measured using the electroencephalogram [EEG]: EEG data will be recorded using a EEG headsets including 128 electrodes. The EEG is related to the brain activity generated by the neural functioning.
Measured: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Alpha frequency (8-12Hz)
Alpha frequency 8-12 Hertz band Alpha frequency will be measured using the electroencephalogram [EEG]: EEG data will be recorded using a EEG headsets including 128 electrodes. The EEG is related to the brain activity generated by the neural functioning.
Measured: Day 1 (V1)
Alpha frequency (8-12Hz)
Alpha frequency 8-12 Hertz band Alpha frequency will be measured using the electroencephalogram [EEG]: EEG data will be recorded using a EEG headsets including 128 electrodes. The EEG is related to the brain activity generated by the neural functioning.
Measured: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Alpha frequency (8-12Hz)
Alpha frequency 8-12 Hertz band Alpha frequency will be measured using the electroencephalogram [EEG]: EEG data will be recorded using a EEG headsets including 128 electrodes. The EEG is related to the brain activity generated by the neural functioning.
Measured: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Beta frequency (13-30Hz)
Beta frequency 13-30 Hertz band Beta frequency will be measured using the electroencephalogram [EEG]: EEG data will be recorded using a EEG headsets including 128 electrodes. The EEG is related to the brain activity generated by the neural functioning.
Measured: Day 1 (V1)
Beta frequency (13-30Hz)
Beta frequency 13-30 Hertz band Beta frequency will be measured using the electroencephalogram [EEG]: EEG data will be recorded using a EEG headsets including 128 electrodes. The EEG is related to the brain activity generated by the neural functioning.
Measured: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Beta frequency (13-30Hz)
Beta frequency 13-30 Hertz band Beta frequency will be measured using the electroencephalogram [EEG]: EEG data will be recorded using a EEG headsets including 128 electrodes. The EEG is related to the brain activity generated by the neural functioning.
Measured: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Gamma frequency (>30Hz)
Gamma frequency >30 Hertz band
Gamma frequency will be measured using the electroencephalogram [EEG]: EEG data will be recorded using a EEG headsets including 128 electrodes. The EEG is related to the brain activity generated by the neural functioning.
Measured: Day 1 (V1)
Gamma frequency (>30Hz)
Gamma frequency >30 Hertz band
Gamma frequency will be measured using the electroencephalogram [EEG]: EEG data will be recorded using a EEG headsets including 128 electrodes. The EEG is related to the brain activity generated by the neural functioning.
Measured: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Gamma frequency (>30Hz)
Gamma frequency >30 Hertz band
Gamma frequency will be measured using the electroencephalogram [EEG]: EEG data will be recorded using a EEG headsets including 128 electrodes. The EEG is related to the brain activity generated by the neural functioning.
Measured: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 May 2024
- Study start9 Sep 2024
- Primary completionMay 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionMay 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Functional Neurological DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- This study consists of 5 visits (V1, V2, V3, V4, V5). At V1, participants will be randomized into two groups: HRV-BFB (experimental group) or Pseudo HRV-BFB (control group). Participants will remain single-blinded after randomization. Depending on the assigned group, participants will practice one specific intervention during the first 30-day period (V1-V2). At V2, participants will switch to the other arm and practice the second intervention during the second 30-day period (V2-V3). At V3, both interventions will end, and participants will be unblinded and encouraged to continue HRV-BFB at home. Clinical evaluation will be repeated 5 times at day 1 (V1), days 30 +/- 10 (V2), days 60 +/- 10 (V2), 6 months (V4) and 1 year (V5). The research team will exercise extreme caution to ensure consistent instructions and feedback, minimizing biases associated with lack of double-blinding.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Dang Khoa Nguyen, Principal investigator, Université de Montréal's affiliated hospital research centre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06422819
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024-12156
- Acronym
- HRV_BFB_FND
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 15 May 2024
- Last updated
- 14 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation. 1996 Mar 1;93(5):1043-65. No abstract available.
PubMed 8598068Lehrer P, Kaur K, Sharma A, Shah K, Huseby R, Bhavsar J, Sgobba P, Zhang Y. Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Improves Emotional and Physical Health and Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2020 Sep;45(3):109-129. doi: 10.1007/s10484-020-09466-z.
PubMed 32385728Laborde S, Mosley E, Thayer JF. Heart Rate Variability and Cardiac Vagal Tone in Psychophysiological Research - Recommendations for Experiment Planning, Data Analysis, and Data Reporting. Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 20;8:213. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00213. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28265249Pick S, Anderson DG, Asadi-Pooya AA, Aybek S, Baslet G, Bloem BR, Bradley-Westguard A, Brown RJ, Carson AJ, Chalder T, Damianova M, David AS, Edwards MJ, Epstein SA, Espay AJ, Garcin B, Goldstein LH, Hallett M, Jankovic J, Joyce EM, Kanaan RA, Keynejad RC, Kozlowska K, LaFaver K, LaFrance WC Jr, Lang AE, Lehn A, Lidstone S, Maurer CW, Mildon B, Morgante F, Myers L, Nicholson C, Nielsen G, Perez DL, Popkirov S, Reuber M, Rommelfanger KS, Schwingenshuh P, Serranova T, Shotbolt P, Stebbins GT, Stone J, Tijssen MA, Tinazzi M, Nicholson TR. Outcome measurement in functional neurological disorder: a systematic review and recommendations. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;91(6):638-649. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-322180. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
PubMed 32111637Busner J, Targum SD. The clinical global impressions scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007 Jul;4(7):28-37.
PubMed 20526405Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-15: validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of somatic symptoms. Psychosom Med. 2002 Mar-Apr;64(2):258-66. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200203000-00008.
PubMed 11914441Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
PubMed 2748771Steinberg M, Rounsaville B, Cicchetti D. Detection of dissociative disorders in psychiatric patients by a screening instrument and a structured diagnostic interview. Am J Psychiatry. 1991 Aug;148(8):1050-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.8.1050.
PubMed 1853955Loas G, Otmani O, Verrier A, Fremaux D, Marchand MP. Factor analysis of the French version of the 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20). Psychopathology. 1996;29(2):139-44. doi: 10.1159/000284983.
PubMed 8861519Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.
PubMed 3397865Boucsein W, Fowles DC, Grimnes S, Ben-Shakhar G, roth WT, Dawson ME, Filion DL; Society for Psychophysiological Research Ad Hoc Committee on Electrodermal Measures. Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. Psychophysiology. 2012 Aug;49(8):1017-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01384.x. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
PubMed 22680988American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. Guideline 6: A proposal for standard montages to be used in clinical EEG. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;23(2):111-7. doi: 10.1097/00004691-200604000-00007. No abstract available.
PubMed 16612227
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Probing the Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback as an Innovative and Non-invasive Treatment for Functional Neurological Disorders Guided by a Multimodal Approach of Autonomic Nervous System.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06422819
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HRV_BFB_FND / 2024-12156
- Conditions
- Functional Neurological Disorder
- Keywords
- Functional Neurological Disorder, Emotional dysregulation, Autonomic nervous system, Endophenotypes, Biofeedback of Heart Rate Variability, Transdiagnostic approach
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition
- Study start
- 9 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- May 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- May 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 May 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Evaluation of the clinical effects of the Heart Rate Variability biofeedback training with patients suffering from Functional neurological Disorders compared with placebo.
Detailed description
Although Functional Neurological Disorders (FND) represent one of the most common reasons for consultation in Neurology, the pathological mechanisms remain unexplained. Recent studies suggest disrupted emotional processes in patients with FND and disturbed autonomic nervous system profiles, highligting the hypothesis of autonomic endophenotypes among the FND population.
The Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRV-BFB) is an innovative and non-invasive approach, based on the self-regulation of autonomic physiological processes. It has shown promising results in clinical and non-clinical populations but has never been assessed in an adult FND population.
Therefore, this approach appears particularly promising for understanding the mechanisms underlying FND and developing personalized therapy.
The main objective is to investigate the clinical effects of HRV-BFB on FND patients compared to placebo in a single-blind crossover design.
The investigators predict that depending on their autonomic profile, patients will respond to HRV-BFB to varying degrees.
Firstly, patients with FND will prospectively undergo an comprehensive clinical evaluation considering symptoms, functional capacity, quality of life, and an assessment of the physical and psychological comorbidities. Then patients will complete an emotional task and undergo multimodal autonomic measures. Cluster analyses will be conducted to identify both dysfunctional and functional autonomic profiles associated with the clinical exploration, enabling confirmation of the endophenotypes hypothesis and allowing for specific characterization of the profils. The clinical evaluation of the beneficial effects of HRV BFB will rely on repeated mesures of symptoms, functional capacity, and quality of life at scheduled points in time before and after the both interventions (HRV-BFB and pseudo-BFB). The emotional task and autonomic measures will be repeated simultaneously.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study consists of 5 visits (V1, V2, V3, V4, V5). At V1, participants will be randomized into two groups: HRV-BFB (experimental group) or Pseudo HRV-BFB (control group). Participants will remain single-blinded after randomization. Depending on the assigned group, participants will practice one specific intervention during the first 30-day period (V1-V2). At V2, participants will switch to the other arm and practice the second intervention during the second 30-day period (V2-V3). At V3, both interventions will end, and participants will be unblinded and encouraged to continue HRV-BFB at home. Clinical evaluation will be repeated 5 times at day 1 (V1), days 30 +/- 10 (V2), days 60 +/- 10 (V2), 6 months (V4) and 1 year (V5). The research team will exercise extreme caution to ensure consistent instructions and feedback, minimizing biases associated with lack of double-blinding.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group (HRV-BFB training) | Experimental | Other: Heart rate variability Biofeedback [HRV-BFB]Participants assigned to the experimental group will undergo HRV Biofeedback training using the Inner Balance Coherence Plus® software. This software incorporates a Bluetooth plethysmograph ear sensor, which will transmit cardiac pulse data to the Inner Balance Coherence Plus smartphone app, where the EmWave Pro® Plus software will extract HRV in real-time. This software will display the participant's HRV-BFB curve on their smartphone. The installation of the program and necessary instructions for its use will be provided at the first visit (V1). Fractional training sessions of 8 minutes will be recommended, twice daily for 30 days (during the period V1-V2 or the period V2-V3). Respiratory instructions will differ between the two interventions. During the HRV-BFB intervention, participants will be instructed to maximize their HRV. |
| Placebo Control group (Pseudo HRV-BFB training) | Placebo comparator | Other: Pseudo HRV-BFBParticipants assigned to the placebo group will undergo a pseudo HRV Biofeedback training using the same Inner Balance Coherence Plus® software and ear sensor. The software will similarly display the participant's HRV-BFB curve on their smartphone. The installation of the program and necessary instructions for its use will be provided at the first visit (V1). To manage placebo effects, the same fractional training sessions of 8 minutes will be recommended, twice daily for 30 days (during the period V1-V2 or the period V2-V3). Respiratory instructions will differ between the two interventions. During the placebo pseudo BFB training, participants will be instructed to no have specific effect on HRV. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Functional Neurological Disorders (FND) diagnosis must be medically established
- Participants must have a smartphone (android ou Iphone)
- Participants must be of the age of majority
- Participants must have signed an informed consent
- Sufficiently fluent in French to understand study documents and instructions
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Specially protected participants: juveniles, pregnant womens, nursing mothers, law's protection peoples
- Participants suffering from a severe psychiatric disease needing specialised attention
- History of severe neurosurgical pathology
- Alcohol dependence or drug use
- Participants suffering from or have suffered from a severe disease causing autonomic dysfunctions (heart failure, asthma, blood disease, renal failure, peripheral neuropathy, vagotomy, thyroid disorder, alcoholism, liver disease, amyloidosis)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Heart rate variability Biofeedback [HRV-BFB]Biofeedback (BFB), sometimes referred to as "biological feedback technique," is a non-invasive and non-pharmacological approach based on physiological recordings that provide real-time feedback enabling people to learn how to control their physiological processes, which are typically unconscious and beyond their control. HRV-BFB specifically targets heart rate variability (HRV), which can help regulate the autonomic nervous system (including vagal tone and sympathetic-parasympathetic balance) as well as emotional states. HRV-BFB has been clinically and experimentally validated as a physiological intervention and has demonstrated its effectiveness. However, it has never been studied in an adult FND population. | Other | Experimental group (HRV-BFB training) |
| Pseudo HRV-BFBThe pseudo HRV-BFB intervention aims to implement the same HRV BFB methods with no specific effect on HRV. | Other | Placebo Control group (Pseudo HRV-BFB training) |
Primary outcome
Patient Clinical Global Impression Score
Time frame: Day 1 (V1)
The impression improvement and severity of the core symptoms will be measured by the participant using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement and/or Severity scale (CGI-I \& CGI-S; French version Busner \& Targum, 2007). This scale includes 2 items.
Patient Clinical Global Impression Score
Time frame: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
The impression improvement and severity of the core symptoms will be measured by the participant using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement and/or Severity scale ( (CGI-I \& CGI-S; French version Busner \& Targum, 2007). This scale includes 2 items.
Patient Clinical Global Impression Score
Time frame: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
The impression improvement and severity of the core symptoms will be measured by the participant using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement and/or Severity scale ( (CGI-I \& CGI-S; French version Busner \& Targum, 2007). This scale includes 2 items.
Patient Clinical Global Impression Score
Time frame: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
The impression improvement and severity of the core symptoms will be measured by the participant using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement and/or Severity scale ( (CGI-I \& CGI-S; French version Busner \& Targum, 2007). This scale includes 2 items.
Patient Clinical Global Impression Score
Time frame: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
The impression improvement and severity of the core symptoms will be measured by the participant using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement and/or Severity scale ( (CGI-I \& CGI-S; French version Busner \& Targum, 2007). This scale includes 2 items.
Clinician Clinical Global Impression Score
Time frame: Day 1 (V1)
The impression improvement and severity of the core symptoms will be measured by the clinician using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement and/or Severity scale (CGI; French version Busner \& Targum, 2007). This scale includes 2 items.
Clinician Clinical Global Impression Score
Time frame: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
The impression improvement and severity of the core symptoms will be measured by the clinician using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement and/or Severity scale (CGI; French version Busner \& Targum, 2007). This scale includes 2 items.
Clinician Clinical Global Impression Score
Time frame: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
The impression improvement and severity of the core symptoms will be measured by the clinician using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement and/or Severity scale (CGI; French version Busner \& Targum, 2007). This scale includes 2 items.
Clinician Clinical Global Impression Score
Time frame: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
The impression improvement and severity of the core symptoms will be measured by the clinician using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement and/or Severity scale (CGI; French version Busner \& Targum, 2007). This scale includes 2 items.
Clinician Clinical Global Impression Score
Time frame: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
The impression improvement and severity of the core symptoms will be measured by the clinician using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement and/or Severity scale (CGI; French version Busner \& Targum, 2007). This scale includes 2 items.
Quality of life Score
Time frame: Day 1 (V1)
The Quality of life Score will be measured using the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36; Jenkinson et al., 1993; French version Leplège et al., 1998). This scale includes 36 items.
Quality of life Score
Time frame: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
The Quality of life Score will be measured using the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36; Jenkinson et al., 1993; French version Leplège et al., 1998). This scale includes 36 items.
Quality of life Score
Time frame: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
The Quality of life Score will be measured using the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36; Jenkinson et al., 1993; French version Leplège et al., 1998). This scale includes 36 items.
Quality of life Score
Time frame: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
The Quality of life Score will be measured using the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36; Jenkinson et al., 1993; French version Leplège et al., 1998). This scale includes 36 items.
Quality of life Score
Time frame: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
The Quality of life Score will be measured using the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36; Jenkinson et al., 1993; French version Leplège et al., 1998). This scale includes 36 items.
Self-perception of Occupation Score
Time frame: Day 1 (V1)
The Self-perception of Occupation will be measured using the Occupational Self- Assessment scale (OSA; French version Baron et al.,2006). This scale includes 21 items.
Self-perception of Occupation Score
Time frame: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
The Self-perception of Occupation will be measured using the Occupational Self- Assessment scale (OSA; French version Baron et al.,2006). This scale includes 21 items.
Self-perception of Occupation Score
Time frame: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
The Self-perception of Occupation will be measured using the Occupational Self- Assessment scale (OSA; French version Baron et al.,2006). This scale includes 21 items.
Self-perception of Occupation Score
Time frame: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
The Self-perception of Occupation will be measured using the Occupational Self- Assessment scale (OSA; French version Baron et al.,2006). This scale includes 21 items.
Self-perception of Occupation Score
Time frame: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
The Self-perception of Occupation will be measured using the Occupational Self- Assessment scale (OSA; French version Baron et al.,2006). This scale includes 21 items.
76 secondary outcomes
Other physical symptoms score
Time frame: Day 1 (V1)
Other physical symptoms score
Time frame: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Other physical symptoms score
Time frame: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Other physical symptoms score
Time frame: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
Other physical symptoms score
Time frame: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
Depressive symptoms score
Time frame: Day 1 (V1)
Depressive symptoms score
Time frame: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Depressive symptoms score
Time frame: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Depressive symptoms score
Time frame: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
Depressive symptoms score
Time frame: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
Trait anxiety score
Time frame: Day 1 (V1)
Trait anxiety score
Time frame: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Trait anxiety score
Time frame: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Trait anxiety score
Time frame: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
Trait anxiety score
Time frame: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
Quality of sleep measure
Time frame: Day 1 (V1)
Quality of sleep measure
Time frame: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Quality of sleep measure
Time frame: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Quality of sleep measure
Time frame: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
Quality of sleep measure
Time frame: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
Dissociative Experiences
Time frame: Day 1 (V1)
Dissociative Experiences
Time frame: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Dissociative Experiences
Time frame: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Dissociative Experiences
Time frame: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
Dissociative Experiences
Time frame: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
Alexithymia score
Time frame: Day 1 (V1)
Brief Illness Perception score
Time frame: Day 1 (V1)
Brief Illness Perception score
Time frame: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Brief Illness Perception score
Time frame: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Brief Illness Perception score
Time frame: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
Brief Illness Perception score
Time frame: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
Emotion Regulation Profile
Time frame: Day 1 (V1)
Emotion Regulation Profile
Time frame: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2)
Emotion Regulation Profile
Time frame: Up to 80 days from V1 (V3)
Emotion Regulation Profile
Time frame: Up to 180 days from V1 (V4)
Emotion Regulation Profile
Time frame: Up to 360 days from V1 (V5)
Childhood Trauma profile
Time frame: Day 1 (V1)
Positive Affect and Negative Affects
Time frame: Day 1 (V1) before the emotional induction task
Positive Affect and Negative Affects
Time frame: Day 1 (V1) after the emotional induction task
Positive Affect and Negative Affects
Time frame: Up to 40 days from V1 (V2) before the emotional re-exposure task
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Aug 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 8598068Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation. 1996 Mar 1;93(5):1043-65. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 32385728Lehrer P, Kaur K, Sharma A, Shah K, Huseby R, Bhavsar J, Sgobba P, Zhang Y. Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Improves Emotional and Physical Health and Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2020 Sep;45(3):109-129. doi: 10.1007/s10484-020-09466-z.
- Results publication: PubMed 28265249Laborde S, Mosley E, Thayer JF. Heart Rate Variability and Cardiac Vagal Tone in Psychophysiological Research - Recommendations for Experiment Planning, Data Analysis, and Data Reporting. Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 20;8:213. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00213. eCollection 2017.
- Results publication: PubMed 32111637Pick S, Anderson DG, Asadi-Pooya AA, Aybek S, Baslet G, Bloem BR, Bradley-Westguard A, Brown RJ, Carson AJ, Chalder T, Damianova M, David AS, Edwards MJ, Epstein SA, Espay AJ, Garcin B, Goldstein LH, Hallett M, Jankovic J, Joyce EM, Kanaan RA, Keynejad RC, Kozlowska K, LaFaver K, LaFrance WC Jr, Lang AE, Lehn A, Lidstone S, Maurer CW, Mildon B, Morgante F, Myers L, Nicholson C, Nielsen G, Perez DL, Popkirov S, Reuber M, Rommelfanger KS, Schwingenshuh P, Serranova T, Shotbolt P, Stebbins GT, Stone J, Tijssen MA, Tinazzi M, Nicholson TR. Outcome measurement in functional neurological disorder: a systematic review and recommendations. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;91(6):638-649. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-322180. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 20526405Busner J, Targum SD. The clinical global impressions scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007 Jul;4(7):28-37.
- Results publication: PubMed 11914441Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-15: validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of somatic symptoms. Psychosom Med. 2002 Mar-Apr;64(2):258-66. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200203000-00008.
- Results publication: PubMed 2748771Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
- Results publication: PubMed 1853955Steinberg M, Rounsaville B, Cicchetti D. Detection of dissociative disorders in psychiatric patients by a screening instrument and a structured diagnostic interview. Am J Psychiatry. 1991 Aug;148(8):1050-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.8.1050.
- Results publication: PubMed 8861519Loas G, Otmani O, Verrier A, Fremaux D, Marchand MP. Factor analysis of the French version of the 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20). Psychopathology. 1996;29(2):139-44. doi: 10.1159/000284983.
- Results publication: PubMed 3397865Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.
- Results publication: PubMed 22680988Boucsein W, Fowles DC, Grimnes S, Ben-Shakhar G, roth WT, Dawson ME, Filion DL; Society for Psychophysiological Research Ad Hoc Committee on Electrodermal Measures. Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. Psychophysiology. 2012 Aug;49(8):1017-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01384.x. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
- Results publication: PubMed 16612227American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. Guideline 6: A proposal for standard montages to be used in clinical EEG. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;23(2):111-7. doi: 10.1097/00004691-200604000-00007. No abstract available.
- Alain Leplège 2001. Le questionnaire MOS SF-36, manuel d'utilisation et guide d'interprétation des scoresLink provided by the sponsor.
- Kathi Baron 2006 A User's Manual for the Occupational Self Assessment (OSA) : (Version 2.2)Link provided by the sponsor.
- C Demoulin 2017. Traduction en français du " Brief Illness Perceived Questionnaire " adapté aux patients lombalgiques et étude de ses qualités métrologiques. Doi : 10.1016/S1169-8330(16)30511-7Link provided by the sponsor.
- Daniel Paquette 2004. Validation de la version française du CTQ et prévalence de l'histoire de maltraitance. DOI: 10.7202/008831arLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Functional Neurological Disorder
Enrolling by invitation
Online Exercise Program for Transplant Patients: A Pilot Study
Kidney Transplantation, Physical Function
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Sequential Therapy With Mexidol® (Intravenous) and Mexidol® FORTE 250 (Oral) on Functional Brain Activity Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biochemical Parameters in Patients With Chronic Cerebral Ischemia: A Comparison of Patients With and Without Metabolic Disorders
Metabolic Abnormalities, Obesity & Overweight
Recruiting
Additional Effects on tDCS With AOT on Lower Limb Functions on Children With Diplegic CP
Diplegic Cerebral Palsy
RecruitingObservational study
Impact of Vestibular Function on Deaf Infants' Activities of Daily Living
Vestibular Dysfunction, Hearing Loss
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Box Breathing Exercise on Anxiety, Pain, and Pulmonary Function Tests in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dang Khoa Nguyen principal investigator
Université de Montréal's affiliated hospital research centre
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Heart rate variability Biofeedback [HRV-BFB] and Pseudo HRV-BFB in people with Functional Neurological Disorder, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient Clinical Global Impression Score (time frame: Day 1 (V1)). The study lists 20 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06422819, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Aug 2026.