Injury;SportsNCT06424886
The Effect of Different Instruction Trainings in Semi-Professional Female Athletes
A study testing Landing error scoring system (LESS) in people with Injury;Sports, run by Bahçeşehir University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Feedback is implanted into workouts to prevent lower extremity injuries. There are different studies where external focus and internal focus feedback were found to be superior. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of training on vertical jump landing technique by comparing a verbal training… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 24 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Injury;Sports
- What is being tested?
- Landing error scoring system (LESS)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 15 Jan 2024to 12 Jun 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 24 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Being female
- Being between the ages of 18-24
- Body mass index being between 18.5 kg/m2 and 25 kg/m2
- Becoming a minor league basketball or volleyball player
- Volunteers must not have suffered any trunk or lower extremity injuries in the last 6 months before participation in the study.
- Having a frontal plane projection angle greater than 100 during the single-leg squat test
Who cannot join
- • Having experienced a trunk or lower extremity injury in the last 6 months before the date of study
- Having a history of fracture or dislocation in the lower extremity
- Having suffered from back pain in the past years
- Having a musculoskeletal system abnormality
- Being unable to perform functional tasks (visual, auditory, vestibular or neurological impairment)
- Being pregnant
- Having malignancy and metabolic diseases
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Istanbul Panterler Sports Club
Kağıthane, Istanbul, 34406
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Verbal Combined Focus of Attention and Video Instruction Training on Landing Technique and Proprioception in Semi-Professional Female Athletes
Feedback is implanted into workouts to prevent lower extremity injuries. There are different studies where external focus and internal focus feedback were found to be superior. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of training on vertical jump landing technique by comparing a verbal training group that receives instructions with an external focus of attention and an internal focus of attention combined, a visual training group with video instructions, and a control group in female athletes with knee valgus. It is also to examine whether possible beneficial results are still present in the retention test performed one week after the test session. The secondary aim of our study is to examine the effect of the training provided on knee joint position sense.
Read the detailed description
Approximately 70% of lower extremity injuries occur during non-contact, single-leg landings, and jumping to the ground is a common injury mechanism in both genders. Additionally, female athletes have higher injury rates compared to men, potentially due to anatomical differences of the lower kinematic chain. Events in which athletes experience non-contact ACL injuries generally show many common biomechanical features such as increased ground reaction forces during single-leg landing, decreased joint flexion in the sagittal plane of the ankle, knee, hip and trunk, as well as increased knee internal rotation angles. Another critical ACL injury risk factor is performing a secondary task during sharp deceleration movements. Current rehabilitation programs focus on neuromuscular training programs to prevent adverse movement patterns and increase proper movement control. However, there is still a need to increase the effectiveness of these neuromuscular training programs to have a more significant impact on ACL injury rates. Therefore, the use of motor learning strategies and neuromuscular training programs with adequate and correct techniques in the rehabilitation of athletes should still be investigated.
There are various approaches to motor learning. One of the best-known approaches is the cognitive approach, where the athlete reaches the automation stage by receiving feedback and repeating the model technique as often as possible. The common denominator of motor learning strategies is the use of explicit instructions and feedback regarding desired landing positions. Instructions for the implementation of movements in rehabilitation programs aim to improve performance and motor learning. These instructions may address the action outcome or the course of action. There are many studies showing that feedback training changes jump landing biomechanics. In line with the results of these studies, using feedback techniques, especially to reduce the vertical ground reaction force and increase the knee flexion angle during landing from a jump, can reduce the stress and risk of injury in the lower extremity.
Motor skills can be learned with an internal focus of attention or with an external focus of attention. Although the difference in these instructions may seem insignificant, externally focused education; has been shown to result in better performance, retention, transfer, and greater movement automaticity. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of training on vertical jump landing technique by comparing a verbal training group that receives instructions with an external focus of attention and an internal focus of attention combined, a visual training group with video instructions, and a control group in female athletes with knee valgus. It is also to examine whether possible beneficial results are still present in the retention test performed one week after the test session. The secondary aim of our study is to examine the effect of the training provided on knee joint position sense.
- Conditions
- Injury;Sports
- Being tested
- Landing error scoring system (LESS)
- Keywords
- motor learning, knee valgus, landing biomechanics, proprioception
- Medical subject headings
- Athletic Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Landing error scoring system (LESS)Other
Also called drop vertical jump landing task, frontal plane projection angle (FPPA), knee joint position sense (KJPS)
Each group will perform two training blocks of 10 drop vertical jumping (DVJ) tasks. Knee joint position sense (KJPS), frontal plane projection angle (FPPA), and Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) assessments will be performed before and after the training blocks, and follow-up assessments will be performed 1 week later. The dominant limb of the participants (the side limb they use when kicking the ball) will be taken into account during the measurement.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Video Instructed Training Group | Experimental | Before the study is conducted, the expert video that will be used for the VI group instructions will be created. The expert video will be created with an athlete with a LESS score of less than 4 and an FPPA of less than 100 who performs a DVJ task in accordance with the instructions. A video recording will be taken of the person designated as an expert performing the DVJ task. The video recording will be used only for the VI group instructions. Receives: Other: Landing error scoring system (LESS) |
| Verbal Combined Focus Instructed Training Group | Experimental | It was emphasized that the participants should jump from the 30 cm high box and immediately after landing, jump as high and forward as possible and maintain the final landing stance for 5 seconds. Participants were asked to perform 5 drop vertical jumps and the jumps performed were evaluated. After pretest evaluations were recorded, verbal training group participants performed two training blocks, receiving instructions specific to their group. Participants were given a combined verbal instruction such as "Focus on how hard you push yourself off the ground after the jump and how quickly you straighten your knees during this push", in which internal and external focus directions were given simultaneously. After receiving the instructions, the participants performed 2 drop vertical jumps, 10 times each. Receives: Other: Landing error scoring system (LESS) |
| Control Group | Experimental | Participants will be explained how to do the DVJ task in the same way as other groups. Then, after the participants' measurements will be taken, they will start the training blocks without any instructions. Participants will not receive any feedback during training blocks. Receives: Other: Landing error scoring system (LESS) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) Measurement
Two standard video cameras capture the frontal plane and sagittal plane view of each subject as they perform the test procedures (jumping from 30 cm height box). The participant's LESS score represents excellent (LESS score <4), good (LESS score >4 to 5), fair (LESS score >5 to 6) and poor (LESS score >6) jumping technique.
Measured: baseline, immediately after the intervention, one week after the baseline
Secondary outcomes (2)
Frontal Plan Projection Angle (FPPA) Measurement
During the frontal plane projection angle (FPPA) measurement, a straight line will be drawn from the anterior superior spina iliaca along the femur to the midpoint of the patella, and the midpoint of the ankle will be determined as the reference point by a straight line drawn from the midpoint of the patella. Participants will stand with their feet aligned in the sagittal plane and their arms crossed across their chests. By prior instruction, subjects will be asked to squat up to 60º knee flexion in a controlled manner without losing their balance, before returning to the starting position. Digital recordings of the frontal plane will be made while individuals perform a single-leg squat test at 60º knee flexion 3 times. The FPPA degree is measured from the medial aspect of the knee and calculated by subtracting 360. FPPA of 195° and above will be considered pathological.
Measured: baseline, immediately after the intervention, one week after the baseline
Knee Joint Position Sense (KJPS) Measurement
Participants are initially placed in a sitting position in 90° knee flexion. Participants' eyes are covered with a mask to block visual input. The smartphone that will perform the measurement is fixed to the participants' lower limb (15 cm from the apex of the fibular head) with a Velcro strap. From the starting position (90 knee flexion), the participants' knee is placed by the researcher at a target joint angle of 45. Participants actively hold the knee at the 45 target joint angle for five seconds to understand the exact angle of the knee. After these five seconds, the participants actively return their knee to the starting position and the researcher shows the target angle to the participant three times. With the command given by the researcher, the participants are directed to extend their knees as close as possible to the target joint angle without any external stimulation or assistance. Participants perform 3 trials and try to maintain the estimated position for 3 seconds.
Measured: baseline, immediately after the intervention, one week after the baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 May 2024
- Study start15 Jan 2024
- Primary completion6 Jun 2024
- Study completion12 Jun 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Injury;SportsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- a randomized, controlled, single-blind, prospective study
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bahçeşehir University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Pelin Pişirici, Bahçeşehir University
- Investigators
- Pelin Pişirici, PT, PhD, Study director, Bahcesehir University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of PhysiotherapyBüşra Tamgüç, PT, Principal investigator, Bahcesehir University, Graduate Education Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06424886
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BT-FocusT
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 17 May 2024
- Last updated
- 13 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Tamguc B, Pisirici P. The Effect of Verbal Combined Focus of Attention and Video Instruction Training on Knee Valgus and Landing Technique in Semiprofessional Female Athletes. Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Apr 4;13(4):23259671251326454. doi: 10.1177/23259671251326454. eCollection 2025 Apr.
PubMed 40291630
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Verbal Combined Focus of Attention and Video Instruction Training on Landing Technique and Proprioception in Semi-Professional Female Athletes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06424886
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BT-FocusT
- Conditions
- Injury;Sports
- Keywords
- motor learning, knee valgus, landing biomechanics, proprioception
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bahçeşehir UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Jun 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 May 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Feedback is implanted into workouts to prevent lower extremity injuries. There are different studies where external focus and internal focus feedback were found to be superior. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of training on vertical jump landing technique by comparing a verbal training group that receives instructions with an external focus of attention and an internal focus of attention combined, a visual training group with video instructions, and a control group in female athletes with knee valgus. It is also to examine whether possible beneficial results are still present in the retention test performed one week after the test session. The secondary aim of our study is to examine the effect of the training provided on knee joint position sense.
Detailed description
Approximately 70% of lower extremity injuries occur during non-contact, single-leg landings, and jumping to the ground is a common injury mechanism in both genders. Additionally, female athletes have higher injury rates compared to men, potentially due to anatomical differences of the lower kinematic chain. Events in which athletes experience non-contact ACL injuries generally show many common biomechanical features such as increased ground reaction forces during single-leg landing, decreased joint flexion in the sagittal plane of the ankle, knee, hip and trunk, as well as increased knee internal rotation angles. Another critical ACL injury risk factor is performing a secondary task during sharp deceleration movements. Current rehabilitation programs focus on neuromuscular training programs to prevent adverse movement patterns and increase proper movement control. However, there is still a need to increase the effectiveness of these neuromuscular training programs to have a more significant impact on ACL injury rates. Therefore, the use of motor learning strategies and neuromuscular training programs with adequate and correct techniques in the rehabilitation of athletes should still be investigated.
There are various approaches to motor learning. One of the best-known approaches is the cognitive approach, where the athlete reaches the automation stage by receiving feedback and repeating the model technique as often as possible. The common denominator of motor learning strategies is the use of explicit instructions and feedback regarding desired landing positions. Instructions for the implementation of movements in rehabilitation programs aim to improve performance and motor learning. These instructions may address the action outcome or the course of action. There are many studies showing that feedback training changes jump landing biomechanics. In line with the results of these studies, using feedback techniques, especially to reduce the vertical ground reaction force and increase the knee flexion angle during landing from a jump, can reduce the stress and risk of injury in the lower extremity.
Motor skills can be learned with an internal focus of attention or with an external focus of attention. Although the difference in these instructions may seem insignificant, externally focused education; has been shown to result in better performance, retention, transfer, and greater movement automaticity. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of training on vertical jump landing technique by comparing a verbal training group that receives instructions with an external focus of attention and an internal focus of attention combined, a visual training group with video instructions, and a control group in female athletes with knee valgus. It is also to examine whether possible beneficial results are still present in the retention test performed one week after the test session. The secondary aim of our study is to examine the effect of the training provided on knee joint position sense.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- a randomized, controlled, single-blind, prospective study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Video Instructed Training Group | Experimental | Other: Landing error scoring system (LESS)Before the study is conducted, the expert video that will be used for the VI group instructions will be created. The expert video will be created with an athlete with a LESS score of less than 4 and an FPPA of less than 100 who performs a DVJ task in accordance with the instructions. A video recording will be taken of the person designated as an expert performing the DVJ task. The video recording will be used only for the VI group instructions. |
| Verbal Combined Focus Instructed Training Group | Experimental | Other: Landing error scoring system (LESS)It was emphasized that the participants should jump from the 30 cm high box and immediately after landing, jump as high and forward as possible and maintain the final landing stance for 5 seconds. Participants were asked to perform 5 drop vertical jumps and the jumps performed were evaluated. After pretest evaluations were recorded, verbal training group participants performed two training blocks, receiving instructions specific to their group. Participants were given a combined verbal instruction such as "Focus on how hard you push yourself off the ground after the jump and how quickly you straighten your knees during this push", in which internal and external focus directions were given simultaneously. After receiving the instructions, the participants performed 2 drop vertical jumps, 10 times each. |
| Control Group | Experimental | Other: Landing error scoring system (LESS)Participants will be explained how to do the DVJ task in the same way as other groups. Then, after the participants' measurements will be taken, they will start the training blocks without any instructions. Participants will not receive any feedback during training blocks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 24 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Being female
- Being between the ages of 18-24
- Body mass index being between 18.5 kg/m2 and 25 kg/m2
- Becoming a minor league basketball or volleyball player
- Volunteers must not have suffered any trunk or lower extremity injuries in the last 6 months before participation in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- • Having experienced a trunk or lower extremity injury in the last 6 months before the date of study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Landing error scoring system (LESS)Also: drop vertical jump landing task, frontal plane projection angle (FPPA), knee joint position sense (KJPS)Each group will perform two training blocks of 10 drop vertical jumping (DVJ) tasks. Knee joint position sense (KJPS), frontal plane projection angle (FPPA), and Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) assessments will be performed before and after the training blocks, and follow-up assessments will be performed 1 week later. The dominant limb of the participants (the side limb they use when kicking the ball) will be taken into account during the measurement. | Other | Control Group, Verbal Combined Focus Instructed Training Group, Video Instructed Training Group |
Primary outcome
Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) Measurement
Time frame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, one week after the baseline
Two standard video cameras capture the frontal plane and sagittal plane view of each subject as they perform the test procedures (jumping from 30 cm height box). The participant's LESS score represents excellent (LESS score <4), good (LESS score >4 to 5), fair (LESS score >5 to 6) and poor (LESS score >6) jumping technique.
2 secondary outcomes
Frontal Plan Projection Angle (FPPA) Measurement
Time frame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, one week after the baseline
Knee Joint Position Sense (KJPS) Measurement
Time frame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, one week after the baseline
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jun 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40291630Tamguc B, Pisirici P. The Effect of Verbal Combined Focus of Attention and Video Instruction Training on Knee Valgus and Landing Technique in Semiprofessional Female Athletes. Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Apr 4;13(4):23259671251326454. doi: 10.1177/23259671251326454. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Related trials for Injury;Sports
Not yet recruiting
Supporting Athletes' Return to Sports After ACL Reconstruction: A Study of a Psychological Readiness Program
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Functional Recovery After a Recent Lateral Ankle Sprain With Early Initiation of Rehabilitation: Changes in the Ankle-GO Score and Its Association With Return to Sport and Recurrent Sprains.
Ankle Sprain
Recruiting
Enovis High Ankle Sprain Brace Testing
Athletes in Cutting Sports
Not yet recruiting
Integrating Sport-Specific Comprehensive Training to Upscale Performance in Women and Girls
Sport Injuries, Performance in Sport
Not yet recruiting
PNF Effects on Volleyball Performance
Sport Injuries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pelin Pişirici, PT, PhD study director
Bahcesehir University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy
Büşra Tamgüç, PT principal investigator
Bahcesehir University, Graduate Education Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Landing error scoring system (LESS) in people with Injury;Sports, run by Bahçeşehir University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) Measurement (time frame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, one week after the baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06424886, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jun 2024.