AzTrials
AzTrials

Menstrual CycleNCT06426459

Social Media Usage in Adolescent Girls

An observational study of Menstrual Cycle and Oral Contraceptive, run by International Research Training Group 2804 at 1 site in Germany.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study aims to explore the effects of hormonal fluctuations throughout the menstrual cycle on social media use, brain architecture, neural reward processing and reward behavior, and affective status in adolescent girls. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 18 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Menstrual Cycle, Oral Contraceptive
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
29 May 2024to 1 Mar 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 18 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Study population: The study participants will be primarily recruited from residents of Tübingen and surrounding areas.

Who may be able to join

  • Between 15 and 18 years old adolescent girls
  • Body mass index(18-25kg/m2)
  • Natural menstrual cycle (between 25 to 31 days) OR use of combined oral contraceptives for at least 4 months
  • Social media use (e.g., Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, Facebook, X, BeReal)
  • Non-smoking
  • German language fluency
  • Attending age-appropriate school

Who cannot join

  • Any neurological or psychiatric disease based on the standardized diagnostic interview (Kinder-DIPS)
  • Medical problems such as hormonal, metabolic, developmental or chronic diseases (e.g., congenital disorders, diabetes, dysfunctions of the thyroid, or congestive heart failure)
  • Pregnancy
  • Females who gave birth or were breastfeeding within the last year
  • Use of any other kind of steroid hormonal treatment (except combined oral contraceptives) or psychotropic treatment in the last three months
  • Females with premenstrual dysphoric disorder(PMDD)
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Not willing to be informed about incidental fMRI findings
  • Additional exclusion criteria for fMRI:
  • Individuals with non-removable metal objects on or in the body such as cardiac pacemaker, artificial heart valve, metal prostheses, metal implants, metal splinters, etc.
  • Tattoos (if fMRI-incompatible according to expert guidelines)
  • Claustrophobia
  • Surgery less than three months ago
  • Pathological hearing or increased sensitivity to loud noises
  • Neurological disease or injury
  • Moderate or severe head injury
  • Restricted (corrected) vision

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Isabel Brandhorst, Dr. Dipl.-Psych. contact

isabel.brandhorst@med.uni-tuebingen.de

Germany1 site
  • University Clinic Tuebingen, Department of Psychiatry & Psychotherapy

    Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 72076

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Positive and Negative Effects of Social Media Usage in Adolescent Girls

The study aims to explore the effects of hormonal fluctuations throughout the menstrual cycle on social media use, brain architecture, neural reward processing and reward behavior, and affective status in adolescent girls. Additionally, it strives to compare the effects of exogenous and endogenous hormones on the above-mentioned aspects. For this purpose, the investigators will compare two main groups in the study: 1. Naturally cycling adolescent girls, 2. Adolescent girls using combined oral contraceptives. This study will combine self-report data via questionnaires, ecological data via Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA), endocrine data via blood collection, and neural data via fMRI assessment to enhance the understanding of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying social media use in adolescent girls. Furthermore, it seeks to elucidate whether there are vulnerable periods throughout the menstrual cycle when adolescent girls are especially prone to dysfunctional social media use and help to design more specific interventions as well as therapy.

Read the detailed description

For each participant, there is a screening session, a month-long EMA assessment and two experimental fMRI sessions are planned.

After making sure the participants fill the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the investigators will invite them to the laboratory for a screening session (T0). In this session, the participants will provide written informed consent and assent in case of those under 18 years old and written, informed consent for those who are 18 year old. Furthermore, the participants will participate in a standardized clinical interview to screen for mental disorders (Kinder-DIPS). Subsequently, they will be informed about the study details. Finally, they will fill out questionnaires about personality, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, gender identity and norms, mood, loneliness, social media disorder, internet use, social support, and fear of missing out.

Naturally cycling adolescent girls will join the two fMRI measurements (T1 \& T2) during the follicular and luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Adolescent girls using combined oral contraceptives will join the first fMRI measurement during the pill intake period, and the second measurement during the break period. The fMRI sessions will comprise of filling out questionnaires, fMRI measurements, and blood collection for hormonal assessment.

Questionnaires on depressive symptoms, state anxiety, mood, gender identity, self-esteem, loneliness, fear of missing out (FOMO), social media disorder, internet use, social support and social media use will be administered through RedCap platform. This will ensure the assessment of subjective, self-report data and its changes throughout the measurement time of one month.

The sequence of fMRI measurements incudes four main parts, namely anatomical scan, resting-state scan, Effort Allocation Task (EAT), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). This protocol ensures the acquisition of the structural and functional data of the brain in the participants. The detailed protocol components are as follows:

  1. Anatomical scan: This first sequence of the protocol ensures assessment and insight into the anatomy of the brain, thus providing structural data of the participants' brain. This will last approximately 8 minutes.
  2. Resting-state scan: The next sequence involves participants watching a movie that was designed to improve imaging at rest for approximately 10 minutes. This sequence ensures insight into brain activity when no task is being performed and when the participant is at rest.
  3. Effort Allocation Task (EAT): This next sequence aims to assess reward processing and reward behavior in the participants. During this task, participants have to exert physical effort on a grip force device when faced with monetary points at stake. There are two types of reward a participant can face; low and high reward. Additionally, there are two difficulty levels during the task, one being easier and the other more difficult. The payoff for the invested effort will be proportional to its duration. The task will last approximately 17 minutes.
  4. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI): During the final sequence, participants will undergo DTI assessment to ensure insight into white matter microstructure and connectivity. This will last approximately 7-8 minutes.

To thoroughly investigate the participants' experiences in their natural environments, Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) will be conducted. This will be done through an app called m-Path where participants will fill out daily questionnaires about social media use, self-esteem, premenstrual symptoms, and mood throughout one month. A daily questionnaire lasts approximately 10 minutes. This assessment will ensure data about subjective experiences with high ecological validity.

Keywords
Social media use, Adolescent girls, Menstrual cycle, Oral contraceptive, Neuroimaging, Women's mental health

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT06426459
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Natural menstrual cycleAdolescent girls who have a natural menstrual cycle and have not used any kind of hormonal contraception for at least 6 months.
Oral contraceptiveAdolescent girls who use combined oral contraceptives for at least 4 months.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Brain disparities: Contrasting naturally cycling adolescent girls with those using combined oral contraceptives

    Possible differences between naturally cycling adolescent girls and those taking combined oral contraceptives in brain structure

    Measured: Measured twice appr. 2-3 weeks apart; approximately 45 minutes each time

  2. Brain disparities: Contrasting naturally cycling adolescent girls with those using combined oral contraceptives

    Possible differences between naturally cycling adolescent girls and those taking combined oral contraceptives in brain function (functional activation based on BOLD effect)

    Measured: Measured twice appr. 2-3 weeks apart; approximately 45 minutes each time]

  3. Reward-processing disparities: Contrasting naturally cycling adolescent girls with those using combined oral contraceptives

    Possible differences between naturally cycling adolescent girls and those taking combined oral contraceptives on reward processing

    Measured: Measured twice appr. 2-3 weeks apart; approx. 17 minutes each time

  4. Social media use disparities: Contrasting naturally cycling adolescent girls and those using combined oral contraceptives

    Possible differences in social media use between the two groups

    Measured: Measured through ecological momentary assessment every day throughout one month

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Social media use disparities: Contrasting follicular and luteal phase in naturally cycling adolescent girls

    Possible differences between the two phases of the menstrual cycle in social media use

    Measured: Measured through ecological momentary assessment every day throughout one month

  2. Brain Disparities: Contrasting follicular and luteal phase in naturally cycling adolescent girls

    Possible differences in brain function and structure in naturally cycling girls in follicular vs. luteal phase

    Measured: Measured twice appr. 2-3 weeks apart; circa 45 minutes each time

  3. Reward-processing disparities: Contrasting follicular and luteal phase in naturally cycling adolescent girls

    Possible differences in reward processing and reward behavior between the two menstrual cycle phases

    Measured: Measured twice appr. 2-3 weeks apart; circa 45 minutes each time

  4. Associations between personality and brain function & structure

    Possible effects of personality type on brain structure and brain function for both groups. Personality measured by the NEO-Five-Factor-Inventory.

    Measured: Measured twice appr. 2-3 weeks apart; circa 45 minutes each time

  5. Associations between personality and reward processing & behavior

    Possible effects of personality type on reward processing for both groups. Personality measured by the NEO-Five-Factor-Inventory.

    Measured: Measured twice appr. 2-3 weeks apart; circa 17 minutes each time

  6. Self-esteem differences: Contrasting follicular and luteal phase in naturally cycling adolescent girls

    Possible differences in self-esteem between the two phases of the menstrual cycle

    Measured: Measured through ecological momentary assessment every day throughout one month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 May 2024
  2. Study start29 May 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Mar 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
70 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06426459
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRTG_P09
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
14 Apr 2024
Last updated
23 May 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Menstrual Cycle and Oral Contraceptive, run by International Research Training Group 2804 at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Edita Karavidaj, MSc (+491746443856, edita.karavidaj@med.uni-tuebingen.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Brain disparities: Contrasting naturally cycling adolescent girls with those using combined oral contraceptives (time frame: Measured twice appr. 2-3 weeks apart; approximately 45 minutes each time). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 May 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in