AzTrials
AzTrials

Autism Spectrum DisorderNCT06427486

Telecoaching Intervention for Children With Autism and Their Parents in Palestine

A study testing Occupational Performance Coaching (OPC) Telecoaching and General Sanad Alhayaa Digital Resources in people with Autism Spectrum Disorder, run by Arab American University (Palestine) at 1 site in Palestinian Territories.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Families of children with autism in Palestine may have difficulty accessing early intervention and rehabilitation services because specialized services are limited and families may face geographical, financial, and other barriers. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 7 years
Conditions the study is for
Autism Spectrum Disorder
What is being tested?
Occupational Performance Coaching (OPC) Telecoaching and General Sanad Alhayaa Digital Resources
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
26 participants
Where
1 sitePalestinian Territories
Study dates
15 Feb 2025to 21 Jun 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 7 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Parent or primary caregiver aged ≥18 years and able to provide informed consent.
  • Parent or caregiver spends the majority of the intervention period with the child.
  • Access to an internet-enabled device capable of videoconferencing and a reliable internet connection.
  • Child aged 3-7 years with a confirmed diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder by a neurologist or psychiatrist.
  • Children receiving other early-intervention or rehabilitation services remained eligible to participate.

Who cannot join

  • Parent or caregiver unable to meet the above participation requirements.
  • Child with a co-occurring medical, neurological, or genetic condition requiring intensive medical or pharmacological management beyond the scope of the intervention, such as uncontrolled epilepsy or a complex genetic syndrome.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Palestinian Territories1 site
  • Arab American University

    Jenin

Other trials in Palestinian Territories

About this study

Official title: Acceptability, Feasibility, and Potential Impact of a Telecoaching Intervention for Parents of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder in Palestine: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Families of children with autism in Palestine may have difficulty accessing early intervention and rehabilitation services because specialized services are limited and families may face geographical, financial, and other barriers. Providing support to parents remotely may help families access professional guidance without needing to travel for every session.

This pilot study examined whether an eight-week parent telecoaching program called Occupational Performance Coaching (OPC) could be delivered successfully and was acceptable to parents of young children with autism in Palestine. The study also explored changes in children's participation in everyday activities and autism-related characteristics, as well as parents' confidence in supporting their child and their quality of life. Because this was a small pilot study, these outcomes were explored to help plan future research rather than to determine whether the intervention was effective.

Read more

Parents were assigned to one of two groups. Parents in the telecoaching group received eight individual online coaching sessions over eight weeks, with each session lasting approximately 40-60 minutes. Coaching helped parents identify activities that were important to their child and family, understand difficulties affecting the child's participation, develop possible strategies, try these strategies during everyday routines, and review progress with the coach.

Parents in the waitlist group had access to general Arabic-language information and videos about autism through the Sanad Alhayaa digital platform during the eight-week comparison period but did not receive individual coaching. After completing the post-intervention assessment, they were offered the telecoaching program.

The study also included interviews with parents who received telecoaching to better understand their experiences, perceived benefits, and barriers to using this form of support.

Read the detailed description

This study used an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. The quantitative component was a two-arm, parallel-group external pilot randomized controlled trial evaluating an eight-week telehealth-delivered Occupational Performance Coaching (OPC) intervention for parents of children with autism in Palestine. The study primarily evaluated the feasibility of trial procedures and intervention delivery and the acceptability of telecoaching. Child and parent outcomes were examined exploratorily to characterize patterns and variability of change and to inform the design of a future definitive trial.

Parents and their children were recruited from West Bank districts through community-based and online recruitment approaches. Eligible parents or primary caregivers were aged 18 years or older, spent the majority of the intervention period with the child, and had access to an internet-enabled device and reliable internet connection. Eligible children were aged 3-7 years and had a confirmed diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder from a neurologist or psychiatrist. Children receiving other early-intervention or rehabilitation services remained eligible.

Following informed consent and completion of baseline assessments, 26 parent-child dyads were randomized, with 14 allocated to OPC telecoaching and 12 to the waitlist control condition. Allocation was conducted using covariate-adaptive minimization based on the Pocock-Simon approach, with a random component, to reduce imbalance between groups with respect to child sex and baseline CARS-2 autism severity. Randomization was centrally controlled by an independent coordinator who was not involved in recruitment, baseline assessment, intervention delivery, or outcome analysis. Participants and the intervention provider could not be masked because of the nature of the coaching intervention.

Participants allocated to the intervention received eight weekly individualized OPC sessions delivered synchronously through Zoom, with sessions lasting approximately 40-60 minutes. Coaching focused on parent-selected occupational performance goals and supported parents to analyze performance challenges, generate possible solutions, implement strategies within everyday routines, and review progress. The Sanad Alhayaa digital platform supported intervention-related procedures, including appointment booking, questionnaires, individualized resources, and intervention documentation. During the randomized comparison period, participants allocated to the waitlist condition had access to general Arabic-language autism-related resources through Sanad Alhayaa but did not receive individualized OPC. They were offered OPC telecoaching after completing the post-intervention assessment.

Feasibility was evaluated using prespecified progression criteria addressing recruitment, digital platform procedures, randomization, retention, questionnaire completion, intervention attendance, intervention fidelity, and safety. Telecoaching acceptability was assessed using the Saudi Telehealth Acceptance Scale. Exploratory child outcomes included individualized occupational performance and satisfaction measured using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, autism-related characteristics measured using the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist and Childhood Autism Rating Scale, Second Edition, and parent outcomes assessing parental competence and quality of life.

Quantitative analyses emphasized descriptive feasibility estimates and exploratory estimation of change rather than confirmatory hypothesis testing. Continuous outcomes were summarized descriptively, and exploratory within-group and between-group changes were accompanied by confidence intervals and standardized effect-size estimates where appropriate. The small pilot sample and exploratory nature of these analyses were considered when interpreting the findings.

Following the intervention, semi-structured interviews were conducted with intervention participants to explore their experiences and perceptions of telecoaching, including acceptability, perceived benefits, facilitators, barriers, and implementation experiences. The qualitative component was intended to provide contextual understanding of the quantitative findings and the implementation of the intervention.

Being tested
Occupational Performance Coaching (OPC) Telecoaching, General Sanad Alhayaa Digital Resources
Keywords
telecoaching, Telehealth, Early intervention, Quality of life, parent's self-competency, Activities of daily living, occupational performance coaching
Medical subject headings
Autism Spectrum Disorder

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Occupational Performance Coaching (OPC) TelecoachingOther

    Occupational Performance Coaching (OPC) is a collaborative, occupation-focused coaching approach that supports parents to identify meaningful participation goals, analyze occupational performance challenges, generate possible solutions, implement strategies within everyday routines, and review progress. In this study, OPC was delivered individually through eight weekly 40-60 minute Zoom sessions. Sanad Alhayaa supported appointment booking, electronic questionnaires, secure individualized resources, and intervention documentation.

  • General Sanad Alhayaa Digital ResourcesOther

    General Arabic-language information and videos addressing autism, sensory needs, social interaction, and activities of daily living were made available through the Sanad Alhayaa resource library. This resource access did not include individualized coaching, individualized resource uploads, private clinical messaging, or coaching-session booking.

Study groups in NCT06427486
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
OPC TelecoachingExperimentalParticipants allocated to this arm received an eight-week individualized Occupational Performance Coaching (OPC) intervention delivered remotely through Zoom and supported by the Sanad Alhayaa digital platform.
Receives: Other: Occupational Performance Coaching (OPC) Telecoaching
Waitlist Control: General Digital ResourcesOtherDuring the eight-week randomized comparison period, participants allocated to this arm had access to general autism-related resources through the Sanad Alhayaa digital platform but did not receive individualized OPC. After completing the post-intervention assessment, they were offered the OPC telecoaching intervention.
Receives: Other: General Sanad Alhayaa Digital Resources

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Recruitment Target Achieved

    Recruitment was assessed as the percentage of the prespecified recruitment target achieved during the planned recruitment period. The prespecified progression criterion was recruitment of 30 parent-child dyads within four weeks.

    Measured: During the recruitment period

  2. Percentage of Participants Successfully Completing Required Digital Platform Procedures

    Digital platform feasibility was assessed as the percentage of participants who successfully completed the required Sanad Alhayaa platform procedures, including account creation and child-profile registration. The prespecified progression criterion was successful completion of the required platform procedures by at least 80% of participants.

    Measured: From enrollment through post-intervention assessment (approximately 8 weeks)

  3. Percentage of Participants Successfully Randomized According to the Prespecified Procedure

    Randomization feasibility was assessed as the percentage of randomized participants allocated according to the prespecified randomization procedure without allocation errors or major protocol deviations. The prespecified progression criterion was successful allocation of all randomized participants without errors or major deviations.

    Measured: Immediately after baseline assessment

  4. Percentage of Participants Completing Required Online Study Questionnaires

    Questionnaire completion was assessed as the percentage of participants who completed the required online study questionnaires at baseline and post-intervention. The prespecified progression criterion was questionnaire completion by at least 80% of participants at each assessment point.

    Measured: At baseline and post-intervention (approximately 8 weeks)

  5. Percentage of Randomized Participants Completing Post-Intervention Assessment

    Participant retention was assessed as the percentage of randomized participants who completed the post-intervention assessment. The prespecified progression criterion was retention of at least 80% of randomized participants.

    Measured: From randomization through post-intervention assessment (approximately 8 weeks)

  6. Percentage of Intervention Participants Attending at Least 7 of 8 OPC Sessions

    Intervention attendance was assessed as the percentage of intervention participants who attended at least seven of the eight planned OPC telecoaching sessions. The prespecified progression criterion was attendance at a minimum of seven of eight sessions.

    Measured: During the 8-week OPC intervention period

  7. OPC Fidelity Measure: Percentage of Prescribed Components Demonstrated

    Intervention fidelity was assessed using the OPC Fidelity Measure in independently audited OPC sessions. Fidelity was calculated as the percentage of prescribed OPC components demonstrated during each audited session. The prespecified progression criterion was fidelity of at least 80%.

    Measured: During the 8-week OPC intervention period

  8. Number of Serious Adverse Events Attributable to Study Participation

    Safety was assessed as the number of serious adverse events considered attributable to study participation. The prespecified progression criterion was no serious adverse events attributable to study participation.

    Measured: From enrollment through post-intervention assessment (approximately 8 weeks)

  9. Mean Saudi Telehealth Acceptance Scale (STAS) Score

    The STAS is a 24-item Arabic-language measure of telehealth acceptance covering Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, Facilitating Conditions, and Behavioral Intention. Items are rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater acceptance of telehealth. Domain and overall scores were assessed at baseline and post-intervention.

    Measured: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure

    The COPM is an individualized, occupation-focused measure in which parents identify and prioritize occupational performance goals for their child. For prioritized goals, parents rate perceived performance and satisfaction with performance separately on 10-point scales ranging from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating better perceived performance or greater satisfaction. Mean Performance and Satisfaction scores were calculated separately and change was assessed from baseline to post-intervention. The COPM was administered only to participants allocated to OPC because it formed part of individualized goal identification and intervention planning.

    Measured: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)

  2. Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC)

    The ATEC is a 77-item parent-report measure comprising four domains: Speech/Language/Communication, Sociability, Sensory/Cognitive Awareness, and Health/Physical/Behavior. Domain scores and the total score were calculated separately. Total scores range from 0 to 179, with lower scores indicating fewer autism-related difficulties. Change in domain and total scores was assessed from baseline to post-intervention.

    Measured: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)

  3. Childhood Autism Rating Scale, Second Edition (CARS-2)

    The CARS-2 is a clinician-rated measure of autism-related characteristics comprising 15 items rated from 1 to 4. Item ratings are summed to produce a total score ranging from 15 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater severity of autism-related characteristics. Change in total score was assessed from baseline to post-intervention.

    Measured: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)

  4. Parental Competence Scale for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

    The PCS-ASD is a 29-item Arabic-language measure of parental competence. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with negatively worded items reverse scored. Total scores range from 29 to 145, with higher scores indicating greater perceived parental competence. Change in total score was assessed from baseline to post-intervention.

    Measured: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)

  5. World Health Organization Quality of Life, Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF)

    The WHOQOL-BREF is a 26-item measure of quality of life covering four domains: Physical Health, Psychological, Social Relationships, and Environment, together with two global items. Items are rated on 5-point response scales. Domain scores are calculated according to WHO scoring guidance, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Change in domain scores was assessed from baseline to post-intervention.

    Measured: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)

  6. Arabic Quality of Life in Autism (A-QoLA)

    The A-QoLA is an autism-specific parent-reported quality-of-life measure comprising two separately scored parts. Part A assesses parents' general quality of life, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Part B assesses the perceived impact of the child's autism-related difficulties on the parent, with higher scores indicating that parents are less affected by those difficulties. Part A and Part B were scored and interpreted separately. Change in each part was assessed from baseline to post-intervention.

    Measured: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 May 2024
  2. Study start15 Feb 2025
  3. Primary completion21 Jun 2025
  4. Study completion21 Jun 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This study used an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. The quantitative component was a two-arm, parallel-group external pilot randomized controlled trial comparing an eight-week telehealth-delivered Occupational Performance Coaching intervention with a waitlist control condition. Participants allocated to the waitlist condition received the telecoaching intervention after completing the randomized post-intervention assessment. Following the intervention, semi-structured interviews were conducted with intervention participants to explore their experiences and perceptions of telecoaching. The quantitative component evaluated feasibility, acceptability, and exploratory child and parent outcomes, while the qualitative component was used to provide additional understanding of participants' experiences and the implementation of the intervention.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
26 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06427486
Sponsor's protocol ID
Parent Telecoaching and ASD
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
18 May 2024
Last updated
24 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data will not be made publicly available because the study involved a small sample of parent-child dyads from a defined population and the consent process did not include public sharing of individual-level participant data. De-identified aggregate study findings will be reported in scientific publications.

Publications

  • Aschbrenner KA, Kruse G, Gallo JJ, Plano Clark VL. Applying mixed methods to pilot feasibility studies to inform intervention trials. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Sep 26;8(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01178-x.

    PubMed 36163045
  • Dunn W, Little LM, Pope E, Wallisch A. Establishing Fidelity of Occupational Performance Coaching. OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2018 Apr;38(2):96-104. doi: 10.1177/1539449217724755. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

    PubMed 28821218
  • Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA; PAFS consensus group. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Oct 21;2:64. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0105-8. eCollection 2016.

    PubMed 27965879
  • Little LM, Pope E, Wallisch A, Dunn W. Occupation-Based Coaching by Means of Telehealth for Families of Young Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Am J Occup Ther. 2018 Mar/Apr;72(2):7202205020p1-7202205020p7. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2018.024786.

    PubMed 29426380

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Occupational Performance Coaching (OPC) Telecoaching and General Sanad Alhayaa Digital Resources in people with Autism Spectrum Disorder, run by Arab American University (Palestine) at 1 site in Palestinian Territories.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Palestinian Territories. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Recruitment Target Achieved (time frame: During the recruitment period). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06427486, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in