AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseaseNCT06437756

Effects of Theraband Resistance Training on Muscle Strength in Coronary Artery Diseases

A study testing Theraband resistance training and Conventional Resistance Training in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To compare the effects of Theraband Resistance Training with Conventional Resistance Training on muscle strength in coronary artery diseases Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Artery Disease
What is being tested?
Theraband resistance training and Conventional Resistance Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
38 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
1 May 2024to 1 Jul 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants having a documented diagnosis of CAD, confirmed by a medical professional.
  • Individuals with a history of myocardial infarction (heart attack), angina, or evidence of significant coronary artery stenosis.
  • Stable CAD who were not experiencing acute coronary events, such as recent heart attacks or unstable angina.
  • Patients who were able to perform exercises with TheraBand.
  • Reduced muscle strength of upper limb/lower limb

Who cannot join

  • Patients over the age of 75 years.
  • Exclude individuals with a recent history of Theraband resistance training.
  • Severe cardiovascular complications such as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, severe arrhythmias, or uncontrolled hypertension.
  • Patients with unstable conditions or cardiac episodes.
  • Individuals who had undergone major cardiovascular surgery (e.g., coronary artery bypass grafting) within the last six months.
  • Ejection fraction < 40%

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Al Nafees Medical Hospital

    Islamabad, Federal, 44000

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

To compare the effects of Theraband Resistance Training with Conventional Resistance Training on muscle strength in coronary artery diseases

Being tested
Theraband resistance training, Conventional Resistance Training
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Theraband resistance trainingOther

    Three sessions of 30 minutes each was used to complete the intervention over the course of six weeks (two sets of 12 repetitions). The participants were warmed up by stretching for 10 minutes before each session Participants were advised to take 5 mins rest before moving to next movement if they would feel fatigued after one movement. Thera-Band was utilized in only three different colors for the workouts.

  • Conventional Resistance TrainingOther

    The intervention was carried out over the course of six weeks in three sessions of 30 minutes each (two sets of 12 repetitions). The participants were warmed up by stretching for 10 minutes before each session. The resistance-training program was performed with Universal weights.

Study groups in NCT06437756
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Theraband resistance trainingExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: Theraband resistance training
Conventional Resistance TrainingActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: Conventional Resistance Training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Hand Held Dynamometer

    If testing techniques are consistent, handheld dynamometry is a valid approach to assess the strength state and change in strength status. Hand-held dynamometry can be a reliable assessment technique when practiced by a single experienced tester

    Measured: 6 week

  2. Modified BORG Scale

    The Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale is numerical rating scale ranging from 0 to 10 and is used to measure dyspnea that patient report during sub-maximal exercise and is regularly administered during six-minute walk test. Changes from the baseline will be measured

    Measured: 6 week

  3. Chadler Fatigue Scale

    It is a self-administered questionnaire for assessing the degree and severity of fatigue/tiredness in epidemiological populations, both clinical and non-clinical. The Chadler Fatigue Scale (CFS) was originally perceived as comprising two subscales that evaluate fatigue in the physical and mental domains. Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = better than usual, 1 = no more than usual, 2 = worse than usual, 3 = much worse than usual), with higher scores indicating greater fatigue. Changes from the baseline are measured

    Measured: 6 week

  4. 6 Min walk test (Distance in meters)

    Changes from the baseline, Body Mass Index can be define as statistical index utilizing an individuals height and weight to give an estimation of muscle versus fat in female and male of all ages. It is determined by taking an individual weight in kilograms, separated by their height in meters squared, or BMI = weight (in kg)/height (in m square).

    Measured: 6 week

  5. The 30 Second Sit to Stand Test(30SSST) for lower limb strength

    The 30-Second Sit to Stand Test evaluates older people's leg strength and endurance using a foldable chair without arms. Participants stand with feet positioned back from knees, arms crossed, and arms crossed. The examiner counts stand within 30 seconds, determining the score.

    Measured: 6 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 May 2024
  2. Study start1 May 2024
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2024
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
38 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06437756
Sponsor's protocol ID
REC/01808 Zunaira Shaukat
Status last verified
Jul 2024
First submitted
27 May 2024
Last updated
3 Jul 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Theraband resistance training and Conventional Resistance Training in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Hand Held Dynamometer (time frame: 6 week). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jul 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in