AnesthesiaLRNBNCT06443879
Loss and Return of Sensation After Axillary Brachial Plexus Nerve Block - Distally or Proximally
An observational study of Anesthesia, run by Balgrist University Hospital at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
Peripheral regional anesthesia is the current gold standard of opioid-sparing perioperative analgesia, especially in shoulder, upper limb, and leg surgery. Axillary brachial plexus nerve block is one possible block for upper limb surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Anesthesia
- What is being tested?
- Axillary brachial plexus nerve block: loss and return of sensation
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2024to 12 Sep 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All outpatients undergoing upper limb surgery with axillary brachial plexus nerve block at Balgrist University Hospital will be eligible to take part in the project.
Who may be able to join
- Outpatients with planed surgery with axillary brachial plexus nerve block
- Informed consent as documented by signature
- Age ≥ 18 years
Who cannot join
- Patients with a known allergy towards the local anaesthetic
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Switzerland1 site
Balgrist University Hospital
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, 8008
About this study
Peripheral regional anesthesia is the current gold standard of opioid-sparing perioperative analgesia, especially in shoulder, upper limb, and leg surgery. Axillary brachial plexus nerve block is one possible block for upper limb surgery. Loss and return of sensation require time and loss of sensation is supposed to spread from the proximal part to the distal part of the upper limb. Interestingly, until now there is no study about the return of sensation related to the anatomic region.
The investigators hypothesize that the loss and return of sensation after axillary brachial plexus nerve block will first occur in the proximal part of the upper limb and last in the distal part.
Read the detailed description
Peripheral regional anesthesia is the current gold standard of opioid-sparing perioperative analgesia, especially in shoulder, upper limb, and leg surgery.(1-8) Axillary brachial plexus nerve block is one possible block for upper limb surgery.(4, 5, 9) Loss and return of sensation require time. It is known from clinical practice that loss of sensation occurs from the proximal part of the arm to the distal part of the upper limb.
Interestingly, until now there is no study about the return of sensation related to the anatomic region. The investigators hypothesize that return of sensation after axillary brachial plexus nerve block will develop in the same direction like loss of sensation, what means from proximal to the distal part of the upper limb.
- Conditions
- Anesthesia
- Being tested
- Axillary brachial plexus nerve block: loss and return of sensation
- Keywords
- Peripheral regional anesthesia, Loss and return of sensation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Axillary brachial plexus nerve block: loss and return of sensationOther
Evaluating loss and return of sensation after axillary brachial plexus nerve block
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Loss of sensation after axillary brachial plexus nerve block
A questionnaire will be used to record the loss of sensation in the upper limb. Sensation loss is recorded separately for the finger, hand, forearm, elbow, and arm. It will distinguish between initial and complete loss of sensation.
Measured: Pre-surgery
Return of sensation after axillary brachial plexus nerve block
A questionnaire will be used to record the return of sensation in the upper limb. Sensation return is recorded separately for the finger, hand, forearm, elbow, and arm. It will distinguish between initial and complete return of sensation.
Measured: Immediately after the surgery
Secondary outcomes (7)
Pain before
Pain score (Numeric Rating Scale: 0 to 10) before loss of sensation after the axillary brachial plexus nerve block on a 0-10 scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable.
Measured: Pre-surgery
Pain after
Pain score (Numeric Rating Scale: 0 to 10) after loss of sensation after the axillary brachial plexus nerve block on a 0-10 scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable.
Measured: Immediately after the surgery
Block failure
Block failure yes or no
Measured: Pre-surgery
Amount of pain medication
Amount of pain medication after surgery, measured in mg
Measured: Immediately after the surgery up to 2 days
Prolongation of hospitalization
The patient is expected to be an outpatient. If this does not occur, the days of hospitalization will be recorded.
Measured: Immediately after the surgery
Patients satisfaction with pain therapy
The patient will be asked to rate their satisfaction with the pain therapy on a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating very dissatisfied and 10 indicating very satisfied.
Measured: Immediately after the surgery
Satisfaction of medical staff with the execution of the axillary brachial plexus nerve block
The medical staff will be asked to rate their satisfaction with the execution of the axillary brachial plexus nerve block on a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating very dissatisfied and 10 indicating very satisfied.
Measured: Immediately after the surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Jun 2024
- Study start1 Feb 2024
- Primary completion12 Sep 2024
- Study completion12 Sep 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AnesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Balgrist University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hagen Bomberg, Dr.med., Principal investigator, Balgrist University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06443879
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- W1049
- Acronym
- LRNB
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 23 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 1 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Bomberg H, Bayer I, Wagenpfeil S, Kessler P, Wulf H, Standl T, Gottschalk A, Doffert J, Hering W, Birnbaum J, Spies C, Kutter B, Winckelmann J, Liebl-Biereige S, Meissner W, Vicent O, Koch T, Sessler DI, Volk T, Raddatz A. Prolonged Catheter Use and Infection in Regional Anesthesia: A Retrospective Registry Analysis. Anesthesiology. 2018 Apr;128(4):764-773. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002105.
PubMed 29420315Bomberg H, Huth A, Wagenpfeil S, Kessler P, Wulf H, Standl T, Gottschalk A, Doffert J, Hering W, Birnbaum J, Spies C, Kutter B, Winckelmann J, Burgard G, Vicent O, Koch T, Sessler DI, Volk T, Raddatz A. Psoas Versus Femoral Blocks: A Registry Analysis of Risks and Benefits. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Nov/Dec;42(6):719-724. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000643.
PubMed 28806216Bomberg H, Kubulus C, List F, Albert N, Schmitt K, Graber S, Kessler P, Steinfeldt T, Standl T, Gottschalk A, Wirtz SP, Burgard G, Geiger P, Spies CD, Volk T; German Network for Regional Anaesthesia Investigators. Diabetes: a risk factor for catheter-associated infections. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):16-21. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000196.
PubMed 25474624Bomberg H, Lorenzana D, Aguirre J, Eichenberger U. [Peripheral Regional Anaesthesia for Perioperative Analgesia]. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2021 Aug;110(10):579-589. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a003682. German.
PubMed 34344186Bomberg H, Wetjen L, Wagenpfeil S, Schope J, Kessler P, Wulf H, Wiesmann T, Standl T, Gottschalk A, Doffert J, Hering W, Birnbaum J, Kutter B, Winckelmann J, Liebl-Biereige S, Meissner W, Vicent O, Koch T, Burkle H, Sessler DI, Volk T. Risks and Benefits of Ultrasound, Nerve Stimulation, and Their Combination for Guiding Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Retrospective Registry Analysis. Anesth Analg. 2018 Oct;127(4):1035-1043. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003480.
PubMed 29863605Donauer K, Bomberg H, Wagenpfeil S, Volk T, Meissner W, Wolf A. Regional vs. General Anesthesia for Total Knee and Hip Replacement: An Analysis of Postoperative Pain Perception from the International PAIN OUT Registry. Pain Pract. 2018 Nov;18(8):1036-1047. doi: 10.1111/papr.12708. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
PubMed 29758587Gabriel RA, Swisher MW, Sztain JF, Furnish TJ, Ilfeld BM, Said ET. State of the art opioid-sparing strategies for post-operative pain in adult surgical patients. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2019 Jun;20(8):949-961. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1583743. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
PubMed 30810425Luedi MM, Upadek V, Vogt AP, Steinfeldt T, Eichenberger U, Sauter AR. A Swiss nationwide survey shows that dual guidance is the preferred approach for peripheral nerve blocks. Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 24;9(1):9178. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45700-3.
PubMed 31235760Marhofer P, Eichenberger U, Stockli S, Huber G, Kapral S, Curatolo M, Kettner S. Ultrasonographic guided axillary plexus blocks with low volumes of local anaesthetics: a crossover volunteer study. Anaesthesia. 2010 Mar;65(3):266-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06247.x. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
PubMed 20121770
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Loss and Return of Sensation After Axillary Brachial Plexus Nerve Block - Distally or Proximally
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06443879
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LRNB / W1049
- Conditions
- Anesthesia
- Keywords
- Peripheral regional anesthesia, Loss and return of sensation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Balgrist University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Sep 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Peripheral regional anesthesia is the current gold standard of opioid-sparing perioperative analgesia, especially in shoulder, upper limb, and leg surgery. Axillary brachial plexus nerve block is one possible block for upper limb surgery. Loss and return of sensation require time and loss of sensation is supposed to spread from the proximal part to the distal part of the upper limb. Interestingly, until now there is no study about the return of sensation related to the anatomic region.
The investigators hypothesize that the loss and return of sensation after axillary brachial plexus nerve block will first occur in the proximal part of the upper limb and last in the distal part.
Detailed description
Peripheral regional anesthesia is the current gold standard of opioid-sparing perioperative analgesia, especially in shoulder, upper limb, and leg surgery.(1-8) Axillary brachial plexus nerve block is one possible block for upper limb surgery.(4, 5, 9) Loss and return of sensation require time. It is known from clinical practice that loss of sensation occurs from the proximal part of the arm to the distal part of the upper limb.
Interestingly, until now there is no study about the return of sensation related to the anatomic region. The investigators hypothesize that return of sensation after axillary brachial plexus nerve block will develop in the same direction like loss of sensation, what means from proximal to the distal part of the upper limb.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All outpatients undergoing upper limb surgery with axillary brachial plexus nerve block at Balgrist University Hospital will be eligible to take part in the project.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Outpatients with planed surgery with axillary brachial plexus nerve block
- Informed consent as documented by signature
- Age ≥ 18 years
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with a known allergy towards the local anaesthetic
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Axillary brachial plexus nerve block: loss and return of sensationEvaluating loss and return of sensation after axillary brachial plexus nerve block | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Loss of sensation after axillary brachial plexus nerve block
Time frame: Pre-surgery
A questionnaire will be used to record the loss of sensation in the upper limb. Sensation loss is recorded separately for the finger, hand, forearm, elbow, and arm. It will distinguish between initial and complete loss of sensation.
Return of sensation after axillary brachial plexus nerve block
Time frame: Immediately after the surgery
A questionnaire will be used to record the return of sensation in the upper limb. Sensation return is recorded separately for the finger, hand, forearm, elbow, and arm. It will distinguish between initial and complete return of sensation.
7 secondary outcomes
Pain before
Time frame: Pre-surgery
Pain after
Time frame: Immediately after the surgery
Block failure
Time frame: Pre-surgery
Amount of pain medication
Time frame: Immediately after the surgery up to 2 days
Prolongation of hospitalization
Time frame: Immediately after the surgery
Patients satisfaction with pain therapy
Time frame: Immediately after the surgery
Satisfaction of medical staff with the execution of the axillary brachial plexus nerve block
Time frame: Immediately after the surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Nov 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 29420315Bomberg H, Bayer I, Wagenpfeil S, Kessler P, Wulf H, Standl T, Gottschalk A, Doffert J, Hering W, Birnbaum J, Spies C, Kutter B, Winckelmann J, Liebl-Biereige S, Meissner W, Vicent O, Koch T, Sessler DI, Volk T, Raddatz A. Prolonged Catheter Use and Infection in Regional Anesthesia: A Retrospective Registry Analysis. Anesthesiology. 2018 Apr;128(4):764-773. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002105.
- Results publication: PubMed 28806216Bomberg H, Huth A, Wagenpfeil S, Kessler P, Wulf H, Standl T, Gottschalk A, Doffert J, Hering W, Birnbaum J, Spies C, Kutter B, Winckelmann J, Burgard G, Vicent O, Koch T, Sessler DI, Volk T, Raddatz A. Psoas Versus Femoral Blocks: A Registry Analysis of Risks and Benefits. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Nov/Dec;42(6):719-724. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000643.
- Results publication: PubMed 25474624Bomberg H, Kubulus C, List F, Albert N, Schmitt K, Graber S, Kessler P, Steinfeldt T, Standl T, Gottschalk A, Wirtz SP, Burgard G, Geiger P, Spies CD, Volk T; German Network for Regional Anaesthesia Investigators. Diabetes: a risk factor for catheter-associated infections. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):16-21. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000196.
- Results publication: PubMed 34344186Bomberg H, Lorenzana D, Aguirre J, Eichenberger U. [Peripheral Regional Anaesthesia for Perioperative Analgesia]. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2021 Aug;110(10):579-589. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a003682. German.
- Results publication: PubMed 29863605Bomberg H, Wetjen L, Wagenpfeil S, Schope J, Kessler P, Wulf H, Wiesmann T, Standl T, Gottschalk A, Doffert J, Hering W, Birnbaum J, Kutter B, Winckelmann J, Liebl-Biereige S, Meissner W, Vicent O, Koch T, Burkle H, Sessler DI, Volk T. Risks and Benefits of Ultrasound, Nerve Stimulation, and Their Combination for Guiding Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Retrospective Registry Analysis. Anesth Analg. 2018 Oct;127(4):1035-1043. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003480.
- Results publication: PubMed 29758587Donauer K, Bomberg H, Wagenpfeil S, Volk T, Meissner W, Wolf A. Regional vs. General Anesthesia for Total Knee and Hip Replacement: An Analysis of Postoperative Pain Perception from the International PAIN OUT Registry. Pain Pract. 2018 Nov;18(8):1036-1047. doi: 10.1111/papr.12708. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 30810425Gabriel RA, Swisher MW, Sztain JF, Furnish TJ, Ilfeld BM, Said ET. State of the art opioid-sparing strategies for post-operative pain in adult surgical patients. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2019 Jun;20(8):949-961. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1583743. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
- Results publication: PubMed 31235760Luedi MM, Upadek V, Vogt AP, Steinfeldt T, Eichenberger U, Sauter AR. A Swiss nationwide survey shows that dual guidance is the preferred approach for peripheral nerve blocks. Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 24;9(1):9178. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45700-3.
- Results publication: PubMed 20121770Marhofer P, Eichenberger U, Stockli S, Huber G, Kapral S, Curatolo M, Kettner S. Ultrasonographic guided axillary plexus blocks with low volumes of local anaesthetics: a crossover volunteer study. Anaesthesia. 2010 Mar;65(3):266-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06247.x. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Anesthesia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
"Comparison of Oxygen Reserve Index (ORI), End-Tidal Oxygen, and Time-Based Preoxygenation Targets With Arterial Blood Gas During Preoxygenation
Preoxygenation Adequacy Assessed by Oxygen Reserve Index, End-tidal Oxygen and Arterial Blood Gas
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia
Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Controlled SaCo-VLM Trial
General Anaesthesia Using Supraglotic Airway
Not yet recruiting
Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Deep Sedation, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hagen Bomberg, Dr.med. principal investigator
Balgrist University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Anesthesia, run by Balgrist University Hospital at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Loss of sensation after axillary brachial plexus nerve block (time frame: Pre-surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06443879, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2024.