AzTrials
AzTrials

Ovarian CancerFOLL-OVNCT06445621

Early Detection of Relapse in Ovarian Cancer Using Capillary Home-sampling and a Protein Biomarker Test

An observational study of Ovarian Cancer and Fallopian Tube Cancer, run by Uppsala University Hospital at 1 site in Sweden.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

PURPOSE/AIMS There is no consensus on optimal follow-up after ovarian cancer. A recent study demonstrated eight months prolonged survival in patients with complete surgical resection. Hence, it is crucial to detect relapses early, when the tumor burden is limited. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
How many people
125 participants
Where
1 siteSweden
Study dates
30 May 2024to May 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Study participants are women included in the control program for ovarian/fallopian/primary peritoneal cancer at Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala or in Norrlands University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden, . They should have been treated within 3 years after primary stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer (or diagnoses above), or within 3 years after treatment for relapse. Study participants should have no evidence of disease (normal CA 125 and no tumor detected on radiology or clinical examination) at inclusion.

Who may be able to join

  • ≥18 years of age
  • Included in the control program for ovarian/fallopian/primary peritoneal cancer at at Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala or in Norrlands University Hospital, Umeå,
  • Within 3 years after completed primary treatment for stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer, or after treatment for relapse
  • No evidence of disease (normal CA 125 and no tumor detected on radiology or clinical examination).

Who cannot join

  • Other cancer diagnosis within 2 years (except squamous skin cancer or basalioma).
  • Non-Swedish speaking.
  • Not able to understand instructions.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Karin Stålberg, A/ Professor contact

+46186111577

karin.stalberg@uu.se

Sweden1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Norrlands University Hospital

    Umeå

    Ulrika Ottander, A/Professor

    Ulrika Ottander, A/Professor

    Recruiting

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: Early Detection of Relapse in Ovarian Cancer Using Capillary Home-sampling and a Multiplex Protein Biomarker Test - a Pilot Study

PURPOSE/AIMS There is no consensus on optimal follow-up after ovarian cancer. A recent study demonstrated eight months prolonged survival in patients with complete surgical resection. Hence, it is crucial to detect relapses early, when the tumor burden is limited.

The research group have previously identified a plasma protein panel with high accuracy in detecting ovarian cancer at diagnosis and follow-up. The aim with this feasibility study is to validate the panel for its' capacity to detect early relapse in symptom-free patients in a user-friendly non-invasive way i.e. a home-administered capillary sampling. The results will be the foundation for a forthcoming national prospective randomized trial.

Read more

METHODS The study is designed as a prospective cohort study including women in the control program after ovarian cancer in Uppsala and Umeå, Sweden. The study participants should have no evidence of disease after primary treatment or after relapse. In addition to standard follow-up, they will be asked to take a capillary home-sample (blood-test from finger) every second month during one year or until relapse. The result of the test will not affect treatment, but solely be used for research purposes.

IMPORTANCE The study aims to clarify following issues:

  1. Calibration of the risk score in capillary blood samples.
  2. Evaluation of the logistics in home-sampling.
  3. Evaluation of the acceptability (reasons of drop-out etc.) of home-sampling by structured interviews of a sample of study participants.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The hypothesis behind the study is that more frequent analysis of a protein panel specific for ovarian cancer, will lead to earlier detection of relapse, earlier treatment and a better prognosis. Additionally, in the future the vision is that women may choose between different ways of follow-up depending on individual risk factors, personal preferences and logistic reasons. In the long-term the results of the applicability of home-administered blood sampling from this study can be useful in other patient groups as well.

Read the detailed description

Early detection of relapse in ovarian cancer using capillary home-sampling and a multiplex protein biomarker test - a pilot study

PURPOSE AND AIMS Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the deadliest of all gynecologic cancers, with 700 incident cases per year in Sweden. Even though almost three out of four women with EOC relapse within 2-3 years, there is a striking lack of prospective trials on optimized follow-up after EOC treatment. The research group have previously identified a plasma marker protein panel with high accuracy for ovarian cancer diagnosis and follow-up. The aim with this pilot study is to validate the protein panel for its capacity to detect early relapse in symptom-free patients in a user-friendly, non-invasive way i.e., a home-administered capillary sampling. Further, the results will be the foundation for a forthcoming national prospective randomized trial (RCT) - the FOLL-OV trial.

SURVEY OF THE FIELD/PRELIMINARY RESULTS One of the main purposes with a follow-up program is to find cancer relapse at an early stage and thereby improve the patient's chance of successful treatment and prolonged survival. Yet, there is a striking lack of prospective studies in the field.

A recent RCT demonstrated eight months prolonged overall survival when treated with surgery at first relapse, compared to chemotherapy alone, however, the survival benefit was limited to women where complete surgical resection was achieved (3). Hence, it has become more important than ever to detect relapse as soon as realistically possible, when the tumor burden is limited.

As of present, the Swedish National Guidelines for EOC recommend follow-up 3-4 times/year during the first two years after completed treatment. The follow-up consists of physical (and gynecologic) examination, transvaginal ultrasound, and is many times complemented with the EOC biomarker CA125, but this is optional. CA125 is an unspecific marker, and not elevated in all types of EOC. In a Cochrane review evaluating follow-up strategies of women with EOC, only one RCT was included, and thus further RCTs are needed to evaluate different types of follow-up strategies, using outcomes such as survival, quality of life (QoL), cost and psychological effects. Importantly, in two recent retrospective studies, almost no relapses were detected exclusively on physical examination and the need for regular in-clinic visits were questioned in favor of virtual meetings with a review of symptoms and measurements of tumor marker.

Clearly, better biomarkers for EOC relapse are needed. The research group have recently developed a risk score for detection of EOC based on analysis of 11 plasma proteins. When validated in two independent clinical cohorts, this assay showed a sensitivity of 0.83/0.91 and specificity of 0.88/0.92 for separating EOC and histology benign conditions. Further, we have demonstrated the possibility to track changes in relation to treatment outcome and relapse using the same risk score. Using machine learning, four distinct risk score trajectories are defined, that indicate that it could be possible to detect relapse events up to 60 days prior to the first clinically recorded event. These results were conducted using wet plasma, but previous investigations show that dried blood spots work well for proteomics analyses with the intended assay (PEA), although a re-calibration of the risk-score is needed to accommodate differences between the dry and wet format.

This pilot study, as part of a larger clinical research project, aims to re-calibrate the risk-score and to assess it in a clinical setting using a home-based capillary blood sampling.

AIMS/ OUTCOME

The pilot study will be designed as a prospective cohort study with aim to clarify following questions before planning of a national RCT:

  • Calibration/validation of the risk score in capillary blood samples
  • Accuracy of monthly home-sampling and standard Ca125 for diagnosis of relapse
  • Evaluate the logistics in home-sampling (patients' instructions, registration, communication etc.)
  • Evaluate the acceptability of home-sampling by semi-structured interviews of a sample of study participants (reasons of drop-out, communication aspects, pros and cons with repeated sampling)

METHOD The pilot study will be designed as a prospective cohort study.

Study population;

Inclusion criteria:

  • ≥18 years of age
  • Included in the control program for ovarian/fallopian/primary peritoneal cancer at Uppsala University Hospital, or at Norrlands University Hospital, Sweden
  • Within 3 years after completed primary treatment for stage III-IV EOC, or after treatment for relapse
  • No evidence of disease (normal CA 125 and no tumor detected on radiology or clinical examination).
  • Patients on maintenance therapy (PARP-inhibitor, bevazicumab) can be included.

Exlusion: Other cancer diagnosis within 2 years (except squamous skin cancer or basalioma). Non-Swedish speaking. Not able to understand instructions.

Intervention The participants will follow the standard follow-up program with scheduled visit 3-4 times/year. The follow-up consists of physical (and gynecologic) examination, transvaginal ultrasound, and sampling of s-CA125.

At inclusion the participants will receive written information and sign informed consent.

Capillary test

Study participants will be asked to take a capillary blood sample:

  • at inclusion with assistance from study nurse
  • at home monthly during one year or until relapse
  • at suspicion of relapse The capillary sample and sent in to the laboratory in an envelope provided to the study participants. The result of the capillary test will be retrospectively analyzed and consequently not affect treatment, but solely be used for research purposes. The results will not be communicated to the study participants.

Uppsala biobank In patients already included with written consent in the Uppsala biobank (U-CAN), follow-up blood samples will be taken according to the biobank routine at inclusion and in case of follow-up (https://www.u-can.uu.se).

End of study Relapse or after one year of inclusion

Data management

The following data will be entered and stored in a pseudonymized database (REDCap):

At inclusion:

  • patient data (age, BMI, smoking comorbidity, performance status)
  • tumor data (CA125, other tumour markers, histology, differention grade, tumor stage, BRCA/HRD status, radiology findings)
  • previous treatment data (surgical and oncological).

At clinical visits/relapse (planned follow-up or unplanned visits):

  • CA125 values
  • symtoms and signs of relapse, including radiology
  • Date and results of capillary tests

The code for personal identification will be stored in a separate file with password. Hence data in the research database cannot be linked to individual patients.

Assessment of feasibility

To evaluate feasibility and acceptability of the study, a short-form questionnaire with 5-7 questions will be handled to study participants at following occasions:

  • Declining participation
  • Drop-off from study protocol
  • End of study A semi-structured interviews will be offered to a strategic sample of participants (around 10) with various age, medical history after completion of the study in order to identify pitfalls and areas of improvement.

Statistics/ power With approximately 250 women fulfilling these inclusion criteria at Uppsala University Hospital and Norrlands University Hospital yearly, and an anticipated inclusion rate of 50%, we will reach a study population of 125 women in one year. With a drop-out of 25 persons, 100 will remain for analysis. Around 30% of these women will suffer from relapse during the study period. With approximately 10 samples/ participant, we consider 1000 samples sufficient for the pilot study.

Analyses The collected capillary dry-cards (Ahlström AutoCollect™) are punched in a semi-automated equipment for punches to be analyzed. The laboratory analyses for the plasma protein biomarkers will be carried out at the Affinity Proteomics Facility at SciLifeLab Uppsala, using a custom assay provided by Olink Proteomics based on absolute quantification. The accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of the risk score to detect relapse and the correlation with s-CA125 will be calculated with aid from machine learning. An optimal cut-off value for the test score will be approximated in ROC-curves, either as an individual increase (for example a doubling of lowest risk score) or at a group level. Time difference between raise in the protein panel score and clinical detection of recurrence will be analyzed.

These results will be used for power calculation and decision of sampling intervals for the forthcoming RCT.

For patients already included in the Uppsala biobank with written consent, venous blood samples will be analysed at follow-up and relapse to be able to validate the results from capillary in venous blood.

Further challenges with inclusion, reasons for drop-out will be analyzed by short-form questionnaire. Qualitative interviews with a selected group of study participants will be carried out to explore patient experience and acceptability and lay the foundation for patient information and communication in the RCT.

Clinical significance The hypothesis is that more frequent analysis of a protein panel specific for EOC, will lead to earlier detection of relapse, earlier treatment and a better prognosis. Additionally, in the future, the vision is that women may choose between different ways of follow-up depending on individual risk factors, personal preferences and logistic reasons. In the long-term the results of the evaluation of the applicability of home-administered blood sampling from this study can be useful in other patient groups as well.

Keywords
ovarian cancer, follow-up, biomarker, protein
Medical subject headings
Ovarian Neoplasms, Fallopian Tube Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT06445621
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Women in control program after ovarian/fallopian/primary peritoneal cancerStudy population; Inclusion criteria: * ≥18 years of age * Included in the control program for ovarian/fallopian/primary peritoneal cancer at Uppsala University Hospital, or in Norrlands University Hospital, Sweden * Within 3 years after completed primary treatment for stage III-IV EOC, or after treatment for relapse * No evidence of disease (normal CA 125 and no tumor detected on radiology or clinical examination). * Patients on maintenance therapy (PARP-inhibitor, bevazicumab) can be included. Exlusion: Other cancer diagnosis within 2 years (except squamous skin cancer or basalioma). Non-Swedish speaking. Not able to understand instructions.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Accuracy of capillary home-sampling to detect recurrence

    Accuracy (sensitivity/specificity) of the protein panel to detect recurrence

    Measured: From date of inclusion until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 months

  2. Calibration/validation of the risk score in capillary blood samples

    Analyses of the optimal protein panel to detect recurrence. Calculation of risk score/cut-off value for recurrence (ROC-curve)

    Measured: Capillary blood samples collected monthly for one year or until relapse

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Evaluate the logistics in home-sampling (patients' instructions, registration, communication.)

    1. Tree short questions, regarding difficulties in blood test, by email at every monthly home-sample.
    2. After end of study a e-mail questionnaire including questions about sampling intervals, difficulties with sampling, reasons for drop-out and open question about the study.

    Measured: Monthly short questionnaire and longer questionnaire at end-of study, maximum one year.

  2. Evaluation of acceptability

    Evaluate the acceptability of home-sampling by semi-structured interviews of a sample of study participants (reasons of drop-out, communication aspects, pros and cons with repeated sampling)

    Measured: Interviews after end of study, (after first relapse, drop-out or end-of-study) maximum one year.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Jun 2024
  2. Study start30 May 2024
  3. Primary completionMay 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
125 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06445621
Sponsor's protocol ID
FOU2024-00132
Acronym
FOLL-OV
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
23 May 2024
Last updated
6 Jun 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Enroth S, Ivansson E, Lindberg JH, Lycke M, Bergman J, Reneland A, Stalberg K, Sundfeldt K, Gyllensten U. Data-driven analysis of a validated risk score for ovarian cancer identifies clinically distinct patterns during follow-up and treatment. Commun Med (Lond). 2022 Oct 1;2:124. doi: 10.1038/s43856-022-00193-6. eCollection 2022.

    PubMed 36196264
  • Enroth S, Berggrund M, Lycke M, Broberg J, Lundberg M, Assarsson E, Olovsson M, Stalberg K, Sundfeldt K, Gyllensten U. High throughput proteomics identifies a high-accuracy 11 plasma protein biomarker signature for ovarian cancer. Commun Biol. 2019 Jun 20;2:221. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0464-9. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 31240259

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Ovarian Cancer and Fallopian Tube Cancer, run by Uppsala University Hospital at 1 site in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Karin Stålberg, A/ Professor (+46186111577, karin.stalberg@uu.se), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Accuracy of capillary home-sampling to detect recurrence (time frame: From date of inclusion until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06445621, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in