StudentNCT06451991
The Effect of Concept Map Use in Nursing Practice
A study testing Use of concept map in clinical practice in nursing students in people with Student and Educational Problems, run by Nilgun Sert Bas at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The aim of this randomised controlled trial is to evaluate the effect of data collection and creating a patient care plan using a concept map on the student s clinical decision-making and reflective thinking skills of students taking the surgical diseases nursing course who are in the hospital for clinical practice. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Student, Educational Problems
- What is being tested?
- Use of concept map in clinical practice in nursing students
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 66 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 3 Mar 2025to 13 May 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- To be taking surgical diseases nursing course
- To agree to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- To have received training on concept mapping before the study
- Not participating in the training given by the researchers before the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Ankara Medipol University
Ankara, Ankara, 06050
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Concept Map Use in Nursing Practice on Clinical Decision Making and Reflective Thinking Levels: A Randomized Controlled Study
The aim of this randomised controlled trial is to evaluate the effect of data collection and creating a patient care plan using a concept map on the student s clinical decision-making and reflective thinking skills of students taking the surgical diseases nursing course who are in the hospital for clinical practice.
Read the detailed description
With the rapid development and change in technology and modern medicine, expectations, tendencies, personality characteristics and learning styles of individuals change. At the same time, today s modern medical environment requires nurses to have analytical thinking, independent decision-making and application skills in clinical practice. One of the main objectives of nursing education is to provide students with critical thinking and decision-making skills and to reflect what they have learnt in theory to their clinical practice skills. The World Health Organisation also recommends the use of innovative and active learning methods, appropriate teaching materials and learning techniques in nursing education. One of the most important modern teaching methods that will facilitate meaningful learning among students is concept maps developed on the basis of Ausubel s Learning Assimilation Theory. At the same time, clinical decision making and reflective thinking are important elements in nursing practice and undergraduate nursing education. One of the most important goals of nursing education is to provide educational approaches to develop these concepts.
The main question[s] it aims to answer are:
- Does collecting data from the patient using a concept map instead of a traditional care plan in the clinic affect student s; clinical decision-making level?
- Does preparing a patient care plan using a concept map instead of a traditional care plan in the clinic affect student s; reflective thinking skill level in the clinic?
Research Process:
- Both groups will be administered sociodemographic data form, clinical decision-making scale in nursing, reflective thinking determination scale and teaching material evaluation form as face-to-face pre-test before the training.
- The control group will use the traditional method data collection form and care plan.
- The experimental group will be given face-to-face training before starting the application. The scope of the training will consist of the definition of concept mapping, the aims and benefits of its use in the nursing education process, the principles of concept mapping, the introduction of the materials to be used in the process of data collection and care plan preparation, concept mapping examples specific to 3 different medical cases to improve nursing student s; understanding and comprehension of concept mapping and to increase their interest in learning techniques.
- After the training, students will be asked to collect data and make a care plan using a concept map.
- After data collection, face-to-face sociodemographic data form, clinical decision-making scale in nursing, scale for determining the level of reflective thinking and teaching material evaluation form will be applied as a post-test. Population and sample: G*Power 3.1.9.7 sampling calculation programme was used to calculate the sample size in the study. Considering the mean±standard deviation values of the Clinical Decision Making in Nursing scale, the total sample size was calculated as 56, with a minimum of 28 for each group, with an effect size of 0.79 and a margin of error of ± 0.05 at the 82% confidence interval level. However, the research will be started with 33 participants by taking 20% more than the sample size determined by taking into account the situation of the participants leaving the research during the process.
Statistical Method(s): The data obtained from the study will be evaluated using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows version 25.0 programme. Number, percentage, standard deviation, mean, min-max values will be used to define the data. According to the measurement level of the data, correlation analysis or chi-square dependency tests will be used for the relationships between variables. The suitability of continuous variables for normal distribution will be evaluated by Kolmogrov-Simirnov test. In group comparisons, Anova will be used for variables that fit the normal distribution, Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests will be used for variables that do not fit the normal distribution. 0,05 will be used as significance level, and it will be stated that there is a significant difference in case of ia small 0,05, and there is no significant difference in case of is small 0,05.
The researchers will compare the control and experimental groups to see whether the use of concept maps in clinical practice has an effect on student s; clinical decision-making and reflective thinking skills.
It is thought that the data obtained as a result of the study will support innovative applications, and at the same time, it will be explanatory and guiding about whether the use of concept maps is effective in developing student s; clinical decision-making and reflective thinking skills.
- Conditions
- Student, Educational Problems
- Being tested
- Use of concept map in clinical practice in nursing students
- Keywords
- Nursing education, Concept map, Reflective thinking, Clinical decision making
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Use of concept map in clinical practice in nursing studentsOther
Concept map will be used in clinical practice in nursing students.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional | No intervention | The control group will use the traditional method data collection form and care plan. |
| Concept Map | Experimental | The experimental group will collect data and make a maintenance plan by using a concept map after the training. Receives: Other: Use of concept map in clinical practice in nursing students |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical Decision Making Scale in Nursing
The scale consists of 40 items. The scale includes four sub-dimensions (10 items each), namely "investigating options and ideas", "investigating goals and values", "evaluating results" and "investigating knowledge and adopting new knowledge impartially". The scale is 5-point Likert type. The minimum total score of the scale is 40 points and the maximum score is 200 points. Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient is 0.78.
Measured: 3 weeks
Determination of Reflective Thinking Scale
The scale is 5-point Likert type and consists of 16 items. The scale measures students' reflective thinking skill levels at the end of a lesson in four sub-dimensions, each consisting of four items: habit, comprehension, reflection and critical reflection. The lowest score that can be obtained from each sub-dimension is 4 and the highest score is 20. Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient is 0.77.
Measured: 3 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Teaching Material Evaluation Form
This form was created by the researchers for the evaluation of the teaching material used. The form consists of 16 items evaluating its effect on clinical practice such as its effect on satisfaction, effect on motivation, effect on critical thinking, effect on problem solving skills, effect on holistic approach, effect on learning. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate these items. The VAS was modified by rephrasing the original scale to assess and measure the traditional or concept map data collection and patient care plan form used by the students. The VAS consists of a straight line from zero to 100. It will be measured and evaluated by the researchers after the students' marking.
Measured: 3 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jun 2024
- Study start3 Mar 2025
- Primary completion13 May 2025
- Study completion13 May 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StudentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nilgun Sert Bas
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Nilgun Sert Bas, Ankara Medipol University
- Investigators
- Nilgün Sert Baş, RN, MSc, Principal investigator, Ankara Medipol University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06451991
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E-81477236-604.01.01-2747
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 5 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 16 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Culha, I. Active learning methods used in nursing education. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 2019; 3(2), 74-86.
Wu HZ, Wu QT. Impact of mind mapping on the critical thinking ability of clinical nursing students and teaching application. J Int Med Res. 2020 Mar;48(3):300060519893225. doi: 10.1177/0300060519893225.
PubMed 32212879World Health Organization.
Amaniyan S, Pouyesh V, Bashiri Y, Snelgrove S, Vaismoradi M. Comparison of the Conceptual Map and Traditional Lecture Methods on Students' Learning Based on the VARK Learning Style Model: A Randomized Controlled Trial. SAGE Open Nurs. 2020 Jul 8;6:2377960820940550. doi: 10.1177/2377960820940550. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
PubMed 33415293Tutticci N, Lewis PA, Coyer F. Measuring third year undergraduate nursing students' reflective thinking skills and critical reflection self-efficacy following high fidelity simulation: A pilot study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2016 May;18:52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
PubMed 27235566Karacabay, K, Savcı A, Öztürk B. Cerrahi Hastalıkları Hemşireliği Dersi Alan Öğrencilerin Kendi Kendine Öğrenme, Klinik Karar Verme ve Yansıtıcı Düşünme Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergisi 10.2 (2022): 667-680.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Concept Map Use in Nursing Practice on Clinical Decision Making and Reflective Thinking Levels: A Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06451991
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E-81477236-604.01.01-2747
- Conditions
- Student, Educational Problems
- Keywords
- Nursing education, Concept map, Reflective thinking, Clinical decision making
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nilgun Sert BasUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 May 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 May 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this randomised controlled trial is to evaluate the effect of data collection and creating a patient care plan using a concept map on the student s clinical decision-making and reflective thinking skills of students taking the surgical diseases nursing course who are in the hospital for clinical practice.
Detailed description
With the rapid development and change in technology and modern medicine, expectations, tendencies, personality characteristics and learning styles of individuals change. At the same time, today s modern medical environment requires nurses to have analytical thinking, independent decision-making and application skills in clinical practice. One of the main objectives of nursing education is to provide students with critical thinking and decision-making skills and to reflect what they have learnt in theory to their clinical practice skills. The World Health Organisation also recommends the use of innovative and active learning methods, appropriate teaching materials and learning techniques in nursing education. One of the most important modern teaching methods that will facilitate meaningful learning among students is concept maps developed on the basis of Ausubel s Learning Assimilation Theory. At the same time, clinical decision making and reflective thinking are important elements in nursing practice and undergraduate nursing education. One of the most important goals of nursing education is to provide educational approaches to develop these concepts.
The main question[s] it aims to answer are:
- Does collecting data from the patient using a concept map instead of a traditional care plan in the clinic affect student s; clinical decision-making level?
- Does preparing a patient care plan using a concept map instead of a traditional care plan in the clinic affect student s; reflective thinking skill level in the clinic?
Research Process:
- Both groups will be administered sociodemographic data form, clinical decision-making scale in nursing, reflective thinking determination scale and teaching material evaluation form as face-to-face pre-test before the training.
- The control group will use the traditional method data collection form and care plan.
- The experimental group will be given face-to-face training before starting the application. The scope of the training will consist of the definition of concept mapping, the aims and benefits of its use in the nursing education process, the principles of concept mapping, the introduction of the materials to be used in the process of data collection and care plan preparation, concept mapping examples specific to 3 different medical cases to improve nursing student s; understanding and comprehension of concept mapping and to increase their interest in learning techniques.
- After the training, students will be asked to collect data and make a care plan using a concept map.
- After data collection, face-to-face sociodemographic data form, clinical decision-making scale in nursing, scale for determining the level of reflective thinking and teaching material evaluation form will be applied as a post-test. Population and sample: G*Power 3.1.9.7 sampling calculation programme was used to calculate the sample size in the study. Considering the mean±standard deviation values of the Clinical Decision Making in Nursing scale, the total sample size was calculated as 56, with a minimum of 28 for each group, with an effect size of 0.79 and a margin of error of ± 0.05 at the 82% confidence interval level. However, the research will be started with 33 participants by taking 20% more than the sample size determined by taking into account the situation of the participants leaving the research during the process.
Statistical Method(s): The data obtained from the study will be evaluated using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows version 25.0 programme. Number, percentage, standard deviation, mean, min-max values will be used to define the data. According to the measurement level of the data, correlation analysis or chi-square dependency tests will be used for the relationships between variables. The suitability of continuous variables for normal distribution will be evaluated by Kolmogrov-Simirnov test. In group comparisons, Anova will be used for variables that fit the normal distribution, Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests will be used for variables that do not fit the normal distribution. 0,05 will be used as significance level, and it will be stated that there is a significant difference in case of ia small 0,05, and there is no significant difference in case of is small 0,05.
The researchers will compare the control and experimental groups to see whether the use of concept maps in clinical practice has an effect on student s; clinical decision-making and reflective thinking skills.
It is thought that the data obtained as a result of the study will support innovative applications, and at the same time, it will be explanatory and guiding about whether the use of concept maps is effective in developing student s; clinical decision-making and reflective thinking skills.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional | No intervention | –The control group will use the traditional method data collection form and care plan. |
| Concept Map | Experimental | Other: Use of concept map in clinical practice in nursing studentsThe experimental group will collect data and make a maintenance plan by using a concept map after the training. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- To be taking surgical diseases nursing course
- To agree to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- To have received training on concept mapping before the study
- Not participating in the training given by the researchers before the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Use of concept map in clinical practice in nursing studentsConcept map will be used in clinical practice in nursing students. | Other | Concept Map |
Primary outcome
Clinical Decision Making Scale in Nursing
Time frame: 3 weeks
The scale consists of 40 items. The scale includes four sub-dimensions (10 items each), namely "investigating options and ideas", "investigating goals and values", "evaluating results" and "investigating knowledge and adopting new knowledge impartially". The scale is 5-point Likert type. The minimum total score of the scale is 40 points and the maximum score is 200 points. Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient is 0.78.
Determination of Reflective Thinking Scale
Time frame: 3 weeks
The scale is 5-point Likert type and consists of 16 items. The scale measures students' reflective thinking skill levels at the end of a lesson in four sub-dimensions, each consisting of four items: habit, comprehension, reflection and critical reflection. The lowest score that can be obtained from each sub-dimension is 4 and the highest score is 20. Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient is 0.77.
1 secondary outcome
Teaching Material Evaluation Form
Time frame: 3 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 May 2025.
- BackgroundCulha, I. Active learning methods used in nursing education. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 2019; 3(2), 74-86.
- Background: PubMed 32212879Wu HZ, Wu QT. Impact of mind mapping on the critical thinking ability of clinical nursing students and teaching application. J Int Med Res. 2020 Mar;48(3):300060519893225. doi: 10.1177/0300060519893225.
- BackgroundWorld Health Organization.
- Background: PubMed 33415293Amaniyan S, Pouyesh V, Bashiri Y, Snelgrove S, Vaismoradi M. Comparison of the Conceptual Map and Traditional Lecture Methods on Students' Learning Based on the VARK Learning Style Model: A Randomized Controlled Trial. SAGE Open Nurs. 2020 Jul 8;6:2377960820940550. doi: 10.1177/2377960820940550. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
- Background: PubMed 27235566Tutticci N, Lewis PA, Coyer F. Measuring third year undergraduate nursing students' reflective thinking skills and critical reflection self-efficacy following high fidelity simulation: A pilot study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2016 May;18:52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
- BackgroundKaracabay, K, Savcı A, Öztürk B. Cerrahi Hastalıkları Hemşireliği Dersi Alan Öğrencilerin Kendi Kendine Öğrenme, Klinik Karar Verme ve Yansıtıcı Düşünme Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergisi 10.2 (2022): 667-680.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Student
Not yet recruiting
Digital Use, 24-Hour Movement Behaviors, and Myofascial Release in University Students With Neck Pain
Forward Head Posture, Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Daily Magnesium Complex Supplementation on Body Composition in University Students
Body Composition Changes, Muscle Mass
Active, not recruiting
MEST : A School- Based Health Literacy Intervention Trial
Health Literacy, Adolescent Health
Not yet recruiting
Immediate Effect of Kinesiotaping With Rounded Shoulder Posture in University Students
Rounded Shoulder Posture, Kinesio Taping
Not yet recruiting
Integrated Core Stability Exercises and Yoga Program on Premenstrual Syndrome
Premenstrual Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nilgün Sert Baş, RN, MSc principal investigator
Ankara Medipol University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Use of concept map in clinical practice in nursing students in people with Student and Educational Problems, run by Nilgun Sert Bas at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical Decision Making Scale in Nursing (time frame: 3 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06451991, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2025.