Tumor Regression GradeNCT06453395
PPIO-009 Tumor Regression Grade and Tumor Location in Esophageal Cancer
An observational study of Tumor Regression Grade, run by Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
At present, the evaluation of the effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer is mainly based on postoperative pathology, among which, the pathological assessment of tumor regression grade (TRG) and TNM staging are the basis for the routine pathological… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Tumor Regression Grade
- What is being tested?
- Patients were grouped according to tumor location
- How many people
- 248 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2023to 4 Jun 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: From January 1, 2019 to October 1, 2023 thoracoscopic esophagectomies for ESCC of the thoracic esophagus were performed in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University (Chongqing, China)
Who may be able to join
- 1. Clinical diagnosis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma 2. patients with clinical TNM (cTNM) stage II-IVA ESCC 3. patients with Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy before esophagectomy
Who cannot join
- 1. nonradical resection (R1 or R2) 2. combined with other anticancer therapies (radiotherapy or Targeted drugs) 3. incomplete data or missing follow-up time 4. concurrent or previous presence of malignancies at other sites
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Army Medical Center of the People's Liberation Army
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 400042
About this study
Official title: PPIO-009 Tumor Regression Grade and Prognosis Analysis of Esophageal Cancer in Different Tumor Location After Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy
At present, the evaluation of the effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer is mainly based on postoperative pathology, among which, the pathological assessment of tumor regression grade (TRG) and TNM staging are the basis for the routine pathological diagnosis of esophageal cancer, and the College of American Pathologists divides the TRG after neoadjuvant therapy to esophageal cancer into four grades: 0, 1, 2, and 3.The residual primary tumor in the resection specimen following neoadjuvant therapy is associated with shorter overall survival. Therefore ,the prediction of TRG after neoadjuvant therapy is vital for patients. We aim to seek to identify factors associated with TRG system as defined by the NCCN.
Read the detailed description
Oesophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer globally (934,870 new cases) and the sixth most common cause of cancer death (287,270 new deaths).The incidence, prevalence, and histological type of oesophageal cancer vary geographically , with about 75% of cases occurring in Asia, with China having the highest share, accounting for about 50% of the total cases and cancer-specific deaths. According to the National Bureau of Statistics of China, Statistics 2022, there were 252,500 cases of oesophageal cancer and 193,900 deaths in China in 2016, making oesophageal cancer the sixth most common cancer and the fifth leading cause of cancer death in China . The etiology of the two most common histological subtypes (esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [ESCC] and adenocarcinoma) varies widely. In the West, heavy alcohol consumption and smoking and their synergistic effects are the main risk factors for ESCC . However, in low-income countries, such as parts of Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, the main risk factors for ESCC, which typically accounts for more than 90% of all oesophageal cancer cases, have not been elucidated.
Preclinical studies have shown that the PD-1/PD-L1 axis can be activated early in solid tumours , and a durable protective effect may occur with preoperative induction of the immune response. Considering the dramatic decrease in tumour antigens after surgical resection and the removal of intact blood vessels and lymph nodes delivering the drug may affect the immunotherapeutic efficacy, the use of immunotherapy preoperatively may be more effective. Several phase 1/2 and phase 2 studies have shown a manageable safety profile and preliminary demonstration of efficacy when PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were added to perioperative therapy in resectable EC subjects. PD-1 inhibitors have demonstrated significant benefit in both second-line therapy and first-line therapy. Given the evidence of antitumour activity of immunotherapy in patients with ESCC and the continuing need to improve survival and reduce recurrence rates in resectable oesophageal cancer, a number of studies exploring the antitumour activity of immunotherapy in the treatment of resectable disease have tentatively shown promise as a neoadjuvant therapy.
Currently, after patients receive neoadjuvant therapy, tumour cell regression can occur with a variety of histological changes, such as tumour cell necrosis and apoptosis, fibrous tissue proliferation, inflammatory cell infiltration, foam cell aggregation, cell-free mucus production and formation of mucus pools, as well as calcified foci formation. However, not all tumours produce the above regression reactions after treatment, fibrohistiocytosis and inflammatory cell infiltration are the most common histological regression changes, and in order to assess the clinical therapeutic efficacy of the tumour, tumour regression needs to be graded quantitatively.TRG is a quantitative analysis of the pathology of tumours resected after neoadjuvant chemotherapy to clarify the therapeutic efficacy of chemotherapy or targeted drugs on tumours and to predict the patient's postoperative recurrence and metastasis. Metastasis. It was firstly used to assess the efficacy of oesophageal cancer after concurrent radiotherapy; and then gradually used to assess the efficacy of oesophageal cancer. The current assessment of post-radiotherapy samples is mainly based on the proportion of residual tumour components and fibrosis to grade pathological regression. Currently, the main methods for TRG scoring after neoadjuvant radiotherapy include NCCN, AJCC and other standards.
Currently, based on the data of pre-surgical clinical studies, the remission rate after neoadjuvant therapy varies in different oesophageal segments, which may indicate that the difference in blood supply of oesophageal cancer in different segments affects the blood drug concentration, leading to different clinical outcomes in patients with oesophageal cancer in different segments. In order to better treat patients in different segments, it is necessary to establish a prediction model based on the clinical data of patients in different oesophageal segments for better clinical decision-making.
- Conditions
- Tumor Regression Grade
- Being tested
- Patients were grouped according to tumor location
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Patients were grouped according to tumor locationOther
Patients were grouped according to tumor location
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| upper thoracic case | Cervical esophagus to lower border of the azygos vein Receives: Other: Patients were grouped according to tumor location | |
| Middle thoracic case | Cervical esophagus to lower border of the azygos vein Receives: Other: Patients were grouped according to tumor location | |
| Lower thoracic case | Lower border of the inferior pulmonary vein to the stomach, including the esophagogastric junction Receives: Other: Patients were grouped according to tumor location |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Tumor regression grade
Tumor regression grade was defined by NCCN/CAP system. The grading ranges from 0 to 3. TRG is scored as follows: grade 0-No viabal cancer cell (including lymph nodes), grade 1-single cells or small groups of cancer cells, grade 2-single cells or rare small groups of cancer cells, and grade 3-extensive residual cancer with no evident tumor regression.
Measured: up to 1 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Disease-free survival
Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the time from the date of surgery to recurrence, metastasis, and death from any cause.
Measured: About 2 years postoperatively
Overall survival
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of surgery to death from any cause or last follow-up
Measured: About 2 years postoperatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jun 2024
- Study start1 Jan 2023
- Primary completion4 Jun 2024
- Study completion4 Jun 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Tumor Regression GradeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 248 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, WEI GUO, Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06453395
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NO:2023(289)
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 4 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 11 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- PPIO-009 Tumor Regression Grade and Prognosis Analysis of Esophageal Cancer in Different Tumor Location After Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06453395
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NO:2023(289)
- Conditions
- Tumor Regression Grade
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 248 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Jun 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
At present, the evaluation of the effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer is mainly based on postoperative pathology, among which, the pathological assessment of tumor regression grade (TRG) and TNM staging are the basis for the routine pathological diagnosis of esophageal cancer, and the College of American Pathologists divides the TRG after neoadjuvant therapy to esophageal cancer into four grades: 0, 1, 2, and 3.The residual primary tumor in the resection specimen following neoadjuvant therapy is associated with shorter overall survival. Therefore ,the prediction of TRG after neoadjuvant therapy is vital for patients. We aim to seek to identify factors associated with TRG system as defined by the NCCN.
Detailed description
Oesophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer globally (934,870 new cases) and the sixth most common cause of cancer death (287,270 new deaths).The incidence, prevalence, and histological type of oesophageal cancer vary geographically , with about 75% of cases occurring in Asia, with China having the highest share, accounting for about 50% of the total cases and cancer-specific deaths. According to the National Bureau of Statistics of China, Statistics 2022, there were 252,500 cases of oesophageal cancer and 193,900 deaths in China in 2016, making oesophageal cancer the sixth most common cancer and the fifth leading cause of cancer death in China . The etiology of the two most common histological subtypes (esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [ESCC] and adenocarcinoma) varies widely. In the West, heavy alcohol consumption and smoking and their synergistic effects are the main risk factors for ESCC . However, in low-income countries, such as parts of Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, the main risk factors for ESCC, which typically accounts for more than 90% of all oesophageal cancer cases, have not been elucidated.
Preclinical studies have shown that the PD-1/PD-L1 axis can be activated early in solid tumours , and a durable protective effect may occur with preoperative induction of the immune response. Considering the dramatic decrease in tumour antigens after surgical resection and the removal of intact blood vessels and lymph nodes delivering the drug may affect the immunotherapeutic efficacy, the use of immunotherapy preoperatively may be more effective. Several phase 1/2 and phase 2 studies have shown a manageable safety profile and preliminary demonstration of efficacy when PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were added to perioperative therapy in resectable EC subjects. PD-1 inhibitors have demonstrated significant benefit in both second-line therapy and first-line therapy. Given the evidence of antitumour activity of immunotherapy in patients with ESCC and the continuing need to improve survival and reduce recurrence rates in resectable oesophageal cancer, a number of studies exploring the antitumour activity of immunotherapy in the treatment of resectable disease have tentatively shown promise as a neoadjuvant therapy.
Currently, after patients receive neoadjuvant therapy, tumour cell regression can occur with a variety of histological changes, such as tumour cell necrosis and apoptosis, fibrous tissue proliferation, inflammatory cell infiltration, foam cell aggregation, cell-free mucus production and formation of mucus pools, as well as calcified foci formation. However, not all tumours produce the above regression reactions after treatment, fibrohistiocytosis and inflammatory cell infiltration are the most common histological regression changes, and in order to assess the clinical therapeutic efficacy of the tumour, tumour regression needs to be graded quantitatively.TRG is a quantitative analysis of the pathology of tumours resected after neoadjuvant chemotherapy to clarify the therapeutic efficacy of chemotherapy or targeted drugs on tumours and to predict the patient's postoperative recurrence and metastasis. Metastasis. It was firstly used to assess the efficacy of oesophageal cancer after concurrent radiotherapy; and then gradually used to assess the efficacy of oesophageal cancer. The current assessment of post-radiotherapy samples is mainly based on the proportion of residual tumour components and fibrosis to grade pathological regression. Currently, the main methods for TRG scoring after neoadjuvant radiotherapy include NCCN, AJCC and other standards.
Currently, based on the data of pre-surgical clinical studies, the remission rate after neoadjuvant therapy varies in different oesophageal segments, which may indicate that the difference in blood supply of oesophageal cancer in different segments affects the blood drug concentration, leading to different clinical outcomes in patients with oesophageal cancer in different segments. In order to better treat patients in different segments, it is necessary to establish a prediction model based on the clinical data of patients in different oesophageal segments for better clinical decision-making.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| upper thoracic case | – | Other: Patients were grouped according to tumor locationCervical esophagus to lower border of the azygos vein |
| Middle thoracic case | – | Other: Patients were grouped according to tumor locationCervical esophagus to lower border of the azygos vein |
| Lower thoracic case | – | Other: Patients were grouped according to tumor locationLower border of the inferior pulmonary vein to the stomach, including the esophagogastric junction |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- From January 1, 2019 to October 1, 2023 thoracoscopic esophagectomies for ESCC of the thoracic esophagus were performed in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University (Chongqing, China)
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1. Clinical diagnosis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma 2. patients with clinical TNM (cTNM) stage II-IVA ESCC 3. patients with Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy before esophagectomy
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1. nonradical resection (R1 or R2) 2. combined with other anticancer therapies (radiotherapy or Targeted drugs) 3. incomplete data or missing follow-up time 4. concurrent or previous presence of malignancies at other sites
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Patients were grouped according to tumor locationPatients were grouped according to tumor location | Other | Lower thoracic case, Middle thoracic case, upper thoracic case |
Primary outcome
Tumor regression grade
Time frame: up to 1 weeks
Tumor regression grade was defined by NCCN/CAP system. The grading ranges from 0 to 3. TRG is scored as follows: grade 0-No viabal cancer cell (including lymph nodes), grade 1-single cells or small groups of cancer cells, grade 2-single cells or rare small groups of cancer cells, and grade 3-extensive residual cancer with no evident tumor regression.
2 secondary outcomes
Disease-free survival
Time frame: About 2 years postoperatively
Overall survival
Time frame: About 2 years postoperatively
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jun 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Tumor Regression Grade
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Objective Response Rate of Ivonescimab With Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Resectable Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
HNSCC, OSCC
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pathological Response to Perioperative FLOT in Gastric Adenocarcinoma
Gastric Adenocarcinoma, Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Standardized MRI and Structured Reporting for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Fruquintinib Plus Chemotherapy for Postoperative Treatment of HER2-Negative Gastric Cancer With Poor TRG
Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma
Recruiting
Magnetic Resonance Tumour Regression Grade (mrTRG) as a Novel Biomarker - Phase III Non CTIMP Trial
Rectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Tumor Regression Grade, run by Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Tumor regression grade (time frame: up to 1 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jun 2024.