Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1STAR-T1DNCT06453928
Starting Technology in At Risk Type 1 Diabetes Study
A study testing Hybrid Closed Loop Insulin Pump System in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Diabetes technology has revolutionized T1D management, disparities in technology access are evident among racial-ethnic minorities, patients with lower socioeconomic status and those with poorly controlled T1D (A1c>8.5%). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
- What is being tested?
- Hybrid Closed Loop Insulin Pump System
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 5 Sep 2024to 1 Jun 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Type 1 Diabetes
- A1c ≥ 8.0%
- Not insulin pump user
- Primary language of English or Spanish
- Have medical insurance coverage
Who cannot join
- No measured A1c in the past year
- Have comorbidities that can result in inaccurate hemoglobin A1c
- Have cognitive, physical or mental impairment precluding diabetes technology use
- Limited life expectancy (<1 year)
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
UCLA
Santa Monica, California, 90404
Rebecca Lopez, BA, (310) 882-0033, rebeccalopez@mednet.ucla.edu
Erin E Shaw, B.S., EEShaw@mednet.ucla.edu
- Recruiting
Olive View-UCLA Medical Center
Sylmar, California, 91342
Hugo Torres, MD, 747-210-3000, HATorres@mednet.ucla.edu
- Recruiting
Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Torrance, California, 90502
Joyce A Graham, (310) 222-1870, jgraham@lundquist.org
About this study
Official title: Starting Technology in At Risk Type 1 Diabetes (STAR-T1D) Study
Diabetes technology has revolutionized T1D management, disparities in technology access are evident among racial-ethnic minorities, patients with lower socioeconomic status and those with poorly controlled T1D (A1c>8.5%). In order to examine whether diabetes technology can reduce diabetes care burdens and enhance outcomes among some of highest need patients, diabetes technology clinical trials must be expanded beyond the very select populations included in studies thus far (ie., mostly White, higher SES). Therefore, the investigators propose to perform a pilot RCT of hybrid closed-loop insulin pump therapy (HCL) in 40 diverse adult patients with poorly controlled T1D (HbA1c ≥8.0%) from the largest academic and safety net health systems in the Los Angeles region to determine the feasibility of a RCT in this population and identify facilitators and barriers of effective use of closed loop insulin pump therapy in patients with poorly controlled T1D.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
- Being tested
- Hybrid Closed Loop Insulin Pump System
- Keywords
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Insulin Pump, Hybrid Closed Loop Systems, Diabetes Technology, Health Disparities
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hybrid Closed Loop Insulin Pump SystemDevice
Patients will be started on an automated insulin delivery system.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hybrid Closed Loop Insulin Pump System | Experimental | Participants will meet 1:1 with our CDE for at least 6 sessions over 6 weeks. Sessions will cover self-management basics, carb counting, CGM interpretation, hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia management and troubleshooting device issues. The investigators will follow up with participants in 24 and 72 hours after CGM and insulin pump initiation, respectively, to answer any device related questions that may arise in between sessions.
Participants will follow up at intervals of 1-4 weeks throughout the study. During visits, the investigators will assess for adherence and adverse effects and evaluate device and safety issues associated with pump settings in the HCL arm. The investigators will repeat A1c at 12 weeks and 24 weeks and administer follow up questionnaires at 12 and 24 weeks. Receives: Device: Hybrid Closed Loop Insulin Pump System |
| Control | No intervention | Participants in the control arm will receive diabetes education at a similar frequency as the intervention group. Diabetes education for the control group will be a combination of in-person visits with the CDE and telephone brief diabetes education sessions. Participants will follow up at intervals of 1-4 weeks throughout the study. During visits, the investigators will assess for adherence and adverse effects. The investigators will repeat A1c at 12 weeks and 24 weeks and administer follow up questionnaires at 12 and 24 weeks. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of screened participants that are eligible
Eligible among screened, enrolled among eligible, excluded among screened (and why) based on screening, recruitment and enrollment data.
Measured: 6 months
Proportion of enrolled participants that are randomized
Randomized among enrolled, and receiving allocated intervention among randomized.
Measured: 6 months
Proportion of average time delay to enrollment
Average time delay from screening to enrollment.
Measured: 6 months
Proportion of retention among participants randomized to the Intervention Group
Retention among participants receiving allocated intervention after being randomized and discontinued intervention among randomized.
Measured: 6 months
Proportion of retention among participants randomized
Participants lost to follow-up among those initially randomized.
Measured: 6 months
Proportion of retention among participants randomized
Retention rates by participants completing all research assessments among randomized.
Measured: 6 months
Number of participants who adhere to assigned treatment
Treatment-specific adherence, Adherence to study protocol and Proportion of planned assessments that are completed.
Fidelity, which pertains to guaranteeing that the intervention is delivered in accordance with the established protocol, will be summarized by study arms, and differences between arms will be examined using t-tests or two-sample tests of proportions as appropriate.
Adherence, which relates to the extent to which participants follow the treatment and study protocol, as well as the proportion of planned assessments completed, will be summarized by study arms, and differences between arms will be examined using t-tests or two-sample tests of proportions as appropriate.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (8)
Change in A1c
Serum Hemoglobin A1c laboratory measurement
Measured: 6 months
Episodes and % of time with severe hypoglycemia ( BG <54 mg/dl)
Hypoglycemia will be measure by combining CGM metrics and glucometer to report severe hypoglycemia in mg/dl.
Measured: 6 months
Mean Diabetes Ketoacidosis Episodes Incidence
Assess instances of diabetic ketoacidosis through participant surveys and comprehensive chart reviews.
Measured: 6 months
ED visits/Hospitalizations Number of diabetes related ED visits or hospitalizations
Number of diabetes related ED visits or hospitalizations
Measured: 6 months
Treatment Burden and Satisfaction: Diabetes Distress
Assessing treatment burden through the Type 1 Diabetes Distress Assessment System T1DDAS, which comprises eight questions and evaluates ten prevalent sources of diabetes distress in adults with type 1 diabetes. The score indicates the level of diabetes distress reported by the respondent, with higher scores indicating greater intensity. The core scale scoring ranges 1 to 5. This scale assesses each of ten common Sources of diabetes distress for adults with type 1 diabetes: Financial Worries, Interpersonal Challenges, Management Difficulties, Shame, Hypoglycemia Concerns, Healthcare Quality, Lack Of Diabetes Resources, Technology Challenges, Burden To Others, Worries About Complications. The higher the score, the more impactful that Source is likely to be in contributing to diabetes distress for this individual with the minimum value being 1 and maximum value being 5.
Measured: 6 months
Treatment Burden and Satisfaction: Insulin Treatment Satisfaction
Assessed treatment burden and satisfaction using the Insulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ITSQ), consisting of 22 questions among 5 content clusters with a score from 0 to 100% where a higher score indicates greater satisfaction with insulin treatment. The scale explores perceptions of current insulin treatment and its impact on daily life.
Measured: 6 months
Treatment Burden and Satisfaction: Glucose Monitoring System Satisfaction (GMSS)
Examined treatment burden and satisfaction employing the Glucose Monitoring System Satisfaction Survey (GMSS), comprising 15 questions divided into four subcategories: openness, emotional burden, behavioral burden and trust. Higher scores within each subcategory denote either greater satisfaction or burden, depending on the specific aspect assessed with the minimum value being 1 and maximum value being 5. The total scare has a minimum value of 1 and maximum value of 15 with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. The scores are obtained by calculating the mean for each.
Measured: 6 months
Treatment Burden and Satisfaction: Motivation and Attitudes Towards Changing Health (MATCH)
Assessed treatment burden and satisfaction using the Motivation and Attitudes towards Health Scale (MATCH), consisting of nine questions categorized into four subgroups: willingness to make changes, perceived ability to make or maintain changes, feeling changes are worthwhile, and overall mean/average of willingness, able, and worthwhile. Scores are calculated by determining the mean or average response within each category with higher scores meaning a better outcome.
WILLINGNESS: minimum value is 1 and maximum value is 5. ABLE: minimum value is 1 and maximum value is 5. WORTHWHILE: minimum value is 1 and maximum value is 5. TOTAL SCALE: minimum value is 1 and maximum value is 9.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jun 2024
- Study start5 Sep 2024
- Primary completion31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jun 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, Los AngelesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Los Angeles
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), Olive View-UCLA Education & Research Institute
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Estelle M. Everett, MD, MHS, University of California, Los Angeles
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06453928
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 22-000236
- Other IDs
- 5K23DK132482-02
- Acronym
- STAR-T1D
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 26 Apr 2024
- Last updated
- 29 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Starting Technology in At Risk Type 1 Diabetes (STAR-T1D) Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06453928
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STAR-T1D / 22-000236
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
- Keywords
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Insulin Pump, Hybrid Closed Loop Systems, Diabetes Technology, Health Disparities
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Los AngelesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), Olive View-UCLA Education & Research Institute
- Study start
- 5 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Diabetes technology has revolutionized T1D management, disparities in technology access are evident among racial-ethnic minorities, patients with lower socioeconomic status and those with poorly controlled T1D (A1c>8.5%). In order to examine whether diabetes technology can reduce diabetes care burdens and enhance outcomes among some of highest need patients, diabetes technology clinical trials must be expanded beyond the very select populations included in studies thus far (ie., mostly White, higher SES). Therefore, the investigators propose to perform a pilot RCT of hybrid closed-loop insulin pump therapy (HCL) in 40 diverse adult patients with poorly controlled T1D (HbA1c ≥8.0%) from the largest academic and safety net health systems in the Los Angeles region to determine the feasibility of a RCT in this population and identify facilitators and barriers of effective use of closed loop insulin pump therapy in patients with poorly controlled T1D.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hybrid Closed Loop Insulin Pump System | Experimental | Device: Hybrid Closed Loop Insulin Pump SystemParticipants will meet 1:1 with our CDE for at least 6 sessions over 6 weeks. Sessions will cover self-management basics, carb counting, CGM interpretation, hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia management and troubleshooting device issues. The investigators will follow up with participants in 24 and 72 hours after CGM and insulin pump initiation, respectively, to answer any device related questions that may arise in between sessions. Participants will follow up at intervals of 1-4 weeks throughout the study. During visits, the investigators will assess for adherence and adverse effects and evaluate device and safety issues associated with pump settings in the HCL arm. The investigators will repeat A1c at 12 weeks and 24 weeks and administer follow up questionnaires at 12 and 24 weeks. |
| Control | No intervention | –Participants in the control arm will receive diabetes education at a similar frequency as the intervention group. Diabetes education for the control group will be a combination of in-person visits with the CDE and telephone brief diabetes education sessions. Participants will follow up at intervals of 1-4 weeks throughout the study. During visits, the investigators will assess for adherence and adverse effects. The investigators will repeat A1c at 12 weeks and 24 weeks and administer follow up questionnaires at 12 and 24 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Type 1 Diabetes
- A1c ≥ 8.0%
- Not insulin pump user
- Primary language of English or Spanish
- Have medical insurance coverage
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- No measured A1c in the past year
- Have comorbidities that can result in inaccurate hemoglobin A1c
- Have cognitive, physical or mental impairment precluding diabetes technology use
- Limited life expectancy (<1 year)
- Pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hybrid Closed Loop Insulin Pump SystemPatients will be started on an automated insulin delivery system. | Device | Hybrid Closed Loop Insulin Pump System |
Primary outcome
Proportion of screened participants that are eligible
Time frame: 6 months
Eligible among screened, enrolled among eligible, excluded among screened (and why) based on screening, recruitment and enrollment data.
Proportion of enrolled participants that are randomized
Time frame: 6 months
Randomized among enrolled, and receiving allocated intervention among randomized.
Proportion of average time delay to enrollment
Time frame: 6 months
Average time delay from screening to enrollment.
Proportion of retention among participants randomized to the Intervention Group
Time frame: 6 months
Retention among participants receiving allocated intervention after being randomized and discontinued intervention among randomized.
Proportion of retention among participants randomized
Time frame: 6 months
Participants lost to follow-up among those initially randomized.
Proportion of retention among participants randomized
Time frame: 6 months
Retention rates by participants completing all research assessments among randomized.
Number of participants who adhere to assigned treatment
Time frame: 6 months
Treatment-specific adherence, Adherence to study protocol and Proportion of planned assessments that are completed. Fidelity, which pertains to guaranteeing that the intervention is delivered in accordance with the established protocol, will be summarized by study arms, and differences between arms will be examined using t-tests or two-sample tests of proportions as appropriate. Adherence, which relates to the extent to which participants follow the treatment and study protocol, as well as the proportion of planned assessments completed, will be summarized by study arms, and differences between arms will be examined using t-tests or two-sample tests of proportions as appropriate.
8 secondary outcomes
Change in A1c
Time frame: 6 months
Episodes and % of time with severe hypoglycemia ( BG <54 mg/dl)
Time frame: 6 months
Mean Diabetes Ketoacidosis Episodes Incidence
Time frame: 6 months
ED visits/Hospitalizations Number of diabetes related ED visits or hospitalizations
Time frame: 6 months
Treatment Burden and Satisfaction: Diabetes Distress
Time frame: 6 months
Treatment Burden and Satisfaction: Insulin Treatment Satisfaction
Time frame: 6 months
Treatment Burden and Satisfaction: Glucose Monitoring System Satisfaction (GMSS)
Time frame: 6 months
Treatment Burden and Satisfaction: Motivation and Attitudes Towards Changing Health (MATCH)
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Not yet recruiting
Care COMPASS Study
Diabetes Mellitus ( Type 1 and Type 2), Hypertension
Active, not recruiting
Impact of Screening and Multicomponent Exercise on Fall Rates, Fractures, and Cardiovascular Health in Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes, Osteoporosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of PAL-119 in Healthy Volunteers and Adult Participants With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes
Healthy Volunteers and Diabetes Participants
RecruitingPhase 4
Cholesterol Lowering and Residual Risk in Diabetes, Type 1
Type 1 Diabetes
RecruitingPhase 4
INfluenza VaccInation To Mitigate typE 1 Diabetes
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Hybrid Closed Loop Insulin Pump System in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Estelle M Everett, MD, MHS (310-267-0625, eeverett@mednet.ucla.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of screened participants that are eligible (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2026.