Rectal ProlapseNCT06455501
FOAM: Functional Outcome After Ventral Mesh Rectopexy
An observational study of Rectal Prolapse, run by Uppsala University.
Trial summary
Rectal prolapse is a protrusion of rectal wall through the anus. A surgical technique called Ventral mesh rectopexy has become a standard procedure for this condition in many centers. The goal of this trial is to investigate functional outcome, recurrence rates and complications after ventral mesh rectopexy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rectal Prolapse
- What is being tested?
- Ventral mesh rectopexy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2024to 31 Aug 2029
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adults undergoing ventral mesh rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse.
Who may be able to join
- full-thickness rectal prolapse
- the surgeon agrees that ventral mesh rectopexy is needed for the condition
- capable of participating in follow-up visits and answering questionnaires
- informed consent
Who cannot join
- patient below 18 years of age
- ongoing pregnancy
- inability to understand the Swedish language
- dementia or other cognitive disorder that unables informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: FOAM: Functional Outcome After Ventral Mesh Rectopexy, Prospective Cohort Study
Rectal prolapse is a protrusion of rectal wall through the anus. A surgical technique called Ventral mesh rectopexy has become a standard procedure for this condition in many centers.
The goal of this trial is to investigate functional outcome, recurrence rates and complications after ventral mesh rectopexy. The main question it aims to answer is:
- Do bowel function, quality of life and sexual function improve after Ventral mesh rectopexy?
Participants will:
- be asked to fill in questionaires before surgery, 3-6 months after surgery and 12 months after surgery.
- be examined by a surgeon 3-6 months, 12 months and 3 years after surgery.
Read the detailed description
Several different procedures have been described for surgical treatment of rectal prolapse and a consensus has not yet been reached. Over the past 20 years, the use of Ventral mesh rectopexy to treat external rectal prolapse has gained increasing worldwide acceptance. Ventral mesh rectopexy has become a standard procedure in many centers based on low recurrence rates, limited complications and good functional results but the use and type of mesh have been debated. Concerns have also been expressed regarding the choice of surgical technique, which differs between centers, and the lack of high-level evidence.
There are few prospective trials and the use of LVMR in a Swedish setting has not yet been evaluated. FOAM (Functional Outcome After ventral Mesh rectopexy) therefore aims to investigate bowel function, quality of life, sexual function, recurrence rates and complications after ventral mesh rectopexy.
A prospective cohort study on patients undergoing ventral mesh rectopexy for external rectal prolapse in Sweden will be conducted. Approximately 70 patients will be included at a maximum of 10 hospitals in Sweden.
- Conditions
- Rectal Prolapse
- Being tested
- Ventral mesh rectopexy
- Keywords
- Ventral mesh rectopexy, Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy, Quality of Life, Bowel function, Recurrence, Sexual function
- Medical subject headings
- Rectal Prolapse, Recurrence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ventral mesh rectopexyProcedure or surgery
Ventral mesh rectopexy is performed with a superficial peritoneal incision from the right side of the sacral promontory, extended over the right outer border of the mesorectum, towards the deepest part of pouch of Douglas, sparing the right hypogastric nerve. In women, the vagina is retracted anteriorly and a dissection of the rectovaginal septum is performed down to the pelvic floor. A strip of mesh is attached to the ventral part of distal rectum and then fixed upon the sacral promontory.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Bowel function
Wexner constipation score: scale 0-30, 30=worst outcome
Measured: Evaluated at baseline, 3-6 months and 12 months postoperatively
Bowel function
Wexner incontinence score: scale 0-20, 20=worst outcome
Measured: Evaluated at baseline, 3-6 months and 12 months postoperatively
Bowel function
Colo-rectal-anal Distress Inventory (CRADI-8): scale 0-100 (100=worst outcome)
Measured: Evaluated at baseline, 3-6 months and 12 months postoperatively
Quality of Life after surgery
Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ-7): scale 0-100, 100=worst outcome
Measured: Evaluated at baseline, 3-6 months and 12 months postoperatively
Sexual function
PROMIS Sexual function and satisfaction version 2.0. Selected domains: Interest in sexual activity (scale 2-10, 10=highest interest), sexual activity screener (scale yes/no) and satisfaction with sex life (scale 2-10, 10=highest satisfaction)
Measured: Evaluated at baseline, 3-6 months and 12 months postoperatively
Secondary outcomes (5)
Recurrence rate
Recurrence of rectal prolapse
Measured: Evaluated at baseline, 3-6 months, 12 months and 3 years postoperatively. Clinical examination by surgeon will be performed to evaluate recurrence.
Postoperative complications
Clavien Dindo classification
Measured: Within 30 days postoperatively
Long-term complications
Ileus, pelvic abscess, mesh erosion, other complications
Measured: Evaluated at baseline, 3-6 months, 12 months and 3 years postoperatively.
Length of stay
Stay in hospital postoperatively
Measured: From day of operation to day of discharge from hospital, reported at follow-up 3-6 months postoperatively.
Mortality
30-day mortality
Measured: Within 30 days postoperatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jun 2024
- Study start1 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Aug 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rectal ProlapseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Uppsala University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Wilhelm Graf, Professor, Principal investigator, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala Universitet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06455501
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FOAM-trial
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 15 May 2024
- Last updated
- 12 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Tou S, Brown SR, Nelson RL. Surgery for complete (full-thickness) rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 24;2015(11):CD001758. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001758.pub3.
PubMed 26599079D'Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 2004 Nov;91(11):1500-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4779.
PubMed 15499644Badrek-Al Amoudi AH, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR. How to deal with complications after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: lessons learnt from a tertiary referral centre. Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jun;15(6):707-12. doi: 10.1111/codi.12164.
PubMed 23384148Evans C, Stevenson AR, Sileri P, Mercer-Jones MA, Dixon AR, Cunningham C, Jones OM, Lindsey I. A Multicenter Collaboration to Assess the Safety of Laparoscopic Ventral Rectopexy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Aug;58(8):799-807. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000402.
PubMed 26163960Randall J, Smyth E, McCarthy K, Dixon AR. Outcome of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for external rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis. 2014 Nov;16(11):914-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12741.
PubMed 25110205Teleman P, Stenzelius K, Iorizzo L, Jakobsson U. Validation of the Swedish short forms of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 May;90(5):483-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01085.x.
PubMed 21306343Hoven E, Flynn KE, Weinfurt KP, Eriksson LE, Wettergren L. Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures in clinical and nonclinical young adult populations. Sex Med. 2023 Jan 12;11(1):qfac006. doi: 10.1093/sexmed/qfac006. eCollection 2023 Feb.
PubMed 37007849Wexner SD. Further validation of the Wexner Incontinence Score: A note of appreciation and gratitude. Surgery. 2021 Jul;170(1):53-54. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.02.039. Epub 2021 Apr 15. No abstract available.
PubMed 33863582Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD. A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 Jun;39(6):681-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02056950.
PubMed 8646957
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- FOAM: Functional Outcome After Ventral Mesh Rectopexy, Prospective Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06455501
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FOAM-trial
- Conditions
- Rectal Prolapse
- Keywords
- Ventral mesh rectopexy, Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy, Quality of Life, Bowel function, Recurrence, Sexual function
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Uppsala UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Rectal prolapse is a protrusion of rectal wall through the anus. A surgical technique called Ventral mesh rectopexy has become a standard procedure for this condition in many centers.
The goal of this trial is to investigate functional outcome, recurrence rates and complications after ventral mesh rectopexy. The main question it aims to answer is:
- Do bowel function, quality of life and sexual function improve after Ventral mesh rectopexy?
Participants will:
- be asked to fill in questionaires before surgery, 3-6 months after surgery and 12 months after surgery.
- be examined by a surgeon 3-6 months, 12 months and 3 years after surgery.
Detailed description
Several different procedures have been described for surgical treatment of rectal prolapse and a consensus has not yet been reached. Over the past 20 years, the use of Ventral mesh rectopexy to treat external rectal prolapse has gained increasing worldwide acceptance. Ventral mesh rectopexy has become a standard procedure in many centers based on low recurrence rates, limited complications and good functional results but the use and type of mesh have been debated. Concerns have also been expressed regarding the choice of surgical technique, which differs between centers, and the lack of high-level evidence.
There are few prospective trials and the use of LVMR in a Swedish setting has not yet been evaluated. FOAM (Functional Outcome After ventral Mesh rectopexy) therefore aims to investigate bowel function, quality of life, sexual function, recurrence rates and complications after ventral mesh rectopexy.
A prospective cohort study on patients undergoing ventral mesh rectopexy for external rectal prolapse in Sweden will be conducted. Approximately 70 patients will be included at a maximum of 10 hospitals in Sweden.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adults undergoing ventral mesh rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- full-thickness rectal prolapse
- the surgeon agrees that ventral mesh rectopexy is needed for the condition
- capable of participating in follow-up visits and answering questionnaires
- informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- patient below 18 years of age
- ongoing pregnancy
- inability to understand the Swedish language
- dementia or other cognitive disorder that unables informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ventral mesh rectopexyVentral mesh rectopexy is performed with a superficial peritoneal incision from the right side of the sacral promontory, extended over the right outer border of the mesorectum, towards the deepest part of pouch of Douglas, sparing the right hypogastric nerve. In women, the vagina is retracted anteriorly and a dissection of the rectovaginal septum is performed down to the pelvic floor. A strip of mesh is attached to the ventral part of distal rectum and then fixed upon the sacral promontory. | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Bowel function
Time frame: Evaluated at baseline, 3-6 months and 12 months postoperatively
Wexner constipation score: scale 0-30, 30=worst outcome
Bowel function
Time frame: Evaluated at baseline, 3-6 months and 12 months postoperatively
Wexner incontinence score: scale 0-20, 20=worst outcome
Bowel function
Time frame: Evaluated at baseline, 3-6 months and 12 months postoperatively
Colo-rectal-anal Distress Inventory (CRADI-8): scale 0-100 (100=worst outcome)
Quality of Life after surgery
Time frame: Evaluated at baseline, 3-6 months and 12 months postoperatively
Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ-7): scale 0-100, 100=worst outcome
Sexual function
Time frame: Evaluated at baseline, 3-6 months and 12 months postoperatively
PROMIS Sexual function and satisfaction version 2.0. Selected domains: Interest in sexual activity (scale 2-10, 10=highest interest), sexual activity screener (scale yes/no) and satisfaction with sex life (scale 2-10, 10=highest satisfaction)
5 secondary outcomes
Recurrence rate
Time frame: Evaluated at baseline, 3-6 months, 12 months and 3 years postoperatively. Clinical examination by surgeon will be performed to evaluate recurrence.
Postoperative complications
Time frame: Within 30 days postoperatively
Long-term complications
Time frame: Evaluated at baseline, 3-6 months, 12 months and 3 years postoperatively.
Length of stay
Time frame: From day of operation to day of discharge from hospital, reported at follow-up 3-6 months postoperatively.
Mortality
Time frame: Within 30 days postoperatively
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jun 2024.
- Background: PubMed 26599079Tou S, Brown SR, Nelson RL. Surgery for complete (full-thickness) rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 24;2015(11):CD001758. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001758.pub3.
- Background: PubMed 15499644D'Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 2004 Nov;91(11):1500-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4779.
- Background: PubMed 23384148Badrek-Al Amoudi AH, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR. How to deal with complications after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: lessons learnt from a tertiary referral centre. Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jun;15(6):707-12. doi: 10.1111/codi.12164.
- Background: PubMed 26163960Evans C, Stevenson AR, Sileri P, Mercer-Jones MA, Dixon AR, Cunningham C, Jones OM, Lindsey I. A Multicenter Collaboration to Assess the Safety of Laparoscopic Ventral Rectopexy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Aug;58(8):799-807. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000402.
- Background: PubMed 25110205Randall J, Smyth E, McCarthy K, Dixon AR. Outcome of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for external rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis. 2014 Nov;16(11):914-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12741.
- Background: PubMed 21306343Teleman P, Stenzelius K, Iorizzo L, Jakobsson U. Validation of the Swedish short forms of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 May;90(5):483-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01085.x.
- Background: PubMed 37007849Hoven E, Flynn KE, Weinfurt KP, Eriksson LE, Wettergren L. Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures in clinical and nonclinical young adult populations. Sex Med. 2023 Jan 12;11(1):qfac006. doi: 10.1093/sexmed/qfac006. eCollection 2023 Feb.
- Background: PubMed 33863582Wexner SD. Further validation of the Wexner Incontinence Score: A note of appreciation and gratitude. Surgery. 2021 Jul;170(1):53-54. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.02.039. Epub 2021 Apr 15. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 8646957Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD. A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 Jun;39(6):681-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02056950.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Rectal Prolapse
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Clinical Outcomes of Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse
Rectal Prolapse, Fecal Incontinence
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Data-driven Clustering in Hemorrhoid Surgery: Retrospective Monocentric Study for the Identification of Clinical Phenotypes
Hemorrhoid, Hemorrhoid Prolapse
Active, not recruiting
RECTOSACROUTEROPEXY vs. WELLS
Rectal Prolapse, Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)
Recruiting
Evaluation of SINGLE PORT (SP) Robotic Technology in Colorectal Surgery
Colo-rectal Cancer, Rectal Prolapse
Recruiting
Biological OviTex Versus Synthetic Graft in Robotic Prolapse Surgery
Colorectal Disorders, Prolapse
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Wilhelm Graf, Professor principal investigator
Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala Universitet
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Rectal Prolapse, run by Uppsala University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jannica Smedberg, MD (+46731525453, jannica.smedberg@gotland.se), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Bowel function (time frame: Evaluated at baseline, 3-6 months and 12 months postoperatively). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06455501, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2024.