Median Nerve InjuryNCT06459908
Effects of Robotic Glove Hand Training in Patients After Median Nerve Transfer
A study testing Robot Glove Hand Training and Conventional Hand Rehabilitation Exercises in people with Median Nerve Injury, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
Selective nerve transfers provide an opportunity for restoring the motor function after nerve injuries. Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy has been established as a safe and feasible treatment to complement rehabilitation after neurological injury. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 to 55 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Median Nerve Injury
- What is being tested?
- Robot Glove Hand Training and Conventional Hand Rehabilitation Exercises
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 46 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 10 Dec 2023to 10 Jul 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 to 55 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Both Genders will be recruited
- Age between 19 to 55 years
- Median nerve transfer after traumatic event (RTA, history of Fall, avulsion, compression or stretch injuries)
- The ability to follow and respond to verbal commands
Who cannot join
- subjects will be excluded if they have
- Altered state of consciousness,
- Aphasia ,
- Severe cognitive deficits .
- Severe pathologies of upper limb of rheumatic nature
- Could not provide informed consent for study
- Severe pain in affected arm Visual analogue scale > 5
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Pakistan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Ghurki Trust Teaching Hospital , Lahore
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000
Sabiha Arshad, Mphil, 03248495979, s.arshad@riphah.edu.pk
Ayesha Kousar, DPT
About this study
Official title: Effects of Robotic Glove Hand Training on Fine and Gross Motor Function and Activities of Daily Living in Patients After Median Nerve Transfer
Selective nerve transfers provide an opportunity for restoring the motor function after nerve injuries. Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy has been established as a safe and feasible treatment to complement rehabilitation after neurological injury. The aim of this study is to explore the combined effects of Hand Training with Robotic Glove on fine and gross motor function and activities of daily living in patients after median nerve transfer. The study will be randomized controlled trial. Participants will be recruited through non probability convenience sampling technique. After screening for eligibility, participants will be randomly assigned by balanced pre-randomization into two groups either to a robot-assisted group (RG), participants of this group receiving robot-assisted Hand Rehabilitation with the Syrebo Robotic Gloves or to a control group (CG), receiving dose-matched conventional Hand Rehabilitation without the robot. Participants will be engaged in exercises 4 times a week for 6 weeks, each participants will receive 3 Hand Rehabilitation therapy sessions of 45 Mins per day focusing on hand function. Data will be assessed at the start of the 1st session and at the end of the last session after 6 weeks with the help of Sollerman Hand Function test, Jebsen Taylor Hand Function test, The Original Barthel Index for Activities of Daily living. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 25
Read the detailed description
Selective nerve transfers provide an opportunity for restoring the motor function after nerve injuries. Over the past decade different hand rehabilitation protocols and exercises are developed, robotic assisted rehabilitation is one of them. Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy has been established as a safe and feasible treatment to complement rehabilitation after neurological injury. Robots can precisely control the interaction with the user (e.g., supporting or resisting in an assist-as-needed manner) and render virtual environments both visually and mechanically, making them ideal tools for sensorimotor training, providing engaging and challenging therapy. The aim of this study is to explore the combined effects of Hand Training with Robotic Glove on fine and gross motor function and activities of daily living in patients after median nerve transfer. The study will be randomized controlled trial. Participants will be recruited through non probability convenience sampling technique. After screening for eligibility, participants will be randomly assigned by balanced pre-randomization into two groups either to a robot-assisted group (RG), participants of this group receiving robot-assisted Hand Rehabilitation with Syrebo Robotic Gloves or to a control group (CG), receiving dose-matched conventional Hand Rehabilitation without the robot. The participants will be engaged in exercises 4 times a week for 6 weeks, each participants will receive three Hand Rehabilitation therapy sessions per day focusing on hand function. Each therapy session will be of 45 minutes. These sessions will be embedded in the weekly therapy plan for each individual participant. Data will be assessed at the start of the 1st session and at the end of the last session after 6 weeks with the help of Sollerman Hand Function test, Jebsen Taylor Hand Function test, The Original Barthel Index for Activities of Daily living. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 25. Key words: Hand Rehabilitation, Nerve transfer Rehabilitation, Robotic Glove
- Conditions
- Median Nerve Injury
- Being tested
- Robot Glove Hand Training, Conventional Hand Rehabilitation Exercises
- Keywords
- Hand Rehabilitation, Nerve transfer Rehabilitation, Robotic Glove
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Robot Glove Hand TrainingOther
Robot Assisted group will perform hand exercises with the help of robotic glove assistance for 3 times per day/ 4 times per week, 45 minutes per session for 6 consecutive weeks. Total Number of Sessions will be 72 Hours.
Conventional Hand Rehabilitation ExercisesOther
Conventional therapy group will perform hand exercises without the help of robotic gloves 3 times per day/ 4 times per week, 45 minute session for 6 consecutive weeks.Total number of sessions will be 72.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Robot-assisted group (RG) | Experimental | Patients in group A will perform these exercises while Wearing robotic hand-training gloves. Group A will perform hand exercises with the help of robotic glove assistance for 3 times per day/ 4 times per week, 45 minutes per session for 6 consecutive weeks, Number of total sessions will be 72 . Receives: Other: Robot Glove Hand Training; Other: Conventional Hand Rehabilitation Exercises |
| conventional hand rehabilitation exercises | Active comparator | The control group will receive the same treatment as Robot Assisted group but without any robot-assisted device.Group B will perform hand exercises without the help of robotic glove for 3 times per day/ 4 times per week, 45 minute session for 6 consecutive weeks.Number of total sessions will be 72 . Receives: Other: Conventional Hand Rehabilitation Exercises |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
THE SOLLERMAN HAND FUNCTION TEST (SHT)
Sollerman Hand Function Test (SHT) is an assessment tool for analyzing hand function and grip strength after hand surgery for recording the recovery rate in rehabilitation phase. The scale include 8 hand grips that further divided into 20 subsets that helps in analyzing hand grip pattern that used for daily activities. Further; each activity was scored form 0 to 4 points with collective score of 80. The lower the score the poor hand function and grip strength was observed. SHT considered as most reliable and valid tool in analyzing hand function with excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC:0.987) and moderate test-retest reliability.
Measured: 6 Weeks
JABSEN-TAYLER HAND FUNCTION TEST
Jabsen-Tayler Hand Function Test is an effective assessment tool in analyzing fine and gross motor activity of hand that are required for performing daily activities of life.
The scale included 7 subsets of activities including writing; turning page, lifting objects; feeding and sacking. It is considered as good to excellent reliable and valid tool with the ICC of 0.77 in dominant hand and 0.84 to 0.97 in non-dominant hand in injured hand.Higher score means worse outcome and Lower score means good outcome.
Measured: 6 Weeks
PEGBOARD TEST
Pegboard Test is a valid instrument that used for assessing hand dexterity movement.Higher score means worse outcome and Lower score means good outcome.
among the individual. It is a test board having five subsets focusing placing pins, bimanual task performance and mathematical problems. The whole test is scored based on the completion of each subset. It has an excellent validity with ICVI= 0.9-1.0, SCVI = 0.93-0.95 and ICCs =0.76-0.85.
Measured: 6 Weeks
The Original Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)
The Barthel Index (BI) measures the extent to which somebody can function Independentlybladder control, toileting, chair transfer, ambulation and stair climbing. Items are weighted according to the level of nursing care required and are rated in terms of whether individuals can perform activities independently, with some assistance, or are dependent (scored as 10, 5 or 0). It has 0.89 test-retest reliability and 0.95 internal reliability. Reliability study found an alpha Cronbach value of 0.90 for the complete scale.(30)Higher the score for barthal index it means good outcome and lower the score means poor outcome.
Measured: 6 Weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jun 2024
- Study start10 Dec 2023
- Primary completion30 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion10 Jul 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Median Nerve InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Riphah International UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sabiha Arshad, Mphil, Principal investigator, Riphah International University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06459908
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REC/RCR&AHS/23/02103
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 11 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 26 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Geuna S, Raimondo S, Ronchi G, Di Scipio F, Tos P, Czaja K, Fornaro M. Chapter 3: Histology of the peripheral nerve and changes occurring during nerve regeneration. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2009;87:27-46. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(09)87003-7.
PubMed 19682632Rydevik B, Lundborg G. Permeability of intraneural microvessels and perineurium following acute, graded experimental nerve compression. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;11(3):179-87. doi: 10.3109/02844317709025516.
PubMed 609900George SC, Burahee AS, Sanders AD, Power DM. Outcomes of anterior interosseous nerve transfer to restore intrinsic muscle function after high ulnar nerve injury. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Feb;75(2):703-710. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.09.072. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
PubMed 34789435Liu Y, Lao J, Gao K, Gu Y, Xin Z. Outcome of nerve transfers for traumatic complete brachial plexus avulsion: results of 28 patients by DASH and NRS questionnaires. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012 Jun;37(5):413-21. doi: 10.1177/1753193411425330. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
PubMed 22067298Yurkewich A, Kozak IJ, Ivanovic A, Rossos D, Wang RH, Hebert D, Mihailidis A. Myoelectric untethered robotic glove enhances hand function and performance on daily living tasks after stroke. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2020 Dec 15;7:2055668320964050. doi: 10.1177/2055668320964050. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
PubMed 33403121
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Robotic Glove Hand Training on Fine and Gross Motor Function and Activities of Daily Living in Patients After Median Nerve Transfer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06459908
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REC/RCR&AHS/23/02103
- Conditions
- Median Nerve Injury
- Keywords
- Hand Rehabilitation, Nerve transfer Rehabilitation, Robotic Glove
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 10 Jul 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Selective nerve transfers provide an opportunity for restoring the motor function after nerve injuries. Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy has been established as a safe and feasible treatment to complement rehabilitation after neurological injury. The aim of this study is to explore the combined effects of Hand Training with Robotic Glove on fine and gross motor function and activities of daily living in patients after median nerve transfer. The study will be randomized controlled trial. Participants will be recruited through non probability convenience sampling technique. After screening for eligibility, participants will be randomly assigned by balanced pre-randomization into two groups either to a robot-assisted group (RG), participants of this group receiving robot-assisted Hand Rehabilitation with the Syrebo Robotic Gloves or to a control group (CG), receiving dose-matched conventional Hand Rehabilitation without the robot. Participants will be engaged in exercises 4 times a week for 6 weeks, each participants will receive 3 Hand Rehabilitation therapy sessions of 45 Mins per day focusing on hand function. Data will be assessed at the start of the 1st session and at the end of the last session after 6 weeks with the help of Sollerman Hand Function test, Jebsen Taylor Hand Function test, The Original Barthel Index for Activities of Daily living. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 25
Detailed description
Selective nerve transfers provide an opportunity for restoring the motor function after nerve injuries. Over the past decade different hand rehabilitation protocols and exercises are developed, robotic assisted rehabilitation is one of them. Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy has been established as a safe and feasible treatment to complement rehabilitation after neurological injury. Robots can precisely control the interaction with the user (e.g., supporting or resisting in an assist-as-needed manner) and render virtual environments both visually and mechanically, making them ideal tools for sensorimotor training, providing engaging and challenging therapy. The aim of this study is to explore the combined effects of Hand Training with Robotic Glove on fine and gross motor function and activities of daily living in patients after median nerve transfer. The study will be randomized controlled trial. Participants will be recruited through non probability convenience sampling technique. After screening for eligibility, participants will be randomly assigned by balanced pre-randomization into two groups either to a robot-assisted group (RG), participants of this group receiving robot-assisted Hand Rehabilitation with Syrebo Robotic Gloves or to a control group (CG), receiving dose-matched conventional Hand Rehabilitation without the robot. The participants will be engaged in exercises 4 times a week for 6 weeks, each participants will receive three Hand Rehabilitation therapy sessions per day focusing on hand function. Each therapy session will be of 45 minutes. These sessions will be embedded in the weekly therapy plan for each individual participant. Data will be assessed at the start of the 1st session and at the end of the last session after 6 weeks with the help of Sollerman Hand Function test, Jebsen Taylor Hand Function test, The Original Barthel Index for Activities of Daily living. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 25. Key words: Hand Rehabilitation, Nerve transfer Rehabilitation, Robotic Glove
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Robot-assisted group (RG) | Experimental | Other: Robot Glove Hand Training, Other: Conventional Hand Rehabilitation ExercisesPatients in group A will perform these exercises while Wearing robotic hand-training gloves. Group A will perform hand exercises with the help of robotic glove assistance for 3 times per day/ 4 times per week, 45 minutes per session for 6 consecutive weeks, Number of total sessions will be 72 . |
| conventional hand rehabilitation exercises | Active comparator | Other: Conventional Hand Rehabilitation ExercisesThe control group will receive the same treatment as Robot Assisted group but without any robot-assisted device.Group B will perform hand exercises without the help of robotic glove for 3 times per day/ 4 times per week, 45 minute session for 6 consecutive weeks.Number of total sessions will be 72 . |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Both Genders will be recruited
- Age between 19 to 55 years
- Median nerve transfer after traumatic event (RTA, history of Fall, avulsion, compression or stretch injuries)
- The ability to follow and respond to verbal commands
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- subjects will be excluded if they have
- Altered state of consciousness,
- Aphasia ,
- Severe cognitive deficits .
- Severe pathologies of upper limb of rheumatic nature
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Robot Glove Hand TrainingRobot Assisted group will perform hand exercises with the help of robotic glove assistance for 3 times per day/ 4 times per week, 45 minutes per session for 6 consecutive weeks. Total Number of Sessions will be 72 Hours. | Other | Robot-assisted group (RG) |
| Conventional Hand Rehabilitation ExercisesConventional therapy group will perform hand exercises without the help of robotic gloves 3 times per day/ 4 times per week, 45 minute session for 6 consecutive weeks.Total number of sessions will be 72. | Other | Robot-assisted group (RG), conventional hand rehabilitation exercises |
Primary outcome
THE SOLLERMAN HAND FUNCTION TEST (SHT)
Time frame: 6 Weeks
Sollerman Hand Function Test (SHT) is an assessment tool for analyzing hand function and grip strength after hand surgery for recording the recovery rate in rehabilitation phase. The scale include 8 hand grips that further divided into 20 subsets that helps in analyzing hand grip pattern that used for daily activities. Further; each activity was scored form 0 to 4 points with collective score of 80. The lower the score the poor hand function and grip strength was observed. SHT considered as most reliable and valid tool in analyzing hand function with excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC:0.987) and moderate test-retest reliability.
JABSEN-TAYLER HAND FUNCTION TEST
Time frame: 6 Weeks
Jabsen-Tayler Hand Function Test is an effective assessment tool in analyzing fine and gross motor activity of hand that are required for performing daily activities of life. The scale included 7 subsets of activities including writing; turning page, lifting objects; feeding and sacking. It is considered as good to excellent reliable and valid tool with the ICC of 0.77 in dominant hand and 0.84 to 0.97 in non-dominant hand in injured hand.Higher score means worse outcome and Lower score means good outcome.
PEGBOARD TEST
Time frame: 6 Weeks
Pegboard Test is a valid instrument that used for assessing hand dexterity movement.Higher score means worse outcome and Lower score means good outcome. among the individual. It is a test board having five subsets focusing placing pins, bimanual task performance and mathematical problems. The whole test is scored based on the completion of each subset. It has an excellent validity with ICVI= 0.9-1.0, SCVI = 0.93-0.95 and ICCs =0.76-0.85.
The Original Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)
Time frame: 6 Weeks
The Barthel Index (BI) measures the extent to which somebody can function Independentlybladder control, toileting, chair transfer, ambulation and stair climbing. Items are weighted according to the level of nursing care required and are rated in terms of whether individuals can perform activities independently, with some assistance, or are dependent (scored as 10, 5 or 0). It has 0.89 test-retest reliability and 0.95 internal reliability. Reliability study found an alpha Cronbach value of 0.90 for the complete scale.(30)Higher the score for barthal index it means good outcome and lower the score means poor outcome.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jun 2024.
- Background: PubMed 19682632Geuna S, Raimondo S, Ronchi G, Di Scipio F, Tos P, Czaja K, Fornaro M. Chapter 3: Histology of the peripheral nerve and changes occurring during nerve regeneration. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2009;87:27-46. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(09)87003-7.
- Background: PubMed 609900Rydevik B, Lundborg G. Permeability of intraneural microvessels and perineurium following acute, graded experimental nerve compression. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;11(3):179-87. doi: 10.3109/02844317709025516.
- Background: PubMed 34789435George SC, Burahee AS, Sanders AD, Power DM. Outcomes of anterior interosseous nerve transfer to restore intrinsic muscle function after high ulnar nerve injury. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Feb;75(2):703-710. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.09.072. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
- Background: PubMed 22067298Liu Y, Lao J, Gao K, Gu Y, Xin Z. Outcome of nerve transfers for traumatic complete brachial plexus avulsion: results of 28 patients by DASH and NRS questionnaires. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012 Jun;37(5):413-21. doi: 10.1177/1753193411425330. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
- Background: PubMed 33403121Yurkewich A, Kozak IJ, Ivanovic A, Rossos D, Wang RH, Hebert D, Mihailidis A. Myoelectric untethered robotic glove enhances hand function and performance on daily living tasks after stroke. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2020 Dec 15;7:2055668320964050. doi: 10.1177/2055668320964050. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Median Nerve Injury
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Postural Control and Balance Performance in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Postural Assessment
Recruiting
Comparison of Wrist Splint Positions in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Peripheral Neuropathies
Recruiting
Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation(rPMS) on CTS(Carpal Tunnel Syndrome)
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)
Recruiting
Hand Function Outcome After the Application of Transfer Energy Capacitive and Resistive on Post-burn Patients Presented With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) Post-burn
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Symptom Recovery Time After the Phalen Test in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sabiha Arshad, Mphil principal investigator
Riphah International University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Robot Glove Hand Training and Conventional Hand Rehabilitation Exercises in people with Median Nerve Injury, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Iqbal Tariq, PhD (03458236752, iqbal.tariq@riphah.edu.pk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
THE SOLLERMAN HAND FUNCTION TEST (SHT) (time frame: 6 Weeks). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06459908, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2024.