MelanomaTUPRONCT06463509
Establishment and Standardization of a Platform for In-depth Tumour Profiling (TUPRO) in Patients With Melanoma
An observational study of Melanoma, run by Reinhard Dummer at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
TUPRO-Melanoma is the first project of the Tumour Profiler (TUPRO) research collaboration, which in the long-term aims to generate data that will help to understand and report the individual tumour biology and the clinical parameters for patients with advanced malignancies using innovative molecular technologies and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Melanoma
- What is being tested?
- Establishment of an in-deepth tumor profiling platform
- How many people
- 116 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 8 Jan 2019to 31 May 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with advanced melanoma (stage III or IV cutaneous melanoma, or rare melanoma subtypes at any stage that require systemic therapy)
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years
- ECOG performance status ≤2 (not bedridden for more than 50% of waking hours)
- Stage III or IV cutaneous melanoma, or rare melanoma subtypes at any stage that require systemic therapy
- Written informed consent according to national legal and regulatory requirements prior to any project specific procedures
Who cannot join
- Any other serious underlying medical, psychiatric, psychological, familial or geographical condition, which in the judgment of the sponsor-project leader or site project leader may interfere with the project or affect patient compliance
- Legal incompetence
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Switzerland1 site
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, 8091
About this study
Official title: Establishment and Standardization of a Platform for In-depth Tumour Profiling (TUPRO) in Patients With Advanced Melanoma - a Prospective, Multicentric HFV Research Project/Category A
TUPRO-Melanoma is the first project of the Tumour Profiler (TUPRO) research collaboration, which in the long-term aims to generate data that will help to understand and report the individual tumour biology and the clinical parameters for patients with advanced malignancies using innovative molecular technologies and computational analyses for in-depth molecular profiling. TUPRO-Melanoma is an exploratory project that aims to establish a comprehensive platform for in-depth tumour profiling in patients suffering from advanced melanoma. Aims of this platform are to establish logistics and algorithms for integrative analyses and discover new molecular biomarker profiles/patterns.
- Conditions
- Melanoma
- Being tested
- Establishment of an in-deepth tumor profiling platform
- Medical subject headings
- Melanoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Establishment of an in-deepth tumor profiling platformOther
In-depth tumor profiling beyond genomics
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sample Processing and Report Generation (Tumor Biopsy, peripheral blood sample and stool sample)
- Number of samples (with sufficient material and quality) made available for intended analysis per technology
- Number of molecular summary reports (generated from the translational domain) that could be made available to the Tumour Board
- Number (proportion) of cases in which the Tumour Board considers the molecular summary report as useful for making a treatment recommendation on a scale from zero (not useful at all) to five (very useful).
- Number (proportion) of cases in which the treating physician considers the Tumour Board's recommendation as useful for making a treatment decision on a scale from zero (not useful at all) to five (very useful)
- Types of molecular information and combinations of molecular information from the biotechnology domain that the pre-Tumour Board considers as useful for making a treatment recommendation beyond routine diagnostics (incl. routine pathology and NGS testing)
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Classification of proposed treatment options (according to the one of the 7 categories below)
Select one of the following categories:
- On-label treatment with molecular matched treatment (SwissMedic label as reference) +/- radiotherapy or chemotherapy;
- Treatment with classical chemotherapy +/- radiotherapy (on label if label available);
- Referral to a suitable clinical trial;
- Off-label treatment (SwissMedic label as reference) with molecular matched treatment or immunotherapy +/- radiotherapy or chemotherapy;
- Off-label treatment (authorization in countries with comparable control systems for medicinal products as defined by SwissMedic) with molecular matched treatment or immunotherapy +/- radiotherapy or chemotherapy;
- Immunotherapy
- No active anti-tumour treatment (best supportive care)
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Classification of Tumour Board's recommendations according to ESCAT (categories below)
Select one of the categories below:
- I-A: prospective, randomised clinical trials show the alteration-drug match in a specific tumour type results in a clinically meaningful improvement of a survival end point
- II-A: retrospective studies show patients with the specific alteration in a specific tumour type experience clinically meaningful benefit with matched drug com pared with alteration-negative patients
- III-A: clinical benefit demonstrated in patients with the specific alteration (as tiers I and II above) but in a different tumour type. Limited/absence of clinical evidence available for the patient-specific cancer type or broadly across cancer types
- IV-A: evidence that the alteration or a functionally similar alteration influences drug sensitivity in preclinical in vitro or in vivo models
- X: No evidence that the genomic alteration is therapeutically actionable
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Time to first subsequent treatment (TTFST)
- Time to first subsequent treatment (TTFST), incl. best supportive care
Measured: through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
Time to first subsequent treatment (TTFST) ratio
- Time to first subsequent treatment (TTFST) ratio (TTFST 2 / TTFST 1: TTFST 2 = TTFST on current project; TTFST 1 = TTFST on previous treatment [before entering the project])
Measured: through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
Toxicity
- Frequency (proportion) of patients terminating treatment due to toxicity
Measured: through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
Survival
- Overall survival (OS), calculated from registration until death due to any cause
Measured: through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
Event free survival
- Event free survival (EFS), defined as time to treatment failure or death
Measured: through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
Radiological tumour response
- Proportion of patients with a radiological tumour response (CR / PR) according to local standards and trial protocol (in case of referral or trial)
Measured: through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
Secondary outcomes (1)
Quality of life
- Quality of Life using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General - 7 Item Version (FACT-G7) questionnaire should be assessed during regular data collection (optional).
Score range: 0-28. The higher the score, the better the Quality of life (QoL).
Measured: through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jun 2024
- Study start8 Jan 2019
- Primary completion31 May 2023
- Study completion31 May 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MelanomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 116 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Reinhard Dummer
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Reinhard Dummer, University of Zurich
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06463509
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TUPRO-Melanoma
- Acronym
- TUPRO
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 15 May 2024
- Last updated
- 1 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Miglino N, Toussaint NC, Ring A, Bonilla X, Tusup M, Gosztonyi B, Mehra T, Gut G, Jacob F, Chevrier S, Lehmann KV, Casanova R, Jacobs A, Sivapatham S, Boos L, Rahimzadeh P, Schuerch M, Sobottka B, Chicherova N, Yu S, Wegmann R, Mena J, Milani ES, Goetze S, Esposito C, Sarabia Del Castillo J, Frei AL, Nowak M, Irmisch A, Kuipers J, Baciu-Dragan MA, Ferreira PF, Singer F, Bertolini A, Prummer M, Lischetti U; Tumor Profiler Consortium; Aebersold R, Bacac M, Maass G, Moch H, Weller M, Theocharides APA, Manz MG, Beerenwinkel N, Beisel C, Pelkmans L, Snijder B, Wollscheid B, Heinzelmann V, Bodenmiller B, Levesque MP, Koelzer VH, Ratsch G, Dummer R, Wicki A. Feasibility of multiomics tumor profiling for guiding treatment of melanoma. Nat Med. 2025 Jul;31(7):2430-2441. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03715-6. Epub 2025 May 27.
PubMed 40425842
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Establishment and Standardization of a Platform for In-depth Tumour Profiling (TUPRO) in Patients With Advanced Melanoma - a Prospective, Multicentric HFV Research Project/Category A
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06463509
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TUPRO / TUPRO-Melanoma
- Conditions
- Melanoma
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 116 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Reinhard DummerUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
TUPRO-Melanoma is the first project of the Tumour Profiler (TUPRO) research collaboration, which in the long-term aims to generate data that will help to understand and report the individual tumour biology and the clinical parameters for patients with advanced malignancies using innovative molecular technologies and computational analyses for in-depth molecular profiling. TUPRO-Melanoma is an exploratory project that aims to establish a comprehensive platform for in-depth tumour profiling in patients suffering from advanced melanoma. Aims of this platform are to establish logistics and algorithms for integrative analyses and discover new molecular biomarker profiles/patterns.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with advanced melanoma (stage III or IV cutaneous melanoma, or rare melanoma subtypes at any stage that require systemic therapy)
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years
- ECOG performance status ≤2 (not bedridden for more than 50% of waking hours)
- Stage III or IV cutaneous melanoma, or rare melanoma subtypes at any stage that require systemic therapy
- Written informed consent according to national legal and regulatory requirements prior to any project specific procedures
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Any other serious underlying medical, psychiatric, psychological, familial or geographical condition, which in the judgment of the sponsor-project leader or site project leader may interfere with the project or affect patient compliance
- Legal incompetence
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Establishment of an in-deepth tumor profiling platformIn-depth tumor profiling beyond genomics | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Sample Processing and Report Generation (Tumor Biopsy, peripheral blood sample and stool sample)
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
* Number of samples (with sufficient material and quality) made available for intended analysis per technology * Number of molecular summary reports (generated from the translational domain) that could be made available to the Tumour Board * Number (proportion) of cases in which the Tumour Board considers the molecular summary report as useful for making a treatment recommendation on a scale from zero (not useful at all) to five (very useful). * Number (proportion) of cases in which the treating physician considers the Tumour Board's recommendation as useful for making a treatment decision on a scale from zero (not useful at all) to five (very useful) * Types of molecular information and combinations of molecular information from the biotechnology domain that the pre-Tumour Board considers as useful for making a treatment recommendation beyond routine diagnostics (incl. routine pathology and NGS testing)
Classification of proposed treatment options (according to the one of the 7 categories below)
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Select one of the following categories: * On-label treatment with molecular matched treatment (SwissMedic label as reference) +/- radiotherapy or chemotherapy; * Treatment with classical chemotherapy +/- radiotherapy (on label if label available); * Referral to a suitable clinical trial; * Off-label treatment (SwissMedic label as reference) with molecular matched treatment or immunotherapy +/- radiotherapy or chemotherapy; * Off-label treatment (authorization in countries with comparable control systems for medicinal products as defined by SwissMedic) with molecular matched treatment or immunotherapy +/- radiotherapy or chemotherapy; * Immunotherapy * No active anti-tumour treatment (best supportive care)
Classification of Tumour Board's recommendations according to ESCAT (categories below)
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Select one of the categories below: * I-A: prospective, randomised clinical trials show the alteration-drug match in a specific tumour type results in a clinically meaningful improvement of a survival end point * II-A: retrospective studies show patients with the specific alteration in a specific tumour type experience clinically meaningful benefit with matched drug com pared with alteration-negative patients * III-A: clinical benefit demonstrated in patients with the specific alteration (as tiers I and II above) but in a different tumour type. Limited/absence of clinical evidence available for the patient-specific cancer type or broadly across cancer types * IV-A: evidence that the alteration or a functionally similar alteration influences drug sensitivity in preclinical in vitro or in vivo models * X: No evidence that the genomic alteration is therapeutically actionable
Time to first subsequent treatment (TTFST)
Time frame: through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
- Time to first subsequent treatment (TTFST), incl. best supportive care
Time to first subsequent treatment (TTFST) ratio
Time frame: through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
- Time to first subsequent treatment (TTFST) ratio (TTFST 2 / TTFST 1: TTFST 2 = TTFST on current project; TTFST 1 = TTFST on previous treatment [before entering the project])
Toxicity
Time frame: through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
- Frequency (proportion) of patients terminating treatment due to toxicity
Survival
Time frame: through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
- Overall survival (OS), calculated from registration until death due to any cause
Event free survival
Time frame: through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
- Event free survival (EFS), defined as time to treatment failure or death
Radiological tumour response
Time frame: through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
- Proportion of patients with a radiological tumour response (CR / PR) according to local standards and trial protocol (in case of referral or trial)
1 secondary outcome
Quality of life
Time frame: through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 May 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40425842Miglino N, Toussaint NC, Ring A, Bonilla X, Tusup M, Gosztonyi B, Mehra T, Gut G, Jacob F, Chevrier S, Lehmann KV, Casanova R, Jacobs A, Sivapatham S, Boos L, Rahimzadeh P, Schuerch M, Sobottka B, Chicherova N, Yu S, Wegmann R, Mena J, Milani ES, Goetze S, Esposito C, Sarabia Del Castillo J, Frei AL, Nowak M, Irmisch A, Kuipers J, Baciu-Dragan MA, Ferreira PF, Singer F, Bertolini A, Prummer M, Lischetti U; Tumor Profiler Consortium; Aebersold R, Bacac M, Maass G, Moch H, Weller M, Theocharides APA, Manz MG, Beerenwinkel N, Beisel C, Pelkmans L, Snijder B, Wollscheid B, Heinzelmann V, Bodenmiller B, Levesque MP, Koelzer VH, Ratsch G, Dummer R, Wicki A. Feasibility of multiomics tumor profiling for guiding treatment of melanoma. Nat Med. 2025 Jul;31(7):2430-2441. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03715-6. Epub 2025 May 27.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-17 Blockade to Decrease irAEs (REPLAY)
Metastatic Melanoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Feasibility Study Utilizing Immune Recall to Increase Response to Checkpoint Therapy
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Dapansutrile Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With PD-1 Refractory Advanced Melanoma
Melanoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Melanoma, run by Reinhard Dummer at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sample Processing and Report Generation (Tumor Biopsy, peripheral blood sample and stool sample) (time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06463509, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2026.