AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyNCT06464081

Tongue Muscular Assessment in Children (TMAC) - Reproducibility Testing

An observational study of Healthy, run by Université Catholique de Louvain at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to assess intra-rater and inter-rater reliability in measuring tongue motor skills in children. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 17 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy
What is being tested?
Sleep quality assessment, Anthropometry and Tongue strength assessment
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
How many people
56 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
15 Oct 2024to 15 Jun 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Study population: Healthy children aged between 4 and 17 years old

Who may be able to join

  • Aged between 4 and 17 years old

Who cannot join

  • Eating disorder
  • Dysphagia
  • Cardiorespiratory disorder
  • Neurological disorder (including neuromuscular disorders)
  • Previous or ongoing obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome
  • Previous or ongoing cancer of the head or neck
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Previous oral or pharyngeal surgery (except for the surgical removal of wisdom teeth)
  • Cranial, oral or upper airway malformation (ex.: nasal cavities, pharynx)
  • Previous or ongoing orthodontic treatment (e.g. braces)
  • More than 33% of positive answers to the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (≥ 8/22)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc

    Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, Brussels Capital, 1200

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

This study aims to assess intra-rater and inter-rater reliability in measuring tongue motor skills in children.

Read the detailed description

Several motor skills of the tongue can be described: tongue elevation, swallowing, and protrusion. They are all relevant for a wide array of disorders, including neurological, musculoskeletal, and respiratory conditions. An ongoing study by our team is attempting to collect normative data on these motor skills in a pediatric cohort (NCT06166680). From this ongoing study, 56 subjects will be selected to assess the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability in measuring these motor skills.

Conditions
Healthy
Being tested
Sleep quality assessment, Anthropometry, Tongue strength assessment, Tongue endurance assessment, Orofacial praxis assessment
Keywords
tongue, motor skills

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sleep quality assessmentOther

    1. Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire.
  • AnthropometryOther

    1. Anthropometric data : 2.1 Height; 2.2 Weight; 2.3 Maximal mouth opening; 2.4 Maximal mouth opening with tongue to palate The measures 2.3 and 2.4 will be realized via the Quick Tongue-Tie assessment tool
  • Tongue strength assessmentOther

    1. Tongue pressure while swallowing. 4. Tongue peak pressure during tongue elevation. 5. Tongue peak pressure during tongue protrusion. These measures will be realized via the IOPI (Iowa Oral Performance Instrument) device.
  • Tongue endurance assessmentOther

    1. The tongue endurance during tongue elevation. 7. The tongue endurance during tongue protrusion. These measures will be realized via the IOPI (Iowa Oral Performance Instrument) device and a timer.
  • Orofacial praxis assessmentOther

    1. Motricité Bucco-Linguo-Faciale (MBLF) test.
Study groups in NCT06464081
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Inter-rater reliability and intra-rater reliabilityTongue protrusion, elevation and swallowing measurements will be assessed at three time points, each interspersed by a one-week to one-month interval. Assessments will be conducted by the same rater during two of these time points, whereas another independent rater will conduct the assessments of the third time point.
Receives: Other: Sleep quality assessment; Other: Anthropometry; Other: Tongue strength assessment; Other: Tongue endurance assessment; Other: Orofacial praxis assessment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Test-retest reproducibility of tongue peak pressure

    Tongue peak pressure during elevation and protrusion movements will be measured. The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of these measures will be computed.

    Measured: Measured at baseline, and then at two other time points. These three time points will each be interspersed by a one-week to one-month interval

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Test-retest reproducibility of tongue endurance

    Tongue endurance during elevation and protrusion movements will be measured. The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of these measures will be computed.

    Measured: Measured at baseline, and then at two other time points. These three time points will each be interspersed by a one-week to one-month interval

  2. Test-retest reproducibility of tongue pressure during swallowing

    Tongue pressure during swallowing will be measured. The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of these measures will be computed.

    Measured: Measured at baseline, and then at two other time points. These three time points will each be interspersed by a one-week to one-month interval

  3. Test-retest reproducibility of tongue mobility restriction

    Assessed through the ratio between maximal mouth opening and maximal mouth opening with tongue to palate. The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of these measures will be computed.

    Measured: Measured at baseline, and then at two other time points. These three time points will each be interspersed by a one-week to one-month interval

  4. Test-retest reproducibility of orofacial praxis

    Orofacial praxis will be assessed. The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of this measure will be computed.

    Measured: Measured at baseline, and then at two other time points. These three time points will each be interspersed by a one-week to one-month interval

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jun 2024
  2. Study start15 Oct 2024
  3. Primary completion15 Jun 2025
  4. Study completion15 Jun 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
56 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06464081
Sponsor's protocol ID
TMAC-reprod
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
12 Jun 2024
Last updated
29 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Healthy, run by Université Catholique de Louvain at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Test-retest reproducibility of tongue peak pressure (time frame: Measured at baseline, and then at two other time points. These three time points will each be interspersed by a one-week to one-month interval). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in