Surgical Site InfectionMARLINNCT06465901
A Stratified, Multi-ARm, muLti-site Randomised Platform Trial Aiming to Reduce the INcidence of Post-operative SSI
A study testing Chlorhexidine Gluconate 2.0% to 4.0% (e.g. Hibiscrub) preoperative shower, Intraoperative wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn) and DACC surgical wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed Sorbact) in people with Surgical Site Infection, run by University of Birmingham at 7 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
MARLIN is a stratified, multi-arm, multi-stage factorial randomised platform trial aiming to reduce the incidence of post-operative surgical site infection (SSI). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Surgical Site Infection
- What is being tested?
- Chlorhexidine Gluconate 2.0% to 4.0% (e.g. Hibiscrub) preoperative shower, Intraoperative wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn) and DACC surgical wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed Sorbact)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10,092 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2024to 30 Sep 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with at least one abdominal incision that is ≥5cm (open or laparoscopic extraction site), with an anticipated clean-contaminated, contaminated, or dirty surgical wound. Definitions and examples of contamination are given in Table 1.
- Patients undergoing emergency (surgery on an unplanned admission) or elective (surgery on a planned admission) operations.
- Any operative indication for abdominal surgery (excluding caesarean section; see exclusion criteria).
- Patient able and willing to provide written informed consent (signature or a fingerprint) prior to surgery (including emergency cases).
- Patients aged 5 years and over. (This criteria MUST be made country-specific. Each country will decide the lower (and upper, if applicable according to local regulations age limit for the trial. This will be dependent on country-specific regulatory approvals. Age eligibility will vary by country.)
Who cannot join
- Patient unable to complete post-operative follow-up (i.e., will not be contactable after discharge).
- Patients undergoing clean surgical procedures.
- Patients undergoing an obstetrics procedure, including caesarean sections.
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 7 countries.
7 sites in 7 countries
Benin1 site
University of Abomey-Calavi
Abomey-Calavi
Ismail Lawani, ismaillawani@gmail.com
Souliath Lawani, tatasouli@gmail.com
Ghana1 site
Tamale Teaching Hospital
Tamale
Stephen Tabiri, kstephenba14@gmail.com
Jane Acquaye, maame.jenny@yahoo.com
India1 site
Christian Medical College (CMC) & Hospital, Ludhiana
Ludhiana, 141008
Parvez Hacque, pdhaque@gmail.com
Atul Suroy, atulsuroy@gmail.com
Mexico1 site
Hospital Espanola Veracruz
Veracruz, 91700
Antonio Ramos
Laura Martinez, martinez.laura@heveracruz.mx
Nigeria1 site
Lagos University Teaching Hospital (Hub)
Lagos
Adesoji Ademuyiwa, adesojiademuyiwa@yahoo.co.uk
Emmanuel Williams, nihr.gsu.lagoshub@gmail.com
Rwanda1 site
University Teaching Hospital of Kigali (Hub)
Kigali
JC Allen Ingabire, ijea2000@gmail.com
Jean Pierre Nganabashaka, nganajp@gmail.com
South Africa1 site
University of the Witwatersrand
Johannesburg
Richard Crawford, richard.crawford@wits.ac.za
Matshego Nkwana, matshego.nkwana@wits.ac.za
About this study
Official title: MARLIN: Stratified, Multi-arm, Multi-stage Factorial Randomised Platform Trial Aiming to Reduce the Incidence of Post-operative Surgical Site Infection (SSI).
MARLIN is a stratified, multi-arm, multi-stage factorial randomised platform trial aiming to reduce the incidence of post-operative surgical site infection (SSI).
Read the detailed description
MARLIN's primary objective is assess whether different interventions used at three different time points during the participant's operative care (pre-, intra- and post-operatively) can reduce SSI at 30 days in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. MARLIN will assess the clinical effectiveness in both clean-contaminated wounds and contaminated or dirty wounds and will assess the interventions being assessed individually and in combination.
Patients (adults and children) undergoing surgery with abdominal incision of at least ≥5cm, with an anticipated clean-contaminated or contaminated or dirty wound, undergoing emergency or elective, and open or laparoscopic surgery are eligible. Participants will be recruited from hospitals within the National Institute for Health and Care Research Global Surgery Unit (NIHR GSU) network (i.e. hospitals in Benin, Rwanda, Ghana, India, Mexico, Nigeria, South Africa).
Interventions will be introduced at the preoperative window, intra-operatively and postoperatively as it is not yet known which if any of these timed intervention periods are most effective. It is planned that only one intervention will be introduced in each window. This format will allow testing for interaction between interventions including cumulated benefit. It will also enable unsuccessful interventions to be withdrawn and potentially substituted. This is a pragmatic design and wherever possible, standard care will be provided in the control arm.
After patient eligibility has been confirmed and informed consent has been obtained, patients will be randomised into the MARLIN trial by a member of the MARLIN research team at the site. Randomisation will occur within 72 hours prior to the patient's operation. Patients will be randomised dependent on which arms are available at the randomising site, and in which they consent to participate (i.e. it is possible for patients to 'opt out' of one or more of the intervention timepoints).
Patients may be randomised to receive:
- Chlorhexidine Gluconate preoperative shower 2.0% - 4.0% (e.g. hibiscrub) or standard preoperative preparation
- Topical wound wash before closure (e.g. granudacyn) or standard intraoperative preparation
- Dialkylcarbamoyl chloride (DACC) wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed sorbact) or standard post-operative wound care
The randomisation ratio at each timepoint will be 1:1 between the intervention and control in the first instance, although if and when multiple intervention arms are open, the ratio may change with agreement of the data monitoring committee (DMC), with reduced randomisation into the control arm due to pooling. Eligible participants will be randomised to receive some or all of the trial interventions; sites will opt-in to each treatment depending on local deliverability, which will be reflected in the randomisation system. Randomisation will occur around the time of pre-operative assessment.
Sample size:
An internal pilot will be carried out for each intervention within the study. For each pilot, Internal pilots of 100 participants per intervention, will be undertaken to assess deliverability, safety, compliance and participant acceptability. Internal pilots will be undertaken in at least two countries for any given intervention to assess generalisability. Interventions will then be made available across the wider Global Surgery network.
For the clean-contaminated stratum, the maximum sample size required for a 3-stage design, with control SSI rate of 16%, two-sided overall alpha of 0.043, overall power of 0.86, and 20% relative reduction (3.2% absolute reduction) with 5% lost to follow up, would be 6006 participants for all 3 questions as a factorial design. As the second and third treatment will start after the first stage interim analysis of the first intervention, 7544 participants are required. 8196 participants are required if the first intervention works and leads to lower SSI rate.
For the contaminated/dirty stratum, the maximum sample size required for a 3-stage design, with control SSI rate of 30%, two-sided overall alpha of 0.043, power of 0.86 and 30% relative reduction (9% absolute reduction) with 10% lost to follow up, would require 1342 participants for all 3 questions as a factorial design. As the second and third treatment will start after first stage interim analysis of the first intervention, 1596 are required participants. 1896 participants are required if the first intervention works and leads to lower SSI rate.
Multistage analysis:
For the clean-contaminated group there will be two interim analyses, the first after 1824 participants and the second at interim analysis at 3126 for each of the questions. For the contaminated/dirty group, the first interim will happen at 372 participants, and the second at 638 participants.
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients with at least one abdominal incision that is ≥5cm (open or laparoscopic extraction site), with an anticipated clean-contaminated, contaminated, or dirty surgical wound.
- Patients undergoing emergency (surgery on an unplanned admission) or elective (surgery on a planned admission) operations.
- Any operative indication for abdominal surgery (excluding caesarean section; see exclusion criteria).
- Patient able and willing to provide written informed consent (signature or a fingerprint) prior to surgery (including emergency cases).
- Patients aged 5 years and over. ( Each country will decide the lower (and upper, if applicable according to local regulations age limit for the trial. This will be dependent on country-specific regulatory approvals. Age eligibility will vary by country.) Patient Exclusion Criteria
- Patient unable to complete post-operative follow-up (i.e., will not be contactable after discharge).
- Patients undergoing clean surgical procedures.
- Conditions
- Surgical Site Infection
- Being tested
- Chlorhexidine Gluconate 2.0% to 4.0% (e.g. Hibiscrub) preoperative shower, Intraoperative wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn), DACC surgical wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed Sorbact)
- Keywords
- surgery, global surgery, SSI, surgical site infection
- Medical subject headings
- Surgical Wound Infection
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Chlorhexidine Gluconate 2.0% to 4.0% (e.g. Hibiscrub) preoperative showerOther
Chlorhexidine Gluconate 2.0% to 4.0% (e.g. Hibiscrub) preoperative shower
Intraoperative wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn)Other
Intraoperative wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn)
DACC surgical wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed Sorbact)Other
DACC surgical wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed Sorbact)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention: Chlorhexidine Gluconate 2.0% to 4.0% (e.g. Hibiscrub) preoperative shower | Experimental | Chlorhexidine Gluconate preoperative shower (e.g. hibiscrub)
The participant may prepare themselves by undertaking whole-body disinfection with Chlorhexidine Gluconate.
On two occasions, usually the day before and the day of the operation, the participant, should wash their whole body. Research teams will remind the participant that they must complete the pre-operative washes before they arrive at theatre.
Finally the whole body should be rinsed and dried thoroughly. Receives: Other: Chlorhexidine Gluconate 2.0% to 4.0% (e.g. Hibiscrub) preoperative shower |
| Comparator: Standard preoperative preparation | Active comparator | Standard of care means whatever pre-operative cleansing is mandated according to local hospital policy. Receives: Other: Chlorhexidine Gluconate 2.0% to 4.0% (e.g. Hibiscrub) preoperative shower |
| Intervention: Intraoperative wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn) | Experimental | Hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) topical wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn) Receives: Other: Intraoperative wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn) |
| Comparator: Standard intraoperative preparation | Active comparator | Standard of care means whatever irrigation of the wound site is mandated according to local hospital policy. Receives: Other: Intraoperative wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn) |
| Intervention: DACC surgical wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed Sorbact) | Experimental | Leukomed Sorbact (Essity), is a sterile, single-use, bacteria-binding, adhesive-bordered wound dressing. It is used to prevent SSI in closed surgical wounds that have dry to low exudate. Receives: Other: DACC surgical wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed Sorbact) |
| Comparator: Standard post-operative wound care | Active comparator | Standard of care means whatever dressing of the wound site is mandated according to local hospital policy (including no dressing). Centres mandating an active wound dressing will be excluded from the trial. Receives: Other: DACC surgical wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed Sorbact) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Surgical site infection
The primary outcome is surgical site infection (SSI) within 30 days post-surgery, defined according to Centre for Disease Control criteria collected using an adapted, validated Wound Healing questionnaire (TALON).
Measured: Within 30 days of surgery
Secondary outcomes (6)
Surgical site infection
SSI at or prior to discharge from hospital
Measured: At or prior to discharge from hospital, usually within approximately 7 days of surgery
Mortality
Mortality (and likely cause)
Measured: Within 30-days post-surgery
Length of hospital stay
Length of hospital stay for index admission
Measured: Within 30 days of surgery
Return to normal activities
Return to normal activities (e.g. work, school, or family duties)
Measured: Within 30 days of surgery
Unplanned wound opening
Unplanned wound opening (i.e. not relating to necessary re-intervention)
Measured: Within 30 days of surgery
Re-operation for SSI
Re-operation for SSI
Measured: Within 30 days of surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jun 2024
- Study start1 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Surgical Site InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Pragmatic, outcome assessor blinded, stratified, international multi-centre, multi-arm multi-stage 2x2x2 factorial randomised controlled trial, with internal pilots. Strata are defined according to the anticipated category of wound contamination: (1) clean-contaminated and (2) contaminated or dirty.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 10,092 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Birmingham
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Kigali University Teaching Hospital, Université d'Abomey-Calavi
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Thomas Pinkney, Principal investigator, University of Birmingham
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06465901
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RG_23-086
- Acronym
- MARLIN
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 29 May 2024
- Last updated
- 20 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Hospital-level data will not be released or published. Country-level analyses will only be conducted with permission of lead investigators from each participating country. Local investigators may access their data across their country to perform country-level analyses (all participating hospitals should consent to their data being used in this way).
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- MARLIN: Stratified, Multi-arm, Multi-stage Factorial Randomised Platform Trial Aiming to Reduce the Incidence of Post-operative Surgical Site Infection (SSI).
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06465901
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MARLIN / RG_23-086
- Conditions
- Surgical Site Infection
- Keywords
- surgery, global surgery, SSI, surgical site infection
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 10,092 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of BirminghamUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Kigali University Teaching Hospital, Université d'Abomey-Calavi
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
MARLIN is a stratified, multi-arm, multi-stage factorial randomised platform trial aiming to reduce the incidence of post-operative surgical site infection (SSI).
Detailed description
MARLIN's primary objective is assess whether different interventions used at three different time points during the participant's operative care (pre-, intra- and post-operatively) can reduce SSI at 30 days in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. MARLIN will assess the clinical effectiveness in both clean-contaminated wounds and contaminated or dirty wounds and will assess the interventions being assessed individually and in combination.
Patients (adults and children) undergoing surgery with abdominal incision of at least ≥5cm, with an anticipated clean-contaminated or contaminated or dirty wound, undergoing emergency or elective, and open or laparoscopic surgery are eligible. Participants will be recruited from hospitals within the National Institute for Health and Care Research Global Surgery Unit (NIHR GSU) network (i.e. hospitals in Benin, Rwanda, Ghana, India, Mexico, Nigeria, South Africa).
Interventions will be introduced at the preoperative window, intra-operatively and postoperatively as it is not yet known which if any of these timed intervention periods are most effective. It is planned that only one intervention will be introduced in each window. This format will allow testing for interaction between interventions including cumulated benefit. It will also enable unsuccessful interventions to be withdrawn and potentially substituted. This is a pragmatic design and wherever possible, standard care will be provided in the control arm.
After patient eligibility has been confirmed and informed consent has been obtained, patients will be randomised into the MARLIN trial by a member of the MARLIN research team at the site. Randomisation will occur within 72 hours prior to the patient's operation. Patients will be randomised dependent on which arms are available at the randomising site, and in which they consent to participate (i.e. it is possible for patients to 'opt out' of one or more of the intervention timepoints).
Patients may be randomised to receive:
- Chlorhexidine Gluconate preoperative shower 2.0% - 4.0% (e.g. hibiscrub) or standard preoperative preparation
- Topical wound wash before closure (e.g. granudacyn) or standard intraoperative preparation
- Dialkylcarbamoyl chloride (DACC) wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed sorbact) or standard post-operative wound care
The randomisation ratio at each timepoint will be 1:1 between the intervention and control in the first instance, although if and when multiple intervention arms are open, the ratio may change with agreement of the data monitoring committee (DMC), with reduced randomisation into the control arm due to pooling. Eligible participants will be randomised to receive some or all of the trial interventions; sites will opt-in to each treatment depending on local deliverability, which will be reflected in the randomisation system. Randomisation will occur around the time of pre-operative assessment.
Sample size:
An internal pilot will be carried out for each intervention within the study. For each pilot, Internal pilots of 100 participants per intervention, will be undertaken to assess deliverability, safety, compliance and participant acceptability. Internal pilots will be undertaken in at least two countries for any given intervention to assess generalisability. Interventions will then be made available across the wider Global Surgery network.
For the clean-contaminated stratum, the maximum sample size required for a 3-stage design, with control SSI rate of 16%, two-sided overall alpha of 0.043, overall power of 0.86, and 20% relative reduction (3.2% absolute reduction) with 5% lost to follow up, would be 6006 participants for all 3 questions as a factorial design. As the second and third treatment will start after the first stage interim analysis of the first intervention, 7544 participants are required. 8196 participants are required if the first intervention works and leads to lower SSI rate.
For the contaminated/dirty stratum, the maximum sample size required for a 3-stage design, with control SSI rate of 30%, two-sided overall alpha of 0.043, power of 0.86 and 30% relative reduction (9% absolute reduction) with 10% lost to follow up, would require 1342 participants for all 3 questions as a factorial design. As the second and third treatment will start after first stage interim analysis of the first intervention, 1596 are required participants. 1896 participants are required if the first intervention works and leads to lower SSI rate.
Multistage analysis:
For the clean-contaminated group there will be two interim analyses, the first after 1824 participants and the second at interim analysis at 3126 for each of the questions. For the contaminated/dirty group, the first interim will happen at 372 participants, and the second at 638 participants.
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients with at least one abdominal incision that is ≥5cm (open or laparoscopic extraction site), with an anticipated clean-contaminated, contaminated, or dirty surgical wound.
- Patients undergoing emergency (surgery on an unplanned admission) or elective (surgery on a planned admission) operations.
- Any operative indication for abdominal surgery (excluding caesarean section; see exclusion criteria).
- Patient able and willing to provide written informed consent (signature or a fingerprint) prior to surgery (including emergency cases).
- Patients aged 5 years and over. ( Each country will decide the lower (and upper, if applicable according to local regulations age limit for the trial. This will be dependent on country-specific regulatory approvals. Age eligibility will vary by country.) Patient Exclusion Criteria
- Patient unable to complete post-operative follow-up (i.e., will not be contactable after discharge).
- Patients undergoing clean surgical procedures.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 6
- Model description
- Pragmatic, outcome assessor blinded, stratified, international multi-centre, multi-arm multi-stage 2x2x2 factorial randomised controlled trial, with internal pilots. Strata are defined according to the anticipated category of wound contamination: (1) clean-contaminated and (2) contaminated or dirty.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention: Chlorhexidine Gluconate 2.0% to 4.0% (e.g. Hibiscrub) preoperative shower | Experimental | Other: Chlorhexidine Gluconate 2.0% to 4.0% (e.g. Hibiscrub) preoperative showerChlorhexidine Gluconate preoperative shower (e.g. hibiscrub) The participant may prepare themselves by undertaking whole-body disinfection with Chlorhexidine Gluconate. On two occasions, usually the day before and the day of the operation, the participant, should wash their whole body. Research teams will remind the participant that they must complete the pre-operative washes before they arrive at theatre. Finally the whole body should be rinsed and dried thoroughly. |
| Comparator: Standard preoperative preparation | Active comparator | Other: Chlorhexidine Gluconate 2.0% to 4.0% (e.g. Hibiscrub) preoperative showerStandard of care means whatever pre-operative cleansing is mandated according to local hospital policy. |
| Intervention: Intraoperative wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn) | Experimental | Other: Intraoperative wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn)Hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) topical wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn) |
| Comparator: Standard intraoperative preparation | Active comparator | Other: Intraoperative wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn)Standard of care means whatever irrigation of the wound site is mandated according to local hospital policy. |
| Intervention: DACC surgical wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed Sorbact) | Experimental | Other: DACC surgical wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed Sorbact)Leukomed Sorbact (Essity), is a sterile, single-use, bacteria-binding, adhesive-bordered wound dressing. It is used to prevent SSI in closed surgical wounds that have dry to low exudate. |
| Comparator: Standard post-operative wound care | Active comparator | Other: DACC surgical wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed Sorbact)Standard of care means whatever dressing of the wound site is mandated according to local hospital policy (including no dressing). Centres mandating an active wound dressing will be excluded from the trial. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with at least one abdominal incision that is ≥5cm (open or laparoscopic extraction site), with an anticipated clean-contaminated, contaminated, or dirty surgical wound. Definitions and examples of contamination are given in Table 1.
- Patients undergoing emergency (surgery on an unplanned admission) or elective (surgery on a planned admission) operations.
- Any operative indication for abdominal surgery (excluding caesarean section; see exclusion criteria).
- Patient able and willing to provide written informed consent (signature or a fingerprint) prior to surgery (including emergency cases).
- Patients aged 5 years and over. (This criteria MUST be made country-specific. Each country will decide the lower (and upper, if applicable according to local regulations age limit for the trial. This will be dependent on country-specific regulatory approvals. Age eligibility will vary by country.)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient unable to complete post-operative follow-up (i.e., will not be contactable after discharge).
- Patients undergoing clean surgical procedures.
- Patients undergoing an obstetrics procedure, including caesarean sections.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Chlorhexidine Gluconate 2.0% to 4.0% (e.g. Hibiscrub) preoperative showerChlorhexidine Gluconate 2.0% to 4.0% (e.g. Hibiscrub) preoperative shower | Other | Comparator: Standard preoperative preparation, Intervention: Chlorhexidine Gluconate 2.0% to 4.0% (e.g. Hibiscrub) preoperative shower |
| Intraoperative wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn)Intraoperative wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn) | Other | Comparator: Standard intraoperative preparation, Intervention: Intraoperative wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn) |
| DACC surgical wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed Sorbact)DACC surgical wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed Sorbact) | Other | Comparator: Standard post-operative wound care, Intervention: DACC surgical wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed Sorbact) |
Primary outcome
Surgical site infection
Time frame: Within 30 days of surgery
The primary outcome is surgical site infection (SSI) within 30 days post-surgery, defined according to Centre for Disease Control criteria collected using an adapted, validated Wound Healing questionnaire (TALON).
6 secondary outcomes
Surgical site infection
Time frame: At or prior to discharge from hospital, usually within approximately 7 days of surgery
Mortality
Time frame: Within 30-days post-surgery
Length of hospital stay
Time frame: Within 30 days of surgery
Return to normal activities
Time frame: Within 30 days of surgery
Unplanned wound opening
Time frame: Within 30 days of surgery
Re-operation for SSI
Time frame: Within 30 days of surgery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jun 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Hospital-level data will not be released or published. Country-level analyses will only be conducted with permission of lead investigators from each participating country. Local investigators may access their data across their country to perform country-level analyses (all participating hospitals should consent to their data being used in this way).
Related trials for Surgical Site Infection
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Evaluation of the Effect of Antibiotic Prophylaxis During Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer: Prospective Randomised Double-blind Noninferiority Study of Placebo vs Cefazolin
Breast Cancer, Breast Surgery
RecruitingPhase 3
Steroids for Facial Nerve Function Protection in Post-surgical Vestibular Schwannoma Patients
Vestibular Schwannoma, Facial Nerve Paralysis
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Antibiotic Tissue Penetration and Tissue Response in Head and Neck Infection and Reconstructive Surgery
Surgical Wound Infection, Neck Infection
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Prevention of Vaginal Cuff Infection After Hysterectomy by Addition of Vaginal Clindamycin
Surgical Site Infection, Vaginal Cuff Cellulitis
Not yet recruiting
Cyanoacrylate Skin Adhesive After Mohs Surgery or Wide Local Excision
Surgical Site Infection, Skin Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Thomas Pinkney principal investigator
University of Birmingham
7 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Chlorhexidine Gluconate 2.0% to 4.0% (e.g. Hibiscrub) preoperative shower, Intraoperative wound wash (e.g. Granudacyn) and DACC surgical wound dressing (e.g. Leukomed Sorbact) in people with Surgical Site Infection, run by University of Birmingham at 7 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in Benin, Ghana, India, Mexico, Nigeria and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Rachel Lillywhite (+44 (0)121 415 9103, r.e.lillywhite@bham.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Surgical site infection (time frame: Within 30 days of surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jun 2024.