MigraineMIRAGENCT06468189
Clinical and Neurophysiological Effects of tDCS to Visual and Motor Cortex in Migraine
A study testing transcranial direct stimulation in people with Migraine, run by Istanbul Medipol University Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
tDCS can be offered as an alternative to migraine patients who have frequent and severe attacks and who are resistant to or unresponsive to preventive drug therapy. Additionally, this technique may also be an option for patients who refuse or have contraindications to taking anti-migraine medications. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Migraine
- What is being tested?
- transcranial direct stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2024to Nov 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Episodic migraine without aura and with aura, with frequent attacks (>4 or more), diagnosed according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders; The diagnosis must meet the 2018 ICHD-3 criteria for migraine without aura and migraine with aura.
- Patients whose previous prophylactic treatments have failed and who cannot or do not want to use treatments for various reasons
- The duration of the disease must be at least 12 months.
- Not having received any botulinum toxin treatment in the last 3 months
- Having the mental functionality and education to understand the scales used
- Patients who volunteered to participate in the research.
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- People with clinical evidence of brain damage
- Metallic implant head
- Heart battery
- History of seizures and chronic pain associated with other pathologies
- Other major neurological or major neuropsychiatric diseases;
- Other chronic pain syndromes;
- Other types of primary or secondary headaches;
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
İstanbul Medipol University
Istanbul, Beykoz, 33333
About this study
Official title: Clinical and Neurophysiological Effects of Simultaneous Application of tDCS to Visual and Motor Cortex in Migraine; Double Blind Randomized Controlled Study
tDCS can be offered as an alternative to migraine patients who have frequent and severe attacks and who are resistant to or unresponsive to preventive drug therapy. Additionally, this technique may also be an option for patients who refuse or have contraindications to taking anti-migraine medications. A decrease in headache severity and frequency is expected with this neuromodulation applied to migraine patients with frequent attacks. Based on this hypothesis; This tested whether simultaneous modulation of motor (M1, left) and visual cortex (O1 or O2, ipsilateral) with tDCS applied for 3 consecutive days is an effective treatment for migraine patients for the following specific purposes . No significant undesirable effects are expected, except for possible side effects that are simple and do not require medical intervention, such as tingling or itching in the area where the electrodes are attached, moderate fatigue, mild headache, nausea at a rate of less than 3%, and insomnia at a rate of less than 1%. . The research will be conducted within the framework of ethical principles and in accordance with the good clinical practice protocol.
- The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether transcranial direct current stimulation applied simultaneously to the motor and visual cortex in migraine patients provides a significant reduction in pain due to migraine attacks compared to sham tDCS. Additionally, to evaluate the effects of this treatment, They will be measured changes in the number of migraine attacks, abortive medication intake (e.g., opioids, triptans), as well as overall improvement in cognitive status and quality of life. In addition, electrophysiological EEG evaluations, before and after treatment, and the results of these measurements, as a potential biomarker in migraine, will be compared in the active and sham groups.
- It is aimed to determine whether the clinical effects of tDCS are long-lasting. Therefore, It will compared whether there is a difference in improvement of migraine-related pain between active and sham tDCS at pre-treatment (baseline) assessments as well as at 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment.
- Finally, it will be examined whether tDCS treatment applied for 3 consecutive days in migraine patients is safe. Safety will be evaluated through neuropsychological testing and adverse event reporting.
Read the detailed description
Headache disorders are quite common. In the 2016 Global Burden of Disease Study, migraine was the second highest cause of disability overall and the most common disease causing disability in young adults (15-49 years). When there are frequent or severe migraine attacks, pharmacological agents are used to reduce the frequency of migraine attacks. Standard migraine prophylactic treatments show either low efficacy or undesirable side effects, and most of them are licensed for other diseases and not for migraine. Additionally, some migraine patients are hesitant to choose pharmacological treatment. Compliance with these treatments is also quite low in the medication-using group. Recently used calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody treatments are quite expensive treatments. Therefore, there remains a need for an effective, tolerable and affordable prophylactic treatment for migraine.
Migraine is complex, involving several circuits of both the central and peripheral nervous system and has a still unclear pathophysiology. Trigeminovascular activation is the key event of migraine pain, mostly related to the peripheral nervous system, but the central nervous system also plays a role in the formation and perception of migraine. The cerebral cortex of migraineurs is hypersensitive (overexcitable) to external stimuli, possibly due to altered functional connectivity in subcortical structures, including the thalamus. This resulting "thalamo-cortical dysrhythmia" and changes in excitability can be controlled with non-invasive neuromodulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
Non-invasive neuromodulation is applied to various forms of primary headaches and is recommended as an easily applicable method for both episodic and chronic migraine. So far, only single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (sTMS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and supraorbital neurostimulation have been approved by the FDA for the treatment of migraine. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS; direct current stimulation) is an electrical stimulation method used for non-invasive brain stimulation, where a weak electrical current of approximately 2 milliamps is applied through two scalp electrodes with a portable battery-powered system. tDCS is an electrical stimulation technique in which low-amplitude direct current is applied to the skull via surface electrodes, thereby modulating neural brain activity. The applied current changes the transmembrane neuronal potential and thus affects the level of excitability. Depending on the polarity of the active electrodes, tDCS can increase or decrease cortical excitability. tDCS has been shown to trigger changes in neuropsychological and motor activity in the brain. Protocols with variable session numbers (1-20 days) applied to different targeted brain regions provide promising results in pain syndromes by regulating pain-related pathways in various ways. Stimulation of the motor cortex with tDCS has already been shown to relieve pain in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury and other chronic pain syndromes, including fibromyalgia. Migraine patients are often hypersensitive to pain. A treatment that targets areas of the brain involved in the experience of pain may also help reduce pain in migraine patients. According to the results of systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted so far; tDCS has been evaluated as an effective, reliable method that can improve migraine symptoms by activating the motor cortex or activating/inhibiting the visual cortex. Additionally, tDCS treatment repeated for days over a period of 4 weeks or longer is effective in reducing migraine pain severity and attack duration. The benefit of tDCS may persist for at least 4 weeks after completion of the last tDCS session. Both anodal and cathodal stimulation have been evaluated as effective for reducing migraine pain severity. The study protocol present here aims to test a unique protocol with simultaneous anodal stimulation to the motor area and cathodal stimulation to the visual cortex. In the meta-analyses conducted so far; In future clinical studies using tDCS in migraine, the importance of simultaneously measuring neuronal activity using EEG or fMRI(Functional magnetic resonance imaging)( is also emphasized in order to better understand the underlying mechanisms of action. Electrophysiological techniques, such as quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG), provide important information about brain functioning at rest and during sensory stimulation. A large amount of data has demonstrated the presence of some excitability changes in the occipital cortex during the interictal period of migraine patients.While some studies have demonstrated hyperexcitability, only a few studies have been able to document a decrease in occipital excitability. This increase in occipital excitability has recently been recognized as an inhibition phenomenon, and a new term "hyperresponsiveness" in migraine has come into use in the last decade. This hyperexcitability has been demonstrated in many neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies as loss of habituation to recurrent stimuli. Clearly, spectral analysis of different frequency bands of qEEG helps us understand the intrinsic activity of the migraineur brain. Differences in peak latency, amplitude, and synchronization of EEG frequency bands in response to sensory stimulation have been reported in migraine patients compared with healthy subjects. In this study, it is planned to make comparative evaluations in the following months with EEG recordings to be taken before and after simultaneous motor cortex and visual cortex stimulation. In this way, the relationship between anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation and different frequency bands in the occipital region will be determined by comparing the active treatment and sham groups.
Review studies and recent studies from our country have shown that tDCS treatment is an effective and safe prophylactic treatment in migraine patients with allodynia in both short and long-term follow-ups. In order to obtain better clinical evidence in this field, as emphasized in the Cochrane analysis conducted in 2018; Randomized controlled studies with larger samples and clinically meaningful long-term results are needed. In these studies, it is planned to test the clinical effect of a protocol combination, which has been shown to be particularly effective, in prophylaxis in migraine patients in a large sample group, while also evaluating its neurophysiological responses in active and sham groups.
- Conditions
- Migraine
- Being tested
- transcranial direct stimulation, Sham treatment
- Keywords
- transcranial direct current stimulation, tDCS, migraine
- Medical subject headings
- Migraine Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
transcranial direct stimulationDevice
Mars-01(Marslab, Turkey) transcranial direct current stimulation device works with a 9 volt battery and consists of two 5x5 (25 cm2) electrodes (anode and cathode). 3 consecutive sessions (days), cathodal to occipital cortex (O1 or O2, ipsilateral); Anodal application will be made to M1 (left). Active stimulation is 2mA tDCS with a 0 to 30 second acceleration period of 20 minutes per session. Placebo stimulation will be applied according to the device's own sham software protocol. Accordingly, the current consists of 30 seconds of increase from 0 to 2mA(milliamp), 10 seconds of stimulation, 30 seconds of decrease to 0 and 20 minutes of current-free application.
Sham treatmentDevice
The same device used for stimulation will be used, but no stimulation will be given.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| tDCS | Experimental | tDCS Interictal application will be performed during the attack-free period. Experimental group, 3 consecutive sessions, cathodal to occipital cortex (O1 or O2, ipsilateral); anodal to M1 (left) Receives: Device: transcranial direct stimulation |
| Sham | Sham comparator | Control group, 3 consecutive sessions of sham stimulation to the same locations. Receives: Device: Sham treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in headache diary variables
The number of migraine attacks, pain intensity, duration of each attack and the number of painkillers taken will be evaluated. Patients will answer this diary throughout the entire experimental period (months).
Measured: Baseline (Before Treatment) / 1 month and 3 months after treatment
Secondary outcomes (9)
EEG Power Spectrum Analysis
10 minutes of resting-state EEG recording.EEG data will be separated into one-second epochs after they are cleared of noise. Power spectrums of these data will be obtained in the delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma frequency bands. Each epoch will be analyzed by Fast Fourier Transform (FFT, Fast Fourier Transform) with 10% Hanning window, then power spectrum analysis will be performed, giving the frequency values for each electrode by averaging all FFTs. Maximum peaks will be determined in the delta (0.5-3.5 Hz), theta (4-7 Hz), alpha (8-13 Hz), beta (15-28 Hz) and gamma (28-48 Hz) frequency bands. these values will be used in statistical analysis for each person and electrode.
Measured: Baseline (Before Treatment) / 1 month and 3 months after treatment
EEG Coherence Analysis
Coherence measurements at delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma frequencies can be analyzed for either intra-hemispheric electrode connections or inter-hemispheric electrode connections.Coherence values take values between 0-1. Values close to 0 indicate that there is no connection at the determined frequency between the two calculated electrode regions, while values close to 1 indicate a high coupling between the two electrode regions.Coherence values will be calculated with the Brain Vision Analyzer program using the formula below.The data obtained during memory and visualization will be separated into one-second epochs after they are cleared of noise.Power spectrums of these data will be obtained in the delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma frequency bands. Each epoch will be analyzed by Fast Fourier Transform with 10% Hanning window.Then, these data will be calculated for all possible electrode pairs using the brain vision analysis program with the formula given below.
Measured: Baseline (Before Treatment) / 1 month and 3 months after treatment
EEG functional connectivity analysis
10 minutes of resting-state EEG recording. eLORETA software will be used for functional connectivity analysis. sLORETA /eLORETA is an online free software developed by Roberto Pascual-Marqui and his team (http://www.uzh.ch/keyinst/loreta.htm). eLORETA is an algorithm developed to solve the inverse problem and it does not contain localization bias even in the presence of noise . In this software, resting state data with eyes closed, separated into 2 second epochs, whose artifacts are cleaned by preprocessing, will be used. The relevant areas to be analyzed in the cortical plane and the relevant frequency band gaps will be determined. The time series containing the eLORETA current source density obtained from these areas will be calculated and a "lagged linear coherence" matrix will be created to be applied in graph theory (Vecchio et al., 2014). "Lagged linear coherence" will give correct physiological connectivity unaffected by volume conduction and low spatial resolution.
Measured: Baseline (Before Treatment) / 1 month and 3 months after treatment
Changes in the Headache Impact Scale (HIT-6)
Headache Impact Scale items evaluate vitality, pain, and psychological distress, as well as domains such as sociability, role, and cognitive functioning. Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) questionnaire was designed to helping describe and communicate the way people feel and what they cannot do because of headaches. Interpreting Headache Impact Test scores is achieve through a simple summary of the six items in the survey, ranging from 36 to 78 with larger scores reflecting greater impact. Levels of headache impact severity can be categorized using score ranges based on the HIT-6 interpretation guide into one of four areas: little or no impact (49 or less), some impact (50-55), substantial impact (56-59), and severe impact (60-78).
Measured: Baseline (Before Treatment) / 1 month and 3 months after treatment
Changes in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measures pain intensity. The VAS consists of a 10cm line, with two end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 10 ('pain as bad as it could possibly be').
Ask the patient to rate their current level of pain by placing a mark on the line. Use a ruler to measure the distance in centimetres from the 'no pain marker' (or zero) to the current pain mark. This provides a pain intensity score out of 10; for example, 6 out of 10 (or 6/10).
Measured: Baseline (Before Treatment) / 1 month and 3 months after treatment
MoCA Tests Scores
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was designed as a rapid screening instrument for mild cognitive dysfunction. It assesses different cognitive domains: attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. Time to administer the MoCA is approximately 10 minutes. The total possible score is 30 points; a score of 26 or above is considered normal.
Measured: Baseline (Before Treatment) / 1 month and 3 months after treatment
Beck depression Tests Scores
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck \& Steer, 1993) is a 21-item self-report instrument that generates one score reflecting the level of depression as being minimal, mild, moderate, or severe.
Measured: Baseline (Before Treatment) / 1 month and 3 months after treatment
Anxiety scales
Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with a total score range of 0-56, where <17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe.
Measured: Baseline (Before Treatment) / 1 month and 3 months after treatment
tDCS side effect registration form
Any side effects occurring in the application area (during or after) Any general side effects that occur at the end of the application will be recorded.
Measured: Baseline (Before Treatment) / 1 month and 3 months after treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jun 2024
- Study start1 Mar 2024
- Primary completionNov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for MigraineStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Prof. Lutfu Hanoglu, MD, Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
- Investigators
- Lütfü Hanoğlu, Prof. DR. MD, Principal investigator, Medipol University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06468189
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2023IMU_Migraine_tDCS
- Acronym
- MIRAGE
- Status last verified
- Nov 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 5 Nov 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Nov 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical and Neurophysiological Effects of Simultaneous Application of tDCS to Visual and Motor Cortex in Migraine; Double Blind Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06468189
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MIRAGE / 2023IMU_Migraine_tDCS
- Conditions
- Migraine
- Keywords
- transcranial direct current stimulation, tDCS, migraine
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul Medipol University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
tDCS can be offered as an alternative to migraine patients who have frequent and severe attacks and who are resistant to or unresponsive to preventive drug therapy. Additionally, this technique may also be an option for patients who refuse or have contraindications to taking anti-migraine medications. A decrease in headache severity and frequency is expected with this neuromodulation applied to migraine patients with frequent attacks. Based on this hypothesis; This tested whether simultaneous modulation of motor (M1, left) and visual cortex (O1 or O2, ipsilateral) with tDCS applied for 3 consecutive days is an effective treatment for migraine patients for the following specific purposes . No significant undesirable effects are expected, except for possible side effects that are simple and do not require medical intervention, such as tingling or itching in the area where the electrodes are attached, moderate fatigue, mild headache, nausea at a rate of less than 3%, and insomnia at a rate of less than 1%. . The research will be conducted within the framework of ethical principles and in accordance with the good clinical practice protocol.
- The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether transcranial direct current stimulation applied simultaneously to the motor and visual cortex in migraine patients provides a significant reduction in pain due to migraine attacks compared to sham tDCS. Additionally, to evaluate the effects of this treatment, They will be measured changes in the number of migraine attacks, abortive medication intake (e.g., opioids, triptans), as well as overall improvement in cognitive status and quality of life. In addition, electrophysiological EEG evaluations, before and after treatment, and the results of these measurements, as a potential biomarker in migraine, will be compared in the active and sham groups.
- It is aimed to determine whether the clinical effects of tDCS are long-lasting. Therefore, It will compared whether there is a difference in improvement of migraine-related pain between active and sham tDCS at pre-treatment (baseline) assessments as well as at 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment.
- Finally, it will be examined whether tDCS treatment applied for 3 consecutive days in migraine patients is safe. Safety will be evaluated through neuropsychological testing and adverse event reporting.
Detailed description
Headache disorders are quite common. In the 2016 Global Burden of Disease Study, migraine was the second highest cause of disability overall and the most common disease causing disability in young adults (15-49 years). When there are frequent or severe migraine attacks, pharmacological agents are used to reduce the frequency of migraine attacks. Standard migraine prophylactic treatments show either low efficacy or undesirable side effects, and most of them are licensed for other diseases and not for migraine. Additionally, some migraine patients are hesitant to choose pharmacological treatment. Compliance with these treatments is also quite low in the medication-using group. Recently used calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody treatments are quite expensive treatments. Therefore, there remains a need for an effective, tolerable and affordable prophylactic treatment for migraine.
Migraine is complex, involving several circuits of both the central and peripheral nervous system and has a still unclear pathophysiology. Trigeminovascular activation is the key event of migraine pain, mostly related to the peripheral nervous system, but the central nervous system also plays a role in the formation and perception of migraine. The cerebral cortex of migraineurs is hypersensitive (overexcitable) to external stimuli, possibly due to altered functional connectivity in subcortical structures, including the thalamus. This resulting "thalamo-cortical dysrhythmia" and changes in excitability can be controlled with non-invasive neuromodulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
Non-invasive neuromodulation is applied to various forms of primary headaches and is recommended as an easily applicable method for both episodic and chronic migraine. So far, only single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (sTMS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and supraorbital neurostimulation have been approved by the FDA for the treatment of migraine. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS; direct current stimulation) is an electrical stimulation method used for non-invasive brain stimulation, where a weak electrical current of approximately 2 milliamps is applied through two scalp electrodes with a portable battery-powered system. tDCS is an electrical stimulation technique in which low-amplitude direct current is applied to the skull via surface electrodes, thereby modulating neural brain activity. The applied current changes the transmembrane neuronal potential and thus affects the level of excitability. Depending on the polarity of the active electrodes, tDCS can increase or decrease cortical excitability. tDCS has been shown to trigger changes in neuropsychological and motor activity in the brain. Protocols with variable session numbers (1-20 days) applied to different targeted brain regions provide promising results in pain syndromes by regulating pain-related pathways in various ways. Stimulation of the motor cortex with tDCS has already been shown to relieve pain in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury and other chronic pain syndromes, including fibromyalgia. Migraine patients are often hypersensitive to pain. A treatment that targets areas of the brain involved in the experience of pain may also help reduce pain in migraine patients. According to the results of systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted so far; tDCS has been evaluated as an effective, reliable method that can improve migraine symptoms by activating the motor cortex or activating/inhibiting the visual cortex. Additionally, tDCS treatment repeated for days over a period of 4 weeks or longer is effective in reducing migraine pain severity and attack duration. The benefit of tDCS may persist for at least 4 weeks after completion of the last tDCS session. Both anodal and cathodal stimulation have been evaluated as effective for reducing migraine pain severity. The study protocol present here aims to test a unique protocol with simultaneous anodal stimulation to the motor area and cathodal stimulation to the visual cortex. In the meta-analyses conducted so far; In future clinical studies using tDCS in migraine, the importance of simultaneously measuring neuronal activity using EEG or fMRI(Functional magnetic resonance imaging)( is also emphasized in order to better understand the underlying mechanisms of action. Electrophysiological techniques, such as quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG), provide important information about brain functioning at rest and during sensory stimulation. A large amount of data has demonstrated the presence of some excitability changes in the occipital cortex during the interictal period of migraine patients.While some studies have demonstrated hyperexcitability, only a few studies have been able to document a decrease in occipital excitability. This increase in occipital excitability has recently been recognized as an inhibition phenomenon, and a new term "hyperresponsiveness" in migraine has come into use in the last decade. This hyperexcitability has been demonstrated in many neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies as loss of habituation to recurrent stimuli. Clearly, spectral analysis of different frequency bands of qEEG helps us understand the intrinsic activity of the migraineur brain. Differences in peak latency, amplitude, and synchronization of EEG frequency bands in response to sensory stimulation have been reported in migraine patients compared with healthy subjects. In this study, it is planned to make comparative evaluations in the following months with EEG recordings to be taken before and after simultaneous motor cortex and visual cortex stimulation. In this way, the relationship between anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation and different frequency bands in the occipital region will be determined by comparing the active treatment and sham groups.
Review studies and recent studies from our country have shown that tDCS treatment is an effective and safe prophylactic treatment in migraine patients with allodynia in both short and long-term follow-ups. In order to obtain better clinical evidence in this field, as emphasized in the Cochrane analysis conducted in 2018; Randomized controlled studies with larger samples and clinically meaningful long-term results are needed. In these studies, it is planned to test the clinical effect of a protocol combination, which has been shown to be particularly effective, in prophylaxis in migraine patients in a large sample group, while also evaluating its neurophysiological responses in active and sham groups.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| tDCS | Experimental | Device: transcranial direct stimulationtDCS Interictal application will be performed during the attack-free period. Experimental group, 3 consecutive sessions, cathodal to occipital cortex (O1 or O2, ipsilateral); anodal to M1 (left) |
| Sham | Sham comparator | Device: Sham treatmentControl group, 3 consecutive sessions of sham stimulation to the same locations. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Episodic migraine without aura and with aura, with frequent attacks (>4 or more), diagnosed according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders; The diagnosis must meet the 2018 ICHD-3 criteria for migraine without aura and migraine with aura.
- Patients whose previous prophylactic treatments have failed and who cannot or do not want to use treatments for various reasons
- The duration of the disease must be at least 12 months.
- Not having received any botulinum toxin treatment in the last 3 months
- Having the mental functionality and education to understand the scales used
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- People with clinical evidence of brain damage
- Metallic implant head
- Heart battery
- History of seizures and chronic pain associated with other pathologies
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| transcranial direct stimulationMars-01(Marslab, Turkey) transcranial direct current stimulation device works with a 9 volt battery and consists of two 5x5 (25 cm2) electrodes (anode and cathode). 3 consecutive sessions (days), cathodal to occipital cortex (O1 or O2, ipsilateral); Anodal application will be made to M1 (left). Active stimulation is 2mA tDCS with a 0 to 30 second acceleration period of 20 minutes per session. Placebo stimulation will be applied according to the device's own sham software protocol. Accordingly, the current consists of 30 seconds of increase from 0 to 2mA(milliamp), 10 seconds of stimulation, 30 seconds of decrease to 0 and 20 minutes of current-free application. | Device | tDCS |
| Sham treatmentThe same device used for stimulation will be used, but no stimulation will be given. | Device | Sham |
Primary outcome
Change in headache diary variables
Time frame: Baseline (Before Treatment) / 1 month and 3 months after treatment
The number of migraine attacks, pain intensity, duration of each attack and the number of painkillers taken will be evaluated. Patients will answer this diary throughout the entire experimental period (months).
9 secondary outcomes
EEG Power Spectrum Analysis
Time frame: Baseline (Before Treatment) / 1 month and 3 months after treatment
EEG Coherence Analysis
Time frame: Baseline (Before Treatment) / 1 month and 3 months after treatment
EEG functional connectivity analysis
Time frame: Baseline (Before Treatment) / 1 month and 3 months after treatment
Changes in the Headache Impact Scale (HIT-6)
Time frame: Baseline (Before Treatment) / 1 month and 3 months after treatment
Changes in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time frame: Baseline (Before Treatment) / 1 month and 3 months after treatment
MoCA Tests Scores
Time frame: Baseline (Before Treatment) / 1 month and 3 months after treatment
Beck depression Tests Scores
Time frame: Baseline (Before Treatment) / 1 month and 3 months after treatment
Anxiety scales
Time frame: Baseline (Before Treatment) / 1 month and 3 months after treatment
tDCS side effect registration form
Time frame: Baseline (Before Treatment) / 1 month and 3 months after treatment
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Nov 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Migraine
RecruitingObservational study
Study of the Glymphatic System in Migraine
Migraine
Active, not recruiting
App-Based Migraine Treatment: The Health enSuite Study
Migraine, Migraine With Aura
Not yet recruiting
A Prospective Study of Rimegepant for Short-term Preventive Treatment of Night-shift-related Migraine in Healthcare Professionals
Migraine Disorders
Recruiting
Marine Lipids Ease Painful TMD
Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD)
Recruiting
Headache Education and Awareness vs. Daily Mindfulness Strategies - Understanding Pain
Migraine, Migraine in Adolescence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lütfü Hanoğlu, Prof. DR. MD principal investigator
Medipol University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing transcranial direct stimulation in people with Migraine, run by Istanbul Medipol University Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in headache diary variables (time frame: Baseline (Before Treatment) / 1 month and 3 months after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2026.