AzTrials
AzTrials

To be Approved by the Ethics CommitteeRASDOPNCT06469632

Radiofrequency and Myofascial Pain Syndrome in Postpartum Pelvic Pain

A study testing Active Comparator: Experimental Group 1 and Experimental: Experimental Group 2 in people with To be Approved by the Ethics Committee, run by University of Alcala at 1 site in Spain.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

About 30% of women experience pain in the perineum and pelvic region one year after the vaginal labor, rising up to 50% when it is triggered during vaginal penetration, called this pain as dyspareunia. An early physiotherapy treatment could be the solution to the pain relief of these women. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
To be Approved by the Ethics Committee
What is being tested?
Active Comparator: Experimental Group 1 and Experimental: Experimental Group 2
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
74 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
27 Jun 2023to Nov 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Primiparous women
  • Eutocic vaginal birth
  • Postpartum pelviperineal pain 8 weeks after birth
  • Intensity ≥ 4 cm in the VAS
  • Freely signed the Informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Multiparous women
  • Instrumental delivery
  • Cesarean delivery
  • Avulsion of the levator ani muscle
  • Diagnosis of coccygodynia and/or coccygeal pain
  • Sphincter anal injury during vaginal birth
Show all 12Show fewer
  • History of pelvic fractures and/or neoplasms
  • Pregnant women
  • Neurological diseases
  • Vaginal infection or active urinary tract, or with any
  • Uterine device with metallic components
  • Women with cognitive, auditory and/or visual limitations to understand information, respond to questionnaires, consent and/or participate in the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Beatriz Navarro-Brazález, PhD contact

+34918854828 ext. 4828

b.navarro@uah.es

Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Physiotherapy in Women's Health (FPSM) Research Group. Physiotherapy Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, 28805 Madrid, Spain.

    Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, 28871

    Beatriz Navarro- Brazález, PhD, +34-91-885-48-28 ext. 4828, b.navarro@uah.es

    Recruiting

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Efficacy of Radiofrequency and the Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome in Postpartum Pelvic Pain: Mixed Research Study

About 30% of women experience pain in the perineum and pelvic region one year after the vaginal labor, rising up to 50% when it is triggered during vaginal penetration, called this pain as dyspareunia. An early physiotherapy treatment could be the solution to the pain relief of these women. Thus, the objectives of the present randomised clinical trail are (i) to determine the effectiveness of a physiotherapy treatment based on education therapeutic, the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) of the pelvic floor muscles (PFM), and PFM specific training with or without radiofrequency in reducing pain and improving sexual function; and, (ii) to know the facilitating factors and barriers in adherence and perceived self-efficacy towards physiotherapy treatment of women with pelviperineal pain in the postpartum.

Methodology: randomized clinical trial with examinator blinding and two parallel groups, followed by a qualitative study. Thirty eight women per group will be needed with postpartum pelviperineal pain between 8 weeks after labour, with intensity ≥ 4 cm on the visual analogue scale. The assignment will be random to an Experimental 1 group based on therapeutic education, plus conservative and invasive treatment of MPS and specific PFM exercise versus an Experimental 2 group consisted in the same treatment plus non-ablative radiofrequency treatment. In both cases, 12 individual supervised sessions will be held by a physiotherapist specialized in women's health, with evaluations pre- and post-intervention, at 3 and 6 months. The outcome variables will be the intensity of the pain, the presence of MPS at PFM, the PFM contraction quality, sexual function and specific quality of life. The qualitative study will be carried out in the assessment 6 months post-intervention, through interviews semi-structured and focus groups. The interviews will be guided with previous questions established, recorded, transcribed and thematically analyzed by a panel of experts.

Being tested
Active Comparator: Experimental Group 1, Experimental: Experimental Group 2
Keywords
Pelvic Pain, Physiotherapy, Therapeutic adherence, Postpartum, Pelvic floor, Radiofrequency, Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Medical subject headings
Pelvic Pain, Treatment Adherence and Compliance, Myofascial Pain Syndromes

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Active Comparator: Experimental Group 1Other

    Multimodal physiotherapy treatment composed of:

    Therapeutic education about anatomy, physiology and pathophysiology of the abdomino-pelvic cavity, pelvic floor dysfunctions and risk factors, the concept of pain and its associated factors, as well as individual strategies to manage pain.

    Specific PFM exercises performing different types of contractions aimed at improving proprioception, strength, resistance and relaxation capacity.

    Conservative and invasive treatment of MPS active myofascial trigger points (MTP) will be treated by dry needling and Swiss technique. Latent MTP will be treated using the Swiss technique.

  • Experimental: Experimental Group 2Other

    Multimodal physiotherapy treatment composed of:

    Therapeutic education about anatomy, physiology and pathophysiology of the abdomino-pelvic cavity, pelvic floor dysfunctions and risk factors, the concept of pain and its associated factors, as well as individual strategies to manage pain.

    Specific PFM exercises performing different types of contractions aimed at improving proprioception, strength, resistance and relaxation capacity.

    Conservative and invasive treatment of MPS active myofascial trigger points (MTP) will be treated by dry needling and Swiss technique. Latent MTP will be treated using the Swiss technique.

    Non-ablative radiofrequency: using capacitive superficial electrodes and resistive superficial and intravaginal electrodes.

Study groups in NCT06469632
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental Group 1Active comparatorThere will be 12 individual sessions guided by a physiotherapist specialized in Women's Health. The approximate duration will be 45 minutes/session, 2 times a week for 6 weeks. The intervention will consist of a multimodal physiotherapy treatment based on therapeutic patient education, specific PFM exercises, and conservative and invasive treatment of the MPS. Pre- and post-intervention assessments will be carried out, and at 3 and 6 months after the intervention, by an examining physiotherapist who will be blinding for the intervention group.
Receives: Other: Active Comparator: Experimental Group 1
Experimental Group 2ExperimentalThere will be 12 individual sessions guided by a physiotherapist specialized in Women's Health. The approximate duration will be 45 minutes/session, 2 times a week for 6 weeks. The intervention will consist of a multimodal physiotherapy treatment based on therapeutic patient education, specific PFM exercises, conservative and invasive treatment of the MPS and non-ablative radiofrequency. Pre- and post-intervention assessments will be carried out, and at 3 and 6 months after the intervention, by an examining physiotherapist who will be blinding for the intervention group.
Receives: Other: Experimental: Experimental Group 2

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain intensity through the Verbal Numerical Scale (0 no pain, and 10 the most bearable pain)

    intensity, behavior and location (pain body chart).

    Measured: Pre-treatment, post-treatment (6 weeks after starting the study), 3 and 6 months after treatment

  2. Sexual function

    Self-completion of the FSFI questionnaire, which evaluates sexual function based on 6 domains: desire, excitement, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction and pain. The maximum score is 36, considering sexual dysfunction a value >27.

    Measured: Pre-treatment, post-treatment (6 weeks after starting the study), 3 and 6 months after treatment

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms

    Presence of urinary, intestinal and/or symptoms suggestive of prolapse

    Measured: Pre-treatment, post-treatment (after 12 sessions of physiotherapy treatment which will last approximately 3 months after starting the study), 3 and 6 months after treatment

  2. PFM capacity of contraction through Modified Oxford Scale (0 no contraction, 5 strong contraction)

    Intravaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscles with one or two fingers.

    Measured: Pre-treatment, post-treatment (6 weeks after starting the study), 3 and 6 months after treatment

  3. PFM capacity of relaxation (yes or no)

    Intravaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscles with one or two fingers.

    Measured: Pre-treatment, post-treatment (6 weeks after starting the study), 3 and 6 months after treatment

  4. PFM basal tone in grams

    Intravaginal dynamometry

    Measured: Pre-treatment, post-treatment (6 weeks after starting the study), 3 and 6 months after treatment

  5. PFM muscle strength in grams

    Intravaginal dynamometry

    Measured: Pre-treatment, post-treatment (6 weeks after starting the study), 3 and 6 months after treatment

  6. Distance of the urogenital hiatus in milimeters

    Assessment through transperineal ultrasound of the distance of the urogenital hiatus at rest, during a strong PFM contraction and during a pushing effort.

    Measured: Pre-treatment, post-treatment (6 weeks after starting the study), 3 and 6 months after treatment

  7. Presence of MPS in PFM and abdominal muscles

    Following the diagnostic criteria of Travel and Simons.

    Measured: Pre-treatment, post-treatment (6 weeks after starting the study), 3 and 6 months after treatment

  8. Specific quality of life and impact of Pelvoc floor Disfunction using questionnaires: PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7

    Through the questionnaires: Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory short version (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire short form (PFIQ-7). In both questionnaires, the scores range between 0 and 300, where a higher score indicates more distress and more impact on quality of life.

    Measured: Pre-treatment, post-treatment (6 weeks after starting the study), 3 and 6 months after treatment

  9. Self-efficacy

    Through Broome Pelvic Muscle Self-Efficacy Scale. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 100 implies greater self-efficacy.

    Measured: Pre-treatment, post-treatment (6 weeks after starting the study), 3 and 6 months after treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Jun 2024
  2. Study start27 Jun 2023
  3. Primary completionOct 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completionNov 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
74 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06469632
Sponsor's protocol ID
2023/00201/001
Other IDs
2023
Acronym
RASDOP
Status last verified
Jun 2024
First submitted
7 Dec 2023
Last updated
21 Jun 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Active Comparator: Experimental Group 1 and Experimental: Experimental Group 2 in people with To be Approved by the Ethics Committee, run by University of Alcala at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Beatriz Navarro-Brazález, PhD (+34918854828 ext. 4828, b.navarro@uah.es), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain intensity through the Verbal Numerical Scale (0 no pain, and 10 the most bearable pain) (time frame: Pre-treatment, post-treatment (6 weeks after starting the study), 3 and 6 months after treatment). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jun 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in