Pronated Left FootNCT06474585
Clinical Effects of the Medial Longitudinal Arch Slope of a Plantar Orthosis
A study testing Plantar orthosis in people with Pronated Left Foot and Pronated Right Foot, run by Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Trial summary
The objective of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of the geometry of the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) of the insole on acceleration impacts during gait, measured using an accelerometry system, in patients with pain related to the presence of a pronated foot morphotype. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pronated Left Foot, Pronated Right Foot
- What is being tested?
- Plantar orthosis
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 74 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 20 Jun 2024to 20 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects of both sexes, aged over 18 years. Patients with painful symptoms in the lower limb associated with a Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) score > 5, indicative of foot pronation position.
- Navicular Drop Test > 10 mm. Subjects with painful symptoms associated with foot pronation position. Signed informed consent explaining the study's characteristics and objectives.
Who cannot join
- Subjects presenting at least one of the following conditions will be excluded:
- Previous diagnosis of neurological or rheumatological systemic disease. History of foot or ankle surgery resulting in limitations in the mobility of the subtalar, midtarsal, or metatarsophalangeal joints.
- History of leg, ankle, or foot fracture resulting in limitations in the mobility of these structures.
- Lower limb morpho-functional alteration: clinical asymmetry greater than 5 mm, presence of genu varum, genu valgum with a difference of more than 2° femoro-tibial between limbs, internal or external femoral torsion.
- Cognitive impairment preventing understanding of the study's objectives and compliance with participation guidelines.
- Patients unable to walk independently due to musculoskeletal injury in the lower limbs within the last 6 months.
- Currently receiving any analgesic treatment for the lower limbs at the time of intervention.
About this study
Official title: Effects of the Medial Longitudinal Slope on Clinical Parameters and Acceleration Impacts During Gait
The objective of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of the geometry of the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) of the insole on acceleration impacts during gait, measured using an accelerometry system, in patients with pain related to the presence of a pronated foot morphotype. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Is the slope of the medial longitudinal arch of the orthotic treatment a factor that reduces the peak tibial accelerometry in a symptomatic foot with a medially oriented subtalar joint axis? To assess the predictive effect of changes in acceleration impacts on the patient's painful symptoms.
Read more
The researchers will compare the MLA of the insole taken in a standing position with the MLA of the insole taken in a sitting position (the treatment applied in routine clinical practice) to evaluate if changing the slope of the MLA generates changes in the tibial acceleration impacts.
The participants:
Must use the insoles to carry out their daily activities, except for sleeping or bathing.
The first review of the orthotic treatment will be conducted 3 months after the treatment initiation.
Read the detailed description
Study Population The study population will consist of patients treated from June 2024 onwards at the Pathology and Orthopedics Service of the University Clinic of Podiatry at Complutense University of Madrid. All participants will be informed beforehand about the characteristics, objectives, and methodology of the present study and must consent by signing the informed consent form, which complies with the regulatory legislation under the Organic Law on Data Protection and guarantee of digital rights 3/2018, of December 5, and Law 41/2002, of November 14, which regulates the patient's autonomy and rights and obligations in terms of information and clinical documentation. (Organic Law 3/2018) recognizes a series of rights for citizens, such as the right of access, rectification, cancellation, and opposition to their personal data, the right to limit the treatment of incorrect data, request a copy, or transfer the data provided for the study to a third party (portability), to the extent that they are applicable.
Sample Size A sample size is estimated for the comparison of two independent proportions at a 5% significance level, an 80% statistical power, and a two-tailed test. Since no published study has evaluated exactly the angulation in both sitting and standing positions under the same conditions, reference values are not precisely known. However, it is estimated that the main outcome variable, peak acceleration, will behave similarly. There is a threshold for this variable at 8 g, such that a peak above this is a risk factor for developing lower limb pathology. In our study, it is expected that only 5% of patients in group A will have a peak above 8 g, while 30% of patients in group B will have a peak above 8 g. Considering these factors and anticipating a 15% possible dropout rate, a minimum sample size of 37 patients per group is needed to achieve the main objective, totaling 74 patients.
Analyzed Variables and Data Collection Procedures Patient data recording will begin on the first consultation day after conducting the relevant screening and fulfilling the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. All data will be collected in a data collection notebook, with each patient assigned an identification code to safeguard compliance with the Organic Law on Data Protection and guarantee of digital rights 3/2018, of December 5, and Law 41/2002, of November 14, which regulates the patient's autonomy and rights and obligations in terms of information and clinical documentation.
Dependent Variables
Outcome Variables:
Primary Variable: Maximum tibial acceleration (g). Continuous quantitative variable (m/s²).
Secondary Variables:
Maximum head acceleration (g). Continuous quantitative variable (m/s²). Magnitude of head acceleration (g). Continuous quantitative variable (m/s²). Head acceleration ratio (38-70) (g/s). Continuous quantitative variable (m/s²). Magnitude of tibial acceleration (g). Continuous quantitative variable (m/s²). Tibial acceleration ratio (30-70) (g/s). Continuous quantitative variable (m/s²).
Impact attenuation (%). Continuous quantitative variable (m/s²). Step length (cm). Continuous quantitative variable (cm). Stride frequency (Hz). Continuous quantitative variable (Hz). Independent Variables Treatment Variables Demographic Variables - Covariates Clinical Variables Variables related to the wear of the orthotic treatment Study Planning Patient Recruitment Start: June 2024 Estimated End of Patient Recruitment: December 2024 Treatments Treatment A: A plantar orthosis made of 4.5 mm polypropylene with BIO at the necessary degrees according to the patient's biomechanical characteristics, MLA that replicates the geometry and slope of the MLA in the sitting position (unloaded). Duration of treatment: 12 weeks.
Treatment B: A plantar orthosis made of 4.5 mm polypropylene with BIO, and the MLA taken from the patient replicates the geometry and slope of the MLA in the standing position (loaded). Duration: 12 weeks.
Patient Visit Planning VISIT 1: Inclusion in the study. VISIT 2: Treatment delivery. Acceleration data will be recorded using an Xsens DOR accelerometry system (Xsens, Enschede, Netherlands: total mass: 10.9 g; dimensions 36x30x11 mm, range ± 16 g), consisting of 3 triaxial accelerometers. Two accelerometers will be placed on the anteromedial surface of the distal end of both tibias, 3 cm superior to the medial malleolus where the first uniform/flat surface is present, with the vertical axis of the accelerometer parallel to the tibial vertical axis; the third accelerometer will be placed on the forehead with the tibial vertical axis; and the third accelerometer will be placed on the forehead with the accelerometer's vertical axis perpendicular to the ground. All accelerometers will be placed by a single researcher (ASR). Patients will wear sports clothing, shorts, and neutral Reebok Classics sneakers. Before starting the test, the patient will walk freely around the room for 5 minutes to get used to the shoes and/or orthosis. Then, the patient will be instructed to walk at a "comfortable and safe" speed along a straight 12 m corridor, performing a total of 10 series. Accelerometry data will be recorded during the central 8 meters, with 2 meters at the start and 2 meters at the end designated as acceleration and deceleration zones, respectively, to avoid their effects. The speed of each series will be recorded using a photo-cell system (Chronojump Boscosystem), but it will not be controlled to avoid altering the natural gait pattern. The average speed of all series for each participant will be calculated, and those not within ±5% of each participant's average speed will be discarded to minimize the effect of gait speed on acceleration impacts.
After this second visit, orthoses A and B will be distributed randomly, dividing the sample into two equal halves, so that patients will use the assigned orthosis daily for 12 weeks.
VISIT 3: 12 weeks after starting the treatment.
- Conditions
- Pronated Left Foot, Pronated Right Foot
- Being tested
- Plantar orthosis
- Keywords
- "tibial accelerometry, biomechanics AND foot"
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Plantar orthosisDevice
Plantar orthosis taken in sitting position Plantar orthosis taken in standing position
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sitting Group | Active comparator | Patients assigned the treatment molded in the unloaded condition (this is the routine clinical practice). Receives: Device: Plantar orthosis |
| Weight-bearing Group | Experimental | Patients assigned the treatment molded under load. Receives: Device: Plantar orthosis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Maximum tibial acceleration (g).
Tibial axial acceleration corresponds to a line bisecting the proximal and distal ends of the tibia in the frontal and sagittal planes. Longitudinal acceleration provides a measure of impact accelerations at the knee moving longitudinally along the tibia and has previously been identified as a potential indicator of injury risk.
Measured: The maximum tibial acceleration (g) is measured during the 2nd visit when we initiate orthopedic treatment and during the 3rd visit, after 3 months of using the plantar orthosis, using a triaxial accelerometry system.
Secondary outcomes (6)
Maximum head acceleration (g)
Peak acceleration is the maximum amplitude of the acceleration signal, providing information about the mechanical stress that the shock wave causes in the body. This variable can be correlated with ground reaction forces measured on a force platform.
Measured: The maximum head acceleration (g) is measured during the 2nd visit when we initiate orthopedic treatment and during the 3rd visit, after 3 months of using the plantar orthosis, using a triaxial accelerometry system.
Magnitude of head acceleration (g).
It is defined as the difference between the maximum acceleration and the minimum acceleration of the head.
Measured: The magnitude of head acceleration (g) is measured during the 2nd visit when we initiate orthopedic treatment and during the 3rd visit, after 3 months of using the plantar orthosis, using a triaxial accelerometry system.
Acceleration ratio (38-70) in head (g/s).
It's the slope of the impact, that is, the variation in acceleration from ground contact time until reaching the peak
Measured: Acceleration ratio (38-70) in head (g/s). It is measured during the 2nd visit when we initiate orthopedic treatment and during the 3rd visit, after 3 months of using the plantar orthosis, using a triaxial accelerometry system
Magnitude of tibial acceleration (g)
It is defined as the difference between the maximum acceleration and the minimum acceleration of the tibia.
Measured: Magnitude of tibial acceleration (g). It is measured during the 2nd visit when we initiate orthopedic treatment and during the 3rd visit, after 3 months of using the plantar orthosis, using a triaxial accelerometry system.
Acceleration ratio (30-70) in tibia (g/s).
It is the slope of the impact, that is, the variation in acceleration from ground contact time until reaching the maximum
Measured: Acceleration ratio (30-70) in tibia (g/s). It is measured during the 2nd visit when we initiate orthopedic treatment and during the 3rd visit, after 3 months of using the plantar orthosis, using a triaxial accelerometry system.
Impact attenuation (%)
It is conceptualized as the reduction in the acceleration signal from one location to another, typically from the tibia to the head. It is obtained by calculating the difference in magnitude between the maximum peak in the tibia, expressed as a percentage.
Measured: Impact attenuation (%). It is measured during the 2nd visit when we initiate orthopedic treatment and during the 3rd visit, after 3 months of using the plantar orthosis, using a triaxial accelerometry system.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jun 2024
- Study start20 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion20 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pronated Left FootStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Universidad Complutense de MadridThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- The patient included in the study will be provided with two pairs of insoles. Insole type A is molded in an unloaded condition (sitting), which is the standard method we routinely use (CONTROL). Insole type B is molded under load (standing), and this treatment is considered EXPERIMENTAL. Once we receive both treatments, they will be randomized using the "random.org" application. Therefore, one group will use insole type A, and another group will use insole type B.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 74 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06474585
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 24/229--E
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 12 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 25 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of the Medial Longitudinal Slope on Clinical Parameters and Acceleration Impacts During Gait
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06474585
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 24/229--E
- Conditions
- Pronated Left Foot, Pronated Right Foot
- Keywords
- "tibial accelerometry, biomechanics AND foot"
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 74 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Complutense de MadridUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 20 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of the geometry of the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) of the insole on acceleration impacts during gait, measured using an accelerometry system, in patients with pain related to the presence of a pronated foot morphotype. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Is the slope of the medial longitudinal arch of the orthotic treatment a factor that reduces the peak tibial accelerometry in a symptomatic foot with a medially oriented subtalar joint axis? To assess the predictive effect of changes in acceleration impacts on the patient's painful symptoms.
The researchers will compare the MLA of the insole taken in a standing position with the MLA of the insole taken in a sitting position (the treatment applied in routine clinical practice) to evaluate if changing the slope of the MLA generates changes in the tibial acceleration impacts.
The participants:
Must use the insoles to carry out their daily activities, except for sleeping or bathing.
The first review of the orthotic treatment will be conducted 3 months after the treatment initiation.
Detailed description
Study Population The study population will consist of patients treated from June 2024 onwards at the Pathology and Orthopedics Service of the University Clinic of Podiatry at Complutense University of Madrid. All participants will be informed beforehand about the characteristics, objectives, and methodology of the present study and must consent by signing the informed consent form, which complies with the regulatory legislation under the Organic Law on Data Protection and guarantee of digital rights 3/2018, of December 5, and Law 41/2002, of November 14, which regulates the patient's autonomy and rights and obligations in terms of information and clinical documentation. (Organic Law 3/2018) recognizes a series of rights for citizens, such as the right of access, rectification, cancellation, and opposition to their personal data, the right to limit the treatment of incorrect data, request a copy, or transfer the data provided for the study to a third party (portability), to the extent that they are applicable.
Sample Size A sample size is estimated for the comparison of two independent proportions at a 5% significance level, an 80% statistical power, and a two-tailed test. Since no published study has evaluated exactly the angulation in both sitting and standing positions under the same conditions, reference values are not precisely known. However, it is estimated that the main outcome variable, peak acceleration, will behave similarly. There is a threshold for this variable at 8 g, such that a peak above this is a risk factor for developing lower limb pathology. In our study, it is expected that only 5% of patients in group A will have a peak above 8 g, while 30% of patients in group B will have a peak above 8 g. Considering these factors and anticipating a 15% possible dropout rate, a minimum sample size of 37 patients per group is needed to achieve the main objective, totaling 74 patients.
Analyzed Variables and Data Collection Procedures Patient data recording will begin on the first consultation day after conducting the relevant screening and fulfilling the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. All data will be collected in a data collection notebook, with each patient assigned an identification code to safeguard compliance with the Organic Law on Data Protection and guarantee of digital rights 3/2018, of December 5, and Law 41/2002, of November 14, which regulates the patient's autonomy and rights and obligations in terms of information and clinical documentation.
Dependent Variables
Outcome Variables:
Primary Variable: Maximum tibial acceleration (g). Continuous quantitative variable (m/s²).
Secondary Variables:
Maximum head acceleration (g). Continuous quantitative variable (m/s²). Magnitude of head acceleration (g). Continuous quantitative variable (m/s²). Head acceleration ratio (38-70) (g/s). Continuous quantitative variable (m/s²). Magnitude of tibial acceleration (g). Continuous quantitative variable (m/s²). Tibial acceleration ratio (30-70) (g/s). Continuous quantitative variable (m/s²).
Impact attenuation (%). Continuous quantitative variable (m/s²). Step length (cm). Continuous quantitative variable (cm). Stride frequency (Hz). Continuous quantitative variable (Hz). Independent Variables Treatment Variables Demographic Variables - Covariates Clinical Variables Variables related to the wear of the orthotic treatment Study Planning Patient Recruitment Start: June 2024 Estimated End of Patient Recruitment: December 2024 Treatments Treatment A: A plantar orthosis made of 4.5 mm polypropylene with BIO at the necessary degrees according to the patient's biomechanical characteristics, MLA that replicates the geometry and slope of the MLA in the sitting position (unloaded). Duration of treatment: 12 weeks.
Treatment B: A plantar orthosis made of 4.5 mm polypropylene with BIO, and the MLA taken from the patient replicates the geometry and slope of the MLA in the standing position (loaded). Duration: 12 weeks.
Patient Visit Planning VISIT 1: Inclusion in the study. VISIT 2: Treatment delivery. Acceleration data will be recorded using an Xsens DOR accelerometry system (Xsens, Enschede, Netherlands: total mass: 10.9 g; dimensions 36x30x11 mm, range ± 16 g), consisting of 3 triaxial accelerometers. Two accelerometers will be placed on the anteromedial surface of the distal end of both tibias, 3 cm superior to the medial malleolus where the first uniform/flat surface is present, with the vertical axis of the accelerometer parallel to the tibial vertical axis; the third accelerometer will be placed on the forehead with the tibial vertical axis; and the third accelerometer will be placed on the forehead with the accelerometer's vertical axis perpendicular to the ground. All accelerometers will be placed by a single researcher (ASR). Patients will wear sports clothing, shorts, and neutral Reebok Classics sneakers. Before starting the test, the patient will walk freely around the room for 5 minutes to get used to the shoes and/or orthosis. Then, the patient will be instructed to walk at a "comfortable and safe" speed along a straight 12 m corridor, performing a total of 10 series. Accelerometry data will be recorded during the central 8 meters, with 2 meters at the start and 2 meters at the end designated as acceleration and deceleration zones, respectively, to avoid their effects. The speed of each series will be recorded using a photo-cell system (Chronojump Boscosystem), but it will not be controlled to avoid altering the natural gait pattern. The average speed of all series for each participant will be calculated, and those not within ±5% of each participant's average speed will be discarded to minimize the effect of gait speed on acceleration impacts.
After this second visit, orthoses A and B will be distributed randomly, dividing the sample into two equal halves, so that patients will use the assigned orthosis daily for 12 weeks.
VISIT 3: 12 weeks after starting the treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The patient included in the study will be provided with two pairs of insoles. Insole type A is molded in an unloaded condition (sitting), which is the standard method we routinely use (CONTROL). Insole type B is molded under load (standing), and this treatment is considered EXPERIMENTAL. Once we receive both treatments, they will be randomized using the "random.org" application. Therefore, one group will use insole type A, and another group will use insole type B.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sitting Group | Active comparator | Device: Plantar orthosisPatients assigned the treatment molded in the unloaded condition (this is the routine clinical practice). |
| Weight-bearing Group | Experimental | Device: Plantar orthosisPatients assigned the treatment molded under load. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Subjects of both sexes, aged over 18 years. Patients with painful symptoms in the lower limb associated with a Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) score > 5, indicative of foot pronation position.
- Navicular Drop Test > 10 mm. Subjects with painful symptoms associated with foot pronation position. Signed informed consent explaining the study's characteristics and objectives.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Previous diagnosis of neurological or rheumatological systemic disease. History of foot or ankle surgery resulting in limitations in the mobility of the subtalar, midtarsal, or metatarsophalangeal joints.
- History of leg, ankle, or foot fracture resulting in limitations in the mobility of these structures.
- Lower limb morpho-functional alteration: clinical asymmetry greater than 5 mm, presence of genu varum, genu valgum with a difference of more than 2° femoro-tibial between limbs, internal or external femoral torsion.
- Cognitive impairment preventing understanding of the study's objectives and compliance with participation guidelines.
- Patients unable to walk independently due to musculoskeletal injury in the lower limbs within the last 6 months.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Plantar orthosisPlantar orthosis taken in sitting position Plantar orthosis taken in standing position | Device | Sitting Group, Weight-bearing Group |
Primary outcome
Maximum tibial acceleration (g).
Time frame: The maximum tibial acceleration (g) is measured during the 2nd visit when we initiate orthopedic treatment and during the 3rd visit, after 3 months of using the plantar orthosis, using a triaxial accelerometry system.
Tibial axial acceleration corresponds to a line bisecting the proximal and distal ends of the tibia in the frontal and sagittal planes. Longitudinal acceleration provides a measure of impact accelerations at the knee moving longitudinally along the tibia and has previously been identified as a potential indicator of injury risk.
6 secondary outcomes
Maximum head acceleration (g)
Time frame: The maximum head acceleration (g) is measured during the 2nd visit when we initiate orthopedic treatment and during the 3rd visit, after 3 months of using the plantar orthosis, using a triaxial accelerometry system.
Magnitude of head acceleration (g).
Time frame: The magnitude of head acceleration (g) is measured during the 2nd visit when we initiate orthopedic treatment and during the 3rd visit, after 3 months of using the plantar orthosis, using a triaxial accelerometry system.
Acceleration ratio (38-70) in head (g/s).
Time frame: Acceleration ratio (38-70) in head (g/s). It is measured during the 2nd visit when we initiate orthopedic treatment and during the 3rd visit, after 3 months of using the plantar orthosis, using a triaxial accelerometry system
Magnitude of tibial acceleration (g)
Time frame: Magnitude of tibial acceleration (g). It is measured during the 2nd visit when we initiate orthopedic treatment and during the 3rd visit, after 3 months of using the plantar orthosis, using a triaxial accelerometry system.
Acceleration ratio (30-70) in tibia (g/s).
Time frame: Acceleration ratio (30-70) in tibia (g/s). It is measured during the 2nd visit when we initiate orthopedic treatment and during the 3rd visit, after 3 months of using the plantar orthosis, using a triaxial accelerometry system.
Impact attenuation (%)
Time frame: Impact attenuation (%). It is measured during the 2nd visit when we initiate orthopedic treatment and during the 3rd visit, after 3 months of using the plantar orthosis, using a triaxial accelerometry system.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jun 2024.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Plantar orthosis in people with Pronated Left Foot and Pronated Right Foot, run by Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Maximum tibial acceleration (g). (time frame: The maximum tibial acceleration (g) is measured during the 2nd visit when we initiate orthopedic treatment and during the 3rd visit, after 3 months of using the plantar orthosis, using a triaxial accelerometry system.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2024.