Cholecystitis, AcuteNCT06476054
Optimal Timing for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Cholecystostomy in Acute Cholecystitis Tokyo II/III Setting
A study testing Optimal timing for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in people with Cholecystitis, Acute, run by Hospital Arnau de Vilanova at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Percutaneous drainage in acute cholecystitis has been recommended by the recent update of the Tokyo Guidelines for patients with grade II and III disease who are unable to undergo surgical treatment due to their condition or associated comorbidities. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cholecystitis, Acute
- What is being tested?
- Optimal timing for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 146 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2024to 1 Aug 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients over 18 years of age
- patients candidates for cholecystectomy, in scheduled surgery
- patients who accept participation and sign informed consent form
Who cannot join
- According to the principal investigator criteria, for reasons that make it impossible to correctly follow the treatment.
- Presence of morbidity associated with the procedure that delays or makes treatment impossible.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova
Lleida, 25198
Nuria Badia, 0034667045245, recercaicsgsslleida@gencat.cat
FULTHON FRANK VELA POLANCO, Dr
About this study
Official title: Optimal Timing for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Acute Cholecystitis Tokyo II/III Setting: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Percutaneous drainage in acute cholecystitis has been recommended by the recent update of the Tokyo Guidelines for patients with grade II and III disease who are unable to undergo surgical treatment due to their condition or associated comorbidities.
There are no reports providing high-quality scientific evidence on the optimal timing for surgery after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage, so a consensus has not been reached. The grade III stage generates the most controversy; after percutaneous drainage, delaying the cholecystectomy can lead to new episodes of exacerbation during the waiting period or may limit the procedure to a specific group of patients with this pathology.
The economic impact, including the number of readmissions, increased length of stay, and associated morbidity and mortality, generates controversy regarding the subsequent therapeutic decisions after the medical management of cholecystitis in this special group of patients.
Read the detailed description
A multicentric, blinded, parallel clinical trial is proposed to compare early and late cholecystectomy after percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC).
The primary objective of the present study is to determine the ideal time interval-early versus late-for performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients who underwent PC. This includes assessing whether recurrence can be reduced. As a secondary aim, to analyze the morbidity and mortality associated with the intervention.
Recruitment and Deadlines
Only surgical departments with an adequate number of patients will be included in the trial to ensure the sample size objective. The selected recruitment period is 18 months.
Study Variables
Surgical sheets, laboratory reports, daily notes made by hospital staff, discharge summaries, and outpatient clinic notes will be reviewed. Pre-operative characteristics, including sex, age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignant neoplasms, and immunosuppressive therapy), the main procedure performed as well as secondary procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) after confirming choledocholithiasis with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), will be collected. Variables related to the pre-operative context of the patient, such as Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, the patient's hemodynamic status, the presence of septic shock, and the need for vasoactive drugs, will also be collected. The characteristics studied for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) were as follows: type of prophylactic antibiotics used, details of the LC surgical technique, intraoperative complications, assessment of technical difficulty (as there are no quantitative scales, relied on previous studies adapted according to our group's consensus) defined as: 1. Need for conversion, 2. Atypical cholecystectomy (e.g., subtotal), 3. Strong adhesions on the gallbladder, 4. Difficult dissection of the hilar region due to chronic inflammatory processes, and 5. Increased average surgery time. Postoperative characteristics recorded included: hospital stay, postoperative complications and treatments, bile cultures, subsequent complications, need for reoperation, 30 and 90-day morbidity and mortality, and total follow-up time.
Interventions
Pre-operative Study
All participants with PC will undergo a preoperative study using MRCP or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) to rule out associated choledocholithiasis. A second MRCP or EUS will be planned for the delayed group just before LC. If choledocholithiasis is confirmed, preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) will be performed.
Prophylactic Pre-operative Antibiotherapy
Prophylactic antibiotherapy will be administered according to hospital protocol
PC Catheter Removal
Various publications have proposed the removal of the PC catheter after confirming the clinical resolution of acute cholecystitis (AC) following PC, performing percutaneous cholangiography between the third and fourth day of the procedure to evaluate the patency of the cystic duct. If continuity is confirmed, the catheter will be removed after the completion of antibiotic treatment and 24 hours before clinical discharge; otherwise, it will remain until the surgical intervention. In the present study, to avoid biases related to the catheter's permanence between groups or complications associated with its removal, the catheter will remain until the day of LC, and its removal will be performed intraoperatively under direct vision. The tip of the PC catheter will be sent for culture.
Randomization and Blinding
Prior to inclusion in the trial, the certified investigator from the Surgical Department will perform the screening and gather patient information and informed consent. An online tool will be provided to generate the sequence for group assignment, stratified by the grade of AC at the time of PC placement.
According to the interval for surgical intervention:
- Early LC group: Less than 2 weeks (within the first 2 weeks of diagnosis, after confirming CA resolution or improvement of functional status and coagulation that allows LC to be performed under optimal conditions), preferably within the first 10 days from the onset of CA symptoms.
- Delayed LC group: From the 6th week (preferably between the 6th and 8th weeks of CA diagnosis).
Randomization sheets will be kept outside the patient's medical records. The primary objective (reduction of recurrence - in a previous study of the group it is up to 20% - with this data and assuming a reduction from 20% to 5% for those cannot be operated, 73 patients per group will be needed) will be clinically evaluated by a local group member who will not be part of the surgical team performing the intervention nor will have access to the randomization results to maintain blinding. In case of risk to the patients included in the study, access to randomization data will be allowed to the local investigator.
- Conditions
- Cholecystitis, Acute
- Being tested
- Optimal timing for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- Keywords
- Cholecystitis, Acute Cholecystitis, percutaneous drainage, laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- Medical subject headings
- Cholecystitis, Acute, Cholecystitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Optimal timing for laparoscopic cholecystectomyProcedure or surgery
To compare early and late cholecystectomy after cholecystostomy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| early interval | Other | Both arms involve interventions, but participants in the early interval arm will undergo treatment (laparoscopic cholecystectomy) within 2 weeks after diagnosis, preferably within 10 days after the onset of symptoms of acute cholecystitis. Receives: Procedure: Optimal timing for laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
| late interval | Other | Both arms involve interventions, but participants in the late interval arm will undergo treatment (laparoscopic cholecystectomy) after the 6th week of diagnosis, ideally between week 6 and week 8 following the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. Receives: Procedure: Optimal timing for laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
recurrence tax of cholecystitis
% of recurrence of cholecystitis after cholecystostomy in acute cholecystitis
Measured: 6 months after cholecystostomy
Secondary outcomes (6)
Patient demographics
Data tracking related to patient demographics to evaluate if it affects to the recurrence tax. Age (years), BMI in kg/m^2, Charlson and ASA classification.
Measured: pre-operative and surgery day
Pre-operative patient comorbidities
Data tracking related to patient previous comorbidities to evaluate if it affects to the recurrence tax.
Measured: pre-operative and surgery day
Collection of pre-operative patient treatment (includes antibiotic prophylaxis)
Data tracking related to patient previous treatments or prophylaxis to evaluate if it affects to the recurrence tax.
Measured: pre-operative and surgery day
Surgery details
Data tracking related to patient surgery issues to evaluate if it affects to the recurrence tax. Presence of: Technique difficulties, description of intra-operative complications.
Measured: pre-operative and surgery day
Post-operative patient morbidity
Analysis of data related to morbidity according to the performed intervention.Clavien-Dindo classification.
Measured: 30 and 90 days post-surgery
Post-operative patient mortality
Analysis of data related to mortality according to the performed intervention.
Measured: 30 and 90 days post-surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jun 2024
- Study start1 Feb 2024
- Primary completion1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Aug 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cholecystitis, AcuteStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 146 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Arnau de Vilanova
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, FULTHON FRANK VELA POLANCO, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova
- Investigators
- 605387406 Vela Polanco, Dr, Principal investigator, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06476054
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2453
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 14 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 28 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimal Timing for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Acute Cholecystitis Tokyo II/III Setting: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06476054
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2453
- Conditions
- Cholecystitis, Acute
- Keywords
- Cholecystitis, Acute Cholecystitis, percutaneous drainage, laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 146 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Arnau de VilanovaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Percutaneous drainage in acute cholecystitis has been recommended by the recent update of the Tokyo Guidelines for patients with grade II and III disease who are unable to undergo surgical treatment due to their condition or associated comorbidities.
There are no reports providing high-quality scientific evidence on the optimal timing for surgery after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage, so a consensus has not been reached. The grade III stage generates the most controversy; after percutaneous drainage, delaying the cholecystectomy can lead to new episodes of exacerbation during the waiting period or may limit the procedure to a specific group of patients with this pathology.
The economic impact, including the number of readmissions, increased length of stay, and associated morbidity and mortality, generates controversy regarding the subsequent therapeutic decisions after the medical management of cholecystitis in this special group of patients.
Detailed description
A multicentric, blinded, parallel clinical trial is proposed to compare early and late cholecystectomy after percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC).
The primary objective of the present study is to determine the ideal time interval-early versus late-for performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients who underwent PC. This includes assessing whether recurrence can be reduced. As a secondary aim, to analyze the morbidity and mortality associated with the intervention.
Recruitment and Deadlines
Only surgical departments with an adequate number of patients will be included in the trial to ensure the sample size objective. The selected recruitment period is 18 months.
Study Variables
Surgical sheets, laboratory reports, daily notes made by hospital staff, discharge summaries, and outpatient clinic notes will be reviewed. Pre-operative characteristics, including sex, age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignant neoplasms, and immunosuppressive therapy), the main procedure performed as well as secondary procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) after confirming choledocholithiasis with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), will be collected. Variables related to the pre-operative context of the patient, such as Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, the patient's hemodynamic status, the presence of septic shock, and the need for vasoactive drugs, will also be collected. The characteristics studied for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) were as follows: type of prophylactic antibiotics used, details of the LC surgical technique, intraoperative complications, assessment of technical difficulty (as there are no quantitative scales, relied on previous studies adapted according to our group's consensus) defined as: 1. Need for conversion, 2. Atypical cholecystectomy (e.g., subtotal), 3. Strong adhesions on the gallbladder, 4. Difficult dissection of the hilar region due to chronic inflammatory processes, and 5. Increased average surgery time. Postoperative characteristics recorded included: hospital stay, postoperative complications and treatments, bile cultures, subsequent complications, need for reoperation, 30 and 90-day morbidity and mortality, and total follow-up time.
Interventions
Pre-operative Study
All participants with PC will undergo a preoperative study using MRCP or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) to rule out associated choledocholithiasis. A second MRCP or EUS will be planned for the delayed group just before LC. If choledocholithiasis is confirmed, preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) will be performed.
Prophylactic Pre-operative Antibiotherapy
Prophylactic antibiotherapy will be administered according to hospital protocol
PC Catheter Removal
Various publications have proposed the removal of the PC catheter after confirming the clinical resolution of acute cholecystitis (AC) following PC, performing percutaneous cholangiography between the third and fourth day of the procedure to evaluate the patency of the cystic duct. If continuity is confirmed, the catheter will be removed after the completion of antibiotic treatment and 24 hours before clinical discharge; otherwise, it will remain until the surgical intervention. In the present study, to avoid biases related to the catheter's permanence between groups or complications associated with its removal, the catheter will remain until the day of LC, and its removal will be performed intraoperatively under direct vision. The tip of the PC catheter will be sent for culture.
Randomization and Blinding
Prior to inclusion in the trial, the certified investigator from the Surgical Department will perform the screening and gather patient information and informed consent. An online tool will be provided to generate the sequence for group assignment, stratified by the grade of AC at the time of PC placement.
According to the interval for surgical intervention:
- Early LC group: Less than 2 weeks (within the first 2 weeks of diagnosis, after confirming CA resolution or improvement of functional status and coagulation that allows LC to be performed under optimal conditions), preferably within the first 10 days from the onset of CA symptoms.
- Delayed LC group: From the 6th week (preferably between the 6th and 8th weeks of CA diagnosis).
Randomization sheets will be kept outside the patient's medical records. The primary objective (reduction of recurrence - in a previous study of the group it is up to 20% - with this data and assuming a reduction from 20% to 5% for those cannot be operated, 73 patients per group will be needed) will be clinically evaluated by a local group member who will not be part of the surgical team performing the intervention nor will have access to the randomization results to maintain blinding. In case of risk to the patients included in the study, access to randomization data will be allowed to the local investigator.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| early interval | Other | Procedure: Optimal timing for laparoscopic cholecystectomyBoth arms involve interventions, but participants in the early interval arm will undergo treatment (laparoscopic cholecystectomy) within 2 weeks after diagnosis, preferably within 10 days after the onset of symptoms of acute cholecystitis. |
| late interval | Other | Procedure: Optimal timing for laparoscopic cholecystectomyBoth arms involve interventions, but participants in the late interval arm will undergo treatment (laparoscopic cholecystectomy) after the 6th week of diagnosis, ideally between week 6 and week 8 following the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- patients over 18 years of age
- patients candidates for cholecystectomy, in scheduled surgery
- patients who accept participation and sign informed consent form
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- According to the principal investigator criteria, for reasons that make it impossible to correctly follow the treatment.
- Presence of morbidity associated with the procedure that delays or makes treatment impossible.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Optimal timing for laparoscopic cholecystectomyTo compare early and late cholecystectomy after cholecystostomy. | Procedure or surgery | early interval, late interval |
Primary outcome
recurrence tax of cholecystitis
Time frame: 6 months after cholecystostomy
% of recurrence of cholecystitis after cholecystostomy in acute cholecystitis
6 secondary outcomes
Patient demographics
Time frame: pre-operative and surgery day
Pre-operative patient comorbidities
Time frame: pre-operative and surgery day
Collection of pre-operative patient treatment (includes antibiotic prophylaxis)
Time frame: pre-operative and surgery day
Surgery details
Time frame: pre-operative and surgery day
Post-operative patient morbidity
Time frame: 30 and 90 days post-surgery
Post-operative patient mortality
Time frame: 30 and 90 days post-surgery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jun 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cholecystitis, Acute
Not yet recruitingObservational study
SnapChole: An International, Time-Bound Prospective Platform Study of Management Strategies and Outcomes in Acute Calculous Cholecystitis
Cholecystitis, Acute
Not yet recruiting
Percutaneous Drainage Versus EUS-guided Gallbladder Drainage in Poor Surgical Patients With Cholecystitis
Cholecystitis, Acute
RecruitingObservational study
Influence of Gut Microbiome in Gallstone Disease
Gall Stone, Gall Stones, Common Bile Duct
Recruiting
Repeat Biliary Point of Care Ultrasound for Detecting Early Acute Cholecystitis
Cholecystitis, Acute, Biliary Diseases
Not yet recruiting
Implementation of RICA (ERAS) Guidelines in Grade II Acute Cholecystitis Undergoing Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Cholecystitis, Acute, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
605387406 Vela Polanco, Dr principal investigator
Hospital Arnau de Vilanova
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Optimal timing for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in people with Cholecystitis, Acute, run by Hospital Arnau de Vilanova at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Fulthon Frank Vela Polanco, Dr (0034605387406, ffvela.lleida.ics@gencat.cat), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
recurrence tax of cholecystitis (time frame: 6 months after cholecystostomy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jun 2024.