BurnoutEduSocial1NCT06477250
Investigating the Effects of a Dyad Intervention on Teacher Resilience, Mental Health, and Social Emotions and Behavior
A study testing Empathy-based socio-emotional mental training in people with Burnout, run by Max Planck Social Neuroscience Lab at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
The COVID-19 pandemic increased psychological burdens in Germany, especially among teachers who have reported higher levels of emotional exhaustion and burnout compared to the general population. Even before the pandemic, teachers found their work highly stressful. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Burnout
- What is being tested?
- Empathy-based socio-emotional mental training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- 20 Jun 2024to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants will have to meet the following inclusion criteria:
- between 18- and 65-years old
- registered residents of Germany
- currently employed as a teacher in Germany
- proficient in the German language
Who cannot join
- Participants would be excluded:
- if they do not have access to the internet or technical equipment necessary.
- if they have a history of or current psychiatric diagnosis.
- Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20; Bagby et al., 1994; Brähler et al., 2000; exclude if score greater than 60)
- Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Gräfe et al., 2004; Löwe et al., 2004; exclude if scores greater than 19) low 2004
- Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7; Löwe et al., 2007; Spitzer et al., 2006; exclude if scores greater than 15)
- if endorsing suicidality on the PHQ-9.
- if endorsing personality disorder on the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder Questionnaire (SAPAS; Moran et al., 2003; Söchtig et al., 2012).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Investigating the Effects of an Online Empathy-Compassion Dyad Intervention on Teacher Resilience, Mental Health, Social Emotions, Social Communication, and Interactions
The COVID-19 pandemic increased psychological burdens in Germany, especially among teachers who have reported higher levels of emotional exhaustion and burnout compared to the general population. Even before the pandemic, teachers found their work highly stressful. Mindfulness- and compassion-based interventions, as well as socio-emotional learning interventions, show promise in combating burnout among educators. Despite increased research, partner-based Dyads have not been explored in schools. Recent studies suggest these social practice formats are more effective than solo mindfulness techniques in reducing loneliness, and social stress, and enhancing social connections and resilience. Additionally, the impact of these interventions on student, classroom, collegium, and system levels remains under-researched.
This study extends the CovSocial project and the ReSource project, which showed the effectiveness of partner-based dyadic mental training on stress reduction, resilience, and social cohesion. The first goal is to test a 10-week online empathy-compassion (EmCo) Dyad training program, inspired by the Affect Dyad from the ReSource project and the online coaching Dyad from the CovSocial project, incorporating empathic and compassionate listening.
The second goal is to evaluate the Dyad intervention's effects in an educational context, focusing on teachers' mental health, social capacities, social networks, and classroom climate, measured across: 1) mental health and resilience, 2) social emotions, 3) social interaction, 4) communication and listening skills, and 5) classroom climate. The third aim is to develop and validate the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA) and the Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP), using autonomic measures and voice recordings to assess teachers' emotional states. The final aim is to investigate the cognitive and affective mechanisms driving changes in teachers' mental health, resilience, and social-emotional competencies.
Read the detailed description
The COVID-19 pandemic led to a dramatic rise in psychological burden and strain within Germany. German teachers, specifically, have reported increased emotional exhaustion and professional burnout, at levels exceeding those of the general population. The rise in teacher burnout is particularly alarming given that teachers already perceived their work as stressful and reported high rates of burnout prior to the pandemic. Mindfulness- and compassion-based interventions as well as socio-emotional learning interventions offer a promising approach to combating burnout among education professionals. Despite an increase in research efforts to alleviate burnout through such mental training intervention programs, partner-based Dyads have never been investigated in the school context. Yet, recent research suggests that these social practice formats are more efficient than classic mindfulness techniques practiced alone when it comes to reducing loneliness and social stress, boosting social connections and cohesion as well as resilience. Interestingly, the underlying mechanisms of these different types of interventions seem to be also rather different ones. Finally, the extent to which these interventions promote desired outcomes at the student, classroom, collegium, and system levels remains poorly known in the empirical literature.
This study is an extension of the CovSocial project and the preceding ReSource project, which provided evidence of the effectiveness of partner-based dyadic mental training interventions on stress reduction, psychological resilience, and social cohesion across multiple traits and state-level indicators of biopsychosocial health.
The first main goal of the proposed study is to test the efficacy of an adapted 10-week online empathy-compassion (EmCo) Dyad training program which both the original Affect Dyad inspired developed originally in the ReSource project and the 10-weeks online coaching Dyad program later developed in the context of the CovSocial project, and now includes an important differentiation between empathic and compassionate listening based on previous research in the lab.
A second main goal is to test the effects of such Dyad intervention in the educational context with a focus on boosting teachers' mental health and social capacities as well as their social networks and the classroom climate. The intervention effects will be measured in several families of outcomes which we will call domains: 1) mental health and resilience, 2) social emotions, 3) social interaction, 4) communication and listening skills, and 5) classroom climate. The third aim is to develop and validate two novel tasks, the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA) and the Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP). In exploring the use of both autonomic measures as well as voice recordings as indicators of the emotional states of the teachers in the classroom, we hope to provide more objective markers of training-induced changes in the teachers' social connections, emotional well-being, self-regulation skills, as well as communication competency during real-time class instruction.
The final aim is to assess underlying cognitive and affective mechanisms driving the observed changes in teachers' mental health, resilience, and social-emotional competencies.
In a multi-factorial mixed (between- and within-subjects) design, the type of intervention will serve as the between-subjects variable with two levels: (a) the EmCo dyad training and (b) a waitlist control group. The within-subject effects from pre- to post-intervention will be evaluated at three time points in the intervention group at the pre-test, mid-test (after 5 weeks), and post-test (after an additional 5 weeks). In the waitlist control group, the variables of interest will be assessed at three time points including pre-test, mid-test and post-test. In a second step, the waitlist control group will also undergo a 5-week period of empathy-based socio-emotional intervention, followed by another 5-week period of compassion-based socio-emotional intervention, using the same protocol and testing as above (sequential intervention approach). If recruitment barriers prevent the implementation of a waitlist control group, only the within-subject pre-post effects as well as all individual difference hypotheses will be tested.
The EmCo Dyad intervention implemented here is based on the daily Affect Dyad practice, and a 10-week program consisting of 10 teacher-guided 1.5-hour online coaching sessions to deepen the daily practice inspired by the CovSocial project. In comparison to the 10-week online training developed in the CovSocial project, an additional component has been added, namely the difference between empathic and compassionate listening. This Dyad program was designed to enhance a) interoceptive body awareness, b) acceptance of challenging emotions, c) resilience through gratitude and compassion, d) non-judgmental empathic and compassionate listening, e) social connectedness and f) common humanity. The topic of each weekly coaching session is organized according to these goals. The weekly coaching session is conducted by a skilled expert trainer with groups of about 20 teachers, following a consistent structure. These sessions include sharing personal experiences and difficulties with the Dyad practice in the group, and teacher-lead content presentations to enhance understanding of key aspects of the practice. Participants also say good-bye to their Dyad partner of the past week and get to know their new Dyad partner for the coming week in break-out rooms.
Participants in the EmCo training course complete a daily practice, six times per week, and weekly 1.5-hour online coaching sessions for 10 weeks via a study app.
The daily practice involves a 13-minute structured contemplative dialogue. It starts with a minute of silence, followed by partners taking turns speaking about one difficult situation (2.5 mins) and one situation that incurred gratitude (2.5 mins) in the past 24 hours. While the participants elaborate on each situation, they are asked to focus on the recall of the bodily experience of the emotions generated during the situation. The listener is asked to contemplate his/her partner's experiences in a non-judgmental manner. The session concludes with a final minute of silence. Participants are randomly assigned new partners each week.
- Conditions
- Burnout
- Being tested
- Empathy-based socio-emotional mental training
- Keywords
- Resilience, Burnout, Psychological distress, Stress, Mental health, Empathy, Compassion, Prosocial Behavior, Classroom climate, Teachers
- Medical subject headings
- Burnout, Psychological, Psychological Well-Being, Altruism
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Empathy-based socio-emotional mental trainingBehavioural
The goal of the EmCo dyad practice is to enhance coping with difficult emotions, empathic and compassionate listening, social sharing, acceptance, and gratitude. It involves a daily partner-based practice and weekly coaching sessions with expert teachers.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Empathy- and compassion-based socio-emotional mental training | Experimental | Core practice: In the EmCo Dyad, participants perform a 13-minute partner-based exercise that involves contemplating over one difficult situation and one situation that incurred gratitude in the past 24 hours. Both partners take turns speaking about the two situations while the other partner listens in a non-judgmental manner. While the participants elaborate on the situations, they are asked to focus on the bodily experience of the emotions generated during the situation.
The focus is on empathic listening in the first 5 weeks, and on compassionate listening in the remaining 5 weeks.
The coaching sessions help deepen the Dyad practice and educate teachers about body language, coping better with difficult emotions/stress, the benefits of empathy versus compassion and the act of listening from a mindset of empathy versus compassion. Receives: Behavioral: Empathy-based socio-emotional mental training |
| Control Group (Waitlist control) | No intervention | The control group will not undergo an intervention. This group will complete the self-report questionnaires but not the EMA and the pre-post dyad practice ratings. In a second step, the waitlist control group will also undergo a 5-week period of empathy-based socio-emotional intervention, followed by another 5-week period of compassion-based socio-emotional intervention, using the same protocol and testing as above (sequential intervention approach). |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline Depression Anxiety Stress Scale - 21 (DASS-21) scores at 5 and 10 weeks
A scale measuring depression, anxiety, and stress (Henry \& Crawford, 2005; Nilges \& Essau, 2021). The scale ranges from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicate more depression, anxiety, and stress.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline), after the first 5 weeks of training (Mid-Test), and then after the second 5 weeks of training (Post-Test)
Change from baseline Maslach Burnout Inventory-Educators Survey (MBI-ES) scores at 5 and 10 weeks
A scale measuring burnout (Maslach \& Jackson, 1981; Schwarzer et al., 2000). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more burnout.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline), after the first 5 weeks of training (Mid-Test), and then after the second 5 weeks of training (Post-Test)
Change from baseline Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) score at 5 and 10 weeks
A scale measuring psychological resilience (Connor \& Davidson, 2003; Sarubin et al., 2015). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more resilience.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline), after the first 5 weeks of training (Mid-Test), and then after the second 5 weeks of training (Post-Test)
Change from baseline Sussex-Oxford Compassion Scale for Self and Others (SOCS) scores at 10 weeks
A scale measuring self-compassion (SOCS-S) and compassion for others (SOCS-O; Gu et al., 2020). The scale ranges from 1 to5, where higher scores indicate more compassion.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline), at week 5 (after empathic listening training) and then again at week 10 (after compassionate listening training)
Change from baseline Active Listening Attitude Scale (ALAS) scores at 5 and 10 weeks
A scale measuring active listening (Mishima et al., 2000). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where, higher scores indicate more active listening.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline), after the first 5 weeks of training (Mid-Test), and then after the second 5 weeks of training (Post-Test)
Change from baseline Socio-Affective Video Task (SoVT) scores at 5 and 10 weeks
This task assesses behavioral empathy and compassion using emotional video clips (Kanske et al., 2015; Klimecki et al., 2013; Valk et al., 2016). Higher scores indicate more empathy or more compassion.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline), at week 5 (after empathic listening training), and then again at week 10 (after compassionate listening training)
Change from baseline Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP) scores at 5 and 10 weeks
In this task, teacher-reported perceptions of their classroom and workplace networks are used to assess the frequency and pleasantness of interactions, as well as relationships within the network. Higher scores indicate more (a) Teacher-perceived interaction frequency (with pupils and teachers), (b) Teacher-perceived network density (% of total ties / all possible ties) (of the classroom, and of work colleagues), (c) Teacher-perceived interaction pleasantness ratio (pupil-pupil and teacher-teacher).
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline), after the first 5 weeks of training (Mid-Test), and then after the second 5 weeks of training (Post-Test)
Change from baseline Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) functioning at 10 weeks: Physiological Resting Baseline - electrocardiogram [ECG]
Resting assessment of autonomic physiology. Participants sit quietly with eyes closed and no specific task is given. Autonomic activity will be measured with PLUX Biosignals sensors including a 3-point ECG sensor attached to the chest.
Resting autonomic physiology data will be analyzed with PLUX OpenSignals software to assess Heart Rate Variability (HRV).
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) functioning at 10 weeks: Physiological Resting Baseline - electrodermal activity [EDA]
Resting assessment of autonomic physiology. Participants sit quietly with eyes closed and no specific task is given. Autonomic activity will be measured with PLUX Biosignals sensors including a 2-point EDA sensor attached to the index and middle fingers of the non-dominant hand.
Resting autonomic physiology data will be analyzed with PLUX OpenSignals software to assess Skin Conductance Response (SCR)
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) functioning at 10 weeks: Physiological Resting Baseline - inductive respiration
Resting assessment of autonomic physiology. Participants sit quietly with eyes closed and no specific task is given. Autonomic activity will be measured with PLUX Biosignals sensors including an inductive respiration adjustable chest strap. Resting autonomic physiology data will be analyzed with PLUX OpenSignals software to assess Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia (RSA) and breathing cycle amplitude and frequency
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) regulation at 10 weeks: Heart Rate Variability
Phasic assessment of autonomic physiology as participants complete a semi-structured lesson plan in classrooms. Participants watch a series of short clips from Inside Out with their students. These clips have emotional (positive and negative) content. After watching the clips participants facilitate a class discussion encouraging students to consider the function of various emotions and self-regulation strategies for managing difficult emotional experiences. Following the discussion, participants are asked to sit quietly while students complete self-report surveys.
Phasic autonomic physiology data will be analyzed with PLUX OpenSignals software to assess HRV and RSA (3-point ECG attached to the chest)
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) regulation at 10 weeks: Skin Conductance
Phasic assessment of autonomic physiology as participants complete a semi-structured lesson plan in classrooms. Participants watch a series of short clips from Inside Out with their students. These clips have emotional (positive and negative) content. After watching the clips participants facilitate a class discussion encouraging students to consider the function of various emotions and self-regulation strategies for managing difficult emotional experiences. Following the discussion, participants are asked to sit quietly while students complete self-report surveys.
Phasic autonomic physiology data will be analyzed with PLUX OpenSignals software to assess SCR (2-point EDA attached to the non-dominant hand)
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) regulation at 10 weeks: inductive respiration
Phasic assessment of autonomic physiology as participants complete a semi-structured lesson plan in classrooms. Participants watch a series of short clips from Inside Out with their students. These clips have emotional (positive and negative) content. After watching the clips participants facilitate a class discussion encouraging students to consider the function of various emotions and self-regulation strategies for managing difficult emotional experiences. Following the discussion, participants are asked to sit quietly while students complete self-report surveys.
Phasic autonomic physiology data will be analyzed with PLUX OpenSignals software to assess inductive Respiration (adjustable chest strap)
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline Vocalized Emotional Expressions at 10 weeks - prosodic features
Acoustic assessment of vocalized emotions as participants complete a semi-structured lesson plan in their classrooms. Participants record their own voices for 15 minutes as they encourage students' engagement during the classroom discussion component of the test lesson. Two sets of simultaneous voice recordings will be collected on participants' phones as well as a research phone. A lapel microphone connected to the research phone will be attached to the participants' collars. Participants' own phones will be placed in a phone case lanyard necklace worn around the neck.
Vocalized emotions will be analyzed with audEERING devAIce software to assess prosodic features (e.g., pitch, voice quality [jitter and shimmer])
Measured: the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline Vocalized Emotional Expressions at 10 weeks - affect dimensions
Acoustic assessment of vocalized emotions as participants complete a semi-structured lesson plan in their classrooms. Participants record their own voices for 15 minutes as they encourage students' engagement during the classroom discussion component of the test lesson. Two sets of simultaneous voice recordings will be collected on participants' phones as well as a research phone. A lapel microphone connected to the research phone will be attached to the participants' collars. Participants' own phones will be placed in a phone case lanyard necklace worn around the neck.
Vocalized emotions will be analyzed with audEERING devAIce software to assess affect dimensions (e.g., activation [arousal], valence, and dominance)
Measured: the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline Vocalized Communication Behaviors at 10 weeks - sensitivity in communication
Acoustic assessment of vocalized communication behaviors as participants complete a semi-structured lesson plan in their classrooms. Participants record their own voice for 15 minutes as they encourage students' engagement during the classroom discussion component of the test lesson. Two sets of simultaneous voice recordings will be collected on participants' personal phones as well as a research phone. A lapel microphone connected to the research phone will be attached to participants' collar. Participants' own phone will be placed in a phone case lanyard necklace worn around the neck.
Vocalized communication behaviors will be analyzed with audEERING devAIce software to assess tone, rate, and dominance scores indicate sensitivity in communication.
Lower tone, rate and dominance scores represent higher sensitivity in communication.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoints, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline Vocalized Communication Behaviors at 10 weeks - silence
Acoustic assessment of vocalized communication behaviors as participants complete a semi-structured lesson plan in their classrooms. Participants record their own voice for 15 minutes as they encourage students' engagement during the classroom discussion component of the test lesson. Two sets of simultaneous voice recordings will be collected on participants' personal phones as well as a research phone. A lapel microphone connected to the research phone will be attached to participants' collar. Participants' own phone will be placed in a phone case lanyard necklace worn around the neck.
Vocalized communication behaviors will be analyzed with audEERING devAIce software to assess the teacher's silence and background sounds indicate the teacher's listening. Higher rates of teacher's silence represent higher listening.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoints, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline listening at 10 weeks
Self-generated items measure active listening during classroom discussions (Mishima et al., 2000). The scale ranges from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate more active listening.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoints, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline Academic Productive Dialogue (APD) scores at 10 weeks
A scale measuring the productivity of a classroom dialog (Gutentag et al., 2022). The scale ranges from 1 to 5. Higher scores mean more engagement and productivity in the dialog.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoints, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline Mindfulness in Teaching Scale (MTS) scores at 10 weeks
A scale measuring mindfulness in teaching during the classroom discussion (Frank et al., 2016). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more mindfulness in teaching.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoints, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline Teacher Self-Efficacy Scale (TSES) scores at 10 weeks
A scale measuring teacher self-efficacy when engaging students (Pfitzner-Eden, 2016; Tschannen-Moran \& Hoy, 2001).The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more self-efficacy.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoints, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline Affect Grid scores at 10 weeks
A scale measuring emotional state (valence) and arousal (Russell et al., 1989). Higher scores on valence and arousal indicate more positive affect and arousal.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline Stress levels at 10 weeks
Custom items based on the Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM; Delahaye et al., 2015; Peacock \& Wong, 1990) and the Cognitive Control and Flexibility Questionnaire (CCFQ; Gabrys et al., 2018) measuring stress intensity and feelings of emotional control. The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more intense stress or higher emotional control.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Custom items based on the Brief-COPE (Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005), Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011) and Self-Compassion Scale (SCS; Albertson et al., 2015; Hupfeld \& Ruffieux, 2011) measuring Coping Strategies (Acceptance and Curiosity, Positive Reinterpretation, Rumination, Self-Blame). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate a higher use of the specified coping strategies.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoints, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline emotional expressions at 10 weeks
Custom items based on an Emotional Labor Strategy Questionnaire (ELSQ; Diefendorff et al., 2005) measure Emotional Expressions (surface acting, emotional dissonance, emotional congruence, emotional authenticity). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more surface acting / emotional dissonance or emotional congruence / emotional authenticity.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoints, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline student-reported Student Personal Perception of Classroom Climate (SPPCC) scores at 10 weeks
A scale measuring classroom climate (Rowe et al., 2010).The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate a better classroom climate. Completed by the pupils.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline student-reported Classroom Belonging Scale (CBS) scores at 10 weeks
A scale measuring classroom belonging (Dong Zhao et al., 2019). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more classroom belonging. Completed by the pupils.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline classroom discussion climate at 10 weeks
Custom items measuring students' perception of classroom discussion. The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate a better classroom discussion climate. Completed by the pupils.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline observer-rated Affect Grid scores at 10 weeks
A scale measuring emotional state (valence) and arousal (Russell et al., 1989). Higher scores on valence and arousal indicate more positive affect and arousal. Completed by independent observers.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline observer-rated teacher listening and communication behaviors at 10 weeks
Custom items based on a Psychological Safety Coding Scheme (O'Donovan et al., 2021) measuring teacher listening and communication behaviors. The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more listening and communication skills. Completed by independent observers.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoints, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline observer-rated student engagement & communication behaviors at 10 weeks
Custom items based on a Psychological Safety Coding Scheme (O'Donovan et al., 2021) measuring student engagement and communication. The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more observer-rated student engagement and communication. Completed by independent observers.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoints, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Change from baseline Affect Grid scores at 10 weeks
A scale measuring emotional state (valence) and arousal (Russell et al., 1989). Higher scores on valence and arousal indicate more positive affect and arousal.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention over a two-week period (Baseline), at week 5 (once), and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoint again for two-week
Change from baseline Positive Teaching Practices Scale (PTPS) scores at 10 weeks
A scale measuring positive teaching practices (Baumgartner et al., 2021). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more positive teaching practices.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention over a two-week period (Baseline), at week 5 (once), and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoint again for two-week
Change from baseline Stress levels at 10 weeks
Custom items based on the Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM; Delahaye et al., 2015; Peacock \& Wong, 1990) and the Cognitive Control and Flexibility Questionnaire (CCFQ; Gabrys et al., 2018) measuring stress intensity and feelings of emotional control. The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more intense stress.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention over a two-week period (Baseline), at week 5 (once), and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoint again for two-week
Change from baseline coping strategies at 10 weeks
Custom items based on the Brief-COPE (Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005), Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011) and Self-Compassion Scale (SCS; Albertson et al., 2015; Hupfeld \& Ruffieux, 2011) measuring Coping Strategies (Acceptance and Curiosity, Positive Reinterpretation, Rumination, Self-Blame). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate a higher use of the specified coping strategies.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention over a two-week period (Baseline), at week 5 (once), and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoint again for two-week
Change from baseline Empathy Scale for Teachers (EST) scores at 10 weeks
A scale measuring teacher empathy (Wang et al., 2022). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more empathy
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention over a two-week period (Baseline), at week 5 (once), and then after 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoint again for two-week
Change from baseline Compassionate Love Scale (Close Others Version) scores at 10 weeks
A scale measuring teacher compassion (Sprecher \& Fehr, 2005). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more compassion.
Measured: Assessed at pre-intervention over a two-week period (Baseline), at week 5 (once), and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoint again for two-week
Secondary outcomes (16)
Cognitive Control and Flexibility Questionnaire (CCFQ) (explanatory mechanism)
A scale measuring cognitive control over emotions (Gabrys et al., 2018). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate more cognitive control over emotions. 3 items from the Cognitive Control over Emotion subscale.
Measured: Assessed weekly during the course of 10 weeks
Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) scores - Self-Regulation (explanatory mechanisms)
A scale measuring levels of interoceptive awareness (Mehling et al., 2012; Mehling \& Bornemann, 2012). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more interoceptive awareness. 3 items from the Self-Regulation subscale.
Measured: Assessed weekly during the course of 10 weeks
Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale (PHLMS) (explanatory mechanism)
A scale measuring two subdimensions of mindfulness (Cardaciotto et al., 2008). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate higher awareness or acceptance. 3 items each from the following two subscales: Awareness and Acceptance.
Measured: Assessed weekly during the course of 10 weeks
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form (DERS-SF) (explanatory mechanism)
A scale measuring difficulties in using emotion regulation strategies (Gutzweiler \& In-Albon, 2018; Kaufman et al., 2016). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more difficulties in emotion regulation. 3 items from the Non-acceptance subscale.
Measured: Assessed weekly during the course of 10 weeks
Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) (explanatory mechanism)
A scale measuring different facets of social emotions, including personal distress and empathic concern (Davis, 1980b, 1980a). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate higher personal distress or empathic concern. 3 items each from the following two subscales: Personal Distress and Empathic Concern.
Measured: Assessed weekly during the course of 10 weeks
Listening
Custom items measuring listening quality. The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate better listening. 5 items.
Measured: Assessed weekly during the course of 10 weeks
Gratitude Questionnaire-6 (GQ-6) (explanatory mechanism)
A scale measuring gratitude (Hudecek et al., 2021; McCullough et al., 2002). The scale ranges from 1 to 7, where higher scores indicate more gratitude. 3 items.
Measured: Assessed weekly during the course of 10 weeks
Coping strategies (explanatory mechanism)
Custom items based on the Brief-COPE (Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005), Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011) and Self-Compassion Scale (SCS; Albertson et al., 2015; Hupfeld \& Ruffieux, 2011) measuring Coping Strategies (Acceptance and Curiosity, Positive Reinterpretation, Rumination, Self-Blame). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate a higher use of the specified coping strategies. 5 items.
Measured: Assessed weekly during the course of 10 weeks
Affect Grid (explanatory mechanism)
Assessment of emotional state (valence) and arousal (Russell et al., 1989). Higher scores on valence and arousal indicate more positive affect and arousal.
Measured: Assessed weekly during the course of 10 weeks of intervention only in intervention group
Social connectedness - Inclusion of Other in Self Scale (explanatory mechanism)
Assessment of how connected participant felt to the dyad partner (pre- and post-dyad exercise). The scale ranges from 1 to 10, where higher scores indicate more social connectedness (Aron et al., 1992; Kinnunen \& Windmann, 2013).
Measured: Assessed for 10 weeks during intervention period, twice a week, only in the intervention group, prior to and after the daily exercise
Personal Self-Disclosure with Partner
Custom item assessing Personal Self-Disclosure with Partner (only post-dyad exercise). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more self-disclosure.
Measured: Assessed for 10 weeks during intervention period, twice a week, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise
Emotional Authenticity
Custom item assessing Emotional Authenticity (only post-dyad exercise) adapted from the Emotional Labor Strategy Questionnaire (ELSQ; Diefendorff et al., 2005). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate higher emotional authenticity.
Measured: Assessed for 10 weeks during intervention period, twice a week, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise
Listening (emotional resonance)
Assessment of listening (2 custom items; only post-dyad exercise). The scale ranges from -10 (for negative mood) to 10 (for positive mood), where Higher changes in affect in accordance with the dyad practice indicate higher resonance.
Measured: Assessed for 10 weeks during intervention period, twice a week, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise
Listening engagement
Assessment of listening engagement (1 custom item; only post-dyad exercise). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more listening engagement.
Measured: Assessed for 10 weeks during intervention period, twice a week, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise
Qualitative Empathic Listening Diary
Two custom qualitative questions asking about how it felt to engage in empathic listening during the dyad.
Measured: Assessed once during intervention period, at week 5, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise
Qualitative Compassionate Listening diary
Two custom qualitative questions asking about how it felt to engage in compassionate listening during the dyad.
Measured: Assessed once at the end of the intervention period, at week 10, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jun 2024
- Study start20 Jun 2024
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (68)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for BurnoutStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Max Planck Social Neuroscience Lab
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Tania Singer, PhD, Principal investigator, Social Neuroscience Lab of the Max Planck Society
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06477250
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Edu:Social School Project
- Acronym
- EduSocial1
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 18 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 26 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Albertson, E. R., Neff, K. D., & Dill-Shackleford, K. E. (2015). Self-compassion and body dissatisfaction in women: A randomized controlled trial of a brief meditation intervention. Mindfulness, 6(3), 444-454.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596-612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
Bagby RM, Parker JD, Taylor GJ. The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale--I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. J Psychosom Res. 1994 Jan;38(1):23-32. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90005-1.
PubMed 8126686Baumgartner, J., Ota, C., DiCarlo, C., Bauer, R., & Carson, R. (2021). Using Ecological Momentary Assessment to Examine the Relationship Between Childcare Teachers' Stress, Classroom Behaviors, and Afterhours Professionalism Activities. Child Care in Practice, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279.2021.1962247
Beutel ME, Hettich N, Ernst M, Schmutzer G, Tibubos AN, Braehler E. Mental health and loneliness in the German general population during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to a representative pre-pandemic assessment. Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 22;11(1):14946. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94434-8.
PubMed 34294816Kupfer J, Brosig B, Brahler E. [Testing and validation of the 26-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in a representative population sample]. Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2000;46(4):368-384. doi: 10.13109/zptm.2000.46.4.368. German.
PubMed 11793322Cardaciotto L, Herbert JD, Forman EM, Moitra E, Farrow V. The assessment of present-moment awareness and acceptance: the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale. Assessment. 2008 Jun;15(2):204-23. doi: 10.1177/1073191107311467. Epub 2008 Jan 9.
PubMed 18187399Carver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92-100. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6.
PubMed 16250744Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76-82. doi: 10.1002/da.10113.
PubMed 12964174Davis, M. H. (1980a). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
Davis, M. H. (1980b). Interpersonal Reactivity Index. https://doi.org/10.1037/t01093-000
Delahaye M, Stieglitz RD, Graf M, Keppler C, Maes J, Pflueger M. [German translation and validation of the Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM)]. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2015 May;83(5):276-85. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1399727. Epub 2015 May 27. German.
PubMed 26018395Diefendorff, J. M., Croyle, M. H., & Gosserand, R. H. (2005). The dimensionality and antecedents of emotional labor strategies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 339-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.02.001
Dong Zhao, Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., & Meltem Duva. (2019, June 15). Measuring Students' Class-level Sense of Belonging: A Social-network-based Approach. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--33093
Frank, J. L., Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2016). Validation of the Mindfulness in Teaching Scale. Mindfulness, 7(1), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0461-0
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigating the Effects of an Online Empathy-Compassion Dyad Intervention on Teacher Resilience, Mental Health, Social Emotions, Social Communication, and Interactions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06477250
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EduSocial1 / Edu:Social School Project
- Conditions
- Burnout
- Keywords
- Resilience, Burnout, Psychological distress, Stress, Mental health, Empathy, Compassion, Prosocial Behavior
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Max Planck Social Neuroscience LabUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
- Study start
- 20 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The COVID-19 pandemic increased psychological burdens in Germany, especially among teachers who have reported higher levels of emotional exhaustion and burnout compared to the general population. Even before the pandemic, teachers found their work highly stressful. Mindfulness- and compassion-based interventions, as well as socio-emotional learning interventions, show promise in combating burnout among educators. Despite increased research, partner-based Dyads have not been explored in schools. Recent studies suggest these social practice formats are more effective than solo mindfulness techniques in reducing loneliness, and social stress, and enhancing social connections and resilience. Additionally, the impact of these interventions on student, classroom, collegium, and system levels remains under-researched.
This study extends the CovSocial project and the ReSource project, which showed the effectiveness of partner-based dyadic mental training on stress reduction, resilience, and social cohesion. The first goal is to test a 10-week online empathy-compassion (EmCo) Dyad training program, inspired by the Affect Dyad from the ReSource project and the online coaching Dyad from the CovSocial project, incorporating empathic and compassionate listening.
The second goal is to evaluate the Dyad intervention's effects in an educational context, focusing on teachers' mental health, social capacities, social networks, and classroom climate, measured across: 1) mental health and resilience, 2) social emotions, 3) social interaction, 4) communication and listening skills, and 5) classroom climate. The third aim is to develop and validate the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA) and the Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP), using autonomic measures and voice recordings to assess teachers' emotional states. The final aim is to investigate the cognitive and affective mechanisms driving changes in teachers' mental health, resilience, and social-emotional competencies.
Detailed description
The COVID-19 pandemic led to a dramatic rise in psychological burden and strain within Germany. German teachers, specifically, have reported increased emotional exhaustion and professional burnout, at levels exceeding those of the general population. The rise in teacher burnout is particularly alarming given that teachers already perceived their work as stressful and reported high rates of burnout prior to the pandemic. Mindfulness- and compassion-based interventions as well as socio-emotional learning interventions offer a promising approach to combating burnout among education professionals. Despite an increase in research efforts to alleviate burnout through such mental training intervention programs, partner-based Dyads have never been investigated in the school context. Yet, recent research suggests that these social practice formats are more efficient than classic mindfulness techniques practiced alone when it comes to reducing loneliness and social stress, boosting social connections and cohesion as well as resilience. Interestingly, the underlying mechanisms of these different types of interventions seem to be also rather different ones. Finally, the extent to which these interventions promote desired outcomes at the student, classroom, collegium, and system levels remains poorly known in the empirical literature.
This study is an extension of the CovSocial project and the preceding ReSource project, which provided evidence of the effectiveness of partner-based dyadic mental training interventions on stress reduction, psychological resilience, and social cohesion across multiple traits and state-level indicators of biopsychosocial health.
The first main goal of the proposed study is to test the efficacy of an adapted 10-week online empathy-compassion (EmCo) Dyad training program which both the original Affect Dyad inspired developed originally in the ReSource project and the 10-weeks online coaching Dyad program later developed in the context of the CovSocial project, and now includes an important differentiation between empathic and compassionate listening based on previous research in the lab.
A second main goal is to test the effects of such Dyad intervention in the educational context with a focus on boosting teachers' mental health and social capacities as well as their social networks and the classroom climate. The intervention effects will be measured in several families of outcomes which we will call domains: 1) mental health and resilience, 2) social emotions, 3) social interaction, 4) communication and listening skills, and 5) classroom climate. The third aim is to develop and validate two novel tasks, the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA) and the Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP). In exploring the use of both autonomic measures as well as voice recordings as indicators of the emotional states of the teachers in the classroom, we hope to provide more objective markers of training-induced changes in the teachers' social connections, emotional well-being, self-regulation skills, as well as communication competency during real-time class instruction.
The final aim is to assess underlying cognitive and affective mechanisms driving the observed changes in teachers' mental health, resilience, and social-emotional competencies.
In a multi-factorial mixed (between- and within-subjects) design, the type of intervention will serve as the between-subjects variable with two levels: (a) the EmCo dyad training and (b) a waitlist control group. The within-subject effects from pre- to post-intervention will be evaluated at three time points in the intervention group at the pre-test, mid-test (after 5 weeks), and post-test (after an additional 5 weeks). In the waitlist control group, the variables of interest will be assessed at three time points including pre-test, mid-test and post-test. In a second step, the waitlist control group will also undergo a 5-week period of empathy-based socio-emotional intervention, followed by another 5-week period of compassion-based socio-emotional intervention, using the same protocol and testing as above (sequential intervention approach). If recruitment barriers prevent the implementation of a waitlist control group, only the within-subject pre-post effects as well as all individual difference hypotheses will be tested.
The EmCo Dyad intervention implemented here is based on the daily Affect Dyad practice, and a 10-week program consisting of 10 teacher-guided 1.5-hour online coaching sessions to deepen the daily practice inspired by the CovSocial project. In comparison to the 10-week online training developed in the CovSocial project, an additional component has been added, namely the difference between empathic and compassionate listening. This Dyad program was designed to enhance a) interoceptive body awareness, b) acceptance of challenging emotions, c) resilience through gratitude and compassion, d) non-judgmental empathic and compassionate listening, e) social connectedness and f) common humanity. The topic of each weekly coaching session is organized according to these goals. The weekly coaching session is conducted by a skilled expert trainer with groups of about 20 teachers, following a consistent structure. These sessions include sharing personal experiences and difficulties with the Dyad practice in the group, and teacher-lead content presentations to enhance understanding of key aspects of the practice. Participants also say good-bye to their Dyad partner of the past week and get to know their new Dyad partner for the coming week in break-out rooms.
Participants in the EmCo training course complete a daily practice, six times per week, and weekly 1.5-hour online coaching sessions for 10 weeks via a study app.
The daily practice involves a 13-minute structured contemplative dialogue. It starts with a minute of silence, followed by partners taking turns speaking about one difficult situation (2.5 mins) and one situation that incurred gratitude (2.5 mins) in the past 24 hours. While the participants elaborate on each situation, they are asked to focus on the recall of the bodily experience of the emotions generated during the situation. The listener is asked to contemplate his/her partner's experiences in a non-judgmental manner. The session concludes with a final minute of silence. Participants are randomly assigned new partners each week.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Empathy- and compassion-based socio-emotional mental training | Experimental | Behavioral: Empathy-based socio-emotional mental trainingCore practice: In the EmCo Dyad, participants perform a 13-minute partner-based exercise that involves contemplating over one difficult situation and one situation that incurred gratitude in the past 24 hours. Both partners take turns speaking about the two situations while the other partner listens in a non-judgmental manner. While the participants elaborate on the situations, they are asked to focus on the bodily experience of the emotions generated during the situation. The focus is on empathic listening in the first 5 weeks, and on compassionate listening in the remaining 5 weeks. The coaching sessions help deepen the Dyad practice and educate teachers about body language, coping better with difficult emotions/stress, the benefits of empathy versus compassion and the act of listening from a mindset of empathy versus compassion. |
| Control Group (Waitlist control) | No intervention | –The control group will not undergo an intervention. This group will complete the self-report questionnaires but not the EMA and the pre-post dyad practice ratings. In a second step, the waitlist control group will also undergo a 5-week period of empathy-based socio-emotional intervention, followed by another 5-week period of compassion-based socio-emotional intervention, using the same protocol and testing as above (sequential intervention approach). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- between 18- and 65-years old
- registered residents of Germany
- currently employed as a teacher in Germany
- proficient in the German language
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- if they do not have access to the internet or technical equipment necessary.
- if they have a history of or current psychiatric diagnosis.
- Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20; Bagby et al., 1994; Brähler et al., 2000; exclude if score greater than 60)
- Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Gräfe et al., 2004; Löwe et al., 2004; exclude if scores greater than 19) low 2004
- Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7; Löwe et al., 2007; Spitzer et al., 2006; exclude if scores greater than 15)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Empathy-based socio-emotional mental trainingThe goal of the EmCo dyad practice is to enhance coping with difficult emotions, empathic and compassionate listening, social sharing, acceptance, and gratitude. It involves a daily partner-based practice and weekly coaching sessions with expert teachers. | Behavioural | Empathy- and compassion-based socio-emotional mental training |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline Depression Anxiety Stress Scale - 21 (DASS-21) scores at 5 and 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline), after the first 5 weeks of training (Mid-Test), and then after the second 5 weeks of training (Post-Test)
A scale measuring depression, anxiety, and stress (Henry \& Crawford, 2005; Nilges \& Essau, 2021). The scale ranges from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicate more depression, anxiety, and stress.
Change from baseline Maslach Burnout Inventory-Educators Survey (MBI-ES) scores at 5 and 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline), after the first 5 weeks of training (Mid-Test), and then after the second 5 weeks of training (Post-Test)
A scale measuring burnout (Maslach \& Jackson, 1981; Schwarzer et al., 2000). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more burnout.
Change from baseline Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) score at 5 and 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline), after the first 5 weeks of training (Mid-Test), and then after the second 5 weeks of training (Post-Test)
A scale measuring psychological resilience (Connor \& Davidson, 2003; Sarubin et al., 2015). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more resilience.
Change from baseline Sussex-Oxford Compassion Scale for Self and Others (SOCS) scores at 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline), at week 5 (after empathic listening training) and then again at week 10 (after compassionate listening training)
A scale measuring self-compassion (SOCS-S) and compassion for others (SOCS-O; Gu et al., 2020). The scale ranges from 1 to5, where higher scores indicate more compassion.
Change from baseline Active Listening Attitude Scale (ALAS) scores at 5 and 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline), after the first 5 weeks of training (Mid-Test), and then after the second 5 weeks of training (Post-Test)
A scale measuring active listening (Mishima et al., 2000). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where, higher scores indicate more active listening.
Change from baseline Socio-Affective Video Task (SoVT) scores at 5 and 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline), at week 5 (after empathic listening training), and then again at week 10 (after compassionate listening training)
This task assesses behavioral empathy and compassion using emotional video clips (Kanske et al., 2015; Klimecki et al., 2013; Valk et al., 2016). Higher scores indicate more empathy or more compassion.
Change from baseline Egocentric Social Network Analysis Paradigm (e-SNAP) scores at 5 and 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline), after the first 5 weeks of training (Mid-Test), and then after the second 5 weeks of training (Post-Test)
In this task, teacher-reported perceptions of their classroom and workplace networks are used to assess the frequency and pleasantness of interactions, as well as relationships within the network. Higher scores indicate more (a) Teacher-perceived interaction frequency (with pupils and teachers), (b) Teacher-perceived network density (% of total ties / all possible ties) (of the classroom, and of work colleagues), (c) Teacher-perceived interaction pleasantness ratio (pupil-pupil and teacher-teacher).
Change from baseline Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) functioning at 10 weeks: Physiological Resting Baseline - electrocardiogram [ECG]
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Resting assessment of autonomic physiology. Participants sit quietly with eyes closed and no specific task is given. Autonomic activity will be measured with PLUX Biosignals sensors including a 3-point ECG sensor attached to the chest. Resting autonomic physiology data will be analyzed with PLUX OpenSignals software to assess Heart Rate Variability (HRV).
Change from baseline Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) functioning at 10 weeks: Physiological Resting Baseline - electrodermal activity [EDA]
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Resting assessment of autonomic physiology. Participants sit quietly with eyes closed and no specific task is given. Autonomic activity will be measured with PLUX Biosignals sensors including a 2-point EDA sensor attached to the index and middle fingers of the non-dominant hand. Resting autonomic physiology data will be analyzed with PLUX OpenSignals software to assess Skin Conductance Response (SCR)
Change from baseline Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) functioning at 10 weeks: Physiological Resting Baseline - inductive respiration
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Resting assessment of autonomic physiology. Participants sit quietly with eyes closed and no specific task is given. Autonomic activity will be measured with PLUX Biosignals sensors including an inductive respiration adjustable chest strap. Resting autonomic physiology data will be analyzed with PLUX OpenSignals software to assess Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia (RSA) and breathing cycle amplitude and frequency
Change from baseline Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) regulation at 10 weeks: Heart Rate Variability
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Phasic assessment of autonomic physiology as participants complete a semi-structured lesson plan in classrooms. Participants watch a series of short clips from Inside Out with their students. These clips have emotional (positive and negative) content. After watching the clips participants facilitate a class discussion encouraging students to consider the function of various emotions and self-regulation strategies for managing difficult emotional experiences. Following the discussion, participants are asked to sit quietly while students complete self-report surveys. Phasic autonomic physiology data will be analyzed with PLUX OpenSignals software to assess HRV and RSA (3-point ECG attached to the chest)
Change from baseline Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) regulation at 10 weeks: Skin Conductance
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Phasic assessment of autonomic physiology as participants complete a semi-structured lesson plan in classrooms. Participants watch a series of short clips from Inside Out with their students. These clips have emotional (positive and negative) content. After watching the clips participants facilitate a class discussion encouraging students to consider the function of various emotions and self-regulation strategies for managing difficult emotional experiences. Following the discussion, participants are asked to sit quietly while students complete self-report surveys. Phasic autonomic physiology data will be analyzed with PLUX OpenSignals software to assess SCR (2-point EDA attached to the non-dominant hand)
Change from baseline Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) regulation at 10 weeks: inductive respiration
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Phasic assessment of autonomic physiology as participants complete a semi-structured lesson plan in classrooms. Participants watch a series of short clips from Inside Out with their students. These clips have emotional (positive and negative) content. After watching the clips participants facilitate a class discussion encouraging students to consider the function of various emotions and self-regulation strategies for managing difficult emotional experiences. Following the discussion, participants are asked to sit quietly while students complete self-report surveys. Phasic autonomic physiology data will be analyzed with PLUX OpenSignals software to assess inductive Respiration (adjustable chest strap)
Change from baseline Vocalized Emotional Expressions at 10 weeks - prosodic features
Time frame: the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Acoustic assessment of vocalized emotions as participants complete a semi-structured lesson plan in their classrooms. Participants record their own voices for 15 minutes as they encourage students' engagement during the classroom discussion component of the test lesson. Two sets of simultaneous voice recordings will be collected on participants' phones as well as a research phone. A lapel microphone connected to the research phone will be attached to the participants' collars. Participants' own phones will be placed in a phone case lanyard necklace worn around the neck. Vocalized emotions will be analyzed with audEERING devAIce software to assess prosodic features (e.g., pitch, voice quality [jitter and shimmer])
Change from baseline Vocalized Emotional Expressions at 10 weeks - affect dimensions
Time frame: the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Acoustic assessment of vocalized emotions as participants complete a semi-structured lesson plan in their classrooms. Participants record their own voices for 15 minutes as they encourage students' engagement during the classroom discussion component of the test lesson. Two sets of simultaneous voice recordings will be collected on participants' phones as well as a research phone. A lapel microphone connected to the research phone will be attached to the participants' collars. Participants' own phones will be placed in a phone case lanyard necklace worn around the neck. Vocalized emotions will be analyzed with audEERING devAIce software to assess affect dimensions (e.g., activation [arousal], valence, and dominance)
Change from baseline Vocalized Communication Behaviors at 10 weeks - sensitivity in communication
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoints, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Acoustic assessment of vocalized communication behaviors as participants complete a semi-structured lesson plan in their classrooms. Participants record their own voice for 15 minutes as they encourage students' engagement during the classroom discussion component of the test lesson. Two sets of simultaneous voice recordings will be collected on participants' personal phones as well as a research phone. A lapel microphone connected to the research phone will be attached to participants' collar. Participants' own phone will be placed in a phone case lanyard necklace worn around the neck. Vocalized communication behaviors will be analyzed with audEERING devAIce software to assess tone, rate, and dominance scores indicate sensitivity in communication. Lower tone, rate and dominance scores represent higher sensitivity in communication.
Change from baseline Vocalized Communication Behaviors at 10 weeks - silence
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoints, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Acoustic assessment of vocalized communication behaviors as participants complete a semi-structured lesson plan in their classrooms. Participants record their own voice for 15 minutes as they encourage students' engagement during the classroom discussion component of the test lesson. Two sets of simultaneous voice recordings will be collected on participants' personal phones as well as a research phone. A lapel microphone connected to the research phone will be attached to participants' collar. Participants' own phone will be placed in a phone case lanyard necklace worn around the neck. Vocalized communication behaviors will be analyzed with audEERING devAIce software to assess the teacher's silence and background sounds indicate the teacher's listening. Higher rates of teacher's silence represent higher listening.
Change from baseline listening at 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoints, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Self-generated items measure active listening during classroom discussions (Mishima et al., 2000). The scale ranges from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate more active listening.
Change from baseline Academic Productive Dialogue (APD) scores at 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoints, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
A scale measuring the productivity of a classroom dialog (Gutentag et al., 2022). The scale ranges from 1 to 5. Higher scores mean more engagement and productivity in the dialog.
Change from baseline Mindfulness in Teaching Scale (MTS) scores at 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoints, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
A scale measuring mindfulness in teaching during the classroom discussion (Frank et al., 2016). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more mindfulness in teaching.
Change from baseline Teacher Self-Efficacy Scale (TSES) scores at 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoints, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
A scale measuring teacher self-efficacy when engaging students (Pfitzner-Eden, 2016; Tschannen-Moran \& Hoy, 2001).The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more self-efficacy.
Change from baseline Affect Grid scores at 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
A scale measuring emotional state (valence) and arousal (Russell et al., 1989). Higher scores on valence and arousal indicate more positive affect and arousal.
Change from baseline Stress levels at 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Custom items based on the Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM; Delahaye et al., 2015; Peacock \& Wong, 1990) and the Cognitive Control and Flexibility Questionnaire (CCFQ; Gabrys et al., 2018) measuring stress intensity and feelings of emotional control. The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more intense stress or higher emotional control.
Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoints, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Custom items based on the Brief-COPE (Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005), Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011) and Self-Compassion Scale (SCS; Albertson et al., 2015; Hupfeld \& Ruffieux, 2011) measuring Coping Strategies (Acceptance and Curiosity, Positive Reinterpretation, Rumination, Self-Blame). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate a higher use of the specified coping strategies.
Change from baseline emotional expressions at 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoints, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Custom items based on an Emotional Labor Strategy Questionnaire (ELSQ; Diefendorff et al., 2005) measure Emotional Expressions (surface acting, emotional dissonance, emotional congruence, emotional authenticity). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more surface acting / emotional dissonance or emotional congruence / emotional authenticity.
Change from baseline student-reported Student Personal Perception of Classroom Climate (SPPCC) scores at 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
A scale measuring classroom climate (Rowe et al., 2010).The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate a better classroom climate. Completed by the pupils.
Change from baseline student-reported Classroom Belonging Scale (CBS) scores at 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
A scale measuring classroom belonging (Dong Zhao et al., 2019). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more classroom belonging. Completed by the pupils.
Change from baseline classroom discussion climate at 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Custom items measuring students' perception of classroom discussion. The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate a better classroom discussion climate. Completed by the pupils.
Change from baseline observer-rated Affect Grid scores at 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention time points, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
A scale measuring emotional state (valence) and arousal (Russell et al., 1989). Higher scores on valence and arousal indicate more positive affect and arousal. Completed by independent observers.
Change from baseline observer-rated teacher listening and communication behaviors at 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoints, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Custom items based on a Psychological Safety Coding Scheme (O'Donovan et al., 2021) measuring teacher listening and communication behaviors. The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more listening and communication skills. Completed by independent observers.
Change from baseline observer-rated student engagement & communication behaviors at 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline) and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoints, in the classroom setting as part of the Teacher Autonomic Voice Assessment (TAVA)
Custom items based on a Psychological Safety Coding Scheme (O'Donovan et al., 2021) measuring student engagement and communication. The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more observer-rated student engagement and communication. Completed by independent observers.
Change from baseline Affect Grid scores at 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention over a two-week period (Baseline), at week 5 (once), and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoint again for two-week
A scale measuring emotional state (valence) and arousal (Russell et al., 1989). Higher scores on valence and arousal indicate more positive affect and arousal.
Change from baseline Positive Teaching Practices Scale (PTPS) scores at 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention over a two-week period (Baseline), at week 5 (once), and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoint again for two-week
A scale measuring positive teaching practices (Baumgartner et al., 2021). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more positive teaching practices.
Change from baseline Stress levels at 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention over a two-week period (Baseline), at week 5 (once), and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoint again for two-week
Custom items based on the Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM; Delahaye et al., 2015; Peacock \& Wong, 1990) and the Cognitive Control and Flexibility Questionnaire (CCFQ; Gabrys et al., 2018) measuring stress intensity and feelings of emotional control. The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more intense stress.
Change from baseline coping strategies at 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention over a two-week period (Baseline), at week 5 (once), and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoint again for two-week
Custom items based on the Brief-COPE (Carver, 1997; Knoll et al., 2005), Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001; Loch et al., 2011) and Self-Compassion Scale (SCS; Albertson et al., 2015; Hupfeld \& Ruffieux, 2011) measuring Coping Strategies (Acceptance and Curiosity, Positive Reinterpretation, Rumination, Self-Blame). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate a higher use of the specified coping strategies.
Change from baseline Empathy Scale for Teachers (EST) scores at 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention over a two-week period (Baseline), at week 5 (once), and then after 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoint again for two-week
A scale measuring teacher empathy (Wang et al., 2022). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more empathy
Change from baseline Compassionate Love Scale (Close Others Version) scores at 10 weeks
Time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention over a two-week period (Baseline), at week 5 (once), and then after a 10-week intervention period at post-intervention timepoint again for two-week
A scale measuring teacher compassion (Sprecher \& Fehr, 2005). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate more compassion.
16 secondary outcomes
Cognitive Control and Flexibility Questionnaire (CCFQ) (explanatory mechanism)
Time frame: Assessed weekly during the course of 10 weeks
Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) scores - Self-Regulation (explanatory mechanisms)
Time frame: Assessed weekly during the course of 10 weeks
Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale (PHLMS) (explanatory mechanism)
Time frame: Assessed weekly during the course of 10 weeks
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form (DERS-SF) (explanatory mechanism)
Time frame: Assessed weekly during the course of 10 weeks
Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) (explanatory mechanism)
Time frame: Assessed weekly during the course of 10 weeks
Listening
Time frame: Assessed weekly during the course of 10 weeks
Gratitude Questionnaire-6 (GQ-6) (explanatory mechanism)
Time frame: Assessed weekly during the course of 10 weeks
Coping strategies (explanatory mechanism)
Time frame: Assessed weekly during the course of 10 weeks
Affect Grid (explanatory mechanism)
Time frame: Assessed weekly during the course of 10 weeks of intervention only in intervention group
Social connectedness - Inclusion of Other in Self Scale (explanatory mechanism)
Time frame: Assessed for 10 weeks during intervention period, twice a week, only in the intervention group, prior to and after the daily exercise
Personal Self-Disclosure with Partner
Time frame: Assessed for 10 weeks during intervention period, twice a week, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise
Emotional Authenticity
Time frame: Assessed for 10 weeks during intervention period, twice a week, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise
Listening (emotional resonance)
Time frame: Assessed for 10 weeks during intervention period, twice a week, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise
Listening engagement
Time frame: Assessed for 10 weeks during intervention period, twice a week, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise
Qualitative Empathic Listening Diary
Time frame: Assessed once during intervention period, at week 5, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise
Qualitative Compassionate Listening diary
Time frame: Assessed once at the end of the intervention period, at week 10, only in the intervention group, after the daily exercise
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Sep 2025.
- BackgroundAlbertson, E. R., Neff, K. D., & Dill-Shackleford, K. E. (2015). Self-compassion and body dissatisfaction in women: A randomized controlled trial of a brief meditation intervention. Mindfulness, 6(3), 444-454.
- BackgroundAron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596-612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
- Background: PubMed 8126686Bagby RM, Parker JD, Taylor GJ. The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale--I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. J Psychosom Res. 1994 Jan;38(1):23-32. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90005-1.
- BackgroundBaumgartner, J., Ota, C., DiCarlo, C., Bauer, R., & Carson, R. (2021). Using Ecological Momentary Assessment to Examine the Relationship Between Childcare Teachers' Stress, Classroom Behaviors, and Afterhours Professionalism Activities. Child Care in Practice, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279.2021.1962247
- Background: PubMed 34294816Beutel ME, Hettich N, Ernst M, Schmutzer G, Tibubos AN, Braehler E. Mental health and loneliness in the German general population during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to a representative pre-pandemic assessment. Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 22;11(1):14946. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94434-8.
- Background: PubMed 11793322Kupfer J, Brosig B, Brahler E. [Testing and validation of the 26-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in a representative population sample]. Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2000;46(4):368-384. doi: 10.13109/zptm.2000.46.4.368. German.
- Background: PubMed 18187399Cardaciotto L, Herbert JD, Forman EM, Moitra E, Farrow V. The assessment of present-moment awareness and acceptance: the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale. Assessment. 2008 Jun;15(2):204-23. doi: 10.1177/1073191107311467. Epub 2008 Jan 9.
- Background: PubMed 16250744Carver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92-100. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6.
- Background: PubMed 12964174Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76-82. doi: 10.1002/da.10113.
- BackgroundDavis, M. H. (1980a). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
- BackgroundDavis, M. H. (1980b). Interpersonal Reactivity Index. https://doi.org/10.1037/t01093-000
- Background: PubMed 26018395Delahaye M, Stieglitz RD, Graf M, Keppler C, Maes J, Pflueger M. [German translation and validation of the Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM)]. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2015 May;83(5):276-85. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1399727. Epub 2015 May 27. German.
Related trials for Burnout
Not yet recruiting
Hand in Hand: Feasibility of a Compassion-Focused App to Support Parents of Children With Mental Health Problems
Physiological Conditions, Distress, Emotional
Active, not recruiting
Health enSuite Caregivers: an App-based Treatment for Distressed Caregivers of Persons With Moderate Dementia
Caregiver Burnout
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Relationship of Forward Head Posture With Burnout and Quality of Life
Forward Head Posture
Active, not recruiting
Online Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for the Mental Health of Healthcare Professionals
Occupational Stress or Workplace Stress, Burnout, Professionals
Active, not recruiting
Self-Help Plus (SH+) for Stress Reduction in Social Service Workers: A Pilot RCT
Stress, Psychological, Occupational, Stress, Psychological
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tania Singer, PhD principal investigator
Social Neuroscience Lab of the Max Planck Society
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Empathy-based socio-emotional mental training in people with Burnout, run by Max Planck Social Neuroscience Lab at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline Depression Anxiety Stress Scale - 21 (DASS-21) scores at 5 and 10 weeks (time frame: Assessed at pre-intervention (Baseline), after the first 5 weeks of training (Mid-Test), and then after the second 5 weeks of training (Post-Test)). The study lists 37 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06477250, which also lists 68 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2025.