Oxidative StressNCT06477757
Inflammatory Response and Oxidative Stress in Cardiac Surgery: Min. Invasive vs. Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation
A study testing Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation and Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation in people with Oxidative Stress and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, run by University Medical Centre Maribor at 1 site in Slovenia.
Trial summary
The goal of our research project is to measure and compare oxidative stress markers, and systemic inflammatory response in patients undergoing open heart surgery with either conventional or minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation as well as develop pharmacokinetic profiles of different oxidative stress markers… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Oxidative Stress, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Extracorporeal Circulation; Complications
- What is being tested?
- Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation and Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSlovenia
- Study dates
- 29 Jul 2024to 31 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients undergoing elective isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with the use of cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) through median sternotomy with central cannulation
Who cannot join
- refusal to participate in the study,
- pregnant women,
- patients with previous cardiac surgery (i.e., redo surgery),
- emergency surgery,
- patients with known allergy to any drugs used in the study protocol except cefazolin.
- Patients in whom intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) would show an atrial septal defect, where additional procedures would be needed intraoperatively or a conversion from MiECC to conventional extracorporeal circulation would be needed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Miha Antonic, MD, PhD contact
Slovenia1 site
UMC Maribor
Maribor
Rebe Petrovic, MD, +38640556570, rene.petrovic@gmail.com
Miha Antonic, MD, PhD, miha.antonic@guest.arnes.si
About this study
Official title: Oxidative Stress and Systemic Inflammatory Response After Cardiac Surgery: Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation vs. Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation
The goal of our research project is to measure and compare oxidative stress markers, and systemic inflammatory response in patients undergoing open heart surgery with either conventional or minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation as well as develop pharmacokinetic profiles of different oxidative stress markers for further research on inflammatory response after open heart surgery. The main questions our study aims to answer are :
- Does the type of extracorporeal circulation affect the levels of different oxidative stress markers?
- Can preoperative and postoperative oxidative stress marker levels be of prognostic values?
- Do preoperative and postoperative oxidative stress markers correlate with the clinical outcomes in patients?
Read more
Researchers will compare the effect of conventional and minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation on clinical outcomes, oxidative stress marker levels, and systemic inflammatory response.
Participants will be randomised into two groups (one undergoing arrested-heart surgery with the use of conventional extracorporeal circulation, and the second group undergoing arrested-heart surgery with the use of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation) and laboratory data, oxidative stress markers, and clinical data will be collected until discharge.
Read the detailed description
The overall project objective is to develop an accurate and simple analytical method(s) for quantification of specified oxidative stress biomarkers in biological samples that will provide easier diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic design in patients undergoing open heart surgery and a possible comparison between different therapeutic strategies in reducing oxidative stress.
To achieve this goal, the project will be divided into specific objectives:
- Assortment of specific reactive oxidative species and development of analytical protocols for these oxidative stress biomarkers using sophisticated analytical equipment.
- Quantification of specific oxidative stress biomarkers as indicators for oxidative stress before and after open heart surgery with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass.
- Prediction of the level of oxidative stress with specific oxidative stress biomarkers in patients undergoing arrested-heart cardiopulmonary bypass surgery
- Statistical processing of the obtained data and implementation in clinical practice tailoring the extracorporeal circulation to an individual patient.
- Comparison of oxidative stress in patients undergoing open-heart surgery with the use of two different types of cardiopulmonary bypass techniques.
State-of-the-art in the proposed field of research and survey of the relevant literature Recent studies on oxidative stress status have identified biomarkers as the potential to revolutionise medical science in terms of diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy. Biomarkers have been identified for various diseases and disorders, for example, metabolic disorders, cardiovascular disease, myocardial infarctions, neurological disorders, etc. The specific biomarkers can help in diagnosing the stress when the prognostic biomarkers are being explored for studying the progression or outcome of this stress-disease cascade and can predict the likelihood of occurrence of disease. Recently, many authors published reviews on oxidative stress and its biomarkers, as well as their quantitative determination, there are also some clinical studies, but often these involve one type of biomarker. Determination of these compounds from serum and plasma is challenging for every analytical technique and requires special precautions at the pre-analytical stage. Recently, various chromatographic methods have been used for substituting conventional spectrophotometric methods. So far, high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) methods have proven to be specific and more sensitive for most oxidative stress (OS) biomarkers from biological material, but there is still no method that is specific, accurate, sensitive and quantitative enough to measure biomarkers in biological samples and can be used in clinical diagnostics. Since the identification of biomarkers is more reliable, more correlations to certain diseases or disorders can be done, especially in the field of cardiovascular diseases, where the literature is scarce or non. In this study, robust and specific analytical methods for specific OS biomarkers will be developed and validated, therefore understanding the mechanisms and timeline of OS biomarker levels after cardiac surgery.
Cardiopulmonary bypass has been identified as an independent factor for systemic inflammatory response, which potentially leads to hemodynamic instability, multiple organ dysfunction and various complications resulting in a prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay. One of the strategies to reduce the inflammatory response has been MiECC. Regarding to the Minimal invasive Extra-Corporeal Technologies international Society (MiECTiS) to characterise a circuit as MiECC it must include a closed circuit; biologically inert blood contact surfaces; reduced priming volume; a centrifugal pump; a membrane oxygenator; a heat exchanger; a system for cardioplegia delivery; a venous bubble trap/venous air removing device and a shed blood management system. Several studies have been published, measuring and comparing the inflammatory response in patients undergoing open heart surgery with either conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CCPB) or MiECC. Recent studies, comparing MiECC group to conventional CPB showed lower C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin 6 and interleukin 8 levels in the MiECC group. A study, measuring oxidative stress markers in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery with either MiECC, CCPB, or without the use of extracorporeal circuit (off-pump coronary artery bypass - OPCAB) revealed statistically significant decrease in malondialdehyde levels in MiECC and OPCAB when compared to CCPB, which showed promising results on 30 patients included in their study. Also malondialdehyde levels peak after a couple of hours after the surgery, thus making the comparison of immune response to MiECC or CCPB even more interesting. By increasing the number of blood samples, a bigger study cohort and novel techniques of malondialdehyde analysis, the investigators believe that potential prognostic values could be identified. In recent years isoprostane has been identified as a promising biomarker of lipid peroxidation. In a recent study in children with congenital heart defects undergoing cardiac surgery, a rapid clearance of isoprostanes was associated with a better clinical outcome. No studies up to date comparing the results of isoprostanes in patients undergoing CCPB or MiECC have been found. Endocan, a potential immunoinflammatory marker, which reflects endothelial dysfunction, could also be used as a potential prognostic marker for identifying groups of patients who would benefit most from MiECC. Up to date, two studies studying the kinetics of endocan after CCPB have been performed. Comparing our results to other studies and adding MiECC to the equation could prove helpful to future studies using endocan as a prognostic marker.
IMPORTANCE OF THE EXPECTED RESULTS:
The research project entitled Oxidative stress and systemic inflammatory response after cardiac surgery: minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation vs. conventional extracorporeal circulation will efficiently contribute to the improvement of the quality of life since its focus will be on the detection of specific OS biomarkers and understanding the mechanisms and timeline of OS biomarker levels after cardiac surgery. To the investigators knowledge, this will be the first such comprehensive study that will include several biomarkers in the prediction of the level of oxidative stress in patients undergoing arrested-heart cardiopulmonary bypass surgery and compare two types of cardiopulmonary bypass circuits. To establish this prediction, OS biomarkers will be quantified using different chromatographic methods in tandem with mass spectrometry for the selective and efficient determination of these biomarkers. Developed and validated analytical methods will be robust and efficient for method transfer in a clinical environment. Obtained data will be statistically processed and implemented in clinical practice tailored to the extracorporeal circulation of individual patient.
- Conditions
- Oxidative Stress, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Extracorporeal Circulation; Complications
- Being tested
- Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation, Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation
- Keywords
- Cardiac Surgery, Minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation, Cardiopulmonary bypass, Oxidative Stress, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Oxidative stress biomarkers, Malondialdehyde, Endocan
- Medical subject headings
- Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal CirculationProcedure or surgery
Clinical outcomes, oxidative stress marker levels comparison in patients undergoing open-heart surgery with minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation.
Conventional Extracorporeal CirculationProcedure or surgery
Clinical outcomes, oxidative stress marker levels comparison in patients undergoing open-heart surgery with either conventional extracorporeal circulation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation Arm (CCPB Arm) | Active comparator | Patients randomized into this group will be undergoing arrested-heart coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of conventional extracorporeal circulation. Receives: Procedure: Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation |
| Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation Arm (MiECC Arm) | Experimental | Patients randomized into this group will be undergoing arrested-heart coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation. Receives: Procedure: Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Oxidative stress biomarker levels
Oxidative stress biomarker levels will be analyzed from blood samples collected at predetermined time-frames.
Measured: From enrollment until discharge, assessed up to 100 weeks.
Secondary outcomes (2)
Incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation
Atrial fibrillation will be monitored by continuous telemetry following cardiac surgery, until discharge.
Measured: From enrollment until discharge, assessed up to 100 weeks.
Incidence of postoperative acute kidney failure
Kidney function will be monitored by measuring urine secretion and glomerular filtration rate at predetermined time frames, and evaluated according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) system.
Measured: From enrollment until discharge, assessed up to 100 weeks.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jun 2024
- Study start29 Jul 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Oxidative StressStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Two groups of patients, each undergoing open-heart surgery with a different type of extracorporeal circulation.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Medical Centre Maribor
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Rene Petrovic, University Medical Centre Maribor
- Investigators
- Rene Petrovic, MD, Principal investigator, UMC MariborPetra Kotnik, PhD, Principal investigator, University of MariborMiha Antonic, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, UMC Maribor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06477757
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- J7-50129
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 26 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 27 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: After the study, approximately in 2026.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Oxidative Stress and Systemic Inflammatory Response After Cardiac Surgery: Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation vs. Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06477757
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- J7-50129
- Conditions
- Oxidative Stress, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Extracorporeal Circulation; Complications
- Keywords
- Cardiac Surgery, Minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation, Cardiopulmonary bypass, Oxidative Stress, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Oxidative stress biomarkers, Malondialdehyde, Endocan
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Medical Centre MariborUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 29 Jul 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of our research project is to measure and compare oxidative stress markers, and systemic inflammatory response in patients undergoing open heart surgery with either conventional or minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation as well as develop pharmacokinetic profiles of different oxidative stress markers for further research on inflammatory response after open heart surgery. The main questions our study aims to answer are :
- Does the type of extracorporeal circulation affect the levels of different oxidative stress markers?
- Can preoperative and postoperative oxidative stress marker levels be of prognostic values?
- Do preoperative and postoperative oxidative stress markers correlate with the clinical outcomes in patients?
Researchers will compare the effect of conventional and minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation on clinical outcomes, oxidative stress marker levels, and systemic inflammatory response.
Participants will be randomised into two groups (one undergoing arrested-heart surgery with the use of conventional extracorporeal circulation, and the second group undergoing arrested-heart surgery with the use of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation) and laboratory data, oxidative stress markers, and clinical data will be collected until discharge.
Detailed description
The overall project objective is to develop an accurate and simple analytical method(s) for quantification of specified oxidative stress biomarkers in biological samples that will provide easier diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic design in patients undergoing open heart surgery and a possible comparison between different therapeutic strategies in reducing oxidative stress.
To achieve this goal, the project will be divided into specific objectives:
- Assortment of specific reactive oxidative species and development of analytical protocols for these oxidative stress biomarkers using sophisticated analytical equipment.
- Quantification of specific oxidative stress biomarkers as indicators for oxidative stress before and after open heart surgery with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass.
- Prediction of the level of oxidative stress with specific oxidative stress biomarkers in patients undergoing arrested-heart cardiopulmonary bypass surgery
- Statistical processing of the obtained data and implementation in clinical practice tailoring the extracorporeal circulation to an individual patient.
- Comparison of oxidative stress in patients undergoing open-heart surgery with the use of two different types of cardiopulmonary bypass techniques.
State-of-the-art in the proposed field of research and survey of the relevant literature Recent studies on oxidative stress status have identified biomarkers as the potential to revolutionise medical science in terms of diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy. Biomarkers have been identified for various diseases and disorders, for example, metabolic disorders, cardiovascular disease, myocardial infarctions, neurological disorders, etc. The specific biomarkers can help in diagnosing the stress when the prognostic biomarkers are being explored for studying the progression or outcome of this stress-disease cascade and can predict the likelihood of occurrence of disease. Recently, many authors published reviews on oxidative stress and its biomarkers, as well as their quantitative determination, there are also some clinical studies, but often these involve one type of biomarker. Determination of these compounds from serum and plasma is challenging for every analytical technique and requires special precautions at the pre-analytical stage. Recently, various chromatographic methods have been used for substituting conventional spectrophotometric methods. So far, high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) methods have proven to be specific and more sensitive for most oxidative stress (OS) biomarkers from biological material, but there is still no method that is specific, accurate, sensitive and quantitative enough to measure biomarkers in biological samples and can be used in clinical diagnostics. Since the identification of biomarkers is more reliable, more correlations to certain diseases or disorders can be done, especially in the field of cardiovascular diseases, where the literature is scarce or non. In this study, robust and specific analytical methods for specific OS biomarkers will be developed and validated, therefore understanding the mechanisms and timeline of OS biomarker levels after cardiac surgery.
Cardiopulmonary bypass has been identified as an independent factor for systemic inflammatory response, which potentially leads to hemodynamic instability, multiple organ dysfunction and various complications resulting in a prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay. One of the strategies to reduce the inflammatory response has been MiECC. Regarding to the Minimal invasive Extra-Corporeal Technologies international Society (MiECTiS) to characterise a circuit as MiECC it must include a closed circuit; biologically inert blood contact surfaces; reduced priming volume; a centrifugal pump; a membrane oxygenator; a heat exchanger; a system for cardioplegia delivery; a venous bubble trap/venous air removing device and a shed blood management system. Several studies have been published, measuring and comparing the inflammatory response in patients undergoing open heart surgery with either conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CCPB) or MiECC. Recent studies, comparing MiECC group to conventional CPB showed lower C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin 6 and interleukin 8 levels in the MiECC group. A study, measuring oxidative stress markers in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery with either MiECC, CCPB, or without the use of extracorporeal circuit (off-pump coronary artery bypass - OPCAB) revealed statistically significant decrease in malondialdehyde levels in MiECC and OPCAB when compared to CCPB, which showed promising results on 30 patients included in their study. Also malondialdehyde levels peak after a couple of hours after the surgery, thus making the comparison of immune response to MiECC or CCPB even more interesting. By increasing the number of blood samples, a bigger study cohort and novel techniques of malondialdehyde analysis, the investigators believe that potential prognostic values could be identified. In recent years isoprostane has been identified as a promising biomarker of lipid peroxidation. In a recent study in children with congenital heart defects undergoing cardiac surgery, a rapid clearance of isoprostanes was associated with a better clinical outcome. No studies up to date comparing the results of isoprostanes in patients undergoing CCPB or MiECC have been found. Endocan, a potential immunoinflammatory marker, which reflects endothelial dysfunction, could also be used as a potential prognostic marker for identifying groups of patients who would benefit most from MiECC. Up to date, two studies studying the kinetics of endocan after CCPB have been performed. Comparing our results to other studies and adding MiECC to the equation could prove helpful to future studies using endocan as a prognostic marker.
IMPORTANCE OF THE EXPECTED RESULTS:
The research project entitled Oxidative stress and systemic inflammatory response after cardiac surgery: minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation vs. conventional extracorporeal circulation will efficiently contribute to the improvement of the quality of life since its focus will be on the detection of specific OS biomarkers and understanding the mechanisms and timeline of OS biomarker levels after cardiac surgery. To the investigators knowledge, this will be the first such comprehensive study that will include several biomarkers in the prediction of the level of oxidative stress in patients undergoing arrested-heart cardiopulmonary bypass surgery and compare two types of cardiopulmonary bypass circuits. To establish this prediction, OS biomarkers will be quantified using different chromatographic methods in tandem with mass spectrometry for the selective and efficient determination of these biomarkers. Developed and validated analytical methods will be robust and efficient for method transfer in a clinical environment. Obtained data will be statistically processed and implemented in clinical practice tailored to the extracorporeal circulation of individual patient.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Two groups of patients, each undergoing open-heart surgery with a different type of extracorporeal circulation.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation Arm (CCPB Arm) | Active comparator | Procedure: Conventional Extracorporeal CirculationPatients randomized into this group will be undergoing arrested-heart coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of conventional extracorporeal circulation. |
| Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation Arm (MiECC Arm) | Experimental | Procedure: Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal CirculationPatients randomized into this group will be undergoing arrested-heart coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients undergoing elective isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with the use of cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) through median sternotomy with central cannulation
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- refusal to participate in the study,
- pregnant women,
- patients with previous cardiac surgery (i.e., redo surgery),
- emergency surgery,
- patients with known allergy to any drugs used in the study protocol except cefazolin.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal CirculationClinical outcomes, oxidative stress marker levels comparison in patients undergoing open-heart surgery with minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation. | Procedure or surgery | Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation Arm (MiECC Arm) |
| Conventional Extracorporeal CirculationClinical outcomes, oxidative stress marker levels comparison in patients undergoing open-heart surgery with either conventional extracorporeal circulation. | Procedure or surgery | Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation Arm (CCPB Arm) |
Primary outcome
Oxidative stress biomarker levels
Time frame: From enrollment until discharge, assessed up to 100 weeks.
Oxidative stress biomarker levels will be analyzed from blood samples collected at predetermined time-frames.
2 secondary outcomes
Incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation
Time frame: From enrollment until discharge, assessed up to 100 weeks.
Incidence of postoperative acute kidney failure
Time frame: From enrollment until discharge, assessed up to 100 weeks.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jun 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. After the study, approximately in 2026.
Related trials for Oxidative Stress
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Periodontal Status and Biomarkers in MASLD
Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD)
RecruitingPhase 1
Study of Preoperative Radiation Therapy in Participants With Resectable Recurrent Abdominal Adrenocortical Carcinoma
Adrenocortical Carcinoma (ACC), Recurrent Adrenocortical Carcinoma (ACC)
Recruiting
Acute Effects of Post-Exercise Hyperoxia on Recovery in Cycling
Athletic Performance, Hyperbaric Oxygenation
Recruiting
Dietary Intervention Study on Liver Health in Young Adults
Liver Health
RecruitingObservational study
Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Gaucher Disease
Gaucher Disease Type I, Oxidative Stress
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Miha Antonic, MD, PhD contact
Rene Petrovic, MD principal investigator
UMC Maribor
Petra Kotnik, PhD principal investigator
University of Maribor
Miha Antonic, MD, PhD principal investigator
UMC Maribor
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation and Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation in people with Oxidative Stress and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, run by University Medical Centre Maribor at 1 site in Slovenia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Slovenia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Rene Petrovic, MD (+38640556570, rene.petrovic@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Oxidative stress biomarker levels (time frame: From enrollment until discharge, assessed up to 100 weeks.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jun 2024.