AzTrials
AzTrials

Oxidative StressNCT06477757

Inflammatory Response and Oxidative Stress in Cardiac Surgery: Min. Invasive vs. Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation

A study testing Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation and Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation in people with Oxidative Stress and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, run by University Medical Centre Maribor at 1 site in Slovenia.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of our research project is to measure and compare oxidative stress markers, and systemic inflammatory response in patients undergoing open heart surgery with either conventional or minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation as well as develop pharmacokinetic profiles of different oxidative stress markers… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 years
What is being tested?
Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation and Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteSlovenia
Study dates
29 Jul 2024to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients undergoing elective isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with the use of cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) through median sternotomy with central cannulation

Who cannot join

  • refusal to participate in the study,
  • pregnant women,
  • patients with previous cardiac surgery (i.e., redo surgery),
  • emergency surgery,
  • patients with known allergy to any drugs used in the study protocol except cefazolin.
  • Patients in whom intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) would show an atrial septal defect, where additional procedures would be needed intraoperatively or a conversion from MiECC to conventional extracorporeal circulation would be needed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Rene Petrovic, MD contact

+38640556570

rene.petrovic@gmail.com

Miha Antonic, MD, PhD contact

miha.antonic@guest.arnes.si

Slovenia1 site
  • UMC Maribor

    Maribor

    Rebe Petrovic, MD, +38640556570, rene.petrovic@gmail.com

    Miha Antonic, MD, PhD, miha.antonic@guest.arnes.si

Other trials in Slovenia

About this study

Official title: Oxidative Stress and Systemic Inflammatory Response After Cardiac Surgery: Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation vs. Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation

The goal of our research project is to measure and compare oxidative stress markers, and systemic inflammatory response in patients undergoing open heart surgery with either conventional or minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation as well as develop pharmacokinetic profiles of different oxidative stress markers for further research on inflammatory response after open heart surgery. The main questions our study aims to answer are :

  • Does the type of extracorporeal circulation affect the levels of different oxidative stress markers?
  • Can preoperative and postoperative oxidative stress marker levels be of prognostic values?
  • Do preoperative and postoperative oxidative stress markers correlate with the clinical outcomes in patients?
Read more

Researchers will compare the effect of conventional and minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation on clinical outcomes, oxidative stress marker levels, and systemic inflammatory response.

Participants will be randomised into two groups (one undergoing arrested-heart surgery with the use of conventional extracorporeal circulation, and the second group undergoing arrested-heart surgery with the use of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation) and laboratory data, oxidative stress markers, and clinical data will be collected until discharge.

Read the detailed description

The overall project objective is to develop an accurate and simple analytical method(s) for quantification of specified oxidative stress biomarkers in biological samples that will provide easier diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic design in patients undergoing open heart surgery and a possible comparison between different therapeutic strategies in reducing oxidative stress.

To achieve this goal, the project will be divided into specific objectives:

  • Assortment of specific reactive oxidative species and development of analytical protocols for these oxidative stress biomarkers using sophisticated analytical equipment.
  • Quantification of specific oxidative stress biomarkers as indicators for oxidative stress before and after open heart surgery with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass.
  • Prediction of the level of oxidative stress with specific oxidative stress biomarkers in patients undergoing arrested-heart cardiopulmonary bypass surgery
  • Statistical processing of the obtained data and implementation in clinical practice tailoring the extracorporeal circulation to an individual patient.
  • Comparison of oxidative stress in patients undergoing open-heart surgery with the use of two different types of cardiopulmonary bypass techniques.

State-of-the-art in the proposed field of research and survey of the relevant literature Recent studies on oxidative stress status have identified biomarkers as the potential to revolutionise medical science in terms of diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy. Biomarkers have been identified for various diseases and disorders, for example, metabolic disorders, cardiovascular disease, myocardial infarctions, neurological disorders, etc. The specific biomarkers can help in diagnosing the stress when the prognostic biomarkers are being explored for studying the progression or outcome of this stress-disease cascade and can predict the likelihood of occurrence of disease. Recently, many authors published reviews on oxidative stress and its biomarkers, as well as their quantitative determination, there are also some clinical studies, but often these involve one type of biomarker. Determination of these compounds from serum and plasma is challenging for every analytical technique and requires special precautions at the pre-analytical stage. Recently, various chromatographic methods have been used for substituting conventional spectrophotometric methods. So far, high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) methods have proven to be specific and more sensitive for most oxidative stress (OS) biomarkers from biological material, but there is still no method that is specific, accurate, sensitive and quantitative enough to measure biomarkers in biological samples and can be used in clinical diagnostics. Since the identification of biomarkers is more reliable, more correlations to certain diseases or disorders can be done, especially in the field of cardiovascular diseases, where the literature is scarce or non. In this study, robust and specific analytical methods for specific OS biomarkers will be developed and validated, therefore understanding the mechanisms and timeline of OS biomarker levels after cardiac surgery.

Cardiopulmonary bypass has been identified as an independent factor for systemic inflammatory response, which potentially leads to hemodynamic instability, multiple organ dysfunction and various complications resulting in a prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay. One of the strategies to reduce the inflammatory response has been MiECC. Regarding to the Minimal invasive Extra-Corporeal Technologies international Society (MiECTiS) to characterise a circuit as MiECC it must include a closed circuit; biologically inert blood contact surfaces; reduced priming volume; a centrifugal pump; a membrane oxygenator; a heat exchanger; a system for cardioplegia delivery; a venous bubble trap/venous air removing device and a shed blood management system. Several studies have been published, measuring and comparing the inflammatory response in patients undergoing open heart surgery with either conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CCPB) or MiECC. Recent studies, comparing MiECC group to conventional CPB showed lower C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin 6 and interleukin 8 levels in the MiECC group. A study, measuring oxidative stress markers in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery with either MiECC, CCPB, or without the use of extracorporeal circuit (off-pump coronary artery bypass - OPCAB) revealed statistically significant decrease in malondialdehyde levels in MiECC and OPCAB when compared to CCPB, which showed promising results on 30 patients included in their study. Also malondialdehyde levels peak after a couple of hours after the surgery, thus making the comparison of immune response to MiECC or CCPB even more interesting. By increasing the number of blood samples, a bigger study cohort and novel techniques of malondialdehyde analysis, the investigators believe that potential prognostic values could be identified. In recent years isoprostane has been identified as a promising biomarker of lipid peroxidation. In a recent study in children with congenital heart defects undergoing cardiac surgery, a rapid clearance of isoprostanes was associated with a better clinical outcome. No studies up to date comparing the results of isoprostanes in patients undergoing CCPB or MiECC have been found. Endocan, a potential immunoinflammatory marker, which reflects endothelial dysfunction, could also be used as a potential prognostic marker for identifying groups of patients who would benefit most from MiECC. Up to date, two studies studying the kinetics of endocan after CCPB have been performed. Comparing our results to other studies and adding MiECC to the equation could prove helpful to future studies using endocan as a prognostic marker.

IMPORTANCE OF THE EXPECTED RESULTS:

The research project entitled Oxidative stress and systemic inflammatory response after cardiac surgery: minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation vs. conventional extracorporeal circulation will efficiently contribute to the improvement of the quality of life since its focus will be on the detection of specific OS biomarkers and understanding the mechanisms and timeline of OS biomarker levels after cardiac surgery. To the investigators knowledge, this will be the first such comprehensive study that will include several biomarkers in the prediction of the level of oxidative stress in patients undergoing arrested-heart cardiopulmonary bypass surgery and compare two types of cardiopulmonary bypass circuits. To establish this prediction, OS biomarkers will be quantified using different chromatographic methods in tandem with mass spectrometry for the selective and efficient determination of these biomarkers. Developed and validated analytical methods will be robust and efficient for method transfer in a clinical environment. Obtained data will be statistically processed and implemented in clinical practice tailored to the extracorporeal circulation of individual patient.

Being tested
Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation, Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation
Keywords
Cardiac Surgery, Minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation, Cardiopulmonary bypass, Oxidative Stress, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Oxidative stress biomarkers, Malondialdehyde, Endocan
Medical subject headings
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal CirculationProcedure or surgery

    Clinical outcomes, oxidative stress marker levels comparison in patients undergoing open-heart surgery with minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation.

  • Conventional Extracorporeal CirculationProcedure or surgery

    Clinical outcomes, oxidative stress marker levels comparison in patients undergoing open-heart surgery with either conventional extracorporeal circulation.

Study groups in NCT06477757
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation Arm (CCPB Arm)Active comparatorPatients randomized into this group will be undergoing arrested-heart coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of conventional extracorporeal circulation.
Receives: Procedure: Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation
Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation Arm (MiECC Arm)ExperimentalPatients randomized into this group will be undergoing arrested-heart coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation.
Receives: Procedure: Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Oxidative stress biomarker levels

    Oxidative stress biomarker levels will be analyzed from blood samples collected at predetermined time-frames.

    Measured: From enrollment until discharge, assessed up to 100 weeks.

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation

    Atrial fibrillation will be monitored by continuous telemetry following cardiac surgery, until discharge.

    Measured: From enrollment until discharge, assessed up to 100 weeks.

  2. Incidence of postoperative acute kidney failure

    Kidney function will be monitored by measuring urine secretion and glomerular filtration rate at predetermined time frames, and evaluated according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) system.

    Measured: From enrollment until discharge, assessed up to 100 weeks.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jun 2024
  2. Study start29 Jul 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Two groups of patients, each undergoing open-heart surgery with a different type of extracorporeal circulation.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06477757
Sponsor's protocol ID
J7-50129
Status last verified
Jun 2024
First submitted
26 Mar 2024
Last updated
27 Jun 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: After the study, approximately in 2026.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation and Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation in people with Oxidative Stress and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, run by University Medical Centre Maribor at 1 site in Slovenia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Slovenia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Rene Petrovic, MD (+38640556570, rene.petrovic@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Oxidative stress biomarker levels (time frame: From enrollment until discharge, assessed up to 100 weeks.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jun 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in