Late AbortionNCT06478316
Intracervical Block During Laminaria Insertion
A study testing Intracervical block in people with Late Abortion and Dilation and Evacuation, run by Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center.
Trial summary
Whether intracervical block with lidocaine 1% is superior to sham procedure - intracervical injection of saline 0.9% - in terms of pain control. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Late Abortion, Dilation and Evacuation
- What is being tested?
- Intracervical block
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jul 2024to Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Voluntary termination of pregnancy approved by a committee or missed abortion
- 18.0 to 22.5 gestational week (The gestational age in the case of a missed abortion is determined by the BPD - Biparietal Diameter, which is the determining measure for the ability to perform D\&E.)
- Singleton pregnancy
Who cannot join
- Multiple pregnancy
- Women undergoing the procedure urgently due to cervical insufficiency, inevitable abortion, premature rupture of membranes, or suspected chorioamnionitis
- Allergy to lidocaine
- Women who do not speak Hebrew or English
- Women who have a guardian for any reason
- Women with a history of cesarean section
Show all 10Show fewer
- Women with abnormal placental implantation, such as placenta previa or suspected placenta accreta
- Women with a psychiatric illness
- Women with a history of alcoholism or drug abuse
- Women who required a "two-stage" laminaria insertion will not be included in the analysis. In cases where the cervix does not allow the insertion of the required number of laminaria, the process is carried out in two stages: in the first stage, the maximum possible number is inserted, the woman is hospitalized, and after a few hours when some initial dilation of the cervix has occurred, the laminaria are removed and new ones are inserted according to the required number
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Pain Control With Intracervical Block, During Laminaria Insertion for Late Abortions, a Double Blind Randomized Control Trial
Whether intracervical block with lidocaine 1% is superior to sham procedure - intracervical injection of saline 0.9% - in terms of pain control.
Read the detailed description
- Research Design - Double-blind randomized study
- Study Population - Women who are candidates for late termination of pregnancy by dilation and evacuation and approach for the insertion of laminaria will be recruited for the study.
- The women will be divided into two groups
- Research Group - Women who will undergo preparation for the insertion of laminaria by anesthesia with lidocaine spray, followed by an intracervical injection of 1% lidocaine.
- Control Group - Women who will be anesthetized with lidocaine spray + intracervical injection of an inactive substance (0.9% saline).
- Randomization will be performed using dedicated computer software according to blocks of 2-6 women.
- All women will be offered to take 400 mg of ibuprofen about half an hour before the procedure.
- In the research group - a 10 ml syringe will be filled with 7 ml of lidocaine and 1 ml of bicarbonate (total 70 mg of lidocaine).
- In the control group - a 10 ml syringe will be filled with 8 ml of 0.9% NaCl saline.
- Primary anesthesia will be performed using 10% lidocaine spray in up to 5 sprays.
- Injection into the cervix will be performed at 3, 6, 9, 12 o'clock positions, after prior aspiration, with a 23-gauge needle, about 2 ml per point.
- Laminaria type to be inserted - "small" diameter 3 mm, length 6.5 cm (MedGyn: Lombard, IL, USA, and Norscan: Westlake Village, CA, USA).
- At weeks 18-20, 7-9 laminaria will be inserted.
- Over 20 weeks - over 10 laminaria will be inserted.
- Number of participants in the study - 70.
- Conditions
- Late Abortion, Dilation and Evacuation
- Being tested
- Intracervical block
- Medical subject headings
- Dilatation, Pathologic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intracervical blockProcedure or surgery
local injection of lidocain to the cervix
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Study | Experimental | a 10 ml syringe will be filled with 7 ml of lidocaine and 1 ml of bicarbonate (total 70 mg of lidocaine). Receives: Procedure: Intracervical block |
| Control | Sham comparator | a 10 ml syringe will be filled with 8 ml of 0.9% NaCl saline Receives: Procedure: Intracervical block |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain level using 0-100 Visual Analog Scale (100=worst pain)
Patients will be asked to rate their maximal pain level during the procedure of laminaria insertion using 0-100 Visual Analog Scale
Measured: During the procedure
Rate of patient reporting severe pain (VAS 75-100) during laminaria insertion
Patients will be asked to rate their maximal pain level during the procedure of laminaria insertion using 0-100 Visual Analog Scale
Measured: During the procedure
Secondary outcomes (2)
The rate of complications
Complications during laminaria insertion: rupture of the membranes, cervical bleeding, false route; complication during dilation and evacuation - failure to complete the dilation and evacuation procedure
Measured: During and immediately after the procedure
Acceptability of the procedure measured as the rate of patients who will state that they found the procedure acceptable
Patients will be asked to state whether they find the procedure they undergone acceptable
Measured: Immediately after the procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jun 2024
- Study startJul 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completionJul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Late AbortionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Matan Mor, MD, Principal investigator, Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06478316
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ASF-0020-24
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 16 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 27 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Fox MC, Hayes JL; Society of Family Planning. Cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion prior to 20 weeks of gestation. Contraception. 2007 Dec;76(6):486-95. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.09.004. Epub 2007 Nov 9.
PubMed 18061709Grimes DA, Schulz KF, Cates WJ Jr. Prevention of uterine perforation during curettage abortion. JAMA. 1984 Apr 27;251(16):2108-11.
PubMed 6708260Borgatta L, Roncari D, Sonalkar S, Mark A, Hou MY, Finneseth M, Vragovic O. Mifepristone vs. osmotic dilator insertion for cervical preparation prior to surgical abortion at 14-16 weeks: a randomized trial. Contraception. 2012 Nov;86(5):567-71. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
PubMed 22682721Prairie BA, Lauria MR, Kapp N, Mackenzie T, Baker ER, George KE. Mifepristone versus laminaria: a randomized controlled trial of cervical ripening in midtrimester termination. Contraception. 2007 Nov;76(5):383-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.07.008. Epub 2007 Oct 4.
PubMed 17963864Mercier RJ, Liberty A. Intrauterine lidocaine for pain control during laminaria insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2014 Dec;90(6):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
PubMed 25139724Shaw KA, Lerma K. Update on second-trimester surgical abortion. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;28(6):510-516. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000318.
PubMed 27684047Ramesh S, Roston A, Zimmerman L, Patel A, Lichtenberg ES, Chor J. Misoprostol 1 to 3 h preprocedure vs. overnight osmotic dilators prior to early second-trimester surgical abortion. Contraception. 2015 Sep;92(3):234-40. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
PubMed 25891258Lerma K, Blumenthal PD. Current and potential methods for second trimester abortion. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Feb;63:24-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 25.
PubMed 31281014Creinin MD, Schimmoeller NR, Matulich MC, Hou MY, Melo J, Chen MJ. Gabapentin for pain management after osmotic dilator insertion and prior to dilation and evacuation: A randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2020 Mar;101(3):167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.12.001. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
PubMed 31927028
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pain Control With Intracervical Block, During Laminaria Insertion for Late Abortions, a Double Blind Randomized Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06478316
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ASF-0020-24
- Conditions
- Late Abortion, Dilation and Evacuation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assaf-Harofeh Medical CenterOther government
- Study start
- Jul 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Whether intracervical block with lidocaine 1% is superior to sham procedure - intracervical injection of saline 0.9% - in terms of pain control.
Detailed description
- Research Design - Double-blind randomized study
- Study Population - Women who are candidates for late termination of pregnancy by dilation and evacuation and approach for the insertion of laminaria will be recruited for the study.
- The women will be divided into two groups
- Research Group - Women who will undergo preparation for the insertion of laminaria by anesthesia with lidocaine spray, followed by an intracervical injection of 1% lidocaine.
- Control Group - Women who will be anesthetized with lidocaine spray + intracervical injection of an inactive substance (0.9% saline).
- Randomization will be performed using dedicated computer software according to blocks of 2-6 women.
- All women will be offered to take 400 mg of ibuprofen about half an hour before the procedure.
- In the research group - a 10 ml syringe will be filled with 7 ml of lidocaine and 1 ml of bicarbonate (total 70 mg of lidocaine).
- In the control group - a 10 ml syringe will be filled with 8 ml of 0.9% NaCl saline.
- Primary anesthesia will be performed using 10% lidocaine spray in up to 5 sprays.
- Injection into the cervix will be performed at 3, 6, 9, 12 o'clock positions, after prior aspiration, with a 23-gauge needle, about 2 ml per point.
- Laminaria type to be inserted - "small" diameter 3 mm, length 6.5 cm (MedGyn: Lombard, IL, USA, and Norscan: Westlake Village, CA, USA).
- At weeks 18-20, 7-9 laminaria will be inserted.
- Over 20 weeks - over 10 laminaria will be inserted.
- Number of participants in the study - 70.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Study | Experimental | Procedure: Intracervical blocka 10 ml syringe will be filled with 7 ml of lidocaine and 1 ml of bicarbonate (total 70 mg of lidocaine). |
| Control | Sham comparator | Procedure: Intracervical blocka 10 ml syringe will be filled with 8 ml of 0.9% NaCl saline |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Voluntary termination of pregnancy approved by a committee or missed abortion
- 18.0 to 22.5 gestational week (The gestational age in the case of a missed abortion is determined by the BPD - Biparietal Diameter, which is the determining measure for the ability to perform D\&E.)
- Singleton pregnancy
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Multiple pregnancy
- Women undergoing the procedure urgently due to cervical insufficiency, inevitable abortion, premature rupture of membranes, or suspected chorioamnionitis
- Allergy to lidocaine
- Women who do not speak Hebrew or English
- Women who have a guardian for any reason
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intracervical blocklocal injection of lidocain to the cervix | Procedure or surgery | Control, Study |
Primary outcome
Pain level using 0-100 Visual Analog Scale (100=worst pain)
Time frame: During the procedure
Patients will be asked to rate their maximal pain level during the procedure of laminaria insertion using 0-100 Visual Analog Scale
Rate of patient reporting severe pain (VAS 75-100) during laminaria insertion
Time frame: During the procedure
Patients will be asked to rate their maximal pain level during the procedure of laminaria insertion using 0-100 Visual Analog Scale
2 secondary outcomes
The rate of complications
Time frame: During and immediately after the procedure
Acceptability of the procedure measured as the rate of patients who will state that they found the procedure acceptable
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jun 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 18061709Fox MC, Hayes JL; Society of Family Planning. Cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion prior to 20 weeks of gestation. Contraception. 2007 Dec;76(6):486-95. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.09.004. Epub 2007 Nov 9.
- Results publication: PubMed 6708260Grimes DA, Schulz KF, Cates WJ Jr. Prevention of uterine perforation during curettage abortion. JAMA. 1984 Apr 27;251(16):2108-11.
- Results publication: PubMed 22682721Borgatta L, Roncari D, Sonalkar S, Mark A, Hou MY, Finneseth M, Vragovic O. Mifepristone vs. osmotic dilator insertion for cervical preparation prior to surgical abortion at 14-16 weeks: a randomized trial. Contraception. 2012 Nov;86(5):567-71. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 17963864Prairie BA, Lauria MR, Kapp N, Mackenzie T, Baker ER, George KE. Mifepristone versus laminaria: a randomized controlled trial of cervical ripening in midtrimester termination. Contraception. 2007 Nov;76(5):383-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.07.008. Epub 2007 Oct 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 25139724Mercier RJ, Liberty A. Intrauterine lidocaine for pain control during laminaria insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2014 Dec;90(6):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 27684047Shaw KA, Lerma K. Update on second-trimester surgical abortion. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;28(6):510-516. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000318.
- Results publication: PubMed 25891258Ramesh S, Roston A, Zimmerman L, Patel A, Lichtenberg ES, Chor J. Misoprostol 1 to 3 h preprocedure vs. overnight osmotic dilators prior to early second-trimester surgical abortion. Contraception. 2015 Sep;92(3):234-40. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 31281014Lerma K, Blumenthal PD. Current and potential methods for second trimester abortion. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Feb;63:24-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 31927028Creinin MD, Schimmoeller NR, Matulich MC, Hou MY, Melo J, Chen MJ. Gabapentin for pain management after osmotic dilator insertion and prior to dilation and evacuation: A randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2020 Mar;101(3):167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.12.001. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Late Abortion
Not yet recruiting
PS IVG : Psychosocial Determinants of Late-term Abortions (14-16 Weeks' Gestation) at Avignon Hospital
Psychosocial Health, Abortion
RecruitingObservational study
Late-term Abortions Between 14 and 16 Weeks of Gestation: Comparison of Hemorrhagic Risks in Surgical vs. Medical Abortions
Abortion Late
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Matan Mor, MD principal investigator
Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intracervical block in people with Late Abortion and Dilation and Evacuation, run by Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Matan Mor, MD (00972506462862, MatanMorMiz@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain level using 0-100 Visual Analog Scale (100=worst pain) (time frame: During the procedure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06478316, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jun 2024.