StrokeNCT06478680
Comparing Effects of Conventional Neurorehabilitation With Exoskeleton With High-intensity Gait Training
A study testing Exoskeleton mediated gait training and High intensity gait training in people with Stroke and Gait, Hemiplegic, run by Alvernia University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this research is to compare improvements between the rehab intervention with walking practice using the robotic exoskeleton versus walking practice that is vigorous enough to keep participants' heart rate over a certain target level during physical therapy sessions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke, Gait, Hemiplegic
- What is being tested?
- Exoskeleton mediated gait training and High intensity gait training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2024to 30 May 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years of age or older
- English or Spanish-speaking
- A diagnosis of stroke (intracerebral hemorrhage or acute ischemic stroke)
- Referred to Good Shepherd Rehabilitation Outpatient Physical Therapy Clinic
Who cannot join
- Unable to follow 1-step commands
- > 220 pounds (100 kg)
- Height < 5'0" or > 6'4"
- Unable to take a few steps with assistance
- A score of ≥ 50/56 on Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
- A score of ≥ 26/30 on Functional Gait Assessment (FGA)
Show all 24Show fewer
- Resting blood pressure >180/110 mmHg
- Resting heart rate > 120 bpm
- Severe cardiac disease (New York Heart Association Classification IV)
- Severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth score > 3)
- Unstable spine or unhealed pelvic/limb fractures
- Active heterotrophic ossification impacting lower extremity range of motion
- Significant lower or upper extremity contractures
- Inability to achieve neutral ankle dorsiflexion with 12° of knee flexion
- Pregnancy
- Colostomy
- Poor skin integrity in areas in contact with the EksoGTTM
- Unresolved deep vein thrombosis
- Lower limb prosthesis or amputation
- Leg length discrepancies > 0.5 inches for upper legs, 0.75 inches for lower legs
- ROM restrictions preventing normal, reciprocal gait
- Inability to stand for > 3 minutes due to pain or orthostatic hypotension
- Pusher syndrome
- Cortical blindness
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Good Shepherd Rehabilitation
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18103
About this study
Official title: Comparing Effects of Conventional Neurorehabilitation With Exoskeleton With High-intensity Gait Training on Gait, Balance, and Depression Following Stroke and the Impact of Social Determinants of Health and Depression on Patients' Adherence to Physical Therapy
The purpose of this research is to compare improvements between the rehab intervention with walking practice using the robotic exoskeleton versus walking practice that is vigorous enough to keep participants' heart rate over a certain target level during physical therapy sessions. Investigators want to compare improvements in your walking function and mental health that occur after 20 interventions. The study also aims to evaluate if participants' mental health, social support, and health literacy affect attendance at physical therapy sessions.
- Conditions
- Stroke, Gait, Hemiplegic
- Being tested
- Exoskeleton mediated gait training, High intensity gait training
- Keywords
- health literacy, balance, compliance to therapy, gait function, high intensity gait training, exoskeleton
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Gait Disorders, Neurologic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Exoskeleton mediated gait trainingBehavioural
Also called EksoGT-mediated gait training
1 session of Forward Walking with EksoGT per week
1 session of conventional neurorehabilitation intervention per week
- Transfer training
- Gait training
- Balance (sitting/standing; static/dynamic)
- Strength
- Neuromuscular re-education
- Orthotics
- Positioning
- Caregiver education
- Assistive device
- Wheelchair assessment and mobility
- Endurance training
High intensity gait trainingBehavioural
2 sessions of High-Intensity Gait Training at a target heart rate of 60-80% of the maximum heart rate or target RPE of 15-18
- Forward stepping practice
- Backwards stepping practices
- Sidestepping
- Stairs
- Balance and compliant surface training while walking
- Propulsion
- Lateral balance training
- Stability training
- Stance control training
- Limb advancement
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High intensity gait training | Active comparator | One session of conventional neurorehabilitation intervention per week One session of Forward Walking with EksoGT per week Receives: Behavioral: High intensity gait training |
| Exoskeleton mediated gait training | Experimental | Two sessions of High-Intensity Gait Training Receives: Behavioral: Exoskeleton mediated gait training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Demographic Questionnaire
Questions include age, sex, date of birth, race/ethnicity, total income during T the past 12 months, main occupation and when was the last work, language at home, marital status, education level, and if they take any antidepressants.
Measured: Pre-intervention
Newest Vital Sign (NVS)
The NVS is a 6-question screening tool that identifies participants' risk of low or limited health literacy (HL) based on interpreting an ice cream nutrition label.
Measured: Pre-intervention
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS)
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support is a 12-item self-administered scale that measures social support. The total score for the MSPSS ranges from 12 to 84, with higher scores indicating higher levels of perceived social support.
Measured: Pre-intervention
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
The PHQ-9 is a self-administered depression screening tool with nine items. It has been reported that the PHQ-9 is the best-performing tool for screening for post-stroke depression.
Measured: Pre-intervention, After 10 interventions (~5 weeks), After 20 interventions (~10 weeks)
3-Meter Backwards Walk Test (3MBWT)
The 3MBWT measures the time (in seconds) it takes for a participant to walk 3 meters backward, hence assessing a backward gait speed. Backward gait speed is used to evaluate neuromuscular control, proprioception, protective reflexes, fall risk, and balance. Use of assistive devices will be documented.
Measured: Pre-intervention, After 10 interventions (~5 weeks), After 20 interventions (~10 weeks)
6-Minute Walk Test
The 6MWT assesses participants' aerobic capacity/endurance by recording the distance (in meters) that the participants walk in 6 minutes. Assistive devices may be used and will be documented.
Measured: Pre-intervention, After 10 interventions (~5 weeks), After 20 interventions (~10 weeks)
10-meter Walk Test
The 10mWT assesses walking speed in meters/second (m/s) over a short distance (10m). Two trials are administered at the patient's comfortable walking speed, followed by 2 trials at their fast walking speed, per Physical Therapist's instruction. The 2 trials for each speed are then averaged and the 2 gait speeds (preferred and fast) are documented in m/s. Assistive devices may be used, and will be documented.
Measured: Pre-intervention, After 10 interventions (~5 weeks), After 20 interventions (~10 weeks)
Muscle coactivation index
Muscle coactivation index will be calculated based on the EMG signals from 8 leg muscles (bilateral tibialis anterior, medial gastrocnemius, rectus femoris, medial hamstring). Surface electromyographic recordings will be conducted during forward and backward walking tests.
Measured: Pre-intervention, After 10 interventions (~5 weeks), After 20 interventions (~10 weeks)
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
The Berg Balance Scale is a 14-item clinician-rated measure that assesses static and balance in sitting and standing. It has a maximum score of 56 points. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the subject is unable to perform the task and 4 being the highest score.
Measured: Pre-intervention, After 10 interventions (~5 weeks), After 20 interventions (~10 weeks)
Functional Gait Assessment (FGA)
The FGA is used to assess postural stability during walking and assesses an individual's ability to perform multiple motor tasks while walking. The Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) is scored on a 4-point ordinal scale ranging from 0-3, with 0 indicating severe impairment and 3 indicating normal ambulation. The total score is calculated by summing all the items and ranges from 0-30, with lower scores indicating greater impairment.
Measured: Pre-intervention, After 10 interventions (~5 weeks), After 20 interventions (~10 weeks)
Borg rating scale of Perceived Exertion
The Borg Rating Scale of Perceived Exertion will be measured in all participants at the completion of 6 minute walk test. It measures exertion on a scale of 0 (no exertion or resting) to 10 (pushing oneself to the max).
Measured: Pre-intervention, After 10 interventions (~5 weeks), After 20 interventions (~10 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Patient compliance
Patient attendance to physical therapy is tracked and will be measured as >80% attendance to physical therapy.
Measured: After 20 interventions (~10 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jun 2024
- Study start1 Oct 2024
- Primary completion30 May 2025
- Study completion30 May 2025
Why it stopped: Lack of participants
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 3 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alvernia University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Good Shepherd Rehabilitation Network
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Soo Yeon Sun, PT, PhD, Alvernia University
- Investigators
- Soo Yeon Sun, PhD, Principal investigator, Alvernia UniversityKelley Limbauan, PT, DPT, NCS, Principal investigator, Good Shepherd Rehabilitation Network
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06478680
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2176775-1
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 23 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 11 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No