Pulp Disease, DentalPhase 1NCT06478940
3Mixtatin and MTA Vital Pulpotomy in Primary Molars
A Phase 1 study testing 3 mixtatin pulpotomy and MTA pulpotomy in people with Pulp Disease, Dental and Deciduous Teeth, run by Cairo University.
Trial summary
The aim of the study is to evaluate clinical and radiographic success of using 3Mixtain versus mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomy of deeply carious Primary molars. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 to 8 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulp Disease, Dental, Deciduous Teeth
- What is being tested?
- 3 mixtatin pulpotomy and MTA pulpotomy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2024to 1 Sep 2025
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 to 8 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- • Children 4-8 years old
- Vital deeply carious primary molars.
- No history of spontaneous pain, pathologic mobility, draining sinus tract, redness or swelling of the vestibule.
- Normal gingival and periodontal condition, with no sensitivity to vestibular palpation, and no pain on percussion test.
- Patient and parent showing cooperation and compliance.
Who cannot join
- • Uncooperative children to avoid time waste and attrition bias.
- Unrestorable molars
- Sign of radiolucency in periapical or furcation area
- Widening of PDL space or loss of lamina dura continuity
- Evidence of internal/external pathologic root resorption
- During operative procedure, when hemorrhage control is not achievable after pulpotomy.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Children with systemic disease as some systemic diseases may have effect on the outcome.
- Unable to attend follow-up visits to avoid attrition bias by decreasing number of drop off cases.
- Refusal of participation as the parent of child has the authority of participation.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of 3Mixtatin Versus MTA Used as Pulpotomy Agents in Vital Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial
The aim of the study is to evaluate clinical and radiographic success of using 3Mixtain versus mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomy of deeply carious Primary molars.
Read the detailed description
Due to the complexity of the root canal microbiome, it is doubtful that they can be treated properly with a single antibiotic. Accordingly, a combination of multiple antibiotics seemed to be essential to diminish different types of pathogenic bacteria. Recently, a combination of three antibiotics (Metronidazole, cefixime, and Ciprofloxacin) along with Statins (new bio-inductive materials in regenerative dentistry) has shown promising results in primary teeth pulp therapy.
Statin components have an anti-inflammatory impact on pulp tissue by lowering the amount of interleukin-6 and interleukin-8. They also decrease osteoclastic processes and strengthen osteoblastic processes. Thus, they promote bone regeneration and dentin formation by enhancing odontoblastic activity. Several studies have shown a clinical and radiographic success rate of 3Mixtatin with inconsistent results. Some randomized controlled Trials (RCTs) showed that MTA had a comparable result with 3Mixtatin, while others reported that 3Mixtatin might be an alternative for MTA due to its higher overall success rate. 3Mixtatin is considered as a novel material with successful outcomes. Owing to limited availability of data in researches and in order to reach a conclusive results our study aims to evaluate clinical and radiographic success of using 3Mixtain versus mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomy of deeply carious Primary molars .
- Conditions
- Pulp Disease, Dental, Deciduous Teeth
- Being tested
- 3 mixtatin pulpotomy, MTA pulpotomy
- Keywords
- pulpotomy - vital pulp therapy, primary molars- baby teeth
- Medical subject headings
- Dental Pulp Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
3 mixtatin pulpotomyDrug
pulp treatment with applying 3mixture of antibiotic (Metronidazole, cefixime, and Ciprofloxacin) along with simvastatin
MTA pulpotomyDrug
pulp treatment with applying MTA
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MTA pulpotomy | Active comparator | pulpotomy with MTA applied in the vital pulp therapy Receives: Drug: MTA pulpotomy |
| 3 Mixtatin pulpotomy | Experimental | pulpotomy with 3 mixtatin (triple antibiotic paste of (Metronidazole, cefixime, and Ciprofloxacin mixed with simvastatin ) applied in the vital pulp therapy Receives: Drug: 3 mixtatin pulpotomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical success Clinical success clinical success
absence of postoperative pain,Absence of pain on percussion,Absence of Swelling and Absence of Sinus or fistula
Measured: 1 week , 3 months , 6 months , 9 months and 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Radiographic success radiographic success
Absence of any adverse radiographic findings (Periodontal membrane space widening, bone resorption, pulp stones, internal or external root resorption )
Measured: 3 months , 6 months , 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jun 2024
- Study start1 Aug 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Sep 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pulp Disease, DentalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sally Ahmed Kotb, Cairo University
- Investigators
- Randa y Abd Al Gawad, professor, Study director, Professor of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo UniversityYasmin M Yousry, Associate professor, Study chair, Assistant Professor of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06478940
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 3Mixtatin and MTA pulpotomy
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 23 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 27 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Almarji W, Laflouf M, Tolibah YA. Evaluation of the modified 3Mix-Simvastatin combination in non-instrumental endodontic therapy of necrotic primary molars: A two-arm randomized controlled trial. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Apr;10(2):e860. doi: 10.1002/cre2.860.
PubMed 38433296Zarabadi MS, Firoozi P, Basir Shabestari S, Maleki A, Nazemi Salman B. 3Mixtatin versus MTA in pulp therapy of primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current randomized controlled trials. Evid Based Dent. 2024 Jun;25(2):111-112. doi: 10.1038/s41432-024-00987-8. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
PubMed 38448571Mushtaq A, Nangia T, Goswami M. Comparative Evaluation of the Treatment Outcomes of Pulpotomy in Primary Molars Using Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and 3Mixtatin: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Nov-Dec;16(6):810-815. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2720.
PubMed 38344366Chak RK, Singh RK, Mutyala J, Killi NK. Clinical Radiographic Evaluation of 3Mixtatin and MTA in Primary Teeth Pulpotomies: A Randomized Controlled. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;15(Suppl 1):S80-S86. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2216.
PubMed 35645497Aminabadi NA, Huang B, Samiei M, Agheli S, Jamali Z, Shirazi S. A Randomized Trial Using 3Mixtatin Compared to MTA in Primary Molars with Inflammatory Root Resorption: A Novel Endodontic Biomaterial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(2):95-102. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.2.95.
PubMed 26950808Asl Aminabadi N, Satrab S, Najafpour E, Samiei M, Jamali Z, Shirazi S. A randomized trial of direct pulp capping in primary molars using MTA compared to 3Mixtatin: a novel pulp capping biomaterial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016 Jul;26(4):281-90. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12196. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
PubMed 26370520Goel N, Kumar A, Singhal R, Jha S, Namdev R, Rani R. Comparative Evaluation of Chlorhexidine Polymer Scaffold, 3Mixtatin, and Formocresol for Vital Primary Pulp Therapy: A Randomized 6-month Clinical Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 May-Jun;16(3):478-482. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2615.
PubMed 37496952Jamali Z, Alavi V, Najafpour E, Aminabadi NA, Shirazi S. Randomized Controlled Trial of Pulpotomy in Primary Molars using MTA and Formocresol Compared to 3Mixtatin: A Novel Biomaterial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;42(5):361-366. doi: 10.17796/1053-4625-42.5.7. Epub 2018 May 15.
PubMed 29763354
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of 3Mixtatin Versus MTA Used as Pulpotomy Agents in Vital Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06478940
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 3Mixtatin and MTA pulpotomy
- Conditions
- Pulp Disease, Dental, Deciduous Teeth
- Keywords
- pulpotomy - vital pulp therapy, primary molars- baby teeth
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study is to evaluate clinical and radiographic success of using 3Mixtain versus mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomy of deeply carious Primary molars.
Detailed description
Due to the complexity of the root canal microbiome, it is doubtful that they can be treated properly with a single antibiotic. Accordingly, a combination of multiple antibiotics seemed to be essential to diminish different types of pathogenic bacteria. Recently, a combination of three antibiotics (Metronidazole, cefixime, and Ciprofloxacin) along with Statins (new bio-inductive materials in regenerative dentistry) has shown promising results in primary teeth pulp therapy.
Statin components have an anti-inflammatory impact on pulp tissue by lowering the amount of interleukin-6 and interleukin-8. They also decrease osteoclastic processes and strengthen osteoblastic processes. Thus, they promote bone regeneration and dentin formation by enhancing odontoblastic activity. Several studies have shown a clinical and radiographic success rate of 3Mixtatin with inconsistent results. Some randomized controlled Trials (RCTs) showed that MTA had a comparable result with 3Mixtatin, while others reported that 3Mixtatin might be an alternative for MTA due to its higher overall success rate. 3Mixtatin is considered as a novel material with successful outcomes. Owing to limited availability of data in researches and in order to reach a conclusive results our study aims to evaluate clinical and radiographic success of using 3Mixtain versus mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomy of deeply carious Primary molars .
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MTA pulpotomy | Active comparator | Drug: MTA pulpotomypulpotomy with MTA applied in the vital pulp therapy |
| 3 Mixtatin pulpotomy | Experimental | Drug: 3 mixtatin pulpotomypulpotomy with 3 mixtatin (triple antibiotic paste of (Metronidazole, cefixime, and Ciprofloxacin mixed with simvastatin ) applied in the vital pulp therapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 to 8 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- • Children 4-8 years old
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- • Uncooperative children to avoid time waste and attrition bias.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 3 mixtatin pulpotomypulp treatment with applying 3mixture of antibiotic (Metronidazole, cefixime, and Ciprofloxacin) along with simvastatin | Drug | 3 Mixtatin pulpotomy |
| MTA pulpotomypulp treatment with applying MTA | Drug | MTA pulpotomy |
Primary outcome
Clinical success Clinical success clinical success
Time frame: 1 week , 3 months , 6 months , 9 months and 12 months
absence of postoperative pain,Absence of pain on percussion,Absence of Swelling and Absence of Sinus or fistula
1 secondary outcome
Radiographic success radiographic success
Time frame: 3 months , 6 months , 12 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jun 2024.
- Background: PubMed 38433296Almarji W, Laflouf M, Tolibah YA. Evaluation of the modified 3Mix-Simvastatin combination in non-instrumental endodontic therapy of necrotic primary molars: A two-arm randomized controlled trial. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Apr;10(2):e860. doi: 10.1002/cre2.860.
- Background: PubMed 38448571Zarabadi MS, Firoozi P, Basir Shabestari S, Maleki A, Nazemi Salman B. 3Mixtatin versus MTA in pulp therapy of primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current randomized controlled trials. Evid Based Dent. 2024 Jun;25(2):111-112. doi: 10.1038/s41432-024-00987-8. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
- Background: PubMed 38344366Mushtaq A, Nangia T, Goswami M. Comparative Evaluation of the Treatment Outcomes of Pulpotomy in Primary Molars Using Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and 3Mixtatin: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Nov-Dec;16(6):810-815. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2720.
- Background: PubMed 35645497Chak RK, Singh RK, Mutyala J, Killi NK. Clinical Radiographic Evaluation of 3Mixtatin and MTA in Primary Teeth Pulpotomies: A Randomized Controlled. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;15(Suppl 1):S80-S86. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2216.
- Background: PubMed 26950808Aminabadi NA, Huang B, Samiei M, Agheli S, Jamali Z, Shirazi S. A Randomized Trial Using 3Mixtatin Compared to MTA in Primary Molars with Inflammatory Root Resorption: A Novel Endodontic Biomaterial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(2):95-102. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.2.95.
- Background: PubMed 26370520Asl Aminabadi N, Satrab S, Najafpour E, Samiei M, Jamali Z, Shirazi S. A randomized trial of direct pulp capping in primary molars using MTA compared to 3Mixtatin: a novel pulp capping biomaterial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016 Jul;26(4):281-90. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12196. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
- Background: PubMed 37496952Goel N, Kumar A, Singhal R, Jha S, Namdev R, Rani R. Comparative Evaluation of Chlorhexidine Polymer Scaffold, 3Mixtatin, and Formocresol for Vital Primary Pulp Therapy: A Randomized 6-month Clinical Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 May-Jun;16(3):478-482. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2615.
- Background: PubMed 29763354Jamali Z, Alavi V, Najafpour E, Aminabadi NA, Shirazi S. Randomized Controlled Trial of Pulpotomy in Primary Molars using MTA and Formocresol Compared to 3Mixtatin: A Novel Biomaterial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;42(5):361-366. doi: 10.17796/1053-4625-42.5.7. Epub 2018 May 15.
Related trials for Pulp Disease, Dental
Not yet recruiting
Post-operative Pain and Clinical Outcome After Single-cone Obturation With a Calcium Silicate-based Versus Epoxy Resin Sealer
Post Operative Pain, Acute, Irreversible Pulpitis (Toothache)
Not yet recruiting
PRP-Assisted Regenerative Endodontics Versus Conventional Root Canal Treatment in Mature Necrotic Teeth
Pulp Necrosis, Apical Periodontitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Submucosal Cryotherapy and Anti-inflammatory Drugs for Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Treatment in Maxillary Molars
Pulpitis
Not yet recruiting
Clinical and Inflammatory Outcomes of Regenerative Endodontic Treatment Using Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Mature Necrotic Teeth With Chronic Apical Periodontitis.
Chronic Apical Periodontitis, Pulp Necrosis
Active, not recruiting
Multiple-Visit RCT in Teeth With SAP: Interappointment Dressing or Not?
Endodontically Treated Teeth, Calcium Hydroxide
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Randa y Abd Al Gawad, professor study director
Professor of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
Yasmin M Yousry, Associate professor study chair
Assistant Professor of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing 3 mixtatin pulpotomy and MTA pulpotomy in people with Pulp Disease, Dental and Deciduous Teeth, run by Cairo University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sally A kotb, PHD researcher (00201001656502, sallyqutb9933@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical success Clinical success clinical success (time frame: 1 week , 3 months , 6 months , 9 months and 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06478940, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jun 2024.