AzTrials
AzTrials

Venous ThromboembolismEXTENDNCT06480994

Exclusion of Venous Thrombo-Embolism With a New Clinical Decision Support

An observational study of Venous Thromboembolism and Pulmonary Embolism, run by Diagnostica Stago R&D at 4 sites in France.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this non interventional study is to demonstrate the diagnostic performances on fresh plasmas in comparison with the performances on frozen plasmas in any patients with VTE suspicion, whatever the pre-test probability. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Routine Assays on fresh plasma, New Clinical Decision Support on fresh plasma and New Clinical Decision Support on frozen plasma
How many people
1,836 participants
Where
4 sitesFrance
Study dates
21 Jun 2022to Feb 2027
How long will I take part?
3 Months
Phase
Observational

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: * Patients eligible for D-dimer assay, with low or moderate clinical probability, compared to the reference diagnosis (imaging and D-Dimer adjusted and not adjusted for age) * Patients with high clinical probability, compared to the reference diagnosis (imaging) * Patients not eligible for D-dimer assay: either with a condition associated with increased D-dimer levels in the absence of VTE, or with a history of PE or DVT for less than 3 months or suspected thrombotic events * Patients with known and active cancer * Patients with COVID-19

Who may be able to join

  • PE and/or DVT suspicion
  • No opposition after informing the patient for his participation in research and processing of their data for this purpose,
  • Benefiting from the social security system

Who cannot join

  • Preventive or curative anticoagulant treatment, or fibrinolytic treatment,
  • Legal protection (e.g. guardianship or curatorship),
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

France4 sites, 4 recruiting
  • CHU Dijon Bourgogne

    Dijon

    Cindy Tissier, PhD, +33380295112, cindy.tissier@chu-dijon.fr

    Cindy Tissier, PhD

    Recruiting
  • University Hospital Grenoble

    Grenoble

    Prudence Mabiala Makele, PhD, +33476766784, pmabialamakele@chu-grenoble.fr

    Damien Viglino, PhD

    Recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier le Mans

    Le Mans, Sartre, 72037

    Françoise Rosalie, +33 (0) 243479970, frosalie@ch-lemans.fr

    Cyrielle Houalard, PhD

    Recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier de Niort

    Niort, Sartres, 79021

    Diane Chuillet-Moreau, +33 (0) 549782049, Diane.CHUILLET-MOREAU@ch-niort.fr

    Angélique Hubert, +33549782428, Angelique.HUBERT@ch-niort.fr

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Exclusion of Venous Thrombo-Embolism With a New Clinical Decision Support With Fresh Plasma, on Any Patient With VTE Suspicion

The goal of this non interventional study is to demonstrate the diagnostic performances on fresh plasmas in comparison with the performances on frozen plasmas in any patients with VTE suspicion, whatever the pre-test probability. The main question it aims to answer is :

Are the performances equivalent on fresh plasmas in comparison with frozen plasmas or is it necessary to determine a new algorithm of the Clinical Decision Support with a new cut-off? Participants will be diagnosed and treated in accordance with routine standard of care.

Read the detailed description

Establish the diagnostic performance of the Clinical Decision Support tool on fresh plasma, in PE and in DVT, in comparison with that on frozen plasma, and in comparison with the current diagnostic strategy, on the entire population and on the following different subpopulations:

  • Patients eligible for D-dimer assay, with low or moderate clinical probability, compared to the reference diagnosis (imaging and D-Dimer adjusted and not adjusted for age)
  • Patients with high clinical probability, compared to the reference diagnosis (imaging)
  • Patients not eligible for D-dimer assay: either with a condition associated with increased D-dimer levels in the absence of VTE, or with a history of PE or DVT for less than 3 months or suspected thrombotic events
  • Patients with known and active cancer
  • Patients with COVID-19. The assays will be conducted on a fresh and frozen plasma aliquots.
Being tested
Routine Assays on fresh plasma, New Clinical Decision Support on fresh plasma, New Clinical Decision Support on frozen plasma
Medical subject headings
Venous Thromboembolism, Pulmonary Embolism, Venous Thrombosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Routine Assays on fresh plasmaDiagnostic test

    Routine coagulation tests using STA-R Max analyzer :

    Prothrombin Time (PT) activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT Thrombin Time (TT) Fibrinogen Anti-Xa activity

  • New Clinical Decision Support on fresh plasmaDiagnostic test

    D-Dimer and fibrin formation assays on STA-R Max analyzer. Calculation of the exclusion score using an algorithm (manual or based on Machine Learning) compared to a Clinical Decision Support cut-off.

  • New Clinical Decision Support on frozen plasmaDiagnostic test

    D-Dimer and fibrin formation assays on STA-R Max analyzer. Calculation of the exclusion score using an algorithm (manual or based on Machine Learning) compared to a Clinical Decision Support cut-off.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Reproducibility of the new clinical decision support with fresh plasma

    Reproducibility (%) calculated with 70% of the study population with fresh plasma in comparison with frozen plasma.

    Measured: 37 months

  2. Threshold of the new clinical decision support with fresh plasma

    Threshold calculated with 70% of the study population with fresh plasma in comparison with frozen plasma.

    Measured: 37 months

  3. PE / DVT sensitivity of the clinical decision support

    Sensitivity of the clinical decision support with fresh plasma in comparison with reference diagnosis.

    Measured: 48 months

  4. PE / DVT specificity of the clinical decision support

    Specificity of the clinical decision support with fresh plasma in comparison with reference diagnosis.

    Measured: 48 months

  5. PE / DVT likelihood ratio of the clinical decision support

    Likelihood ratio of the clinical decision support with fresh plasma in comparison with reference diagnosis.

    Measured: 48 months

  6. PE / DVT exclusion percentage of the clinical decision support

    Exclusion percentage of the clinical decision support with fresh plasma in comparison with reference diagnosis.

    Measured: 48 months

  7. PE / DVT negative predictive value of the clinical decision support

    Negative Predictive Value of the clinical decision support with fresh plasma in comparison with reference diagnosis.

    Measured: 48 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jul 2024
  2. Study start21 Jun 2022
  3. Primary completionApr 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionFeb 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,836 participants (estimated)
Target duration
3 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06480994
Sponsor's protocol ID
EXTEND 2021-A03135-36
Acronym
EXTEND
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
17 Jun 2024
Last updated
26 Jun 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Contant G., Mirshahi S.S., Depasse F., Soria J. A new D-dimer concept for more specific detection of venous thromboembolism. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2017; 1, (Suppl. 1), PB 1385, Abstracts of the XXVI Congress of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, July 8-13, 2017

  • Planquette B, Jumel S, Pastre J, Pereira H, Marey J, Roche A, Chatellier G, Sanchez O and Meyer G. SOFIE: Soluble Fibrin for Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2017; 1, (Suppl. 1), PB 1393, Abstracts of the XXVI Congress of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, July 8-13, 2017.

  • Heit JA, Cohen AT, Anderson FA. Estimated annual number of incident and recurrent, non-fatal and fatal venous thromboembolism (VTE) events in the US. Blood 2005;106(11):910

  • Cohen AT, Agnelli G, Anderson FA, Arcelus JI, Bergqvist D, Brecht JG, Greer IA, Heit JA, Hutchinson JL, Kakkar AK, Mottier D, Oger E, Samama MM, Spannagl M; VTE Impact Assessment Group in Europe (VITAE). Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Europe. The number of VTE events and associated morbidity and mortality. Thromb Haemost. 2007 Oct;98(4):756-64. doi: 10.1160/TH07-03-0212.

    PubMed 17938798
  • ISTH Steering Committee for World Thrombosis Day. Thrombosis: a major contributor to the global disease burden. J Thromb Haemost. 2014 Oct;12(10):1580-90. doi: 10.1111/jth.12698.

    PubMed 25302663
  • Anderson FA Jr, Spencer FA. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003 Jun 17;107(23 Suppl 1):I9-16. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000078469.07362.E6.

    PubMed 12814980
  • Wells PS. Integrated strategies for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2007 Jul;5 Suppl 1:41-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02493.x.

    PubMed 17635707
  • Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J, Guy F, Mitchell M, Gray L, Clement C, Robinson KS, Lewandowski B. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet. 1997 Dec 20-27;350(9094):1795-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08140-3.

    PubMed 9428249
  • Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM, Sanchez O, Aujesky D, Bounameaux H, Perrier A. Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Feb 7;144(3):165-71. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-3-200602070-00004.

    PubMed 16461960
  • Schulman S, Ageno W, Konstantinides SV. Venous thromboembolism: Past, present and future. Thromb Haemost. 2017 Jun 28;117(7):1219-1229. doi: 10.1160/TH16-10-0823. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

    PubMed 28594049
  • Di Nisio M, Squizzato A, Rutjes AW, Buller HR, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM. Diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer test for exclusion of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review. J Thromb Haemost. 2007 Feb;5(2):296-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02328.x. Epub 2006 Nov 28.

    PubMed 17155963
  • Righini M. Is it worth diagnosing and treating distal deep vein thrombosis? No. J Thromb Haemost. 2007 Jul;5 Suppl 1:55-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02468.x.

    PubMed 17635709
  • Pawelec G, Goldeck D, Derhovanessian E. Inflammation, ageing and chronic disease. Curr Opin Immunol. 2014 Aug;29:23-8. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 Apr 22.

    PubMed 24762450
  • Tita-Nwa F, Bos A, Adjei A, Ershler WB, Longo DL, Ferrucci L. Correlates of D-dimer in older persons. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2010 Feb;22(1):20-3. doi: 10.1007/BF03324810.

    PubMed 20305364
  • Harper PL, Theakston E, Ahmed J, Ockelford P. D-dimer concentration increases with age reducing the clinical value of the D-dimer assay in the elderly. Intern Med J. 2007 Sep;37(9):607-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01388.x. Epub 2007 Jun 2.

    PubMed 17543005

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in