PsychologicalNCT06485297
Effect Tunnel in Oral Medicine
An observational study of Psychological, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Evaluate whether there are differences in knowledge between practitioners and students regarding the tunnel effect, to validate the benefit of teaching it in oral medicine. Main objective: to evaluate the state of knowledge relating to the tunnel effect concerning the performance of a surgical procedure, of a cohort… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Psychological
- What is being tested?
- questionnary
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 18 Mar 2024to 18 Apr 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: 6th year students and interns + CHU and liberal practitioners
Inclusion Criteria: - Externs in the 6th year, interns and teachers working within the Riquier Institute of Oral Medicine at Nice University Hospital, and private dental surgeons.
Exclusion Criteria: - dental student under 6th year
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Tunnel Effect Within a French Population of Dental Surgeons: a Pilot Cross-sectional Study
Evaluate whether there are differences in knowledge between practitioners and students regarding the tunnel effect, to validate the benefit of teaching it in oral medicine. Main objective: to evaluate the state of knowledge relating to the tunnel effect concerning the performance of a surgical procedure, of a cohort of odontologists of different professional levels. Secondary objectives: evaluate the nature of the means they propose in order to counter the effects of this cognitive bias.
- Conditions
- Psychological
- Being tested
- questionnary
- Keywords
- tunnel effect
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
questionnaryOther
questionnaire in word format, sent by email and in paper version, which was established by the two main investigators (Diana Neponoceno, Pr Sophie-Myriam Dridi)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Externs in 6th year | external in the 6th year working within the Riquier Institute of Oral Medicine at Nice University Hospital. Receives: Other: questionnary | |
| Interns | interns working within the Riquier Institute of Oral Medicine at Nice University Hospital. Receives: Other: questionnary | |
| Private practitioners | teachers working within the Riquier Institute of Oral Medicine at Nice University Hospital. Receives: Other: questionnary | |
| CHU practitioners | several categories of dental surgeons, on the basis of a list of addresses provided by the school of the faculty of dental surgery of Côte d'Azur University Receives: Other: questionnary |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluation of the state of knowledge relating to the tunnel effect concerning the performance of a surgical procedure, of a cohort of odontologists of different professional levels.
Questionnaire: 6 items. Main objective: to evaluate the state of knowledge relating to the tunnel effect concerning the performance of a surgical procedure, of a cohort of odontologists of different professional levels. The responses were compared to each other, following interpretation of the relevant data by Diana Neponoceno. Discrepancies in responses or inconsistencies were supported by studies confirming or refuting the results
Measured: At the inclusion
Secondary outcomes (1)
Evaluation of the nature of the means proposed to combat the tunnel effect
Secondary objectives: evaluate the nature of the means they propose in order to counter the effects of this cognitive bias. The responses were compared to each other, following interpretation of the relevant data by Diana Neponoceno. Discrepancies in responses or inconsistencies were supported by studies confirming or refuting the results
Measured: At the inclusion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jul 2024
- Study start18 Mar 2024
- Primary completion18 Apr 2024
- Study completion18 Apr 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for PsychologicalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06485297
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 24Odonto02
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 26 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 17 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Tunnel Effect Within a French Population of Dental Surgeons: a Pilot Cross-sectional Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06485297
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 24Odonto02
- Conditions
- Psychological
- Keywords
- tunnel effect
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Apr 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Evaluate whether there are differences in knowledge between practitioners and students regarding the tunnel effect, to validate the benefit of teaching it in oral medicine. Main objective: to evaluate the state of knowledge relating to the tunnel effect concerning the performance of a surgical procedure, of a cohort of odontologists of different professional levels. Secondary objectives: evaluate the nature of the means they propose in order to counter the effects of this cognitive bias.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Externs in 6th year | – | Other: questionnaryexternal in the 6th year working within the Riquier Institute of Oral Medicine at Nice University Hospital. |
| Interns | – | Other: questionnaryinterns working within the Riquier Institute of Oral Medicine at Nice University Hospital. |
| Private practitioners | – | Other: questionnaryteachers working within the Riquier Institute of Oral Medicine at Nice University Hospital. |
| CHU practitioners | – | Other: questionnaryseveral categories of dental surgeons, on the basis of a list of addresses provided by the school of the faculty of dental surgery of Côte d'Azur University |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- 6th year students and interns + CHU and liberal practitioners
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| questionnaryquestionnaire in word format, sent by email and in paper version, which was established by the two main investigators (Diana Neponoceno, Pr Sophie-Myriam Dridi) | Other | CHU practitioners, Externs in 6th year, Interns, Private practitioners |
Primary outcome
Evaluation of the state of knowledge relating to the tunnel effect concerning the performance of a surgical procedure, of a cohort of odontologists of different professional levels.
Time frame: At the inclusion
Questionnaire: 6 items. Main objective: to evaluate the state of knowledge relating to the tunnel effect concerning the performance of a surgical procedure, of a cohort of odontologists of different professional levels. The responses were compared to each other, following interpretation of the relevant data by Diana Neponoceno. Discrepancies in responses or inconsistencies were supported by studies confirming or refuting the results
1 secondary outcome
Evaluation of the nature of the means proposed to combat the tunnel effect
Time frame: At the inclusion
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Feb 2025.
Related trials for Psychological
Recruiting
The Trans-Led Care Study
Substance Abuse, Substance Addiction
Recruiting
Neurobehavioral Changes Following Spaceflight Stressors
Stressor, Individual, Alcohol Impairment
Not yet recruitingObservational study
A Natural History of Cardiometabolic Disease Among US Bhutanese: Developing the Cross-Sectional Bhutanese Community of Central Ohio Health Study to Understand Acculturation as Synergizing Socioenvironmental and Biobehavioral Risk Factors Propagating ...
Cardiometabolic Risk Factors, Mental Health
Active, not recruiting
Health enSuite Caregivers: an App-based Treatment for Distressed Caregivers of Persons With Moderate Dementia
Caregiver Burnout
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Gulf Long-Term Follow-Up Study
Cardiovascular Disease, Hematologic Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Psychological, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluation of the state of knowledge relating to the tunnel effect concerning the performance of a surgical procedure, of a cohort of odontologists of different professional levels. (time frame: At the inclusion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2025.