AzTrials
AzTrials

Spinal Cord Injury CervicalNCT06489106

Noninvasive Spinal Stimulation to Restore Hand Function in Children With Spinal Cord Injury

A study testing Activity based upper extremity training with and without stimulation in people with Spinal Cord Injury Cervical, run by University of Louisville at 1 site in United States.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main goal of this pilot study is to find the best ways to use transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (scTS) to improve hand function in children with spinal cord injuries (SCI). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 7 to 12 years
Conditions the study is for
Spinal Cord Injury Cervical
What is being tested?
Activity based upper extremity training with and without stimulation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
13 Jun 2025to 31 Jul 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 7 to 12 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • For aim 1 and 2, 10 participants with SCI:
  • age 7-12 years;
  • chronic (>6 months), acquired upper motor neuron SCI;
  • cervical SCI at or above C8 neurological level with motor score of 1-3 for finger flexors
  • Pediatric Neurorecovery scale score of ≥2B and ≤ 4C for impaired grip
  • For Aim 3, 4 participants with SCI who:
Show all 10Show fewer
  • complete aim 1 and 2;
  • consent/assent for aim 3
  • demonstrate a minimum of 10% increase in HG force with scTS (aim1-2)
  • confirmed volitional activation in hand muscles during hang grip assessment without scTS

Who cannot join

  • For all 3 aims will include:
  • Botox use within past 3 months (for upper or lower extremity);
  • current oral baclofen (or pump);
  • musculoskeletal impairment limiting range of motion;
  • unhealed fracture or other medical condition limiting participation in AB-UET;
  • etiology of spina bifida;
  • total ventilator dependence.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site
  • Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40202

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Optimization of Noninvasive Spinal Stimulation to Restore Hand Function in Children With Spinal Cord Injury

The main goal of this pilot study is to find the best ways to use transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (scTS) to improve hand function in children with spinal cord injuries (SCI). The investigators will start by exploring the best places and strengths for applying scTS on the neck, the added benefits of applying scTS on the lower back (T11-T12), and comparing the effects of using activity based upper extremity training (a control treatment) alone versus combining it with scTS to help children with chronic SCI regain hand function.

Read the detailed description

After learning about the study and potential risks, parents/legal guardians and their eligible children with SCI will sign consent and assent forms, respectively. For the first two aims of the study, the investigators will recruit and enroll 10 participants. In the first week, participants will undergo clinical assessments from day 1 to day 4 to categorize the severity and level of their injuries and assess their current arm and hand function. On day 5, eligible participants will have experimental assessments to measure hand grip and control, both with and without spinal cord stimulation (scTS) at one or two neck sites optimized to improve hand grip. On day 6, participants will have similar assessments, this time adding stimulation to the trunk area to help with upright sitting and study its impact on hand grip and control.

For the third aim, 4 participants who showed improved hand grip and control with stimulation in aims 1 and 2 will be selected on a first-come, first-served basis. They will undergo 20 sessions of activity-based upper extremity training, followed by 20 more sessions with the optimal stimulation sites identified from aims 1 and 2. After completing the training, participants will be asked to follow up and repeat experimental and clinical assessments to determine how long the improvements last.

Being tested
Activity based upper extremity training with and without stimulation
Keywords
Pediatric onset, Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, Hand and arm function, Chronic spinal cord injury

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Activity based upper extremity training with and without stimulationDevice

    Activity-based upper extremity training (AB-UET) will be administered 5d/week and 1 hour 30 minutes/session. For AB-UET+ stimulation (scTS), UE tasks will be repeated with and without scTS so that scTS is administered intermittently for the duration of ~ 10 minute/bouts.

Study groups in NCT06489106
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Activity based upper extremity trainingActive comparatorActivity-based upper extremity training (AB-UET) will be administered 5d/week and 1 hour 30 minutes/session.
Receives: Device: Activity based upper extremity training with and without stimulation
Activity based upper extremity training with stimulationExperimentalActivity-based upper extremity training (AB-UET + scTS) will be administered 5d/week and 1 hour 30 minutes/session. UE tasks will be repeated with and without scTS so that scTS is administered intermittently for the duration of ~ 10 minute/bouts.
Receives: Device: Activity based upper extremity training with and without stimulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Hand grip

    Voluntary maximal hand grip force

    Measured: 12 weeks

  2. Hand control

    Peak to peak distance on hand grip force

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Functional neurophysiological assessment-Upper extremity

    Multi-muscle activation patterns

    Measured: 12 weeks

  2. Pediatric Neurorecovery scale

    Pediatric Neurorecovery scale (NRS) is a validated clinical scale that assesses a child's (age 1-12 years) neuromuscular capacity to perform everyday tasks without behavioral compensation, physical assistance, or assistive device. The total score is the sum of all tasks on a scale from 1-12. For a total of 12 items, the highest score being 144 and lowest a sore of 12. Higher scores indicate improved function.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  3. Capabilities of upper extremity test

    The Capabilities of the Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) is a performance measure intended to assess upper extremity function following spinal cord injury. The CUE-T is an objective measure of the ability to complete actions and tasks involving the arm and hand in individuals with tetraplegia and can be used clinically, for research and in clinical trials. Respondents answer questions on a 7-point scale that represents their self-perceived difficulty in performing the action, with 1 indicating "totally limited, can't do at all" and 7 indicating "not at all limited". The total score is the sum of all responses, and ranges from 32 to 224, with higher scores indicating greater function.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  4. Box and block test

    The Box and Block Test (BBT) measures unilateral gross manual dexterity and is validated in pediatric population. The score is the number of blocks carried from one compartment to the other in one minute. Each hand is scored separately. Higher scores within 1-minute indicate better manual dexterity.

    Measured: 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Jul 2024
  2. Study start13 Jun 2025
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
10 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06489106
Sponsor's protocol ID
24.0267
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
27 Jun 2024
Last updated
18 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Activity based upper extremity training with and without stimulation in people with Spinal Cord Injury Cervical, run by University of Louisville at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Hand grip (time frame: 12 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Feb 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in