Esophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaNCT06490003
Predicting Postoperative Chemotherapy Efficacy in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
An observational study of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Chemotherapy Effect, run by City of Hope Medical Center at 1 site in Japan.
Trial summary
Esophageal cancer remains a disease with a poor prognosis. Chemotherapy is an important part of its treatment, but there are cases in which chemotherapy is ineffective. The investigators aim to develop a model to predict the response to chemotherapy by DNA methylation of preoperative biopsy specimens to identify the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Chemotherapy Effect, DNA Methylation
- What is being tested?
- Fluoro Uracil
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteJapan
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2004to 18 Jun 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Chemotherapy naive patient needed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma chemotherapy
Who may be able to join
- Patients who had histologically confirmed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
- Patients who had undergone chemotherapy.
- Patients receiving initial chemotherapy
- Written informed consent following full study information is provided to the patient.
Who cannot join
- Patients for whom a preoperative biopsy sample cannot be obtained
- Patients who cannot assess at 2 months later after chemotherapy.
- Patients with multiple cancers.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Japan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Yamanashi Universiy
Chūō, Yamanashi, 4093898
Katsutoshi Shoda, PhD, kshoda@yamanashi.ac.jp
About this study
Official title: Predicting Postoperative Chemotherapy Efficacy in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Biopsy Specimens.
Esophageal cancer remains a disease with a poor prognosis. Chemotherapy is an important part of its treatment, but there are cases in which chemotherapy is ineffective. The investigators aim to develop a model to predict the response to chemotherapy by DNA methylation of preoperative biopsy specimens to identify the chemotherapy ineffective group.
Read the detailed description
Esophageal cancer remains a disease with a poor prognosis. In the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), multidisciplinary treatment including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy is important. Chemotherapy is an effective treatment for esophageal cancer, but some patients do not respond to it. Non-response to chemotherapy can result in disease progression, loss of patient fitness, and even the opportunity to receive other treatments that might have originally had a therapeutic effect. If there are biomarkers that could indicate the efficacy of chemotherapy before treatment, ineffective patients would be able to change their treatment plan. Patients on preoperative chemotherapy would be able to avoid unnecessary chemotherapy and undergo surgery without the effects of physical weakness and side effects. On the other hand, patients on definitive chemotherapy may choose to intensify their treatment with additional radiation therapy or immunotherapy. The investigators aim to develop a model to predict the response to chemotherapy by DNA methylation of preoperative biopsy specimens to identify the chemotherapy ineffective
- Being tested
- Fluoro Uracil
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fluoro UracilDrug
Also called Cisplatin
Esophageal cancer chemotherapy(First line treatment)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Chemotherapy response patients. | Responders according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST).
A panel of DNA methylation, whose specific methylation level is tested DNA from resection tissue with Methylation-specific PCR(MSP) Receives: Drug: Fluoro Uracil | |
| Chemotherapy non-response patients | Responders according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST).
A panel of DNA methylation, whose specific methylation level is tested DNA from resection tissue with Methylation-specific PCR(MSP) Receives: Drug: Fluoro Uracil |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall response rate(Chemotherapy)
The effect of initial chemotherapy is evaluated by imaging. Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) is used for treatment efficacy.
Measured: 1year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jul 2024
- Study start1 Jun 2004
- Primary completion18 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion18 Jun 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Esophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by City of Hope Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- City of Hope Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Koichi Takiguchi, PhD, Principal investigator, City of Hope Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06490003
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 23228/ESCC-Chemo
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 21 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 13 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
PubMed 38572751Morgan E, Soerjomataram I, Rumgay H, Coleman HG, Thrift AP, Vignat J, Laversanne M, Ferlay J, Arnold M. The Global Landscape of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Incidence and Mortality in 2020 and Projections to 2040: New Estimates From GLOBOCAN 2020. Gastroenterology. 2022 Sep;163(3):649-658.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.05.054. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
PubMed 35671803Shah MA, Kennedy EB, Catenacci DV, Deighton DC, Goodman KA, Malhotra NK, Willett C, Stiles B, Sharma P, Tang L, Wijnhoven BPL, Hofstetter WL. Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Aug 10;38(23):2677-2694. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00866. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
PubMed 32568633Macedo-Silva C, Constancio V, Miranda-Goncalves V, Leite-Silva P, Salta S, Lobo J, Guimaraes R, Carvalho-Maia C, Gigliano D, Farinha M, Sousa O, Henrique R, Jeronimo C. DNA methylation biomarkers accurately detect esophageal cancer prior and post neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Cancer Med. 2023 Apr;12(7):8777-8788. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5623. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
PubMed 36670548Zhang Y, Cao Y, Zhang J, Huang M, Roy P, Huang B, Yang H, Rong Y, Chen Y, Zhu C, Fang W, Yu Z, Mao W, Xiang J, Han Y, Lin J, Zhang J, Fu J, He J, Li H. Lymph Node Ratio Improves Prediction of Overall Survival in Esophageal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A National Cancer Database Analysis. Ann Surg. 2023 Jun 1;277(6):e1239-e1246. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005450. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
PubMed 35797545Zhang XY, Yan WP, Sun Y, Li XT, Chen Y, Fan MY, Wu Y, Liang Z, Xiong HC, Wang ZL, Sun YS, Chen KN. CT Signs Can Predict Treatment Response and Long-Term Survival: A Study in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer with Preoperative Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22 Suppl 3:S1380-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4531-2. Epub 2015 May 5.
PubMed 25940570Oliver J, Garcia-Aranda M, Chaves P, Alba E, Cobo-Dols M, Onieva JL, Barragan I. Emerging noninvasive methylation biomarkers of cancer prognosis and drug response prediction. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022 Aug;83:584-595. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
PubMed 33757849Komoto S, Noma K, Kato T, Kobayashi T, Nishiwaki N, Narusaka T, Sato H, Katsura Y, Kashima H, Kikuchi S, Ohara T, Tazawa H, Fujiwara T. Conventional Cancer Therapies Can Accelerate Malignant Potential of Cancer Cells by Activating Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts in Esophageal Cancer Models. Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 30;15(11):2971. doi: 10.3390/cancers15112971.
PubMed 37296933Jeong DY, Lee KS, Choi JY, Chung MJ, Min YW, Kim HK, Zo JI, Shim YM, Sun JM. Surgically Resected Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Patient Survival and Clinicopathological Prognostic Factors. Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 19;10(1):5077. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62028-5.
PubMed 32193500Cao W, Lee H, Wu W, Zaman A, McCorkle S, Yan M, Chen J, Xing Q, Sinnott-Armstrong N, Xu H, Sailani MR, Tang W, Cui Y, Liu J, Guan H, Lv P, Sun X, Sun L, Han P, Lou Y, Chang J, Wang J, Gao Y, Guo J, Schenk G, Shain AH, Biddle FG, Collisson E, Snyder M, Bivona TG. Multi-faceted epigenetic dysregulation of gene expression promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 22;11(1):3675. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17227-z.
PubMed 32699215Liu Z, Zhao Y, Kong P, Liu Y, Huang J, Xu E, Wei W, Li G, Cheng X, Xue L, Li Y, Chen H, Wei S, Sun R, Cui H, Meng Y, Liu M, Li Y, Feng R, Yu X, Zhu R, Wu Y, Li L, Yang B, Ma Y, Wang J, Zhu W, Deng D, Xi Y, Wang F, Li H, Guo S, Zhuang X, Wang X, Jiao Y, Cui Y, Zhan Q. Integrated multi-omics profiling yields a clinically relevant molecular classification for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2023 Jan 9;41(1):181-195.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.12.004. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
PubMed 36584672
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Predicting Postoperative Chemotherapy Efficacy in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Biopsy Specimens.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06490003
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 23228/ESCC-Chemo
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- City of Hope Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2004 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 18 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Esophageal cancer remains a disease with a poor prognosis. Chemotherapy is an important part of its treatment, but there are cases in which chemotherapy is ineffective. The investigators aim to develop a model to predict the response to chemotherapy by DNA methylation of preoperative biopsy specimens to identify the chemotherapy ineffective group.
Detailed description
Esophageal cancer remains a disease with a poor prognosis. In the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), multidisciplinary treatment including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy is important. Chemotherapy is an effective treatment for esophageal cancer, but some patients do not respond to it. Non-response to chemotherapy can result in disease progression, loss of patient fitness, and even the opportunity to receive other treatments that might have originally had a therapeutic effect. If there are biomarkers that could indicate the efficacy of chemotherapy before treatment, ineffective patients would be able to change their treatment plan. Patients on preoperative chemotherapy would be able to avoid unnecessary chemotherapy and undergo surgery without the effects of physical weakness and side effects. On the other hand, patients on definitive chemotherapy may choose to intensify their treatment with additional radiation therapy or immunotherapy. The investigators aim to develop a model to predict the response to chemotherapy by DNA methylation of preoperative biopsy specimens to identify the chemotherapy ineffective
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Chemotherapy response patients. | – | Drug: Fluoro UracilResponders according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). A panel of DNA methylation, whose specific methylation level is tested DNA from resection tissue with Methylation-specific PCR(MSP) |
| Chemotherapy non-response patients | – | Drug: Fluoro UracilResponders according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). A panel of DNA methylation, whose specific methylation level is tested DNA from resection tissue with Methylation-specific PCR(MSP) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Chemotherapy naive patient needed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma chemotherapy
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients who had histologically confirmed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
- Patients who had undergone chemotherapy.
- Patients receiving initial chemotherapy
- Written informed consent following full study information is provided to the patient.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients for whom a preoperative biopsy sample cannot be obtained
- Patients who cannot assess at 2 months later after chemotherapy.
- Patients with multiple cancers.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fluoro UracilAlso: CisplatinEsophageal cancer chemotherapy(First line treatment) | Drug | Chemotherapy non-response patients, Chemotherapy response patients. |
Primary outcome
Overall response rate(Chemotherapy)
Time frame: 1year
The effect of initial chemotherapy is evaluated by imaging. Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) is used for treatment efficacy.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jul 2026.
- Background: PubMed 38572751Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
- Background: PubMed 35671803Morgan E, Soerjomataram I, Rumgay H, Coleman HG, Thrift AP, Vignat J, Laversanne M, Ferlay J, Arnold M. The Global Landscape of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Incidence and Mortality in 2020 and Projections to 2040: New Estimates From GLOBOCAN 2020. Gastroenterology. 2022 Sep;163(3):649-658.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.05.054. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
- Background: PubMed 32568633Shah MA, Kennedy EB, Catenacci DV, Deighton DC, Goodman KA, Malhotra NK, Willett C, Stiles B, Sharma P, Tang L, Wijnhoven BPL, Hofstetter WL. Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Aug 10;38(23):2677-2694. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00866. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
- Background: PubMed 36670548Macedo-Silva C, Constancio V, Miranda-Goncalves V, Leite-Silva P, Salta S, Lobo J, Guimaraes R, Carvalho-Maia C, Gigliano D, Farinha M, Sousa O, Henrique R, Jeronimo C. DNA methylation biomarkers accurately detect esophageal cancer prior and post neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Cancer Med. 2023 Apr;12(7):8777-8788. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5623. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
- Background: PubMed 35797545Zhang Y, Cao Y, Zhang J, Huang M, Roy P, Huang B, Yang H, Rong Y, Chen Y, Zhu C, Fang W, Yu Z, Mao W, Xiang J, Han Y, Lin J, Zhang J, Fu J, He J, Li H. Lymph Node Ratio Improves Prediction of Overall Survival in Esophageal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A National Cancer Database Analysis. Ann Surg. 2023 Jun 1;277(6):e1239-e1246. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005450. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
- Background: PubMed 25940570Zhang XY, Yan WP, Sun Y, Li XT, Chen Y, Fan MY, Wu Y, Liang Z, Xiong HC, Wang ZL, Sun YS, Chen KN. CT Signs Can Predict Treatment Response and Long-Term Survival: A Study in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer with Preoperative Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22 Suppl 3:S1380-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4531-2. Epub 2015 May 5.
- Background: PubMed 33757849Oliver J, Garcia-Aranda M, Chaves P, Alba E, Cobo-Dols M, Onieva JL, Barragan I. Emerging noninvasive methylation biomarkers of cancer prognosis and drug response prediction. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022 Aug;83:584-595. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
- Background: PubMed 37296933Komoto S, Noma K, Kato T, Kobayashi T, Nishiwaki N, Narusaka T, Sato H, Katsura Y, Kashima H, Kikuchi S, Ohara T, Tazawa H, Fujiwara T. Conventional Cancer Therapies Can Accelerate Malignant Potential of Cancer Cells by Activating Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts in Esophageal Cancer Models. Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 30;15(11):2971. doi: 10.3390/cancers15112971.
- Background: PubMed 32193500Jeong DY, Lee KS, Choi JY, Chung MJ, Min YW, Kim HK, Zo JI, Shim YM, Sun JM. Surgically Resected Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Patient Survival and Clinicopathological Prognostic Factors. Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 19;10(1):5077. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62028-5.
- Background: PubMed 32699215Cao W, Lee H, Wu W, Zaman A, McCorkle S, Yan M, Chen J, Xing Q, Sinnott-Armstrong N, Xu H, Sailani MR, Tang W, Cui Y, Liu J, Guan H, Lv P, Sun X, Sun L, Han P, Lou Y, Chang J, Wang J, Gao Y, Guo J, Schenk G, Shain AH, Biddle FG, Collisson E, Snyder M, Bivona TG. Multi-faceted epigenetic dysregulation of gene expression promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 22;11(1):3675. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17227-z.
- Background: PubMed 36584672Liu Z, Zhao Y, Kong P, Liu Y, Huang J, Xu E, Wei W, Li G, Cheng X, Xue L, Li Y, Chen H, Wei S, Sun R, Cui H, Meng Y, Liu M, Li Y, Feng R, Yu X, Zhu R, Wu Y, Li L, Yang B, Ma Y, Wang J, Zhu W, Deng D, Xi Y, Wang F, Li H, Guo S, Zhuang X, Wang X, Jiao Y, Cui Y, Zhan Q. Integrated multi-omics profiling yields a clinically relevant molecular classification for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2023 Jan 9;41(1):181-195.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.12.004. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Prospective Cohort on Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Superficial Esophageal Cancer, Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
Recruiting
Individually Tailored, Supervised, Remote Exercise Intervention to Improve Physical Function for Stage I-III Gastroesophageal Cancer Survivors, PRECISE Trial
Clinical Stage I Esophageal Adenocarcinoma American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) v8, Clinical Stage I Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma AJCC v8
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Standardized Management of Esophageal Fistula in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC), Esophageal Fistula
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Koichi Takiguchi, PhD principal investigator
City of Hope Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Chemotherapy Effect, run by City of Hope Medical Center at 1 site in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ajay Goel, PhD (6262183452, AJGOEL@COH.ORG), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall response rate(Chemotherapy) (time frame: 1year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06490003, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jul 2026.