MesotheliomaNCT06491784
EXTRA-Meso (EXercise TheRApy in Mesothelioma) Feasibility
A study testing Exercise Therapy in people with Mesothelioma, run by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether running an exercise study in patients with mesothelioma is feasible. The main question(s) it aims to answer are: 1. Is it feasible to recruit patients to a randomised clinical trial of exercise therapy 2. What are the barriers to study recruitment 3. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Mesothelioma
- What is being tested?
- Exercise Therapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 25 Jan 2024to 31 Jul 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of mesothelioma, ratified by a mesothelioma multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meeting
- Performance status 0 - 2
- Clinical frailty score ≤5
- Informed written consent
Who cannot join
- Performance status ≥3
- Clinical frailty score ≥6
- Unlikely to be able to participate in an exercise programme (clinician/physiotherapist judgement)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Queen Elizabeth University Hospital
Glasgow, G51 4TF
Selina Tsim, PhD, 0141 451 6163, Selina.Tsim@ggc.scot.nhs.uk
Selina Tsim, PhD
- Recruiting
Wythenshawe Hospital
Manchester, M23 9LT
Matthew Evison, MD, 0161 915 320, Matthew.Evison@mft.nhs.uk
Matthew Evison, MD
About this study
Official title: EXercise TheRApy in Mesothelioma - A Feasibility Study
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether running an exercise study in patients with mesothelioma is feasible. The main question(s) it aims to answer are:
- Is it feasible to recruit patients to a randomised clinical trial of exercise therapy
- What are the barriers to study recruitment
- What are the barriers to study retention
Read more
Participants who decide to take part in the study will be randomly allocated one of two study arms:
- Standard of care, where the participant will undergo their usual clinical follow-up
- Exercise therapy, where the participant will receive a personalised 12 week exercise, nutrition and wellbeing programme Participants in both study arms will be asked to complete quality of life questionnaires and a basic fitness assessment at the start and end of the study follow-up period.
Participants will be asked if they would be happy to conduct a short interview with a member of the research team, to assess their views on the study. This interview will be audio recorded and the audio recording will be transcribed anonymously to allow researchers to improve future study design.
Read the detailed description
The aim of this study is to examine the feasibility of a randomised trial of exercise therapy in Mesothelioma. It will define likely rate of recruitment based on performance in two mesothelioma centres and identify barriers to recruitment and retention. Outcomes from the study will help refine the design of a future definitive phase 3 trial. That future phase 3 trial will have a patient-centred primary endpoint, e.g. a meaningful improvement in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) or an increase in treatment uptake or tolerance. Additional outcome measures are likely to include functional fitness, hospital admissions and overall survival.
A randomised prospective feasibility study will be performed over 12 months in two centres in the United Kingdom (Glasgow and Manchester). If eligible for the study, patients will be randomised 1:1 to receive a personalised exercise programme or standard care. Patients randomised to the intervention (exercise) arm will undergo an individualised assessment by either a physiotherapist or a qualified exercise specialist with specialised exercise and health condition qualifications. Following this initial assessment, patients will receive a tailored exercise, wellbeing and nutritional support package. The investigators will assess functional fitness and health-related quality of life scores as study outcome measures. The investigators also aim to conduct semi-structured interviews in patients who decline to participate or drop out of the study in order to examine barriers to study recruitment and retention.
- Conditions
- Mesothelioma
- Being tested
- Exercise Therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Mesothelioma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Exercise TherapyOther
12 week personalised exercise, nutrition and wellbeing programme
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Care | No intervention | Routine clinical follow-up |
| Exercise Therapy (Intervention) | Active comparator | 12 week multi-modal exercise and wellbeing programme Receives: Other: Exercise Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of patients recruited
Number of patients recruited to the study
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Proportion of screened patients who are ineligible
Proportion of screened patients who are ineligible for the study
Measured: 12 months
Study drop-out rate
Proportion of patients who enter the study who withdraw prior to study completion
Measured: 12 months
Intervention adherence rate
Proportion of patients randomised to the intervention arm who complete the exercise programme
Measured: 12 months
Health-related Quality of Life questionnaire completion rate
Number of Health-related Quality of Life questionnaires completed by participants in the study (higher numbers of completed questionnaires equates to better outcome)
Measured: 18 months
Framework analysis from qualitative interviews
Framework analysis from qualitative interviews with study participants
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jul 2024
- Study start25 Jan 2024
- Primary completion31 Jan 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jul 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MesotheliomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- 1:1 randomisation, feasibility study
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Surrey, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Mesothelioma UK
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Selina Tsim, PhD, Principal investigator, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06491784
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GN22ON168
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 27 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 9 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Nowak AK, Stockler MR, Byrne MJ. Assessing quality of life during chemotherapy for pleural mesothelioma: feasibility, validity, and results of using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire and Lung Cancer Module. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Aug 1;22(15):3172-80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.147.
PubMed 15284270Nagamatsu Y, Oze I, Aoe K, Hotta K, Kato K, Nakagawa J, Hara K, Kishimoto T, Fujimoto N. Quality of life of survivors of malignant pleural mesothelioma in Japan: a cross sectional study. BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4293-x.
PubMed 29587685Hoon SN, Lawrie I, Qi C, Rahman N, Maskell N, Forbes K, Gerry S, Monterosso L, Chauhan A, Brims FJH. Symptom Burden and Unmet Needs in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Exploratory Analyses From the RESPECT-Meso Study. J Palliat Care. 2021 Apr;36(2):113-120. doi: 10.1177/0825859720948975. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
PubMed 32791881Arnold DT, Hooper CE, Morley A, White P, Lyburn ID, Searle J, Darby M, Hall T, Hall D, Rahman NM, De Winton E, Clive A, Masani V, Dangoor A, Guglani S, Jankowska P, Lowndes SA, Harvey JE, Braybrooke JP, Maskell NA. The effect of chemotherapy on health-related quality of life in mesothelioma: results from the SWAMP trial. Br J Cancer. 2015 Mar 31;112(7):1183-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.77.
PubMed 25756395Baas P, Scherpereel A, Nowak AK, Fujimoto N, Peters S, Tsao AS, Mansfield AS, Popat S, Jahan T, Antonia S, Oulkhouir Y, Bautista Y, Cornelissen R, Greillier L, Grossi F, Kowalski D, Rodriguez-Cid J, Aanur P, Oukessou A, Baudelet C, Zalcman G. First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (CheckMate 743): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021 Jan 30;397(10272):375-386. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32714-8. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
PubMed 33485464Gravier FE, Smondack P, Prieur G, Medrinal C, Combret Y, Muir JF, Baste JM, Cuvelier A, Boujibar F, Bonnevie T. Effects of exercise training in people with non-small cell lung cancer before lung resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax. 2022 May;77(5):486-496. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217242. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
PubMed 34429375Olivier C, Grosbois JM, Cortot AB, Peres S, Heron C, Delourme J, Gierczynski M, Hoorelbeke A, Scherpereel A, Le Rouzic O. Real-life feasibility of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in chemotherapy-treated patients with thoracic cancers: a pilot study. BMC Cancer. 2018 Feb 13;18(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4102-6.
PubMed 29433474Li S, Wang T, Tong G, Li X, You D, Cong M. Prognostic Impact of Sarcopenia on Clinical Outcomes in Malignancies Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol. 2021 Aug 26;11:726257. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.726257. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34513704Jeffery E, Lee YCG, Newton RU, Lyons-Wall P, McVeigh J, Nowak AK, Cheah HM, Nguyen B, Fitzgerald DB, Creaney J, Straker L, Peddle-McIntyre CJ. Body composition and nutritional status in malignant pleural mesothelioma: implications for activity levels and quality of life. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2019 Oct;73(10):1412-1421. doi: 10.1038/s41430-019-0418-9. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
PubMed 30886321Mangano GD, Fouani M, D'Amico D, Di Felice V, Barone R. Cancer-Related Cachexia: The Vicious Circle between Inflammatory Cytokines, Skeletal Muscle, Lipid Metabolism and the Possible Role of Physical Training. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Mar 10;23(6):3004. doi: 10.3390/ijms23063004.
PubMed 35328423Gerritsen JK, Vincent AJ. Exercise improves quality of life in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;50(13):796-803. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094787. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
PubMed 26719503Mishra SI, Scherer RW, Geigle PM, Berlanstein DR, Topaloglu O, Gotay CC, Snyder C. Exercise interventions on health-related quality of life for cancer survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD007566. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007566.pub2.
PubMed 22895961Bradley P, Merchant Z, Rowlinson-Groves K, Taylor M, Moore J, Evison M. Feasibility and outcomes of a real-world regional lung cancer prehabilitation programme in the UK. Br J Anaesth. 2023 Jan;130(1):e47-e55. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.05.034. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
PubMed 35840361Koller M, Musoro JZ, Tomaszewski K, Coens C, King MT, Sprangers MAG, Groenvold M, Cocks K, Velikova G, Flechtner HH, Bottomley A. Minimally important differences of EORTC QLQ-C30 scales in patients with lung cancer or malignant pleural mesothelioma - Interpretation guidance derived from two randomized EORTC trials. Lung Cancer. 2022 May;167:65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.03.018. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
PubMed 35413526
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- EXercise TheRApy in Mesothelioma - A Feasibility Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06491784
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GN22ON168
- Conditions
- Mesothelioma
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Surrey, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Mesothelioma UK
- Study start
- 25 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether running an exercise study in patients with mesothelioma is feasible. The main question(s) it aims to answer are:
- Is it feasible to recruit patients to a randomised clinical trial of exercise therapy
- What are the barriers to study recruitment
- What are the barriers to study retention
Participants who decide to take part in the study will be randomly allocated one of two study arms:
- Standard of care, where the participant will undergo their usual clinical follow-up
- Exercise therapy, where the participant will receive a personalised 12 week exercise, nutrition and wellbeing programme Participants in both study arms will be asked to complete quality of life questionnaires and a basic fitness assessment at the start and end of the study follow-up period.
Participants will be asked if they would be happy to conduct a short interview with a member of the research team, to assess their views on the study. This interview will be audio recorded and the audio recording will be transcribed anonymously to allow researchers to improve future study design.
Detailed description
The aim of this study is to examine the feasibility of a randomised trial of exercise therapy in Mesothelioma. It will define likely rate of recruitment based on performance in two mesothelioma centres and identify barriers to recruitment and retention. Outcomes from the study will help refine the design of a future definitive phase 3 trial. That future phase 3 trial will have a patient-centred primary endpoint, e.g. a meaningful improvement in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) or an increase in treatment uptake or tolerance. Additional outcome measures are likely to include functional fitness, hospital admissions and overall survival.
A randomised prospective feasibility study will be performed over 12 months in two centres in the United Kingdom (Glasgow and Manchester). If eligible for the study, patients will be randomised 1:1 to receive a personalised exercise programme or standard care. Patients randomised to the intervention (exercise) arm will undergo an individualised assessment by either a physiotherapist or a qualified exercise specialist with specialised exercise and health condition qualifications. Following this initial assessment, patients will receive a tailored exercise, wellbeing and nutritional support package. The investigators will assess functional fitness and health-related quality of life scores as study outcome measures. The investigators also aim to conduct semi-structured interviews in patients who decline to participate or drop out of the study in order to examine barriers to study recruitment and retention.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- 1:1 randomisation, feasibility study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Care | No intervention | –Routine clinical follow-up |
| Exercise Therapy (Intervention) | Active comparator | Other: Exercise Therapy12 week multi-modal exercise and wellbeing programme |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Diagnosis of mesothelioma, ratified by a mesothelioma multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meeting
- Performance status 0 - 2
- Clinical frailty score ≤5
- Informed written consent
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Performance status ≥3
- Clinical frailty score ≥6
- Unlikely to be able to participate in an exercise programme (clinician/physiotherapist judgement)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Exercise Therapy12 week personalised exercise, nutrition and wellbeing programme | Other | Exercise Therapy (Intervention) |
Primary outcome
Number of patients recruited
Time frame: 12 months
Number of patients recruited to the study
5 secondary outcomes
Proportion of screened patients who are ineligible
Time frame: 12 months
Study drop-out rate
Time frame: 12 months
Intervention adherence rate
Time frame: 12 months
Health-related Quality of Life questionnaire completion rate
Time frame: 18 months
Framework analysis from qualitative interviews
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jul 2024.
- Background: PubMed 15284270Nowak AK, Stockler MR, Byrne MJ. Assessing quality of life during chemotherapy for pleural mesothelioma: feasibility, validity, and results of using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire and Lung Cancer Module. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Aug 1;22(15):3172-80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.147.
- Background: PubMed 29587685Nagamatsu Y, Oze I, Aoe K, Hotta K, Kato K, Nakagawa J, Hara K, Kishimoto T, Fujimoto N. Quality of life of survivors of malignant pleural mesothelioma in Japan: a cross sectional study. BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4293-x.
- Background: PubMed 32791881Hoon SN, Lawrie I, Qi C, Rahman N, Maskell N, Forbes K, Gerry S, Monterosso L, Chauhan A, Brims FJH. Symptom Burden and Unmet Needs in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Exploratory Analyses From the RESPECT-Meso Study. J Palliat Care. 2021 Apr;36(2):113-120. doi: 10.1177/0825859720948975. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
- Background: PubMed 25756395Arnold DT, Hooper CE, Morley A, White P, Lyburn ID, Searle J, Darby M, Hall T, Hall D, Rahman NM, De Winton E, Clive A, Masani V, Dangoor A, Guglani S, Jankowska P, Lowndes SA, Harvey JE, Braybrooke JP, Maskell NA. The effect of chemotherapy on health-related quality of life in mesothelioma: results from the SWAMP trial. Br J Cancer. 2015 Mar 31;112(7):1183-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.77.
- Background: PubMed 33485464Baas P, Scherpereel A, Nowak AK, Fujimoto N, Peters S, Tsao AS, Mansfield AS, Popat S, Jahan T, Antonia S, Oulkhouir Y, Bautista Y, Cornelissen R, Greillier L, Grossi F, Kowalski D, Rodriguez-Cid J, Aanur P, Oukessou A, Baudelet C, Zalcman G. First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (CheckMate 743): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021 Jan 30;397(10272):375-386. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32714-8. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
- Background: PubMed 34429375Gravier FE, Smondack P, Prieur G, Medrinal C, Combret Y, Muir JF, Baste JM, Cuvelier A, Boujibar F, Bonnevie T. Effects of exercise training in people with non-small cell lung cancer before lung resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax. 2022 May;77(5):486-496. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217242. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
- Background: PubMed 29433474Olivier C, Grosbois JM, Cortot AB, Peres S, Heron C, Delourme J, Gierczynski M, Hoorelbeke A, Scherpereel A, Le Rouzic O. Real-life feasibility of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in chemotherapy-treated patients with thoracic cancers: a pilot study. BMC Cancer. 2018 Feb 13;18(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4102-6.
- Background: PubMed 34513704Li S, Wang T, Tong G, Li X, You D, Cong M. Prognostic Impact of Sarcopenia on Clinical Outcomes in Malignancies Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol. 2021 Aug 26;11:726257. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.726257. eCollection 2021.
- Background: PubMed 30886321Jeffery E, Lee YCG, Newton RU, Lyons-Wall P, McVeigh J, Nowak AK, Cheah HM, Nguyen B, Fitzgerald DB, Creaney J, Straker L, Peddle-McIntyre CJ. Body composition and nutritional status in malignant pleural mesothelioma: implications for activity levels and quality of life. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2019 Oct;73(10):1412-1421. doi: 10.1038/s41430-019-0418-9. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
- Background: PubMed 35328423Mangano GD, Fouani M, D'Amico D, Di Felice V, Barone R. Cancer-Related Cachexia: The Vicious Circle between Inflammatory Cytokines, Skeletal Muscle, Lipid Metabolism and the Possible Role of Physical Training. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Mar 10;23(6):3004. doi: 10.3390/ijms23063004.
- Background: PubMed 26719503Gerritsen JK, Vincent AJ. Exercise improves quality of life in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;50(13):796-803. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094787. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
- Background: PubMed 22895961Mishra SI, Scherer RW, Geigle PM, Berlanstein DR, Topaloglu O, Gotay CC, Snyder C. Exercise interventions on health-related quality of life for cancer survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD007566. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007566.pub2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Mesothelioma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
VMD-928 Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab to Treat TrkA Overexpression Driven Solid Tumors or Lymphoma
Head and Neck Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Rinatabart Sesutecan (Rina-S, PRO1184, GEN1184) for Advanced Solid Tumors (GCT1184-01/ PRO1184-001)
High Grade Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Individual Response to Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Peritoneal Mesothelioma or Atypical Mesothelial Proliferation or From Ovarian, Colorectal, or Appendiceal Histologies
Peritoneal Mesothelioma, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
RecruitingPhase 2
The Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Value of FAPI PET in Pleural Mesothelioma
Pleural Mesothelioma, Pleural Diseases
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Preliminary Antitumor Activity of Ivonescimab Plus Pemetrexed and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma, Advanced
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Selina Tsim, PhD principal investigator
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Exercise Therapy in people with Mesothelioma, run by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Selina Tsim, PhD (0141 451 6163, Selina.Tsim@glasgow.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of patients recruited (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06491784, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jul 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 5 Nov 2026.